
<!DOCTYPE article
  PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Archiving and Interchange DTD with MathML3 v1.4 20241031//EN" "JATS-archivearticle1-4-mathml3.dtd">
<article xml:lang="en" article-type="research-article" dtd-version="1.4"><processing-meta base-tagset="archiving" mathml-version="3.0" table-model="xhtml" tagset-family="jats"><restricted-by>pmc</restricted-by></processing-meta><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="nlm-ta">Cannabis Cannabinoid Res</journal-id><journal-id journal-id-type="iso-abbrev">Cannabis Cannabinoid Res</journal-id><journal-id journal-id-type="pmc-domain-id">3219</journal-id><journal-id journal-id-type="pmc-domain">can</journal-id><journal-id journal-id-type="nlm-id">101684827</journal-id><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">can</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title>Cannabis and Cannabinoid Research</journal-title></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="ppub">2578-5125</issn><issn pub-type="epub">2378-8763</issn><?publisher_abbrev sage?><publisher><publisher-name>SAGE Publications</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="pmcid">PMC9587786</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="pmcid-ver">PMC9587786.1</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="pmcaid">9587786</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="pmcaiid">9587786</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="pmid">34762497</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1089/can.2021.0132</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">10.1089/can.2021.0132</article-id><article-version article-version-type="pmc-version">1</article-version><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Original Research</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>Cannabidiol Does Not Impact Acute Anabolic or Inflammatory Signaling in Skeletal Muscle <italic toggle="yes">In Vitro</italic></article-title><alt-title alt-title-type="left-running-head">LANGER ET AL.</alt-title><alt-title alt-title-type="right-running-head">CBD, ANABOLIC SIGNALING, AND INFLAMMATION IN MUSCLE</alt-title></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes"><name name-style="western"><surname>Langer</surname><given-names initials="HT">Henning T.</given-names></name><xref rid="aff1" ref-type="aff">
<sup>1</sup>
</xref><xref rid="corr1" ref-type="corresp">
<sup>*</sup>
</xref><contrib-id contrib-id-type="orcid" authenticated="false">https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1838-4279</contrib-id></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author"><name name-style="western"><surname>Avey</surname><given-names initials="A">Alec</given-names></name><xref rid="aff2" ref-type="aff">
<sup>2</sup>
</xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author"><name name-style="western"><surname>Baar</surname><given-names initials="K">Keith</given-names></name><xref rid="aff1" ref-type="aff">
<sup>1</sup>
</xref><xref rid="aff2" ref-type="aff">
<sup>2</sup>
</xref><xref rid="aff3" ref-type="aff">
<sup>3</sup>
</xref></contrib><aff id="aff1"><label><sup>1</sup></label>Department of Physiology and Membrane Biology, Physiology and Behavior, University of California, Davis, California, USA.</aff><aff id="aff2"><label><sup>2</sup></label>Department of Neurobiology, Physiology and Behavior, University of California, Davis, California, USA.</aff><aff id="aff3"><label><sup>3</sup></label>VA Northern California Health Care System, Mather, California, USA.</aff></contrib-group><author-notes><corresp id="corr1"><label><sup>*</sup></label>Address correspondence to: Henning T. Langer, PhD, Department of Physiology and Membrane Biology, University of California, Davis, CA 95616-5270, USA <email>htlanger@ucdavis.edu</email>
</corresp><fn fn-type="fn"><p><sup>i</sup>ORCID ID (<uri xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xlink:href="https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1838-4279">https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1838-4279</uri>).</p></fn></author-notes><pub-date pub-type="collection"><month>10</month><year>2022</year><string-date>October 2022</string-date></pub-date><pub-date pub-type="epub"><day>12</day><month>10</month><year>2022</year></pub-date><volume>7</volume><issue>5</issue><issue-id pub-id-type="pmc-issue-id">419677</issue-id><fpage>628</fpage><lpage>636</lpage><pub-history><event event-type="pmc-release"><date><day>12</day><month>10</month><year>2022</year></date></event><event event-type="pmc-live"><date><day>25</day><month>10</month><year>2022</year></date></event><event event-type="pmc-last-change"><date iso-8601-date="2026-09-04 17:55:46.463"><day>04</day><month>09</month><year>2026</year></date></event></pub-history><permissions><copyright-statement>© Henning T. Langer et al. 2022; Published by Mary Ann Liebert, Inc.</copyright-statement><copyright-year>2022</copyright-year><copyright-holder>Henning T. Langer et al. </copyright-holder><license><ali:license_ref xmlns:ali="http://www.niso.org/schemas/ali/1.0/" specific-use="textmining" content-type="ccbylicense">https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</ali:license_ref><license-p>This Open Access article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons License [CC-BY] (<ext-link xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/">http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0</ext-link>), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.</license-p></license></permissions><self-uri xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" content-type="pmc-pdf" xlink:href="can.2021.0132.pdf"><?pdf-name can.2021.0132.pdf?><?pdf-size 527734?><?pdf-md5 84376c7a23545dd61e2172fb9a71a470?><?pdf-image-server-status NEVER_LOAD?><?pdf-cloudpmc-urn urn:app:a8b3/9587786/84376c7a2354/can.2021.0132.pdf?></self-uri><self-uri xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" content-type="pdf" xlink:href="can.2021.0132.pdf"/><abstract><sec id="S018"><title>Background:</title><p>Cannabidiol (CBD) is becoming increasingly popular for the treatment of clinical conditions including as an aid for muscle recovery. Previous work demonstrated that CBD exhibited mild effects on skeletal muscle, with a tendency to increase anabolic signaling and decrease inflammatory signaling.</p></sec><sec id="S019"><title>Methods:</title><p>To gain mechanistic insight and extend these findings, we conducted a set of experiments using C2C12 myotubes.</p></sec><sec id="S020"><title>Results:</title><p>Increasing the dose of CBD (1–5 μM) provided with insulin-like growth factor 1 (IGF-1) showed no effect on anabolic signaling through mTORC1 (S6K1 [Thr389], <italic toggle="yes">p</italic>=0.27; rpS6 [Ser240/244], <italic toggle="yes">p</italic>=0.81; or 4E-BP1 [Thr37/46], <italic toggle="yes">p</italic>=0.87). Similarly, inflammatory signaling through nuclear factor kappa B (NF-κB) (p105, <italic toggle="yes">p</italic>=0.88; p50, <italic toggle="yes">p</italic>=0.93; or phosphorylated p65 [Ser536], <italic toggle="yes">p</italic>=0.84) in response to tumor necrosis factor α (TNFα) was unaffected by CBD (2.5 μM), whereas dioscin, a natural product that blocks NF-κB signaling, reduced p105 and phosphorylated p65 (Ser536) compared with the TNFα and the TNFα + CBD condition (<italic toggle="yes">p</italic>&lt;0.01 and <italic toggle="yes">p</italic>&lt;0.05, respectively). Finally, cannabinoid receptor type 1 (CB1) receptor levels were measured in C2C12 cells, murine skeletal muscle, cortex, and hippocampus. Although CB1 was not detectable in muscle cells or muscle tissue, high levels were observed in brain tissue.</p></sec><sec id="S021"><title>Conclusion:</title><p>In conclusion, CBD does not directly modulate anabolic or inflammatory signaling in myotubes <italic toggle="yes">in vitro</italic>, which can likely be explained by the lack of functional receptors.</p></sec></abstract><kwd-group kwd-group-type="author"><kwd>muscle</kwd><kwd>CBD</kwd><kwd>mTORC1</kwd><kwd>NF-κB</kwd><kwd>inflammation</kwd><kwd>C2C12</kwd></kwd-group><counts><fig-count count="4"/><ref-count count="20"/><page-count count="9"/></counts><custom-meta-group><custom-meta><meta-name>pmc-status-qastatus</meta-name><meta-value>0</meta-value></custom-meta><custom-meta><meta-name>pmc-status-live</meta-name><meta-value>yes</meta-value></custom-meta><custom-meta><meta-name>pmc-status-embargo</meta-name><meta-value>no</meta-value></custom-meta><custom-meta><meta-name>pmc-status-released</meta-name><meta-value>yes</meta-value></custom-meta><custom-meta><meta-name>pmc-prop-open-access</meta-name><meta-value>yes</meta-value></custom-meta><custom-meta><meta-name>pmc-prop-olf</meta-name><meta-value>no</meta-value></custom-meta><custom-meta><meta-name>pmc-prop-manuscript</meta-name><meta-value>no</meta-value></custom-meta><custom-meta><meta-name>pmc-prop-legally-suppressed</meta-name><meta-value>no</meta-value></custom-meta><custom-meta><meta-name>pmc-prop-has-pdf</meta-name><meta-value>yes</meta-value></custom-meta><custom-meta><meta-name>pmc-prop-has-supplement</meta-name><meta-value>no</meta-value></custom-meta><custom-meta><meta-name>pmc-prop-pdf-only</meta-name><meta-value>no</meta-value></custom-meta><custom-meta><meta-name>pmc-prop-suppress-copyright</meta-name><meta-value>no</meta-value></custom-meta><custom-meta><meta-name>pmc-prop-is-real-version</meta-name><meta-value>no</meta-value></custom-meta><custom-meta><meta-name>pmc-prop-is-scanned-article</meta-name><meta-value>no</meta-value></custom-meta><custom-meta><meta-name>pmc-prop-preprint</meta-name><meta-value>no</meta-value></custom-meta><custom-meta><meta-name>pmc-prop-in-epmc</meta-name><meta-value>yes</meta-value></custom-meta><custom-meta><meta-name>pmc-license-ref</meta-name><meta-value>CC BY</meta-value></custom-meta></custom-meta-group></article-meta></front><body><sec sec-type="intro" id="s001"><title>Introduction</title><p>Cannabidiol (CBD) is the main chemical compound in the <italic toggle="yes">Cannabis sativa</italic> plant. It has been shown to have several medical properties such as being an anticonvulsant, analgesic, and anti-inflammatory.<sup><xref rid="B1" ref-type="bibr">1</xref>,<xref rid="B2" ref-type="bibr">2</xref></sup> CBD was recently approved by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for the treatment of epilepsy and symptoms of multiple sclerosis. Other reports have shown that CBD has promise for the treatment of neuromuscular disorders.<sup><xref rid="B3" ref-type="bibr">3</xref></sup> Beyond its clinical application, the increasing national and international legalization of CBD has caused a rise in medicinal use for the treatment of pain, sleeplessness, or as a recovery aid after exercise.<sup><xref rid="B4" ref-type="bibr">4</xref></sup></p><p>Recently, we investigated the effect of acute administration of CBD on molecular signaling in skeletal muscle after eccentric exercise in rats.<sup><xref rid="B5" ref-type="bibr">5</xref></sup> We found that despite a relatively high dose of intraperitoneal CBD, the overall effect on protein levels in skeletal muscle after exercise was modest. There was a tendency for increased anabolic signaling through mTORC1 and a concomitant decrease in inflammatory signaling through nuclear factor kappa B (NF-κB) with the administration of CBD. Interestingly, previous research into drugs such as ibuprofen has indicated that blunting inflammatory signaling could have adverse effects on skeletal muscle adaptations and muscle growth in response to acute and chronic exercise.<sup><xref rid="B6" ref-type="bibr">6</xref>,<xref rid="B7" ref-type="bibr">7</xref></sup></p><p> Therefore, finding a treatment option that decreases inflammation and pain without hampering anabolic signaling, muscle remodeling, growth, or other adaptations would be of great interest to a wide range of individuals. However, robust evidence for such an effect of CBD on skeletal muscle is lacking and mechanistic insights are sparse. For example, it is currently unknown whether the decrease in inflammatory markers that we previously observed in muscle <italic toggle="yes">in vivo</italic> was the result of a direct effect of CBD on muscle or an indirect effect on inflammatory cells.</p><p>To determine whether the decreased inflammation and the tendency to increase anabolism <italic toggle="yes">in vivo</italic> were the results of a direct action on muscle cells, we conducted a set of cell culture experiments in C2C12 myotubes. We hypothesized that CBD would amplify anabolic signaling through the mTORC1 axis and decrease inflammatory signaling through NF-κB.</p></sec><sec sec-type="materials|methods" id="s002"><title>Materials and Methods</title><sec id="s003"><title>Cell culture</title><p>C2C12 myoblasts were cultured in growth media (high glucose Dulbecco's modified Eagle medium [DMEM], 10% fetal bovine serum, 0.1% penicillin) until they reached 95–100% confluence at which time, they were shifted into differentiation media (DM; high glucose DMEM, 2% horse serum, 0.1% penicillin) to promote the differentiation and fusion of cells to form myotubes. All experiments were conducted on fully formed myotubes 5 days after the introduction of DM.</p></sec><sec id="s004"><title>Anabolic signaling</title><p>The first dose–response relationship experiment for CBD and anabolic signaling was assessed using a previously published protocol with modifications (<xref rid="f1" ref-type="fig">Fig. 1</xref>).<sup><xref rid="B8" ref-type="bibr">8</xref></sup> Myotubes plated in six-well plates were fasted for 15 min by replacing DM with starvation media (SM; phosphate-buffered saline [PBS], 2% horse serum, and increasing dosages of CBD [0, 1, 2.5 and 5 μM]). The CBD product (Amber Metric, Santa Rosa, CA) was laboratory tested and hemp derived (99.8% purity). After the 15 min fasting period, SM in half of the wells was replaced with DM containing insulin-like growth factor 1 (IGF-1) (5 nM; PeproTech, NJ) and increasing dosages of CBD for a duration of 30 min before the cells were collected.</p><fig position="float" id="f1" fig-type="figure" orientation="portrait"><label>FIG. 1.</label><caption><p>CBD and anabolic signaling in a fasted state and after IGF-1 treatment. Protein levels of IRS1 <bold>(A)</bold>, phosphorylated S6K1 (Thr389) <bold>(B)</bold>, phosphorylated rpS6 (Ser240/244) <bold>(C)</bold>, and puromycin <bold>(D)</bold> with increasing dosages of CBD (1–5 μM) in C2C12 myotubes in a fasted condition on PBS +2% horse serum or after 30 min on DM + IGF-1 (5 nM). *<italic toggle="yes">p</italic>-Value &lt;0.05 compared with the fasted control, <sup>#</sup><italic toggle="yes">p</italic>-value &lt;0.05 compared with the IGF-1 control condition. <italic toggle="yes">n</italic>=3 biological replicates. CBD, cannabidiol; DM, differentiation media.</p></caption><graphic xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" position="float" orientation="portrait" xlink:href="can.2021.0132_figure1.jpg"><?image-name can.2021.0132_figure1.jpg?><?image-size 165766?><?image-md5 bb75390a78f45cc205cbe162a6803e44?><?image-image-server-status LOAD_COMPLETED?><?image-original-height 4854?><?image-original-width 3700?><?image-scaled-height 971?><?image-scaled-width 740?><?image-cloudpmc-urn urn:cdn:blobs/a8b3/9587786/bb75390a78f4/can.2021.0132_figure1.jpg?><?thumb-name can.2021.0132_figure1.gif?><?thumb-size 18352?><?thumb-md5 ad5cfd41660abcd7c2090dabbf2fe343?><?thumb-image-server-status NEVER_LOAD?><?thumb-scaled-height 131?><?thumb-scaled-width 100?><?thumb-cloudpmc-urn urn:cdn:blobs/a8b3/9587786/ad5cfd41660a/can.2021.0132_figure1.gif?></graphic></fig><p>To improve statistical power and based on the absence of baseline differences in the first experiment, we grew the cells on 24-well plates and omitted the starved condition from the second dose–response experiment (<xref rid="f2" ref-type="fig">Fig. 2</xref>). Instead, DM in all wells was replaced with DM + IGF-1 (5 nM) with increasing dosages of CBD (0, 1, 2.5, and 5 μM) for 60 min before collection.</p><fig position="float" id="f2" fig-type="figure" orientation="portrait"><label>FIG. 2.</label><caption><p>Dose–response relationship between CBD and mTORC1 signaling. Protein levels of IRS1 <bold>(A)</bold>, phosphorylated S6K1 (Thr389) <bold>(B)</bold>, phosphorylated rpS6 (Ser240/244) <bold>(C)</bold>, phosphorylated 4E-BP1 (Thr37/46) <bold>(D)</bold>, and puromycin <bold>(E)</bold> with increasing dosages of CBD (1–5 μM) in C2C12 myotubes after 60 min on DM + IGF-1 (5 nM). <italic toggle="yes">n</italic>=6 biological replicates.</p></caption><graphic xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" position="float" orientation="portrait" xlink:href="can.2021.0132_figure2.jpg"><?image-name can.2021.0132_figure2.jpg?><?image-size 214031?><?image-md5 41bb522bc1f3fcaa2f6f398a072dea8e?><?image-image-server-status LOAD_COMPLETED?><?image-original-height 5770?><?image-original-width 3735?><?image-scaled-height 1154?><?image-scaled-width 747?><?image-cloudpmc-urn urn:cdn:blobs/a8b3/9587786/41bb522bc1f3/can.2021.0132_figure2.jpg?><?thumb-name can.2021.0132_figure2.gif?><?thumb-size 19992?><?thumb-md5 01d4ffdb09721e4e9148a56dcc202c05?><?thumb-image-server-status NEVER_LOAD?><?thumb-scaled-height 154?><?thumb-scaled-width 100?><?thumb-cloudpmc-urn urn:cdn:blobs/a8b3/9587786/01d4ffdb0972/can.2021.0132_figure2.gif?></graphic></fig></sec><sec id="s005"><title>Natural product screen for inhibitors of the NF-κB activity</title><p>To identify natural products that could decrease the activity of NF-κB in response to tumor necrosis factor α (TNFα), NF-κB reporter (luc)-HEK293 cells (BPS Bioscience, San Diego, CA) containing the firefly luciferase gene driven by four copies of NF-κB response element were treated with 10 ng/mL TNFα. Following treatment for 6 h, cells were collected in passive lysis buffer and luciferase activity was determined using a GloMax(R) 20/20 Luminometer System w/dual injectors (Promega, Madison, WI). To find NF-κB inhibitors, 146 structurally diverse, bioactive, and cell permeable natural products (Selleck Chemicals, Houston, TX) were added together with TNFα at a final concentration of 10 μM. Of the six natural products that decreased the NF-κB activity by more than 85%, the effect of increasing doses was determined. Data are presented for one of these natural products (dioscin).</p></sec><sec id="s006"><title>Inflammatory signaling</title><p>For the experiment on CBD and acute inflammatory signaling, C2C12 cells were differentiated into myotubes in 24-well plates. On the day of the experiment, existing media in the wells was replaced with fresh DM that contained no additional compounds, DM + TNFα (2.5 ng/mL; PeproTech), DM + TNFα + CBD (2.5 μM), or DM + TNFα + the phytochemical dioscin (10 μM; Selleck Chemicals) as a positive control. Cells were treated for 1 h before collection (<xref rid="f3" ref-type="fig">Fig. 3</xref>).</p><fig position="float" id="f3" fig-type="figure" orientation="portrait"><label>FIG. 3.</label><caption><p>CBD does not decrease inflammatory signaling through NF-κB after TNFα treatment. <bold>(A)</bold> The transcription activity of NF-κB in control HEK293 cells and following treatment with TNFα and increasing doses of the steroidal saponin dioscin. <bold>(B)</bold> The dose–response relationship between dioscin and NF-κB activity. <bold>(C)</bold> Representative pictures of western blot analysis. Levels of <bold>(D)</bold> NF-κB p105, <bold>(E)</bold> phosphorylated NF-κB p65 (Ser536), and <bold>(F)</bold> and NF-κB p50 in C2C12 myotubes after 60 min in DM, or following treatment with TNFα (2.5 ng/mL), TNFα + CBD (2.5 μM), or TNFα + dioscin (10 μM). *<italic toggle="yes">p</italic>-Value &lt;0.05 compared with the control and the TNFα condition <bold>(A)</bold>, and <italic toggle="yes">p</italic>-value &lt;0.05 compared with the control and the TNFα + dioscin condition <bold>(B)</bold>. <italic toggle="yes">n</italic>=6 biological replicates. NF-κB, nuclear factor kappa B; TNFα, tumor necrosis factor α.</p></caption><graphic xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" position="float" orientation="portrait" xlink:href="can.2021.0132_figure3.jpg"><?image-name can.2021.0132_figure3.jpg?><?image-size 126382?><?image-md5 8358f250207365dff118b3011001e76c?><?image-image-server-status LOAD_COMPLETED?><?image-original-height 2733?><?image-original-width 3700?><?image-scaled-height 547?><?image-scaled-width 740?><?image-cloudpmc-urn urn:cdn:blobs/a8b3/9587786/8358f2502073/can.2021.0132_figure3.jpg?><?thumb-name can.2021.0132_figure3.gif?><?thumb-size 17014?><?thumb-md5 f92113373afbc8f68f340be2da49e5c0?><?thumb-image-server-status NEVER_LOAD?><?thumb-scaled-height 80?><?thumb-scaled-width 108?><?thumb-cloudpmc-urn urn:cdn:blobs/a8b3/9587786/f92113373afb/can.2021.0132_figure3.gif?></graphic></fig></sec><sec id="s007"><title>Cannabinoid receptor type 1 protein levels</title><p>To compare protein levels of cannabinoid receptor type 1 (CB1) between skeletal muscle <italic toggle="yes">in vitro</italic> and <italic toggle="yes">in vivo</italic> with a positive control (brain tissue), we used cell culture samples from the experiments above and analyzed them alongside of rat tibialis anterior tissue from previous CBD experiments<sup><xref rid="B5" ref-type="bibr">5</xref></sup> and murine cortex and hippocampus samples (<xref rid="f4" ref-type="fig">Fig. 4</xref>).</p><fig position="float" id="f4" fig-type="figure" orientation="portrait"><label>FIG. 4.</label><caption><p>CB1 receptor protein levels in C2C12 cells, rat skeletal muscle, and murine brain tissue. Protein levels of CB1 in C2C12 cells with and without IGF-1 treatment (5 nM) in the presence or absence of CBD (5 μM), rat tibialis anterior after eccentric exercise in the presence or absence of CBD (100 mg/kg body weight administered intraperitoneally), mouse cortex, and mouse hippocampus. *<italic toggle="yes">p</italic>-Value &lt;0.05 compared with all other conditions. <italic toggle="yes">n</italic>=8 biological replicates (C2C12 cells), <italic toggle="yes">n</italic>=8 animals (rat tibialis anterior), <italic toggle="yes">n</italic>=4 animals (murine cortex), and <italic toggle="yes">n</italic>=4 animals (murine hippocampus). CB1, cannabinoid receptor type 1.</p></caption><graphic xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" position="float" orientation="portrait" xlink:href="can.2021.0132_figure4.jpg"><?image-name can.2021.0132_figure4.jpg?><?image-size 155459?><?image-md5 387daa888b5be4b82257f30bc629a9b2?><?image-image-server-status LOAD_COMPLETED?><?image-original-height 2499?><?image-original-width 1700?><?image-scaled-height 1000?><?image-scaled-width 680?><?image-cloudpmc-urn urn:cdn:blobs/a8b3/9587786/387daa888b5b/can.2021.0132_figure4.jpg?><?thumb-name can.2021.0132_figure4.gif?><?thumb-size 17547?><?thumb-md5 f7a331dbbf5466b94e8b5945fcbbb06c?><?thumb-image-server-status NEVER_LOAD?><?thumb-scaled-height 147?><?thumb-scaled-width 100?><?thumb-cloudpmc-urn urn:cdn:blobs/a8b3/9587786/f7a331dbbf54/can.2021.0132_figure4.gif?></graphic></fig></sec><sec id="s008"><title>Cell collection and Western blot analysis</title><p>For assessment of global muscle protein synthesis via the SUnSET method, 50 μL of puromycin (45 μM; Research Products International, IL) was added to every cell culture well 5 min before collection. Upon collection, all wells were placed on ice and washed three times with ice-cold PBS. For six-well plates, 100 μL of ice-cold sucrose lysis buffer was added to each well after the last wash, as described previously.<sup><xref rid="B8" ref-type="bibr">8</xref></sup> Cells were then scraped off the plate using a spatula and collected in an Eppendorf tube. After centrifuging them at 10,000 <italic toggle="yes">g</italic> for 5 min at 4°C, 80 μL of the supernatant was transferred to a fresh tube and 20 μL of 4×Laemmli sample buffer (LSB) was added. The samples were then vortexed, heated at 100°C for 5 min, and finally stored at −30°C until Western blot analysis was completed. For the 24-well plate experiments, the collection protocol was identical except for two modifications: after the last washing step with ice-cold PBS, 75 μL of 1×LSB was directly added to each well before the samples were transferred to a fresh tube. The samples were then briefly sonicated before boiling and storage at −30°C until further analysis.</p><p>Western blotting was carried out as described previously.<sup><xref rid="B8" ref-type="bibr">8</xref></sup> Briefly, for the cell culture experiments, 10 μL of sample was loaded per lane, run for 40 min at 200 V, and transferred onto polyvinylidene fluoride or nitrocellulose membrane in an ice-cold transfer buffer at 100 V for 30 min. For the rodent skeletal muscle and brain samples, 10 μg of protein per lane was loaded. Membranes were blocked in 1% fish skin gelatin dissolved in Tris-buffered saline with 0.1% Tween-20 for 30 min and probed with the primary antibody overnight. The following antibodies were used: Cell Signaling (Cell Signaling Technology, Danvers, MA): S6K1 (Thr389) (No. 9205; lot 16), ribosomal protein S6 (Ser240/244) (No. 5364), 4E-BP1 (Thr37/46) (No. 2855), NF-kB p65 (Ser536) (No. 3033; lot14), NF-kB p105/p50 (No. 13586), CB1 receptor (No. 93815); Millipore Sigma (Merck Group): IRS1 (No. 06-248; lot 2465193), puromycin (No. MABE343). Levels of each protein were normalized to total protein content per lane as assessed via Ponceau S staining of the membrane or a fluorescent gel.<sup><xref rid="B9" ref-type="bibr">9</xref></sup></p></sec><sec id="s009"><title>Statistics</title><p>Data analysis was carried out using GraphPad Prism 9 (GraphPad Software, San Diego, CA). One- or two-way analysis of variance combined with Dunnett's (one-way analysis of variance [ANOVA]; <xref rid="f2" ref-type="fig">Fig. 2</xref>) or Tukey's (one-way ANOVA and two-way ANOVA; <xref rid="f1" ref-type="fig">Figs. 1</xref>, <xref rid="f3" ref-type="fig">3</xref>, and 4) multiple comparison test to allocate differences <italic toggle="yes">post hoc</italic> were applied depending on the number of groups and variables. The alpha level was set at <italic toggle="yes">p</italic>=0.05; <italic toggle="yes">p</italic>-values &lt;0.05 were deemed statistically significant, and <italic toggle="yes">p</italic>-values between 0.05 and 0.1 are described as trends.</p></sec></sec><sec sec-type="results" id="s010"><title>Results</title><sec id="s011"><title>CBD and anabolic signaling in a fasted state and after IGF-1 treatment</title><p>IRS1 protein showed a distinct upwards shift in the gel indicating post-translational modification. The absolute amount of protein tended to increase with IGF-1 treatment (<italic toggle="yes">p</italic>=0.06) and CBD did not affect this process (CBD: <italic toggle="yes">p</italic>=0.65 and interaction: <italic toggle="yes">p</italic>=0.99; <xref rid="f1" ref-type="fig">Fig. 1A</xref>). Phosphorylated S6K1 (Thr389) levels increased significantly with IGF-1 treatment (<italic toggle="yes">p</italic>&lt;0.0001) without significant effect of CBD (<italic toggle="yes">p</italic>=0.27) or an interaction effect (<italic toggle="yes">p</italic>=0.3). No differences at baseline or after IGF-1 treatment between the different CBD conditions could be detected via <italic toggle="yes">post hoc</italic> testing (<xref rid="f1" ref-type="fig">Fig. 1B</xref>). Similarly, phosphorylated rpS6 (Ser240/244) increased with IGF-1 treatment (<italic toggle="yes">p</italic>&lt;0.0001) without an effect of CBD (<italic toggle="yes">p</italic>=0.76) or an interaction effect (<italic toggle="yes">p</italic>=0.91; <xref rid="f1" ref-type="fig">Fig. 1C</xref>). Finally, global protein synthesis as assessed via puromycin increased significantly with IGF-1 treatment (<italic toggle="yes">p</italic>&lt;0.0001) and showed a trend for an effect of CBD (<italic toggle="yes">p</italic>=0.06) but no interaction effect (<italic toggle="yes">p</italic>=0.18). <italic toggle="yes">Post hoc</italic> testing determined a difference between the IGF-1 control condition and the IGF-1 CBD (5 μM) condition (<italic toggle="yes">p</italic>&lt;0.05; <xref rid="f1" ref-type="fig">Fig. 1D</xref>).</p></sec><sec id="s012"><title>Dose–response relationship between CBD and mTORC1 signaling</title><p>To increase technical replicates in each trial, the starved conditions were omitted and the effect of CBD on the IGF-1 response was determined. Total IRS1 protein levels did not differ significantly (<xref rid="f2" ref-type="fig">Fig. 2A</xref>). Similarly, S6K1 (Thr389), rpS6 (Ser240/244), 4E-BP1 (Thr37/46), and puromycin failed to show a main effect of CBD (<italic toggle="yes">p</italic>=0.27, <italic toggle="yes">p</italic>=0.81, <italic toggle="yes">p</italic>=0.87, and <italic toggle="yes">p</italic>=0.26, respectively) or <italic toggle="yes">post hoc</italic> group differences (<xref rid="f2" ref-type="fig">Fig. 2B–E</xref>).</p></sec><sec id="s013"><title>CBD does not decrease inflammatory signaling through NF-κB after TNFα treatment</title><p>To investigate NF-κB signaling, natural product inhibitors of NF-κB transcription were initially identified in HEK293 NF-κB reporter cells. Of 146 structurally diverse natural products, 6 decreased the NF-κB activity &gt;85%. Of these factors, we focused of dioscin, a natural steroidal saponin that inhibited NF-κB activation by TNFα in a dose-dependent manner (<xref rid="f3" ref-type="fig">Fig. 3A, B</xref>). C2C12 cells were then treated with 2.5 ng/mL TNFα in the presence or absence of 2.5 μM CBD or 10 μM dioscin (<xref rid="f3" ref-type="fig">Fig. 3</xref>). We found a main effect for p105 protein levels (<italic toggle="yes">p</italic>&lt;0.01) with group differences between the control condition and cells that were treated with TNFα and dioscin (<italic toggle="yes">p</italic>&lt;0.05) as well as a difference between the TNFα condition and the TNFα plus dioscin condition (<italic toggle="yes">p</italic>&lt;0.05; <xref rid="f3" ref-type="fig">Fig. 3D</xref>), whereas CBD had no effect. Phosphorylated p65 (Ser536) also showed a main effect (<italic toggle="yes">p</italic>&lt;0.001) with various group differences. TNFα treatment increased phosphorylated-p65 compared with the control condition (<italic toggle="yes">p</italic>&lt;0.001). Similarly, TNFα in conjunction with CBD increased phosphorylated-p65 levels significantly (<italic toggle="yes">p</italic>&lt;0.01), whereas phosphorylated-p65 did not increase with TNFα and dioscin treatment. Accordingly, phosphorylated-p65 levels with TNFα or TNFα plus CBD were significantly higher than with TNFα and dioscin (<italic toggle="yes">p</italic>&lt;0.01 and <italic toggle="yes">p</italic>&lt;0.05, respectively; <xref rid="f3" ref-type="fig">Fig. 3E</xref>). There was no significant effect of any treatment on p50 levels, but a trend toward a main effect (<italic toggle="yes">p</italic>=0.07) and a trend toward a group difference between TNFα and TNFα plus dioscin (<italic toggle="yes">p</italic>=0.05; <xref rid="f3" ref-type="fig">Fig. 3F</xref>).</p></sec><sec id="s014"><title>CB1 receptor protein levels in C2C12 cells, rat skeletal muscle, and murine brain tissue</title><p>Since CBD had modest effects on skeletal muscle <italic toggle="yes">in vitro</italic> and <italic toggle="yes">in vivo</italic>, levels of the main cannabinoid receptor (CB1) were determined in C2C12 cells and rat tibialis anterior muscle, each with and without CBD treatment. As a positive control, murine brain tissue from either the cortex or hippocampus where CB1 receptor is abundant was run in parallel. The predicted molecular weight of CB1 is 52.8 kDa, but the protein tends to run at around 60 kDa. CB1 was highest in the murine cortex, significantly less CB1 was observed in the hippocampus (<italic toggle="yes">p</italic>&lt;0.01), and the protein was not detected in either the C2C12 myotubes or the rat TA muscle (<xref rid="f4" ref-type="fig">Fig. 4</xref>).</p></sec></sec><sec sec-type="discussion" id="s015"><title>Discussion</title><p>In this study, we investigated the effect of CBD on anabolic and inflammatory signaling in C2C12 myotubes. We looked at the effect of CBD on mTORC1 signaling under fasted conditions and after addition of amino acids and IGF-1. We found that a range of 1–5 μM of CBD had no effect on anabolic signaling through the mTORC1-axis. However, we did detect a small increase in global protein synthesis via puromycin after IGF-1 treatment for the highest CBD dose. Since there were no baseline differences, the effect of CBD (5 μM) on puromycin after IGF-1 was small, and the technical replicates were limited (<italic toggle="yes">n</italic>=3; <xref rid="f2" ref-type="fig">Fig. 2</xref>), we decided to repeat the experiment, double the technical replicates, and omit the fasted condition. In our follow-up experiment with increased statistical power (<xref rid="f3" ref-type="fig">Fig. 3</xref>), the observed tendency of higher protein levels of mTORC1 signaling and global protein synthesis with increasing dosages of CBD disappeared.</p><p>To investigate the anti-inflammatory properties of CBD in muscle cell culture, we tested NF-κB signaling in the presence or absence of TNFα, together with CBD or a natural product inhibitor of NF-κB activation dioscin. Dioscin was identified as a potent inhibitor of TNFα using an NF-κB reporter cell line to screen 146 natural products. Compared with dioscin, CBD had little to no effect on inflammatory signaling through the NF-κB axis in muscle cells. Although dioscin decreased the phosphorylation and activation of p65 (Ser536), p105, and tended to decrease NF-κB p50, CBD had no effect on NF-κB signaling.</p><p>To determine whether the inability of CBD to affect anabolism or inflammatory signaling in C2C12 myotubes was the result of low receptor number, the primary CBD receptor CB1 was determined in C2C12 cells and skeletal muscle of rodents and compared with the cortex and hippocampus. Neither myotubes nor muscle demonstrated CB1 protein, and this likely explains the observation that CBD did not affect myotubes in cell culture and had modest effects on muscle <italic toggle="yes">in vivo</italic>. Previous studies on CB1 in muscle were able to detect CB1 in skeletal muscle cell culture and in rodent muscle samples.<sup><xref rid="B10" ref-type="bibr">10–12</xref></sup> However, these studies used immunoprecipitation of specific subfractions to enrich CB1 in an effort to detect CB1 protein levels. It is possible that using these methods we would be able to detect CB1 in our samples. However, the current work clearly demonstrates that the cellular abundance of CB1 is orders of magnitude lower in muscle cells than in brain tissue. This observation is in line with earlier findings on the subject.<sup><xref rid="B13" ref-type="bibr">13</xref>,<xref rid="B14" ref-type="bibr">14</xref></sup></p><p>A significant issue with any cell culture experiment is dosing and the translatability of findings to the <italic toggle="yes">in vivo</italic> setting. In our previous experiments in rats, we combined eccentric exercise with the injection of 100 mg CBD per kg bodyweight (intraperitoneal).<sup><xref rid="B5" ref-type="bibr">5</xref></sup> Deiana et al. have measured plasma CBD levels after intraperitoneal injection of 120 mg per kg bodyweight in mice.<sup><xref rid="B15" ref-type="bibr">15</xref></sup> Plasma levels peaked at 14 μg/mL at 120 min after injection, equivalent to about 45 mM. Since the dosage we used in our cell culture experiments is considerably lower (1–5 μM), it is possible that CBD would have started to exhibit effects at higher concentrations.</p><p>However, in a recent systematic review on CBD in cell culture, the authors concluded that CBD starts to negatively impact cell viability at doses higher than 2 μM and induces apoptosis at dosages higher than 10 μM.<sup><xref rid="B16" ref-type="bibr">16</xref></sup> Therefore, we chose 5 μM as the upper limit of our dose–response studies. Indeed, we performed a subset of our experiments with 10 μM without seeing any beneficial effects compared with 5 μM. Similarly, going out to 24 h with the CBD treatment concomitantly with TNFα or before the addition of IGF-1 had no effect on NF-κB or mTORC1 signaling, respectively (data not shown).</p><p>Furthermore, it is important to remember that the effects of CBD on anabolic and inflammatory signaling in our <italic toggle="yes">in vivo</italic> experiments were small.<sup><xref rid="B5" ref-type="bibr">5</xref></sup> This was the case despite a relatively high dose and an efficient route of administration, which could be associated with toxicity in chronic settings.<sup><xref rid="B17" ref-type="bibr">17–20</xref></sup> Given this context, it appears unlikely that there is a direct physiological role for CBD in anabolic and inflammatory signaling within skeletal muscle tissue.</p><p>Even though our data indicate that direct effects of CBD on anabolic or inflammatory signaling in skeletal muscle <italic toggle="yes">in vitro</italic> are small, it is still possible that CBD could exert indirect effects <italic toggle="yes">in vivo</italic> through modulation of immune cells that interact with skeletal muscle or by causing systemic changes to circulating cytokines and hormones that affect the central nervous system, immune system, and other endocrinologically active tissues. Future research needs to determine whether such indirect effects could be clinically relevant and whether they can be elicited without requiring toxic dosages of CBD. Additionally, future projects will need to investigate in how far the effects of CBD on skeletal muscle may differ from other cannabinoids, endocannabinoids and analogs.</p></sec></body><back><sec sec-type="COI-statement" id="s016"><title>Author Disclosure Statement</title><p>No competing financial interests exist.</p></sec><sec id="s017"><title>Funding Information</title><p>This study was supported via a Research Investments in Cannabis and Hemp (RICH) project grant to H.T.L. by the Cannabis and Hemp Research Center (CHRC) at the University of California, Davis.</p></sec><ref-list content-type="parsed"><title>References</title><ref id="B1"><label>1.</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author"><string-name name-style="western"><surname>Lattanzi</surname>
<given-names>S</given-names></string-name>, <string-name name-style="western"><surname>Brigo</surname>
<given-names>F</given-names></string-name>, <string-name name-style="western"><surname>Trinka</surname>
<given-names>E</given-names></string-name>, <etal>et al.</etal></person-group>
<article-title>Efficacy and safety of cannabidiol in epilepsy: a systematic review and meta-analysis</article-title>. <source>Drugs</source>. <year>2018</year>;<volume>78</volume>:<fpage>1791</fpage>–<lpage>1804</lpage>.<pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">30390221</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="doi" assigning-authority="pmc">10.1007/s40265-018-0992-5</pub-id></mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B2"><label>2.</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author"><string-name name-style="western"><surname>Iskedjian</surname>
<given-names>M</given-names></string-name>, <string-name name-style="western"><surname>Bereza</surname>
<given-names>B</given-names></string-name>, <string-name name-style="western"><surname>Gordon</surname>
<given-names>A</given-names></string-name>, <etal>et al.</etal></person-group>
<article-title>Meta-analysis of cannabis based treatments for neuropathic and multiple sclerosis-related pain</article-title>. <source>Curr Med Res Opin</source>. <year>2007</year>;<volume>23</volume>:<fpage>17</fpage>–<lpage>24</lpage>.<pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">17257464</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="doi" assigning-authority="pmc">10.1185/030079906x158066</pub-id></mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B3"><label>3.</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author"><string-name name-style="western"><surname>Iannotti</surname>
<given-names>FA</given-names></string-name>, <string-name name-style="western"><surname>Pagano</surname>
<given-names>E</given-names></string-name>, <string-name name-style="western"><surname>Moriello</surname>
<given-names>AS</given-names></string-name>, <etal>et al.</etal></person-group>
<article-title>Effects of non-euphoric plant cannabinoids on muscle quality and performance of dystrophic mdx mice</article-title>. <source>Br J Pharmacol</source>. <year>2019</year>;<volume>176</volume>:<fpage>1568</fpage>–<lpage>1584</lpage>.<pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">30074247</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="doi" assigning-authority="pmc">10.1111/bph.14460</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmcid">PMC6487563</pub-id></mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B4"><label>4.</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author"><string-name name-style="western"><surname>Kasper</surname>
<given-names>AM</given-names></string-name>, <string-name name-style="western"><surname>Sparks</surname>
<given-names>SA</given-names></string-name>, <string-name name-style="western"><surname>Hooks</surname>
<given-names>M</given-names></string-name>, <etal>et al.</etal></person-group>
<article-title>High prevalence of cannabidiol use within male professional rugby union and league players: a quest for pain relief and enhanced recovery</article-title>. <source>Int J Sport Nutr Exerc Metab</source>. <year>2020</year>;<volume>30</volume>:<fpage>315</fpage>–<lpage>322</lpage>.<pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">32732454</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="doi" assigning-authority="pmc">10.1123/ijsnem.2020-0151</pub-id></mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B5"><label>5.</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author"><string-name name-style="western"><surname>Langer</surname>
<given-names>HT</given-names></string-name>, <string-name name-style="western"><surname>Mossakowski</surname>
<given-names>AA</given-names></string-name>, <string-name name-style="western"><surname>Pathak</surname>
<given-names>S</given-names></string-name>, <etal>et al.</etal></person-group>
<article-title>Cannabidiol does not impair anabolic signaling following eccentric contractions in rats</article-title>. <source>Int J Sport Nutr Exerc Metab</source>. <year>2021</year>;<volume>31</volume>:<fpage>93</fpage>–<lpage>100</lpage>.<pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">33621949</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="doi" assigning-authority="pmc">10.1123/ijsnem.2020-0270</pub-id></mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B6"><label>6.</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author"><string-name name-style="western"><surname>Trappe</surname>
<given-names>TA</given-names></string-name>, <string-name name-style="western"><surname>White</surname>
<given-names>F</given-names></string-name>, <string-name name-style="western"><surname>Lambert</surname>
<given-names>CP</given-names></string-name>, <etal>et al.</etal></person-group>
<article-title>Effect of ibuprofen and acetaminophen on postexercise muscle protein synthesis</article-title>. <source>Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab</source>. <year>2002</year>;<volume>282</volume>:<fpage>E551</fpage>–<lpage>E556</lpage>.<pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">11832356</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="doi" assigning-authority="pmc">10.1152/ajpendo.00352.2001</pub-id></mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B7"><label>7.</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author"><string-name name-style="western"><surname>Soltow</surname>
<given-names>QA</given-names></string-name>, <string-name name-style="western"><surname>Betters</surname>
<given-names>JL</given-names></string-name>, <string-name name-style="western"><surname>Sellman</surname>
<given-names>JE</given-names></string-name>, <etal>et al.</etal></person-group>
<article-title>Ibuprofen inhibits skeletal muscle hypertrophy in rats</article-title>. <source>Med Sci Sports Exerc</source>. <year>2006</year>;<volume>38</volume>:<fpage>840</fpage>.<pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">16672835</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="doi" assigning-authority="pmc">10.1249/01.mss.0000218142.98704.66</pub-id></mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B8"><label>8.</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author"><string-name name-style="western"><surname>West</surname>
<given-names>DWD</given-names></string-name>, <string-name name-style="western"><surname>Baehr</surname>
<given-names>LM</given-names></string-name>, <string-name name-style="western"><surname>Marcotte</surname>
<given-names>GR</given-names></string-name>, <etal>et al.</etal></person-group>
<article-title>Acute resistance exercise activates rapamycin-sensitive and-insensitive mechanisms that control translational activity and capacity in skeletal muscle</article-title>. <source>J Physiol</source>. <year>2016</year>;<volume>594</volume>:<fpage>453</fpage>–<lpage>468</lpage>.<pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">26548696</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="doi" assigning-authority="pmc">10.1113/JP271365</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmcid">PMC4713726</pub-id></mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B9"><label>9.</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author"><string-name name-style="western"><surname>Gilda</surname>
<given-names>JE</given-names></string-name>, <string-name name-style="western"><surname>Gomes</surname>
<given-names>AV</given-names></string-name></person-group>. <article-title>Stain-Free total protein staining is a superior loading control to β-actin for Western blots</article-title>. <source>Anal Biochem</source>. <year>2013</year>;<volume>440</volume>:<fpage>186</fpage>–<lpage>188</lpage>.<pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">23747530</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="doi" assigning-authority="pmc">10.1016/j.ab.2013.05.027</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmcid">PMC3809032</pub-id></mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B10"><label>10.</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author"><string-name name-style="western"><surname>Iannotti</surname>
<given-names>FA</given-names></string-name>, <string-name name-style="western"><surname>Silvestri</surname>
<given-names>C</given-names></string-name>, <string-name name-style="western"><surname>Mazzarella</surname>
<given-names>E</given-names></string-name>, <etal>et al.</etal></person-group>
<article-title>The endocannabinoid 2-AG controls skeletal muscle cell differentiation via CB1 receptor-dependent inhibition of Kv7 channels</article-title>. <source>Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A</source>. <year>2014</year>;<volume>111</volume>:<fpage>E2472</fpage>–<lpage>E2481</lpage>.<pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">24927567</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="doi" assigning-authority="pmc">10.1073/pnas.1406728111</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmcid">PMC4066524</pub-id></mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B11"><label>11.</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author"><string-name name-style="western"><surname>Arrabal</surname>
<given-names>S</given-names></string-name>, <string-name name-style="western"><surname>Lucena</surname>
<given-names>MA</given-names></string-name>, <string-name name-style="western"><surname>Canduela</surname>
<given-names>MJ</given-names></string-name>, <etal>et al.</etal></person-group>
<article-title>Pharmacological blockade of cannabinoid CB1 receptors in diet-induced obesity regulates mitochondrial dihydrolipoamide dehydrogenase in muscle</article-title>. <source>PLoS One</source>. <year>2015</year>;<volume>10</volume>:<fpage>e0145244</fpage>.<pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">26671069</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="doi" assigning-authority="pmc">10.1371/journal.pone.0145244</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmcid">PMC4682857</pub-id></mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B12"><label>12.</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author"><string-name name-style="western"><surname>Mendizabal-Zubiaga</surname>
<given-names>J</given-names></string-name>, <string-name name-style="western"><surname>Melser</surname>
<given-names>S</given-names></string-name>, <string-name name-style="western"><surname>Bénard</surname>
<given-names>G</given-names></string-name>, <etal>et al.</etal></person-group>
<article-title>Cannabinoid CB(1) receptors are localized in striated muscle mitochondria and regulate mitochondrial respiration</article-title>. <source>Front Physiol</source>. <year>2016</year>;<volume>7</volume>:<fpage>476</fpage>.<pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">27826249</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="doi" assigning-authority="pmc">10.3389/fphys.2016.00476</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmcid">PMC5078489</pub-id></mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B13"><label>13.</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author"><string-name name-style="western"><surname>Galiègue</surname>
<given-names>S</given-names></string-name>, <string-name name-style="western"><surname>Mary</surname>
<given-names>S</given-names></string-name>, <string-name name-style="western"><surname>Marchand</surname>
<given-names>J</given-names></string-name>, <etal>et al.</etal></person-group>
<article-title>Expression of central and peripheral cannabinoid receptors in human immune tissues and leukocyte subpopulations</article-title>. <source>Eur J Biochem</source>. <year>1995</year>;<volume>232</volume>:<fpage>54</fpage>–<lpage>61</lpage>.<pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">7556170</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="doi" assigning-authority="pmc">10.1111/j.1432-1033.1995.tb20780.x</pub-id></mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B14"><label>14.</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author"><string-name name-style="western"><surname>Uhlén</surname>
<given-names>M</given-names></string-name>, <string-name name-style="western"><surname>Fagerberg</surname>
<given-names>L</given-names></string-name>, <string-name name-style="western"><surname>Hallström</surname>
<given-names>BM</given-names></string-name>, <etal>et al.</etal></person-group>
<article-title>Tissue-based map of the human proteome</article-title>. <source>Science</source>. <year>2015</year>;<volume>347</volume>:<fpage>1260419</fpage>.<pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">25613900</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="doi" assigning-authority="pmc">10.1126/science.1260419</pub-id></mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B15"><label>15.</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author"><string-name name-style="western"><surname>Deiana</surname>
<given-names>S</given-names></string-name>, <string-name name-style="western"><surname>Watanabe</surname>
<given-names>A</given-names></string-name>, <string-name name-style="western"><surname>Yamasaki</surname>
<given-names>Y</given-names></string-name>, <etal>et al.</etal></person-group>
<article-title>Plasma and brain pharmacokinetic profile of cannabidiol (CBD), cannabidivarine (CBDV), Δ⁹-tetrahydrocannabivarin (THCV) and cannabigerol (CBG) in rats and mice following oral and intraperitoneal administration and CBD action on obsessive-compulsive behaviour</article-title>. <source>Psychopharmacology</source>. <year>2012</year>;<volume>219</volume>:<fpage>859</fpage>–<lpage>873</lpage>.<pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">21796370</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="doi" assigning-authority="pmc">10.1007/s00213-011-2415-0</pub-id></mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B16"><label>16.</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author"><string-name name-style="western"><surname>Pagano</surname>
<given-names>S</given-names></string-name>, <string-name name-style="western"><surname>Coniglio</surname>
<given-names>M</given-names></string-name>, <string-name name-style="western"><surname>Valenti</surname>
<given-names>C</given-names></string-name>, <etal>et al.</etal></person-group>
<article-title>Biological effects of cannabidiol on normal human healthy cell populations: systematic review of the literature</article-title>. <source>Biomed Pharmacother</source>. <year>2020</year>;<volume>132</volume>:<fpage>110728</fpage>.<pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">33038581</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="doi" assigning-authority="pmc">10.1016/j.biopha.2020.110728</pub-id></mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B17"><label>17.</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author"><string-name name-style="western"><surname>Huestis</surname>
<given-names>MA</given-names></string-name>, <string-name name-style="western"><surname>Solimini</surname>
<given-names>R</given-names></string-name>, <string-name name-style="western"><surname>Pichini</surname>
<given-names>S</given-names></string-name>, <etal>et al.</etal></person-group>
<article-title>Cannabidiol adverse effects and toxicity</article-title>. <source>Curr Neuropharmacol</source>. <year>2019</year>;<volume>17</volume>:<fpage>974</fpage>–<lpage>989</lpage>.<pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">31161980</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="doi" assigning-authority="pmc">10.2174/1570159X17666190603171901</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmcid">PMC7052834</pub-id></mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B18"><label>18.</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author"><string-name name-style="western"><surname>Machado Bergamaschi</surname>
<given-names>M</given-names></string-name>, <string-name name-style="western"><surname>Helena Costa Queiroz</surname>
<given-names>R</given-names></string-name>, <string-name name-style="western"><surname>Waldo Zuardi</surname>
<given-names>A</given-names></string-name>, <etal>et al.</etal></person-group>
<article-title>Safety and side effects of cannabidiol, a Cannabis sativa constituent</article-title>. <source>Curr Drug Safety</source>. <year>2011</year>;<volume>6</volume>:<fpage>237</fpage>–<lpage>249</lpage>.<pub-id pub-id-type="doi" assigning-authority="pmc">10.2174/157488611798280924</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">22129319</pub-id></mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B19"><label>19.</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author"><string-name name-style="western"><surname>Dziwenka</surname>
<given-names>M</given-names></string-name>, <string-name name-style="western"><surname>Coppock</surname>
<given-names>R</given-names></string-name>, <string-name name-style="western"><surname>Alexander</surname>
<given-names>M</given-names></string-name>, <etal>et al.</etal></person-group>
<article-title>Safety assessment of a hemp extract using genotoxicity and oral repeat-dose toxicity studies in Sprague-Dawley rats</article-title>. <source>Toxicol Rep</source>. <year>2020</year>;<volume>7</volume>:<fpage>376</fpage>–<lpage>385</lpage>.<pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">32123668</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="doi" assigning-authority="pmc">10.1016/j.toxrep.2020.02.014</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmcid">PMC7036713</pub-id></mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B20"><label>20.</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author"><string-name name-style="western"><surname>Marx</surname>
<given-names>TK</given-names></string-name>, <string-name name-style="western"><surname>Reddeman</surname>
<given-names>R</given-names></string-name>, <string-name name-style="western"><surname>Clewell</surname>
<given-names>AE</given-names></string-name>, <etal>et al.</etal></person-group>
<article-title>An assessment of the genotoxicity and subchronic toxicity of a supercritical fluid extract of the aerial parts of hemp</article-title>. <source>J Toxicol</source>. <year>2018</year>;<volume>2018</volume>:<fpage>8143582</fpage>.<pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">29977291</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="doi" assigning-authority="pmc">10.1155/2018/8143582</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmcid">PMC6011091</pub-id></mixed-citation></ref></ref-list><sec><boxed-text position="float" orientation="portrait"><p><bold>Cite this article as:</bold> Langer HT, Avey A, Baar K (2022) Cannabidiol does not impact acute anabolic or inflammatory signaling in skeletal muscle <italic toggle="yes">in vitro</italic>, <italic toggle="yes">Cannabis and Cannabinoid Research</italic> 7:5, 628–636, DOI: 10.1089/can.2021.0132.</p></boxed-text></sec><glossary><title>Abbreviations Used</title><def-list><def-item><term id="G1">ANOVA</term><def><p>analysis of variance</p></def></def-item><def-item><term id="G2">CB1</term><def><p>cannabinoid receptor type 1</p></def></def-item><def-item><term id="G3">CBD</term><def><p>cannabidiol</p></def></def-item><def-item><term id="G4">CHRC</term><def><p>Cannabis and Hemp Research Center</p></def></def-item><def-item><term id="G5">DM</term><def><p>differentiation media</p></def></def-item><def-item><term id="G6">FDA</term><def><p>Food and Drug Administration</p></def></def-item><def-item><term id="G7">LSB</term><def><p>Laemmli sample buffer</p></def></def-item><def-item><term id="G8">NF-κB</term><def><p>nuclear factor kappa B</p></def></def-item><def-item><term id="G9">PBS</term><def><p>phosphate-buffered saline</p></def></def-item><def-item><term id="G10">RICH</term><def><p>Research Investments in Cannabis and Hemp</p></def></def-item><def-item><term id="G11">SLB</term><def><p>sucrose lysis buffer</p></def></def-item><def-item><term id="G12">SM</term><def><p>starvation media</p></def></def-item><def-item><term id="G13">TNFα</term><def><p>tumor necrosis factor α</p></def></def-item></def-list></glossary></back></article>