
<!DOCTYPE article
  PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Archiving and Interchange DTD with MathML3 v1.4 20241031//EN" "JATS-archivearticle1-4-mathml3.dtd">
<article article-type="research-article" xml:lang="en" dtd-version="1.4"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="nlm-ta">J Neuroinflammation</journal-id><journal-id journal-id-type="iso-abbrev">J Neuroinflammation</journal-id><journal-id journal-id-type="pmc-domain-id">249</journal-id><journal-id journal-id-type="pmc-domain">jneuro</journal-id><journal-id journal-id-type="nlm-id">101222974</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title>Journal of Neuroinflammation</journal-title></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">1742-2094</issn><?publisher_abbrev csg?><publisher><publisher-name>BMC</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="pmcid">PMC5771072</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="pmcid-ver">PMC5771072.1</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="pmcaid">5771072</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="pmcaiid">5771072</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="pmid">29338785</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1186/s12974-018-1060-5</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">1060</article-id><article-version article-version-type="pmc-version">1</article-version><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Research</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>Benefits of VCE-003.2, a cannabigerol quinone derivative, against inflammation-driven neuronal deterioration in experimental Parkinson’s disease: possible involvement of different binding sites at the PPARγ receptor</article-title></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author"><name name-style="western"><surname>García</surname><given-names initials="C">Concepción</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="Aff1">1</xref><xref ref-type="aff" rid="Aff2">2</xref><xref ref-type="aff" rid="Aff3">3</xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author"><name name-style="western"><surname>Gómez-Cañas</surname><given-names initials="M">María</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="Aff1">1</xref><xref ref-type="aff" rid="Aff2">2</xref><xref ref-type="aff" rid="Aff3">3</xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author"><name name-style="western"><surname>Burgaz</surname><given-names initials="S">Sonia</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="Aff1">1</xref><xref ref-type="aff" rid="Aff2">2</xref><xref ref-type="aff" rid="Aff3">3</xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author"><name name-style="western"><surname>Palomares</surname><given-names initials="B">Belén</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="Aff4">4</xref><xref ref-type="aff" rid="Aff5">5</xref><xref ref-type="aff" rid="Aff6">6</xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author"><name name-style="western"><surname>Gómez-Gálvez</surname><given-names initials="Y">Yolanda</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="Aff1">1</xref><xref ref-type="aff" rid="Aff9">9</xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author"><name name-style="western"><surname>Palomo-Garo</surname><given-names initials="C">Cristina</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="Aff1">1</xref><xref ref-type="aff" rid="Aff2">2</xref><xref ref-type="aff" rid="Aff3">3</xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author"><name name-style="western"><surname>Campo</surname><given-names initials="S">Sara</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="Aff1">1</xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author"><name name-style="western"><surname>Ferrer-Hernández</surname><given-names initials="J">Joel</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="Aff1">1</xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author"><name name-style="western"><surname>Pavicic</surname><given-names initials="C">Carolina</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="Aff7">7</xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author"><name name-style="western"><surname>Navarrete</surname><given-names initials="C">Carmen</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="Aff8">8</xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author"><name name-style="western"><surname>Luz Bellido</surname><given-names initials="M">M.</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="Aff8">8</xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author"><name name-style="western"><surname>García-Arencibia</surname><given-names initials="M">Moisés</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="Aff1">1</xref><xref ref-type="aff" rid="Aff2">2</xref><xref ref-type="aff" rid="Aff3">3</xref><xref ref-type="aff" rid="Aff10">10</xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author"><name name-style="western"><surname>Ruth Pazos</surname><given-names initials="M">M.</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="Aff1">1</xref><xref ref-type="aff" rid="Aff2">2</xref><xref ref-type="aff" rid="Aff3">3</xref><xref ref-type="aff" rid="Aff11">11</xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author"><name name-style="western"><surname>Muñoz</surname><given-names initials="E">Eduardo</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="Aff4">4</xref><xref ref-type="aff" rid="Aff5">5</xref><xref ref-type="aff" rid="Aff6">6</xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes"><name name-style="western"><surname>Fernández-Ruiz</surname><given-names initials="J">Javier</given-names></name><address><phone>34913941450</phone><email>jjfr@med.ucm.es</email></address><xref ref-type="aff" rid="Aff1">1</xref><xref ref-type="aff" rid="Aff2">2</xref><xref ref-type="aff" rid="Aff3">3</xref></contrib><aff id="Aff1"><label>1</label><institution-wrap><institution-id institution-id-type="ISNI">0000 0001 2157 7667</institution-id><institution-id institution-id-type="GRID">grid.4795.f</institution-id><institution>Instituto Universitario de Investigación en Neuroquímica, Departamento de Bioquímica y Biología Molecular, Facultad de Medicina, </institution><institution>Universidad Complutense, </institution></institution-wrap>28040 Madrid, Spain </aff><aff id="Aff2"><label>2</label><institution-wrap><institution-id institution-id-type="ISNI">0000 0000 9314 1427</institution-id><institution-id institution-id-type="GRID">grid.413448.e</institution-id><institution>Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Enfermedades Neurodegenerativas (CIBERNED), </institution></institution-wrap>Madrid, Spain </aff><aff id="Aff3"><label>3</label><institution-wrap><institution-id institution-id-type="GRID">grid.420232.5</institution-id><institution>Instituto Ramón y Cajal de Investigación Sanitaria (IRYCIS), </institution></institution-wrap>Madrid, Spain </aff><aff id="Aff4"><label>4</label><institution-wrap><institution-id institution-id-type="ISNI">0000 0004 0445 6160</institution-id><institution-id institution-id-type="GRID">grid.428865.5</institution-id><institution>Instituto Maimónides de Investigación Biomédica de Córdoba (IMIBIC), </institution></institution-wrap>Córdoba, Spain </aff><aff id="Aff5"><label>5</label><institution-wrap><institution-id institution-id-type="ISNI">0000 0001 2183 9102</institution-id><institution-id institution-id-type="GRID">grid.411901.c</institution-id><institution>Departamento de Biología Celular, Fisiología e Inmunología, </institution><institution>Universidad de Córdoba, </institution></institution-wrap>Córdoba, Spain </aff><aff id="Aff6"><label>6</label><institution-wrap><institution-id institution-id-type="ISNI">0000 0004 1771 4667</institution-id><institution-id institution-id-type="GRID">grid.411349.a</institution-id><institution>Hospital Universitario Reina Sofía, </institution></institution-wrap>Córdoba, Spain </aff><aff id="Aff7"><label>7</label>Innohealth Group, Madrid, Spain </aff><aff id="Aff8"><label>8</label>Vivacell Biotechnology España, Córdoba, Spain </aff><aff id="Aff9"><label>9</label><institution-wrap><institution-id institution-id-type="ISNI">0000 0004 0415 6205</institution-id><institution-id institution-id-type="GRID">grid.9757.c</institution-id><institution>Present address: Institute for Science and Technology in Medicine, </institution><institution>Keele University, </institution></institution-wrap>Newcastle under Lyme, UK </aff><aff id="Aff10"><label>10</label><institution-wrap><institution-id institution-id-type="ISNI">0000 0004 1769 9380</institution-id><institution-id institution-id-type="GRID">grid.4521.2</institution-id><institution>Present address: Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Universidad de Las Palmas de Gran Canaria, </institution></institution-wrap>Las Palmas, Spain </aff><aff id="Aff11"><label>11</label><institution-wrap><institution-id institution-id-type="ISNI">0000 0004 1767 1089</institution-id><institution-id institution-id-type="GRID">grid.411316.0</institution-id><institution>Present address: Laboratorio de Apoyo a la Investigación. Hospital Universitario Fundación Alcorcón, </institution></institution-wrap>Alcorcón, Madrid, Spain </aff></contrib-group><pub-date pub-type="epub"><day>16</day><month>1</month><year>2018</year></pub-date><pub-date pub-type="collection"><year>2018</year></pub-date><volume>15</volume><issue-id pub-id-type="pmc-issue-id">304041</issue-id><elocation-id>19</elocation-id><history><date date-type="received"><day>7</day><month>12</month><year>2017</year></date><date date-type="accepted"><day>8</day><month>1</month><year>2018</year></date></history><pub-history><event event-type="pmc-release"><date><day>16</day><month>01</month><year>2018</year></date></event><event event-type="pmc-live"><date><day>25</day><month>01</month><year>2018</year></date></event><event event-type="pmc-last-change"><date iso-8601-date="2024-07-19 03:25:19.040"><day>19</day><month>07</month><year>2024</year></date></event></pub-history><permissions><copyright-statement>© The Author(s). 2018</copyright-statement><license license-type="OpenAccess"><ali:license_ref xmlns:ali="http://www.niso.org/schemas/ali/1.0/" specific-use="textmining" content-type="ccbylicense">https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</ali:license_ref><license-p><bold>Open Access</bold>This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (<ext-link xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/">http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</ext-link>), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (<ext-link xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/">http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/</ext-link>) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.</license-p></license></permissions><self-uri xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" content-type="pmc-pdf" xlink:href="12974_2018_Article_1060.pdf"><?pdf-name 12974_2018_Article_1060.pdf?><?pdf-size 3177709?><?pdf-md5 ef1f9805f8f307656c35de115e4a761d?><?pdf-image-server-status NEVER_LOAD?><?pdf-cloudpmc-urn urn:app:ee4d/5771072/ef1f9805f8f3/12974_2018_Article_1060.pdf?></self-uri><abstract id="Abs1"><sec><title>Background</title><p id="Par1">Neuroprotection with cannabinoids in Parkinson’s disease (PD) has been afforded predominantly with antioxidant or anti-inflammatory cannabinoids. In the present study, we investigated the anti-inflammatory and neuroprotective properties of VCE-003.2, a quinone derivative of the non-psychotrophic phytocannabinoid cannabigerol (CBG), which may derive its activity at the peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-γ (PPARγ). The compound is also an antioxidant.</p></sec><sec><title>Methods</title><p id="Par2">We evaluated VCE-003.2 in an in vivo [mice subjected to unilateral intrastriatal injections of lipopolysaccharide (LPS)] model of PD, as well as in in vitro (LPS-exposed BV2 cells and M-213 cells treated with conditioned media generated from LPS-exposed BV2 cells) cellular models. The type of interaction of VCE-003.2 at the PPARγ receptor was furtherly investigated in bone marrow-derived human mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) and sustained with transcriptional assays and in silico docking studies.</p></sec><sec><title>Results</title><p id="Par3">VCE-003.2 has no activity at the cannabinoid receptors, a fact that we confirmed in this study using competition studies. The administration of VCE-003.2 to LPS-lesioned mice attenuated the loss of tyrosine hydroxylase (TH)-containing nigrostriatal neurons and, in particular, the intense microgliosis provoked by LPS in the substantia nigra, measured by Iba-1/Cd68 immunostaining. The analysis by qPCR of proinflammatory mediators such as tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α), interleukin-1β (IL-1β), and inducible nitric oxide synthase (iNOS) in the striatum showed they were markedly elevated by the LPS lesion and strongly reduced by the treatment with VCE-003.2. The effects of VCE-003.2 in LPS-lesioned mice implied the activation of PPARγ receptors, as they were attenuated when VCE-003.2 was co-administered with the PPARγ inhibitor T0070907. We then moved to some in vitro approaches, first to confirm the anti-inflammatory profile of VCE-003.2 in cultured BV2 cells exposed to LPS. VCE-003.2 was able to attenuate the synthesis and release of TNF-α and IL-1β, as well as the induction of iNOS and cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2) elicited by LPS in these cells. However, we found such effects were not reversed by GW9662, another classic PPARγ antagonist. Next, we investigated the neuroprotective effects of VCE-003.2 in cultured M-213 neuronal cells exposed to conditioned media generated from LPS-exposed cultured BV2 cells. VCE-003.2 reduced M-213 cell death, but again, such effects were not reversed by T0070907. Using docking analysis, we detected that VCE-003.2 binds both the canonical and the alternative binding sites in the PPARγ ligand-binding pocket (LBP). Functional assays further showed that T0070907 almost abolished PPARγ transcriptional activity induced by rosiglitazone (RGZ), but it did not affect the activity of VCE-003.2 in a Gal4-Luc system. However, T0070907 inhibited the effects of RGZ and VCE-003.2 on the expression of PPARγ-dependent genes upregulated in MSCs.</p></sec><sec><title>Conclusions</title><p id="Par4">We have demonstrated that VCE-003.2 is neuroprotective against inflammation-driven neuronal damage in an in vivo model of PD and in in vitro cellular models of neuroinflammation. Such effects might involve PPARγ receptors, although in silico and in vitro experiments strongly suggest that VCE-003.2 targets PPARγ by acting through two binding sites at the LBP, one that is sensitive to T0070907 (canonical binding site) and other that is not affected by this PPARγ antagonist (alternative binding site).</p></sec><sec><title>Electronic supplementary material</title><p>The online version of this article (10.1186/s12974-018-1060-5) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.</p></sec></abstract><kwd-group xml:lang="en"><title>Keywords</title><kwd>Cannabinoids</kwd><kwd>VCE-003.2</kwd><kwd>PPARγ receptors</kwd><kwd>Inflammation</kwd><kwd>Microglial activation</kwd><kwd>LPS</kwd><kwd>Parkinson’s disease</kwd></kwd-group><funding-group><award-group><funding-source><institution-wrap><institution-id institution-id-type="FundRef">http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/501100004587</institution-id><institution>Instituto de Salud Carlos III</institution></institution-wrap></funding-source><award-id>CB06/05/0089</award-id></award-group><award-group><funding-source><institution-wrap><institution-id institution-id-type="FundRef">http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/501100007136</institution-id><institution>Secretaría de Estado de Investigación, Desarrollo e Innovación</institution></institution-wrap></funding-source><award-id>SAF2015-68580-C2-1-R</award-id><award-id>RTC-2014-1877-1</award-id></award-group></funding-group><custom-meta-group><custom-meta><meta-name>pmc-status-qastatus</meta-name><meta-value>0</meta-value></custom-meta><custom-meta><meta-name>pmc-status-live</meta-name><meta-value>yes</meta-value></custom-meta><custom-meta><meta-name>pmc-status-embargo</meta-name><meta-value>no</meta-value></custom-meta><custom-meta><meta-name>pmc-status-released</meta-name><meta-value>yes</meta-value></custom-meta><custom-meta><meta-name>pmc-prop-open-access</meta-name><meta-value>yes</meta-value></custom-meta><custom-meta><meta-name>pmc-prop-olf</meta-name><meta-value>no</meta-value></custom-meta><custom-meta><meta-name>pmc-prop-manuscript</meta-name><meta-value>no</meta-value></custom-meta><custom-meta><meta-name>pmc-prop-legally-suppressed</meta-name><meta-value>no</meta-value></custom-meta><custom-meta><meta-name>pmc-prop-has-pdf</meta-name><meta-value>yes</meta-value></custom-meta><custom-meta><meta-name>pmc-prop-has-supplement</meta-name><meta-value>yes</meta-value></custom-meta><custom-meta><meta-name>pmc-prop-pdf-only</meta-name><meta-value>no</meta-value></custom-meta><custom-meta><meta-name>pmc-prop-suppress-copyright</meta-name><meta-value>no</meta-value></custom-meta><custom-meta><meta-name>pmc-prop-is-real-version</meta-name><meta-value>no</meta-value></custom-meta><custom-meta><meta-name>pmc-prop-is-scanned-article</meta-name><meta-value>no</meta-value></custom-meta><custom-meta><meta-name>pmc-prop-preprint</meta-name><meta-value>no</meta-value></custom-meta><custom-meta><meta-name>pmc-prop-in-epmc</meta-name><meta-value>yes</meta-value></custom-meta><custom-meta><meta-name>pmc-license-ref</meta-name><meta-value>CC BY</meta-value></custom-meta><custom-meta><meta-name>issue-copyright-statement</meta-name><meta-value>© The Author(s) 2018</meta-value></custom-meta></custom-meta-group></article-meta></front><body><sec id="Sec1"><title>Background</title><p id="Par29">Inflammation is a key pathogenic event in Parkinson’s disease (PD), so that anti-inflammatory strategies are being investigated to limit neuronal deterioration in this disease [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CR1">1</xref>]. Certain cannabinoids have proved important anti-inflammatory/neuroprotective properties, which have been primarily assigned to the role exerted by the cannabinoid receptor type-2 (CB<sub>2</sub>) in the control of glia-dependent inflammatory events typical of neurodegenerative/neuroinflammatory disorders [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CR2">2</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CR3">3</xref>]. However, its relevance in PD has remained elusive for years. A few years ago, Price and coworkers [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CR4">4</xref>] described an elevation of CB<sub>2</sub> receptors in microglial cells recruited at the lesion sites in mice intoxicated with MPTP, a model with a modest glial response. These authors found that targeting these receptors reduced the damage of nigrostriatal neurons [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CR4">4</xref>], although a further study showed that the inhibition of microglial activation and the preservation of nigrostriatal dopaminergic neurons in MPTP-lesioned mice involved surprisingly the activation of the cannabinoid receptor type-1 (CB<sub>1</sub>) too [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CR5">5</xref>]. In our laboratory, we worked with postmortem basal ganglia collected from PD patients and confirmed such upregulatory response of CB<sub>2</sub> receptors in glial elements [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CR6">6</xref>]. We also investigated the issue in an inflammatory model of nigrostriatal damage consisting in intrastriatal injection of lipopolysaccharide (LPS), in which we found elevated levels of CB<sub>2</sub> receptors in the basal ganglia [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CR6">6</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CR7">7</xref>]. Such receptors may be apparently located in activated glial elements, although we did not investigate the cell substrates in which this response takes place. In addition, we found that CB<sub>2</sub> receptor-deficient mice were more vulnerable to LPS lesion than wild-type animals [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CR6">6</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CR7">7</xref>], a difference that was not found in a model with poor inflammatory responses, mice lesioned with 6-hydroxydopamine, in which the death of dopaminergic neurons is related to mitochondrial dysfunction and oxidative damage [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CR7">7</xref>]. In agreement with this difference, LPS-lesioned mice responded to compounds targeting the CB<sub>2</sub> receptor by preserving tyrosine hydroxylase (TH)-containing neurons and by reducing microglial reactivity and macrophage infiltration [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CR6">6</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CR7">7</xref>]. In contrast, 6-hydroxydopamine-lesioned mice did not respond to CB<sub>2</sub> receptor activation [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CR8">8</xref>]. Such differences were recently confirmed by Concannon and coworkers [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CR9">9</xref>] who compared the elevation of CB<sub>2</sub> receptors in LPS-lesioned rats, which was paralleled by increased microglial activation, with the poor response found in rodents lesioned with 6-hydroxydopamine. However, work conducted by Ternianov and coworkers [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CR10">10</xref>] supported a role of CB<sub>2</sub> receptors in 6-hydroxydopamine-lesioned mice too, as they found that mice overexpressing CB<sub>2</sub> receptors were more protected against 6-hydroxydopamine-induced nigrostriatal damage.</p><p id="Par30">The anti-inflammatory potential of cannabinoids in PD has been recently reinforced with the possibility that some of them can also bind and activate specific receptor types of the peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor (PPAR) family such as PPARγ [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CR11">11</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CR12">12</xref>]. Such nuclear receptors have long been involved in the control of neuroinflammatory responses [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CR13">13</xref>], whereas specific non-cannabinoid PPARγ activators (e.g., thiazolidinediones) have been found to be active in experimental models of PD and have entered recently in clinical investigation [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CR14">14</xref>]. Some endocannabinoids (e.g., anandamide and 2-arachidonoylglycerol) and their related signaling lipids (e.g., palmitoylethanolamide, oleylethanolamide), as well as different phytocannabinoids and their derivatives, have been found to exert PPARγ-mediated anti-inflammatory activity [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CR12">12</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CR15">15</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CR16">16</xref>]. We have recently designed, synthesized, and characterized different phytocannabinoid derivatives, in particular a series of quinone derivatives of cannabigerol (CBG) that behave as PPARγ activators [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CR17">17</xref>–<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CR19">19</xref>], while retaining the lack of CB<sub>1</sub>/CB<sub>2</sub> activity of their phytocannabinoid template. For this study, we were particularly interested in one non-thiophilic CBG quinone derivative, so-called VCE-003.2, whose ability to activate PPARγ [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CR19">19</xref>] enables this compound to serve as an anti-inflammatory and a neuroprotectant in LPS-lesioned mice, the experimental model of PD that better reproduces inflammation as a pathogenic event in this disease. We have investigated VCE-003.2 in this in vivo PD model following previous research conducted in murine models of Huntington’s disease [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CR19">19</xref>], which confirmed its activity at the PPARγ and its capability to cross the blood-brain barrier after systemic administration. In addition, we have extended this research with some in vitro experiments useful to confirm the anti-inflammatory profile of VCE-003.2 (cultured BV2 cells stimulated with LPS) or its neuroprotective effects (cultured M-213 neuronal cells incubated with conditioned media generated from cultured BV2 cells stimulated with LPS). In all these experimental approaches, the possible contribution of PPARγ activation has been investigated using selective inhibitors of these nuclear receptors. However, the lack of activity of classic PPARγ antagonists (e.g., T0070907, GW9662) against VCE-003.2 effects in the in vitro studies and the recent identification of a functional alternative binding site for PPARγ ligands that does not overlap with the canonical binding site used by glitazones [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CR20">20</xref>] prompted us to investigate whether VCE-003.2 binds to this receptor at this different site using docking and transcriptional analyses. In an additional experiment presented as supplementary data (see Additional file <xref rid="MOESM3" ref-type="media">3</xref>), we have also investigated whether the cannabinoid receptor-independent antioxidant profile of VCE-003.2 enables this compound to also serve as neuroprotectant in 6-hydroxydopamine-lesioned mice, which is characterized, as mentioned above, by mitochondrial dysfunction and oxidative stress but having a poor inflammatory response. In this model, other antioxidant phytocannabinoids (Δ<sup>9</sup>-tetrahydrocannabinol, cannabidiol, Δ<sup>9</sup>-tetrahydrocannabivarin) have been shown to preserve nigrostriatal dopaminergic neurons by antioxidant mechanisms independent of cannabinoid receptors [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CR7">7</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CR8">8</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CR21">21</xref>]. With this study in whole, we expect to add experimental support to the idea that a pharmaceutical formulation, using a pleiotropic cannabinoid derivative targeting PPARγ receptors, and perhaps other relevant targets for PD, may be of great interest to reduce inflammation and oxidative stress, as well as to enhance neuronal integrity in PD.</p></sec><sec id="Sec2"><title>Methods</title><sec id="Sec3"><title>Synthesis and receptor characterization of VCE-003.2</title><p id="Par31">The quinone derivative of CBG (6-(3,7)-dimethyl-octa-2,6-dienyl)-5-hydroxy-3-pentyl-2-ethylamino-[1,4]benzoquinone), so-called VCE-003.2, was synthesized as described previously [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CR19">19</xref>]. Its activity as a PPARγ activator was also previously characterized [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CR19">19</xref>]. To confirm that, as expected, VCE-003.2 has no affinity at the CB<sub>1</sub> and the CB<sub>2</sub> receptors, we conducted radioligand binding assays using membranes purified from cells transfected with human CB<sub>1</sub> or CB<sub>2</sub> receptors (RBHCB1M400UA and RBXCB2M400UA; Perkin-Elmer Life and Analytical Sciences, Boston, MA, USA). The protein concentration was 8 μg/well for the CB<sub>1</sub> receptor membranes and 4 μg/well for those of the CB<sub>2</sub> receptor. The binding buffer was 50 mM Tris-Cl, 5 mM MgCl<sub>2</sub>, 2.5 mM EDTA, and 0.5 mg/mL bovine serum albumin (pH = 7.4) for CB<sub>1</sub> and 50 mM TrisCl, 5 mM MgCl<sub>2</sub>, 2.5 mM EGTA, and 1 mg/mL bovine serum albumin (pH = 7.5) for CB<sub>2</sub>. The radioligand was [<sup>3</sup>H]-CP55940 (Perkin-Elmer) used at a concentration of membrane K<sub>D</sub> × 0.8 nM, and the final incubation volume was 200 μl for CB<sub>1</sub> and 600 μl for CB<sub>2</sub>. Ninety-six-well plates and the tubes necessary for the experiment were previously siliconized with Sigmacote (Sigma-Aldrich, Madrid, Spain). Membranes were resuspended in the corresponding buffer and were incubated (90 min at 30 °C) with the radioligand and VCE-003.2 at a high concentration (40 μM) with the purpose to determine the percentage of radioligand displacement. Non-specific binding was determined with 10 μM WIN55212-2 and total radioligand binding by incubation with the membranes in absence of VCE-003.2. Filtration was performed by a Harvester® filtermate (Perkin-Elmer) with Filtermat A GF/C filters pretreated with polyethylenimine 0.05%. After filtering, the filter was washed nine times with a binding buffer and dried and a melt-on scintillation sheet (Meltilex™ A, Perkin-Elmer) was melted onto it. Then, radioactivity was quantified by a liquid scintillation spectrophotometer (Wallac MicroBeta Trilux, Perkin-Elmer). In the case of both CB<sub>1</sub>- and CB<sub>2</sub>-transfected membranes, radioligand displacement at these conditions was always lower than 50%, then indicating negligible activity at both cannabinoid receptor types with Ki values in the micromolar range (&gt; 40 μM; data from at least 3 experiments performed in triplicate for each point).</p></sec><sec id="Sec4"><title>Cultures of BV2 cells and M-213 neuronal cells</title><p id="Par32">In a first experiment, mouse BV2 microglial cells (kindly provided by Dr. Carmen Guaza, Instituto Cajal, CSIC) were cultured in Dulbecco’s modified Eagle’s medium (DMEM, Lonza, Verviers, Belgium) supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS, Sigma-Aldrich, Madrid, Spain), 2 mM UltraGlutamine, and antibiotics (Lonza, Verviers, Belgium) in a humidified atmosphere of 5% CO<sub>2</sub> at 37 °C. Cells were plated at a density of 45 × 10<sup>4</sup> cells per well in 12-well culture plates and incubated in DMEM with a reduction of FBS to 1%. Three hours later, cells were treated with 0.5 μg/ml LPS (from <italic toggle="yes">Escherichia coli</italic> 055:B5, Sigma-Aldrich, Madrid, Spain), alone or in combination with VCE-003.2, used at a concentration of 5 μM (selected from previous concentration–response studies), and added 1 h before LPS. Twenty hours after the addition of LPS, media were removed and used for the analysis of tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α) and interleukin-1β (IL-1β) levels using commercial ELISA kits (ref. MTA00B, R&amp;D Systems, Minneapolis, MN, USA for TNF-α, and ref. MLB00C, R&amp;D Systems, Minneapolis, MN, USA for IL-1β), whereas cell pellets were collected for analyzing protein levels by the Lowry method, which were used to normalize the cytokine data. In a follow-up experiment, the procedure for cell plating, incubation, and treatment with LPS and VCE-003.2 described above was repeated again, but an additional experimental group consisting of cells treated with LPS (0.5 μg/ml), VCE-003.2 (5 μM), and GW9662 (10 μM; Abcam, Cambridge, UK) was added. Twenty hours after the addition of LPS, cell pellets were collected for the qPCR analysis of TNF-α, IL-1β, inducible nitric oxide synthase (iNOS), and cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2).</p><p id="Par33">In a second experiment, cultured BV2 cells were maintained in DMEM (Lonza, Verviers, Belgium) supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS, Sigma-Aldrich, Madrid, Spain), 2 mM UltraGlutamine, and antibiotics (Lonza, Verviers, Belgium) in a humidified atmosphere of 5% CO<sub>2</sub> at 37 °C. For experiments, cells were plated at a density of 2 × 10<sup>5</sup> cells per well in 6-well culture plates and incubated in DMEM with a reduction of FBS to 1%. Three hours later, cells were treated with 0.5 μg/ml LPS (from <italic toggle="yes">Escherichia coli</italic> 055:B5, Sigma-Aldrich, Madrid, Spain). Twenty-four hours after the addition of LPS, media were removed to be added to cultures of the rat M-213 striatal cell line (kindly provided by Dr. WJ Freed, National Institute on Drug Abuse, Bethesda, MD, USA) to induce cell death following a procedure described previously [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CR22">22</xref>]. To this end, M-213 cells were maintained in DMEM supplemented with 10% FBS, 2 mM UltraGlutamine, and 1% antibiotics (Lonza, Verviers, Belgium) under a humidified 5% CO<sub>2</sub> atmosphere at 37 °C. For cytotoxicity experiments, cells were seeded at 50,000 cells/well in 24-well plates and maintained under a humidified atmosphere (5% CO<sub>2</sub>) at 37 °C overnight. Afterwards, normal medium was completely replaced by the conditioned media generated in BV2 cell experiments, and then, M-213 cells were treated with the vehicle (0.1% DMSO) or with three different concentrations of VCE-003.2 (0.1, 0.5, and 1 μM; selected according to our previously published study [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CR19">19</xref>], which described an IC50 = 1.2 μM for the binding of VCE003.2 to PPARγ receptors), added alone or combined with the selective PPARγ inhibitor T0070907 (10 μM; Cayman Chemical, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA). Rosiglitazone (RGZ) (20 μM, according to [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CR23">23</xref>] and laboratory experience; Sigma-Aldrich, Madrid, Spain) was also added, alone or combined with T0070907 (10 μM), as a positive control for PPARγ activation. Cells were incubated for 40 h before the neuronal death was analyzed with the MTT assay (Panreac AppliChem., Barcelona, Spain). The data were normalized in relation with a control group consisting in M-213 cells exposed to conditioned media generated by BV2 cells in absence of LPS.</p></sec><sec id="Sec5"><title>Mesenchymal stem cell differentiation</title><p id="Par34">Human mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) derived from bone marrow were obtained as previously described [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CR19">19</xref>]. Cells were seeded in α-MEM containing 15% FCS, 2 mM UltraGlutamine, 1 ng/ml bFGF, and antibiotics, and adipogenic differentiation was performed as described [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CR19">19</xref>]. Treatment with RGZ (1 μM) and VCE-003.2 (1 μM) in the presence and the absence of T0070907 (5 μM) started at the same time as the differentiation process. After a week of differentiation, the mRNA expression for PPARγ isoform 2 (PPARγ2), lipoprotein-lipase (LPL), CCAAT/enhancer-binding protein-α (CEBPA), adiponectin (ADIPOQ), and fatty acid-binding protein 4 (FABP4) was analyzed as described [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CR19">19</xref>].</p></sec><sec id="Sec6"><title>PPARγ transcriptional assays</title><p id="Par35">To analyze PPARγ transcriptional activity, HEK-293T cells were cultured in 24-well plates and transiently co-transfected with the expression vector GAL4-PPARγ and the luciferase reporter vectors GAL4-luc (firefly luciferase) and pRL-CMV (renilla luciferase) using Roti©-Fect (Carl Roth, Karlsruhe, Germany). After stimulation, the luciferase activities were quantified using Dual-Luciferase Assay (Promega, Madison, WI, USA).</p></sec><sec id="Sec7"><title>Immunoblotting</title><p id="Par36">Whole cell extracts were obtained by lysing the cells in NP-40 buffer (50 mM Tris-HCl pH 7.5, 150 mM NaCl, 10% glycerol, and 1% NP-40) supplemented with protease and phosphatase inhibitors. Lysate concentrations were determined by the Bradford assay (Bio-Rad Laboratories, Hercules, CA, USA). Proteins (30 μg/lane) were separated by SDS-PAGE, transferred onto PVDF membranes, and blocked with PBS-T (PBS + 0.1% Tween-20) containing 5% non-fat dry milk for 30 min at room temperature. Incubation with anti-PPARγ (ref. C26H12, Cell Signaling Technology, Beverly, MA, USA) and anti-α-actin (ref. AC-74, Sigma-Aldrich, Madrid, Spain) was performed overnight at 4 °C, and washed membranes were incubated with appropriate secondary antibodies coupled to horseradish peroxidase that were detected by an enhanced chemiluminescent reagent.</p></sec><sec id="Sec8"><title>Animals and surgical lesions</title><p id="Par37">Male C57BL/6 mice were housed in a room with a controlled photoperiod (06:00–18:00 light) and temperature (22 ± 1 °C). They had free access to standard food and water and were used at adult age (3- to 4-month-old; 25–30 g weight). All experiments were conducted according to European guidelines (directive 2010/63/EU) and approved by the “Comité de Experimentación Animal” of our university (ref. CEA-UCM 56/2012). For in vivo experiments, mice were anesthesized (ketamine 40 mg/kg + xylazine 4 mg/kg, i.p.) and subjected to unilateral injections of <italic toggle="yes">S. Minnesota</italic> LPS (Sigma-Aldrich, Madrid, Spain) into two points of the right striatum following the procedure developed by Hunter et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CR24">24</xref>]. We used the following stereotaxic coordinates from bregma: + 1.18 mm AP, − 1.5 mm ML, and − 3.5 mm DV, as well as − 0.34 mm AP, − 2.5 mm ML, and − 3.2 mm DV (see details in [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CR24">24</xref>]). At each intrastriatal coordinate, 5 μg of LPS in a volume of 1 μl of saline was injected slowly (0.5 μl/30 s) and the needle was left in place for 5 min before being slowly withdrawn. This avoids generating reflux and a rapid increase in intracranial pressure. Controls were sham-operated and injected with 1 μl of saline using the same coordinates. After the application of LPS or saline, mice were also subjected to pharmacological treatments as described in the following section. The lesions were generated using unilateral administration, the advantage of which is that contralateral structures serve as controls for the different analyses.</p></sec><sec id="Sec9"><title>Pharmacological treatments and sampling</title><p id="Par38">LPS-lesioned mice were distributed in three groups and administered i.p. with 10 mg/kg of VCE-003.2, alone or in combination with 5 mg/kg of the PPARγ antagonist T0070907 (Cayman Chemical, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CR25">25</xref>] or vehicle [DMSO (3.3%) + Tween 20 (2%) + saline (94.7%)]. The experiment included a fourth group consisting of sham-operated mice also treated with DMSO-Tween 20-saline. The treatment was initiated approximately 16 h after the LPS lesion and was repeated daily for 21 days. One day after the last injection, mice were killed by rapid and careful decapitation and their brains were rapidly removed and frozen in 2-methylbutane cooled in dry ice and stored at − 80 °C for subsequent immunohistochemical analysis in the substantia nigra and qPCR analysis in the striatum.</p></sec><sec id="Sec10"><title>Real-time qRT-PCR analysis</title><p id="Par39">Brain coronal slices (around 500 μm thick) were made at levels containing the striatum, according to Palkovits and Brownstein Atlas [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CR26">26</xref>]. Subsequently, such structure was dissected and used for qRT-PCR analysis. Cell pellets from the in vitro experiments were also used for qRT-PCR analysis. Total RNA was isolated from the different samples using SurePrep RNA/Protein Purification Kit (Fisher Bioreagents, Madrid, Spain). The total amount of RNA extracted was quantitated by spectrometry at 260 nm and its purity from the ratio between the absorbance values at 260 and 280 nm. After genomic DNA was removed (to eliminate DNA contamination), single-stranded complementary DNA was synthesized from up to 1 μg of total RNA using the commercial kits Rneasy Mini Quantitect Reverse Transcription (Qiazen, Hilgen, Germany) and iScript™ cDNA Synthesis Kit (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA, USA). The reaction mixture was kept frozen at − 20 °C until enzymatic amplification. Quantitative RT-PCR assays were performed using TaqMan Gene Expression Assays (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA, USA) to quantify mRNA levels for TNF-α (ref. Mm99999068_m1), IL-1β (ref. Mm00434228_m1), iNOS (ref. Mm01309902_m1), and COX-2 (ref. Mm00478372_m1), using GAPDH expression (ref. Mm99999915_g1) as an endogenous control gene for normalization. The PCR assay was performed using the 7300 Fast Real-Time PCR System (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA, USA), and the threshold cycle (Ct) was calculated by the instrument’s software (7300 Fast System, Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA, USA). Expression levels were calculated using the 2<sup>−ΔΔCt</sup> method.</p></sec><sec id="Sec11"><title>Immunohistochemical procedures</title><p id="Par40">Brains were sliced in coronal sections (containing the substantia nigra) in a cryostat (30 μm thick) and collected on antifreeze solution (glycerol/ethylene glycol/PBS; 2:3:5) and stored at − 20 °C until used. Sections were mounted on gelatin-coated slides and, once adhered, washed in 0.1 M potassium PBS (KPBS) at pH 7.4. Then, endogenous peroxidase was blocked by 30-min incubation at room temperature in a peroxidaseblocking solution (Dako Cytomation, Glostrup, Denmark). After several washes with KPBS, sections were incubated overnight at room temperature with the following primary antibodies: (i) rabbit polyclonal anti-TH (Chemicon-Millipore, Temecula, CA, USA) used at 1/400; (ii) rabbit polyclonal anti-Iba-1 antibody (Wako Chemicals, Richmond, VA, USA) used at 1/300; or (iii) monoclonal rat anti-mouse Cd68 antibody (AbD Serotec, Oxford, UK) used at 1/200. Dilutions were carried out in KPBS containing 5% normal horse serum and 0.1% Triton X-100 (Sigma Chem., Madrid, Spain). After incubation, sections were washed in KPBS, followed by incubation with the corresponding biotinylated secondary antibody (1/400) (Vector Laboratories, Burlingame, CA, USA) for 1 h at room temperature. Avidin–biotin complex (Vector Laboratories, Burlingame, CA, USA) and 3,3′-diaminobenzidine substrate–chromogen system (Dako Cytomation, Glostrup, Denmark) were used to obtain a visible reaction product. Negative control sections were obtained using the same protocol with omission of the primary antibody. A Leica DMRB microscope and a DFC300FX camera (Leica, Wetzlar, Germany) were used for the observation and photography of the slides, respectively. For quantification of the intensity of TH, Iba-1, or CD68 immunostaining either in the substantia nigra (both ipsilateral and contralateral sides), we used the NIH Image Processing and Analysis software (ImageJ; NIH, Bethesda, MD, USA) using 4–5 sections, separated approximately by 200 μm, and observed with × 5–20 objectives depending on the method and the brain area under quantification. In all sections, the same area of the substantia nigra <italic toggle="yes">pars compacta</italic> was analyzed. Analyses were always conducted by experimenters who were blinded to all animal characteristics. Data were expressed as percentage of immunostaining intensity in the ipsilateral (lesioned) side over the contralateral (non-lesioned) side.</p><p id="Par41">Immunofluorescence was used for a double-labeling analysis with TH and Cd68 in sections containing the substantia nigra pars compacta. After pre-incubation for 20 min with Tris-buffered saline with 1% Triton X-100 (pH 7.5), sections were sequentially incubated overnight at 4 °C with a monoclonal rat anti-mouse Cd68 antibody (AbD Serotec, Oxford, UK) used at 1/200, followed by washing in a Tris-buffered saline and a new incubation (at 37 °C for 2 h) with an anti-rat secondary antibody made in donkey (1/200) conjugated with Alexa 488 (Life Technologies-Thermofisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) rendering green fluorescence. Sections were then washed again and incubated overnight at 4 °C with a polyclonal rabbit anti-TH (Chemicon-Merck Millipore, Darmstadt, Germany) used at 1/200, again followed by washing in a Tris-buffered saline and a new incubation (at 37 °C for 2 h) with an anti-rabbit secondary antibody made in goat (1/200) conjugated with Alexa 546 (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA) rendering red fluorescence. Sections were counter-stained with nuclear stain TOPRO-3-iodide (Molecular Probes, Eugene, OR, USA) to visualize cell nuclei. A SP5 Leica confocal microscope was used for slide observation and photography.</p></sec><sec id="Sec12"><title>Docking analysis</title><p id="Par42">Ligand docking was performed using the <italic toggle="yes">AutoDock4</italic> [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CR27">27</xref>] and the <italic toggle="yes">Vina</italic> software [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CR28">28</xref>] with the virtual screening tools <italic toggle="yes">PyRx</italic> [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CR29">29</xref>] and PyMOL [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CR30">30</xref>]. The receptor model used was the PDB reference (RCSB Protein Data Bank accession code) 2Q59 and 3B0R [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CR20">20</xref>], and 4EMA [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CR31">31</xref>]. The search space for the docking, around the receptor molecule surface, was set according to previous findings about several binding sites for different ligands. Once analysis has been performed, <italic toggle="yes">AutoDock Vina</italic> provides the estimated binding affinity value, which is the sum of the intermolecular energy, due to the interaction between both molecules, and the torsional free-energy penalty, due to the conformation adopted by these molecules to properly fit the interaction surface. A negative value indicates that the bond is thermodynamically stable, whereas a positive value means instability. Search space for the docking was set around the binding sites described previously [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CR20">20</xref>].</p></sec><sec id="Sec13"><title>Data analysis</title><p id="Par43">Data were subjected to the one-way analysis of variance followed by the Student–Newman–Keuls, Tukey, or the Bonferroni multiple comparison tests.</p></sec></sec><sec id="Sec14"><title>Results</title><sec id="Sec15"><title>Determination of CB<sub>1</sub>/CB<sub>2</sub> receptor binding for VCE-003.2</title><p id="Par44">VCE-003.2 was synthesized as described in a previous study [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CR19">19</xref>], in which its pharmacodynamic properties, in particular its activity as a PPARγ activator, were already investigated using transcriptional assays [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CR19">19</xref>]. VCE-003.2 is a derivative of CBG, a non-psychoactive cannabinoid present in the Cannabis plant that does not exhibit any activity at the CB<sub>1</sub> receptor [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CR32">32</xref>]. We have recently confirmed that CBG binds the CB<sub>2</sub> receptor also with a poor affinity in the micromolar range [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CR17">17</xref>]. Therefore, it was expected that its quinone derivative VCE-003.2 has no affinity at both CB<sub>1</sub> and CB<sub>2</sub> receptors. To confirm that, we conducted radioligand binding assays using membranes purified from cells transfected with human CB<sub>1</sub> or CB<sub>2</sub> receptors. Our data demonstrated that a high concentration of VCE-003.2 (40 μM) displaced radioligand binding to both CB<sub>1</sub> and CB<sub>2</sub> receptors with a percentage in both cases lower than 50%, then indicating negligible affinity for both receptors with predicted Ki always &gt; 40 μM in both cases.</p></sec><sec id="Sec16"><title>Anti-inflammatory and neuroprotective effects of VCE-003.2 in LPS-lesioned mice</title><p id="Par45">Given the activity of VCE-003.2 at the PPARγ receptors, which is an important factor involved in the control of inflammation, we wanted to evaluate its anti-inflammatory/neuroprotective properties in a typically in vivo inflammatory model of PD, LPS-lesioned mice. It is likely that, in the absence of CB<sub>2</sub> receptor activity for VCE-003.2, such beneficial effects, if they exist, should be possibly mediated by enhancing PPARγ signaling. First, we analyzed TH immunostaining in the substantia nigra pars compacta and demonstrated a reduction of immunoreactivity in LPS-lesioned mice (<italic toggle="yes">F</italic>(3,17) = 5.21, <italic toggle="yes">p</italic> &lt; 0.05; see Fig. <xref rid="Fig1" ref-type="fig">1</xref>) in concordance with the previous data [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CR6">6</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CR7">7</xref>], and evident here comparing the lesioned ipsilateral side with the non-lesioned contralateral side (Fig. <xref rid="Fig1" ref-type="fig">1</xref>). In addition to these quantitative data, the morphological analysis of the immunostained substantia nigra showed an evident reduction in neuropil (Fig. <xref rid="Fig1" ref-type="fig">1</xref>), possibly reflecting neurite losses in nigral neurons. The reduction in immunoreactivity levels and also the deteriorated aspect of neuropil in nigral neurons were reversed by the treatment with VCE-003.2 (Fig. <xref rid="Fig1" ref-type="fig">1</xref>). In addition, we also found a lowering effect of VCE-003.2 on the intense microgliosis provoked by LPS and revealed by Iba-1 (<italic toggle="yes">F</italic>(3,18) = 6.76, <italic toggle="yes">p</italic> &lt; 0.005; see Fig. <xref rid="Fig2" ref-type="fig">2</xref>) and Cd68 (<italic toggle="yes">F</italic>(3,19) = 5.03, <italic toggle="yes">p</italic> &lt; 0.05; see Fig. <xref rid="Fig3" ref-type="fig">3</xref>) immunostaining in the substantia nigra. Such microgliosis was evident not only by the elevated immunoreactivity but also by the presence of microglial cells (labeled with Iba-1) with ameboid aspect (activated state) compared with the ramified form (quiescent state) currently found in controls (Fig. <xref rid="Fig2" ref-type="fig">2</xref>). The treatment with VCE-003.2 changed this activated morphology towards a classic resting aspect (Fig. <xref rid="Fig2" ref-type="fig">2</xref>). In addition, using a double immunofluorescence analysis for TH and Cd68, we confirmed that this reactive microgliosis was specifically located inside and surrounding the substantia nigra pars compacta and associated with the loss of TH-positive neurons. This analysis is presented as a supplementary figure (see Additional file <xref rid="MOESM1" ref-type="media">1</xref>) and demonstrates the proximity of TH and Cd68 labeling, but the expected lack of any overlapping.<fig id="Fig1" position="float" orientation="portrait"><label>Fig. 1</label><caption><p>Intensity of the immunostaining for TH (bottom right panel) measured in a selected area of the substantia nigra pars compacta of adult male mice at 3 weeks of being subjected to an intrastriatal injection of LPS and daily treated with VCE-003.2 (10 mg/kg), alone or combined with T0070907 (5 mg/kg), or vehicle. Immunoreactivity values are measures in the lesioned side over the non-lesioned side and correspond to means ± SEM of 4–6 subjects <italic toggle="yes">per</italic> group. Data were assessed by the one-way analysis of variance followed by the Student–Newman–Keuls test (*<italic toggle="yes">p</italic> &lt; 0.05 versus vehicle-treated control mice). Representative immunostaining images for each experimental group, with indication of the approximate area quantified, are shown in the top and left panels (scale bar = 100 μm)</p></caption><graphic xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" id="MO1" position="float" orientation="portrait" xlink:href="12974_2018_1060_Fig1_HTML.jpg"><?image-name 12974_2018_1060_Fig1_HTML.jpg?><?image-size 84148?><?image-md5 dd00fa17200af090c06af438f87c9c8d?><?image-image-server-status NEVER_LOAD?><?image-original-height 381?><?image-original-width 567?><?image-scaled-height 381?><?image-scaled-width 567?><?image-cloudpmc-urn urn:cdn:blobs/ee4d/5771072/dd00fa17200a/12974_2018_1060_Fig1_HTML.jpg?><?thumb-name 12974_2018_1060_Fig1_HTML.gif?><?thumb-size 143236?><?thumb-md5 9d9d08c9277952e5992998186979964d?><?thumb-image-server-status NEVER_LOAD?><?thumb-scaled-height 381?><?thumb-scaled-width 567?><?thumb-cloudpmc-urn urn:cdn:blobs/ee4d/5771072/9d9d08c92779/12974_2018_1060_Fig1_HTML.gif?></graphic></fig><fig id="Fig2" position="float" orientation="portrait"><label>Fig. 2</label><caption><p>Intensity of the immunostaining for Iba-1 (bottom right panel) measured in a selected area of the substantia nigra pars compacta of adult male mice at 3 weeks of being subjected to an intrastriatal injection of LPS and daily treated with VCE-003.2 (10 mg/kg), alone or combined with T0070907 (5 mg/kg), or vehicle. Immunoreactivity values are measures in the lesioned side over the non-lesioned side and correspond to means ± SEM of 4–6 subjects <italic toggle="yes">per</italic> group. Data were assessed by the one-way analysis of variance followed by the Student–Newman–Keuls test (*<italic toggle="yes">p</italic> &lt; 0.05, **<italic toggle="yes">p</italic> &lt; 0.01 versus vehicle-treated control mice; <sup>#</sup><italic toggle="yes">p</italic> &lt; 0.05 versus VCE-003.2-treated LPS-lesioned mice). Representative Iba-1 immunostaining images for each experimental group are shown in the top and left panels (scale bar = 100 μm), including a specific inlet showing the morphological characteristics of Iba-1-labeled cells (scale bar = 25 μm)</p></caption><graphic xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" id="MO2" position="float" orientation="portrait" xlink:href="12974_2018_1060_Fig2_HTML.jpg"><?image-name 12974_2018_1060_Fig2_HTML.jpg?><?image-size 83672?><?image-md5 3c3750b91ce2fcd6a6e89e7b7f5b0fa2?><?image-image-server-status NEVER_LOAD?><?image-original-height 403?><?image-original-width 568?><?image-scaled-height 403?><?image-scaled-width 568?><?image-cloudpmc-urn urn:cdn:blobs/ee4d/5771072/3c3750b91ce2/12974_2018_1060_Fig2_HTML.jpg?><?thumb-name 12974_2018_1060_Fig2_HTML.gif?><?thumb-size 127942?><?thumb-md5 0115a4a1f4e0fb50214a1a9c2c7a0725?><?thumb-image-server-status NEVER_LOAD?><?thumb-scaled-height 403?><?thumb-scaled-width 568?><?thumb-cloudpmc-urn urn:cdn:blobs/ee4d/5771072/0115a4a1f4e0/12974_2018_1060_Fig2_HTML.gif?></graphic></fig><fig id="Fig3" position="float" orientation="portrait"><label>Fig. 3</label><caption><p>Intensity of the immunostaining for Cd68 (left panel) measured in a selected area of the substantia nigra pars compacta of adult male mice at 3 weeks of being subjected to an intrastriatal injection of LPS and daily treated with VCE-003.2 (10 mg/kg), alone or combined with T0070907 (5 mg/kg), or vehicle. Immunoreactivity values are measures in the lesioned side over the non-lesioned side and correspond to means ± SEM of 4–6 subjects <italic toggle="yes">per</italic> group. Data were assessed by the one-way analysis of variance followed by the Student–Newman–Keuls test (*<italic toggle="yes">p</italic> &lt; 0.05, **<italic toggle="yes">p</italic> &lt; 0.01 versus vehicle-treated control mice). Representative Cd68 immunostaining images for each experimental group are shown in the right panels (scale bar = 100 μm)</p></caption><graphic xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" id="MO3" position="float" orientation="portrait" xlink:href="12974_2018_1060_Fig3_HTML.jpg"><?image-name 12974_2018_1060_Fig3_HTML.jpg?><?image-size 56996?><?image-md5 d2441fcd4686a85c8fedb8e00ea6704b?><?image-image-server-status NEVER_LOAD?><?image-original-height 339?><?image-original-width 567?><?image-scaled-height 339?><?image-scaled-width 567?><?image-cloudpmc-urn urn:cdn:blobs/ee4d/5771072/d2441fcd4686/12974_2018_1060_Fig3_HTML.jpg?><?thumb-name 12974_2018_1060_Fig3_HTML.gif?><?thumb-size 88669?><?thumb-md5 0fb872966875ade00f6d30e52314f05d?><?thumb-image-server-status NEVER_LOAD?><?thumb-scaled-height 339?><?thumb-scaled-width 567?><?thumb-cloudpmc-urn urn:cdn:blobs/ee4d/5771072/0fb872966875/12974_2018_1060_Fig3_HTML.gif?></graphic></fig></p><p id="Par46">We also analyzed by qPCR several proinflammatory markers typical of the activated microglial cells recruited at the lesioned ipsilateral striatum, always compared to the non-lesioned contralateral side. As expected, we detected a strong elevation in the expression of two proinflammatory cytokines TNF-α (<italic toggle="yes">F</italic>(3,19) = 4.375, <italic toggle="yes">p</italic> &lt; 0.05; Fig. <xref rid="Fig4" ref-type="fig">4</xref>) and IL-1β (<italic toggle="yes">F</italic>(3,19) = 6.472, <italic toggle="yes">p</italic> &lt; 0.005; Fig. <xref rid="Fig4" ref-type="fig">4</xref>), as well as in the proinflammatory enzyme iNOS (<italic toggle="yes">F</italic>(3,19) = 6.808, <italic toggle="yes">p</italic> &lt; 0.005; Fig. <xref rid="Fig4" ref-type="fig">4</xref>) in the striatum of LPS-lesioned mice, all of them compatible with the microglial activation found in these mice (Figs. <xref rid="Fig2" ref-type="fig">2</xref> and <xref rid="Fig3" ref-type="fig">3</xref>). The elevation in iNOS was attenuated by the treatment with VCE-003.2, with differences between vehicle- and VCE-003.2-treated LPS-lesioned mice being statistically significant (Fig. <xref rid="Fig4" ref-type="fig">4</xref>). Moreover, the treatment of LPS-lesioned mice with VCE-003.2, although did not reach a statistically significant difference compared to vehicle-treated LPS-lesioned animals in TNF-α and IL-1β, provoked that the values for both cytokines are no longer statistically different compared to control mice, thus supporting a modest but evident effect (Fig. <xref rid="Fig4" ref-type="fig">4</xref>).<fig id="Fig4" position="float" orientation="portrait"><label>Fig. 4</label><caption><p>mRNA levels for TNF-α, IL-1β, and iNOS in the striatum of adult male mice at 3 weeks of being subjected to an intrastriatal injection of LPS and daily treated with VCE-003.2 (10 mg/kg), alone or combined with T0070907 (5 mg/kg), or vehicle. Values are the ratio between the lesioned side and the non-lesioned side and correspond to means ± SEM of 4–6 subjects <italic toggle="yes">per</italic> group. Data were assessed by the one-way analysis of variance followed by the Student–Newman–Keuls test (*<italic toggle="yes">p</italic> &lt; 0.05, **<italic toggle="yes">p</italic> &lt; 0.01 versus vehicle-treated control mice; <sup>#</sup><italic toggle="yes">p</italic> &lt; 0.05 versus VCE-003.2-treated LPS-lesioned mice)</p></caption><graphic xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" id="MO4" position="float" orientation="portrait" xlink:href="12974_2018_1060_Fig4_HTML.jpg"><?image-name 12974_2018_1060_Fig4_HTML.jpg?><?image-size 32098?><?image-md5 bd04455629085a62a6bb8361e632cc64?><?image-image-server-status NEVER_LOAD?><?image-original-height 227?><?image-original-width 778?><?image-scaled-height 227?><?image-scaled-width 778?><?image-cloudpmc-urn urn:cdn:blobs/ee4d/5771072/bd0445562908/12974_2018_1060_Fig4_HTML.jpg?><?thumb-name 12974_2018_1060_Fig4_HTML.gif?><?thumb-size 14775?><?thumb-md5 219e49b341396dafaa78881b57656b31?><?thumb-image-server-status NEVER_LOAD?><?thumb-scaled-height 227?><?thumb-scaled-width 778?><?thumb-cloudpmc-urn urn:cdn:blobs/ee4d/5771072/219e49b34139/12974_2018_1060_Fig4_HTML.gif?></graphic></fig></p><p id="Par47">The most interesting was that these effects and also those observed with VCE-003.2 on the microglial activation (Iba-1 and Cd68 immunostaining) disappeared when the CBG derivative was co-administered with the PPARγ antagonist T0070907 (Figs. <xref rid="Fig2" ref-type="fig">2</xref>, <xref rid="Fig3" ref-type="fig">3</xref>, and <xref rid="Fig4" ref-type="fig">4</xref>), then supporting the involvement of this nuclear receptor in VCE-003.2 effects. The only effect of VCE-003.2 that was not reversed by T0070907 in a statistically significant manner was the recovery in TH immunostaining, although the pattern of changes showed the expected tendency (Fig. <xref rid="Fig1" ref-type="fig">1</xref>). It is also important to remark that, in some cases, e.g., Iba-1 and Cd68 immunostaining and IL-1β and iNOS gene expression, the values reached after the blockade of PPARγ receptors in VCE-003.2-treated LPS-lesioned mice were even elevated when compared to the vehicle-treated LPS-lesioned mice (Figs. <xref rid="Fig2" ref-type="fig">2</xref>, <xref rid="Fig3" ref-type="fig">3</xref>, and <xref rid="Fig4" ref-type="fig">4</xref>). This may suggest the existence of an endogenous basal tone activating PPARγ, whose apparent beneficial effects would be eliminated only when these receptors are blocked. Such idea would be concordant with previous data showing that GW9662, another irreversible PPARγ inhibitor, was toxic for dopaminergic neurons in MPTP-treated mice [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CR33">33</xref>].</p><p id="Par48">This evaluation of the neuroprotective effects of VCE-003.2 in in vivo models of PD also included experiments in an additional model of parkinsonism, mice lesioned with 6-hydroxydopamine, which, contrarily to LPS-lesioned mice, is a model with poor inflammation and glial reactivity and mainly based on oxidative stress derived from mitochondrial dysfunction. These data are presented as a supplementary material (see Additional file <xref rid="MOESM3" ref-type="media">3</xref>).</p></sec><sec id="Sec17"><title>Anti-inflammatory effects of VCE-003.2 against a LPS insult in cultured BV2 cells</title><p id="Par49">Next, we used some in vitro approaches to further investigate the benefits found with VCE-003.2 in the inflammatory in vivo model of PD. We investigated first the anti-inflammatory profile of VCE-003.2 in cultured BV2 cells exposed to LPS. On the one hand, VCE-003.2 was able to attenuate the LPS-induced release of TNF-α (<italic toggle="yes">F</italic>(2,43) = 104.4, <italic toggle="yes">p</italic> &lt; 0.0001; Fig. <xref rid="Fig5" ref-type="fig">5</xref>) and reduced the <italic toggle="yes">p</italic> values compared to controls in the case of IL-1β (<italic toggle="yes">F</italic>(2,44) = 18.72, <italic toggle="yes">p</italic> &lt; 0.0001; Fig. <xref rid="Fig5" ref-type="fig">5</xref>), with both cytokines being measured in culture media using ELISA kits. On the other hand, this was associated with similar changes measured by qPCR in cell pellets, with elevations after LPS which were attenuated after the treatment with VCE-003.2 for TNF-α (<italic toggle="yes">F</italic>(3,27) = 8.327, <italic toggle="yes">p</italic> &lt; 0.001; Fig. <xref rid="Fig6" ref-type="fig">6</xref>) and for two proinflammatory enzymes like COX-2 (<italic toggle="yes">F</italic>(3,27) = 16.10, <italic toggle="yes">p</italic> &lt; 0.0001; Fig. <xref rid="Fig6" ref-type="fig">6</xref>) and iNOS (<italic toggle="yes">F</italic>(3,27) = 35.95, <italic toggle="yes">p</italic> &lt; 0.0001; Fig. <xref rid="Fig6" ref-type="fig">6</xref>). Again, in the case of IL-1β (<italic toggle="yes">F</italic>(3,27) = 5.05, <italic toggle="yes">p</italic> &lt; 0.01; Fig. <xref rid="Fig6" ref-type="fig">6</xref>), the effect of VCE-003.2 consisted in a reduction in <italic toggle="yes">p</italic> values compared to controls (Fig. <xref rid="Fig6" ref-type="fig">6</xref>). However, these effects of VCE-003.2 effects were not inhibited by the PPARγ antagonist GW9662; in fact, they were apparently enhanced in the presence of this antagonist (Fig. <xref rid="Fig6" ref-type="fig">6</xref>). We do not believe that this result may be due to the change in the PPARγ antagonist because, as mentioned above, GW9662 is other synthetic irreversible PPARγ antagonist, which, as T0070907, covalently binds to Cys285 into the PPARγ ligand-binding pocket (LBP). The only difference between both antagonists is a single nitrogen substitution, so that both compounds can be indistinctly used as a tool to investigate PPARγ activation by different ligand activators. Hence, the fact that the effects of VCE-003.2 were not reversed by GW9662, which would presumably occur with T0070907 too, might indicate that, in LPS-treated BV2 cells, VCE-003.2 might act also through PPARγ-independent mechanisms, and this may be the consequence of the well-known LPS-induced downregulation of these receptors found in BV2 cells [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CR34">34</xref>] and also in macrophages [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CR35">35</xref>]. However, we do not believe that this may happen in our study, as we have evidence that both RGZ and VCE-003.2 increase the expression of PPARγ, which, in general, is known to be upregulated by PPARγ ligand agonists, counteracting the repressive effect of LPS on the expression of this nuclear receptor (see Additional file <xref rid="MOESM2" ref-type="media">2</xref>). As regards the enhancing action of GW9662 on VCE-003.2 effects in LPS-treated BV2 cells, we believe that they may be related to an additive interaction of both at the PPARγ LBP derived from a potential activity of GW9662 as partial agonist too. This has been previously described for different biological activities of this class of antagonists [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CR36">36</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CR37">37</xref>], whereas, in our hands, both GW9662 and T0070907 exert PPARγ transcriptional activity in a Gal4-Luc system, although to a much lesser extent than RGZ and VCE-003.2 (data not shown).<fig id="Fig5" position="float" orientation="portrait"><label>Fig. 5</label><caption><p>Levels of TNF-α and IL-1β measured in the media of cultured BV2 cells exposed to LPS (0.5 μg/ml) in the presence or absence of VCE-003.2 (5 μM). Values are means ± SEM of at least 4 independent experiments each performed in triplicate. Data were assessed by the one-way analysis of variance followed by the Student–Newman–Keuls test (**<italic toggle="yes">p</italic> &lt; 0.01, ***<italic toggle="yes">p</italic> &lt; 0.005 versus control cells (no treated with LPS); <sup>###</sup><italic toggle="yes">p</italic> &lt; 0.005 versus cells treated with LPS)</p></caption><graphic xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" id="MO5" position="float" orientation="portrait" xlink:href="12974_2018_1060_Fig5_HTML.jpg"><?image-name 12974_2018_1060_Fig5_HTML.jpg?><?image-size 14522?><?image-md5 2a83f3af45f8b6a713aaddb530dd3795?><?image-image-server-status NEVER_LOAD?><?image-original-height 195?><?image-original-width 358?><?image-scaled-height 195?><?image-scaled-width 358?><?image-cloudpmc-urn urn:cdn:blobs/ee4d/5771072/2a83f3af45f8/12974_2018_1060_Fig5_HTML.jpg?><?thumb-name 12974_2018_1060_Fig5_HTML.gif?><?thumb-size 7311?><?thumb-md5 730da2e0abd3b3028322303cc8757c83?><?thumb-image-server-status NEVER_LOAD?><?thumb-scaled-height 195?><?thumb-scaled-width 358?><?thumb-cloudpmc-urn urn:cdn:blobs/ee4d/5771072/730da2e0abd3/12974_2018_1060_Fig5_HTML.gif?></graphic></fig><fig id="Fig6" position="float" orientation="portrait"><label>Fig. 6</label><caption><p>mRNA levels for TNF-α, IL-1β, COX-2, and iNOS measured in the cell pellets of cultured BV2 cells exposed to LPS (0.5 μg/ml) in the presence or absence of VCE-003.2 (5 μM) and/or GW9662 (10 μM). Values are means ± SEM of at least 7 independent experiments each performed in duplicate. Data were assessed by the one-way analysis of variance followed by the Student–Newman–Keuls test (*<italic toggle="yes">p</italic> &lt; 0.05, **<italic toggle="yes">p</italic> &lt; 0.01, ***<italic toggle="yes">p</italic> &lt; 0.005 versus control cells (no treated with LPS); <sup>#</sup><italic toggle="yes">p</italic> &lt; 0.05, <sup>###</sup><italic toggle="yes">p</italic> &lt; 0.005 versus cells treated with LPS)</p></caption><graphic xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" id="MO6" position="float" orientation="portrait" xlink:href="12974_2018_1060_Fig6_HTML.jpg"><?image-name 12974_2018_1060_Fig6_HTML.jpg?><?image-size 36594?><?image-md5 c215b7d0b9cae91befacb8bee0661b48?><?image-image-server-status NEVER_LOAD?><?image-original-height 233?><?image-original-width 778?><?image-scaled-height 233?><?image-scaled-width 778?><?image-cloudpmc-urn urn:cdn:blobs/ee4d/5771072/c215b7d0b9ca/12974_2018_1060_Fig6_HTML.jpg?><?thumb-name 12974_2018_1060_Fig6_HTML.gif?><?thumb-size 10291?><?thumb-md5 e231eabbdcdfa3876cc448d2194099e1?><?thumb-image-server-status NEVER_LOAD?><?thumb-scaled-height 233?><?thumb-scaled-width 778?><?thumb-cloudpmc-urn urn:cdn:blobs/ee4d/5771072/e231eabbdcdf/12974_2018_1060_Fig6_HTML.gif?></graphic></fig></p></sec><sec id="Sec18"><title>Neuroprotective effects of VCE-003.2 in M-213 neuronal cells exposed to conditioned media generated by cultured BV2 cells exposed to LPS</title><p id="Par50">The second in vitro approach we used to further explore the neuroprotective properties of VCE-003.2 in PD consisted in investigating its capability to protect cultured M-213 neuronal cells against death induced by exposure to conditioned media generated from cultured BV2 cells overexposed to LPS. This is a classic method to investigate neuroprotection against inflammation-driven neurotoxicity [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CR22">22</xref>]. First, we wanted to evaluate different concentrations of VCE-003.2 and what we found was the classic dual effect of cannabinoids, with low concentrations (0.1–0.5 μM) preserving M-213 cells against the inflammatory insult, to a similar extent than RGZ used as a positive control for PPARγ, whereas higher concentrations, but not particularly high (1 μM), resulted toxic (<italic toggle="yes">F</italic>(9,38) = 24.95, <italic toggle="yes">p</italic> &lt; 0.0001; Fig. <xref rid="Fig7" ref-type="fig">7</xref>). This was mostly similar to the results found with VCE-003.2 in cultured neural progenitor cells, in which toxicity was evident from a concentration of 2 μM [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CR19">19</xref>]. The three concentrations of VCE-003.2 and RGZ were examined also in the presence of the PPARγ receptor inhibitor T0070907 in order to determine whether their effects were mediated by activation of these receptors. However, whereas the effect of RGZ was completely reversed by the PPARγ receptor inhibitor T0070907, this inhibitor was inactive against the effect of VCE-003.2 at the two protective concentrations (Fig. <xref rid="Fig7" ref-type="fig">7</xref>), then suggesting the contribution of mechanisms other than the canonic activation of PPARγ in these effects. The same happened with the toxic concentration (Fig. <xref rid="Fig7" ref-type="fig">7</xref>).<fig id="Fig7" position="float" orientation="portrait"><label>Fig. 7</label><caption><p>Cell viability measured in cultured M-213 cells treated with different concentrations of VCE-003.2 (0.1, 0.5, and 1.0 μM) or RGZ (20 μM) in the presence or the absence of T0070907 (10 μM) and exposed to conditioned media generated from LPS-stimulated BV2 cells. The control (100% of cell viability) consisted in M-213 cells that were exposed to conditioned media in the absence of LPS. Values are means ± SEM of at least 4 independent experiments each performed in duplicate. Data were assessed by the one-way analysis of variance followed by the Student–Newman–Keuls test (*<italic toggle="yes">p</italic> &lt; 0.05, **<italic toggle="yes">p</italic> &lt; 0.01, ***<italic toggle="yes">p</italic> &lt; 0.005 compared to the control cells (incubated with conditioned media no generated with LPS); <sup>@</sup><italic toggle="yes">p</italic> &lt; 0.05, <sup>@@</sup><italic toggle="yes">p</italic> &lt; 0.01 versus cells treated with RGZ, as well as versus cells treated with VCE-003.2 (0.1 and 0.5 μM) combined or not with T0070907 (incubated with conditioned media generated with LPS))</p></caption><graphic xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" id="MO7" position="float" orientation="portrait" xlink:href="12974_2018_1060_Fig7_HTML.jpg"><?image-name 12974_2018_1060_Fig7_HTML.jpg?><?image-size 21322?><?image-md5 65275c3bb633920efe7911f445bde626?><?image-image-server-status NEVER_LOAD?><?image-original-height 309?><?image-original-width 358?><?image-scaled-height 309?><?image-scaled-width 358?><?image-cloudpmc-urn urn:cdn:blobs/ee4d/5771072/65275c3bb633/12974_2018_1060_Fig7_HTML.jpg?><?thumb-name 12974_2018_1060_Fig7_HTML.gif?><?thumb-size 10793?><?thumb-md5 7edbb3d5464b66b5a37ddf6a04070505?><?thumb-image-server-status NEVER_LOAD?><?thumb-scaled-height 309?><?thumb-scaled-width 358?><?thumb-cloudpmc-urn urn:cdn:blobs/ee4d/5771072/7edbb3d5464b/12974_2018_1060_Fig7_HTML.gif?></graphic></fig></p></sec><sec id="Sec19"><title>VCE-003.2 binds to the canonical and alternative sites in the PPARγ LBP</title><p id="Par51">We have previously shown that VCE-003.2 is a PPARγ partial agonist compared to RGZ [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CR19">19</xref>]. PPARγ receptor ligands can induce a graded response such as full and partial agonism and antagonism that may depend on the mode of interaction and binding to the LBP [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CR20">20</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CR38">38</xref>]. Thus, we were interested to study the potential functionality of the canonical and alternative PPARγ sites involved in the response to VCE-003.2. Luciferase reporter assays were used to measure PPARγ-dependent transcription, and RGZ (<italic toggle="yes">F</italic>(13,28) = 84.77, <italic toggle="yes">p</italic> &lt; 0.0001; Fig. <xref rid="Fig8" ref-type="fig">8</xref>a) and VCE-003.2 (<italic toggle="yes">F</italic>(13,35) = 15.41, <italic toggle="yes">p</italic> &lt; 0.005; Fig. <xref rid="Fig8" ref-type="fig">8</xref>b) showed increase in PPARγ transactivation. To study the participation of the alternative binding site, the cells were pre-incubated with T0070907 before treating the cells with the agonist ligands. T0070907 did not block the action of VCE-003.2 (Fig. <xref rid="Fig8" ref-type="fig">8</xref>b), but it was very effective to block RGZ-induced PPARγ transactivation (Fig. <xref rid="Fig8" ref-type="fig">8</xref>a) that is consistent with the fact that RGZ activates PPARγ by acting mainly through the canonical binding site [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CR20">20</xref>]. To further analyze the effects of VCE-003.2 at this nuclear receptor, we studied the behavior of this compound in the presence of RGZ. To achieve this, GAL4-PPARγ/GAL4-luc co-transfected cells were pre-incubated with increasing concentrations of VCE-003.2, then treated with 1 μM RGZ. VCE-003.2 did not affect RGZ-induced PPARγ transactivation, thus suggesting that VCE-003.2 does not compete with RGZ for the same binding site at the LBP PPARγ (Fig. <xref rid="Fig8" ref-type="fig">8</xref>c).<fig id="Fig8" position="float" orientation="portrait"><label>Fig. 8</label><caption><p>Effects of T0070907 on RGZ- and VCE-003.2-induced PPARγ transcriptional activity and MSCs differentiation. HEK-293T cells were transiently transfected with PPARγ-GAL4 plus GAL4-luc, pre-incubated with T0070907 (5 μM) for 15 min and then treated with increasing concentrations of either RGZ (<bold>a</bold>) or VCE-003.2 (<bold>b</bold>) for 6 h and luciferase activity measured in the cell lysates (open circles, PPARγ ligand; dark circles, PPARγ ligand plus T0070907). <bold>c</bold> Cells were transfected with the same pair of plasmids and treated with RGZ, VCE-003.2, or a combination of both compounds for 6 h and luciferase activity measured in the cell lysates. T0070907 prevented <bold>d</bold> RGZ- and <bold>e</bold> VCE-003.2-induced adipogenic differentiation in MSCs. The cells were differentiated in AM in the presence of RGZ and VCE-003.2 in the absence and the presence of T0070907, and adipogenic markers were characterized. Gene expression of adipogenic markers such as <italic toggle="yes">PPARγ2</italic>, <italic toggle="yes">LPL</italic>, <italic toggle="yes">FABP4</italic>, <italic toggle="yes">CEBPA</italic>, and <italic toggle="yes">ADIPOQ</italic> were measured after 7 days of differentiation. Data were assessed by the one-way analysis of variance followed by the Tukey test (*<italic toggle="yes">p</italic> &lt; 0.05, **<italic toggle="yes">p</italic> &lt; 0.01, ***<italic toggle="yes">p</italic> &lt; 0.001 RGZ or VCE-003.2 compared to the control cells; <sup><bold>##</bold></sup><italic toggle="yes">p</italic> &lt; 0.01, <sup><bold>###</bold></sup><italic toggle="yes">p</italic> &lt; 0.001 RGZ or VCE-003.2 + T0070907 compared to RGZ- or VCE-003.2-treated cells)</p></caption><graphic xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" id="MO8" position="float" orientation="portrait" xlink:href="12974_2018_1060_Fig8_HTML.jpg"><?image-name 12974_2018_1060_Fig8_HTML.jpg?><?image-size 71955?><?image-md5 d72d3336f5f8be799f7deb42f01403b1?><?image-image-server-status NEVER_LOAD?><?image-original-height 576?><?image-original-width 778?><?image-scaled-height 576?><?image-scaled-width 778?><?image-cloudpmc-urn urn:cdn:blobs/ee4d/5771072/d72d3336f5f8/12974_2018_1060_Fig8_HTML.jpg?><?thumb-name 12974_2018_1060_Fig8_HTML.gif?><?thumb-size 19041?><?thumb-md5 c9da567e6d5daf372717a523f656e78c?><?thumb-image-server-status NEVER_LOAD?><?thumb-scaled-height 576?><?thumb-scaled-width 778?><?thumb-cloudpmc-urn urn:cdn:blobs/ee4d/5771072/c9da567e6d5d/12974_2018_1060_Fig8_HTML.gif?></graphic></fig></p><p id="Par52">Next, we also studied the action of VCE-003.2 in MSCs, which is a valid cell model to assess endogenous PPARγ function related to adipogenic differentiation. MSCs were differentiated to adipocytes in the presence of VCE-003.2 or RGZ with or without T0070907 for 7 days, as reflected the data of mRNA expression for the PPARγ-dependent genes PPARγ2, LPL, CEBPA, ADIPOQ, and FABP4 analyzed by RT-PCR. In the absence of an antagonist, both RGZ [PPARγ2: <italic toggle="yes">F</italic>(3,8) = 67.85, <italic toggle="yes">p</italic> &lt; 0.0001; LPL: <italic toggle="yes">F</italic>(3,8) = 114.4, <italic toggle="yes">p</italic> &lt; 0.0001; CEBPA: <italic toggle="yes">F</italic>(3,8) = 27.37, <italic toggle="yes">p</italic> = 0.0005; ADIPOQ: <italic toggle="yes">F</italic>(3,8) = 491.1, <italic toggle="yes">p</italic> &lt; 0.0001; FABP4: <italic toggle="yes">F</italic>(3,8) = 50.45, <italic toggle="yes">p</italic> &lt; 0.0001; Fig. <xref rid="Fig8" ref-type="fig">8</xref>d] and VCE-003.2 [PPARγ2: <italic toggle="yes">F</italic>(3,8) = 67.85, <italic toggle="yes">p</italic> &lt; 0.0001; LPL: <italic toggle="yes">F</italic>(3,8) = 63.38, <italic toggle="yes">p</italic> &lt; 0.001; CEBPA: <italic toggle="yes">F</italic>(3,8) = 16.29, <italic toggle="yes">p</italic> &lt; 0,005; ADIPOQ: <italic toggle="yes">F</italic>(3,8) = 24.67, <italic toggle="yes">p</italic> = 0.0016; FABP4: <italic toggle="yes">F</italic>(3,8) = 50.45, <italic toggle="yes">p</italic> &lt; 0.0001; Fig. <xref rid="Fig8" ref-type="fig">8</xref>e] upregulated the expression of these adipogenic-related genes, although to a different extent, thus confirming the differences between a full PPARγ agonist (RGZ) and a PPARγ modulator (VCE-003.2) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CR19">19</xref>]. T0070907 abrogate the effects of both RGZ (Fig. <xref rid="Fig8" ref-type="fig">8</xref>d) and VCE-003.2 (Fig. <xref rid="Fig8" ref-type="fig">8</xref>e) on the expression of PPARγ-dependent genes, indicating that VCE-003.2 is also functional through the canonical LBP.</p><p id="Par53">To confirm the ability of VCE-003.2 to adopt different binding modes, we performed docking simulation studies using crystal structures 3B0R, 4EMA, and 2Q59 deposited in the Protein Data Bank (PDB). Molecular docking demonstrated that VCE-03.2 molecule binds to the hydrophobic core within the 11-helix bundle (canonical site) and also to the side of the Ω loop β3-β4 region in Helix 3 (alternative binding site). Moreover, in the presence of GW9662, VCE-003.2 only binds to the alternative site by interacting with Ser342 in the Ω loop β3 and Gly284 in Helix 3 (Fig. <xref rid="Fig9" ref-type="fig">9</xref>).<fig id="Fig9" position="float" orientation="portrait"><label>Fig. 9</label><caption><p>PPARγ LBD structures 3B0R, 4EMA, and 2Q59 bound to VCE-003.2 (yellow) with and without of GW9662 (orange). Binding of VCE-003.2 to the alternative binding site through Ser342 in the Ω loop β3 for crystals 4EMA (Ki = 2.11 μM), 2Q59 (Ki = 2.24 μM), and 3B0R (358.38 nM). In the presence of GW9662, VCE-003.2 binds to G284 of Helix 3 and Ser342 on the Ω loop and GW9662 binds to the canonical LPB site (Ki for VCE-003.2 = 711.27 nM). Analysis of VCE-003.2 binding to the canonical LBP site by interacting with Ser289 (2Q59: Ki for VCE-003.2 = 1.49 μM), R288 (3B0R: Ki for VCE-003.2 = 3.21 μM), and H449 (4EMA, Ki for VCE-003.2 = 607.81 nM) on Helix 11</p></caption><graphic xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" id="MO9" position="float" orientation="portrait" xlink:href="12974_2018_1060_Fig9_HTML.jpg"><?image-name 12974_2018_1060_Fig9_HTML.jpg?><?image-size 105231?><?image-md5 ccf0a0377e9ea3c79cd48a4576bd8336?><?image-image-server-status NEVER_LOAD?><?image-original-height 352?><?image-original-width 779?><?image-scaled-height 352?><?image-scaled-width 779?><?image-cloudpmc-urn urn:cdn:blobs/ee4d/5771072/ccf0a0377e9e/12974_2018_1060_Fig9_HTML.jpg?><?thumb-name 12974_2018_1060_Fig9_HTML.gif?><?thumb-size 103328?><?thumb-md5 252de205ce333ae1fd0338f4231467e7?><?thumb-image-server-status NEVER_LOAD?><?thumb-scaled-height 352?><?thumb-scaled-width 779?><?thumb-cloudpmc-urn urn:cdn:blobs/ee4d/5771072/252de205ce33/12974_2018_1060_Fig9_HTML.gif?></graphic></fig></p></sec></sec><sec id="Sec20"><title>Discussion</title><p id="Par54">Whether neuroinflammation and microglia activation is a consequence or a cause of nigral cell deterioration and death in PD has been a controversial issue for years. However, it appears that presently, there is a general consensus about the important pathogenic role played by glial activation in this disease [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CR39">39</xref>], with increasing evidence supporting that glia-driven inflammation contributes to the progressive degeneration of nigral dopaminergic neurons even in early phases of PD in patients [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CR40">40</xref>]. Such situation may be experimentally reproduced using LPS insults into the nigrostriatal area [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CR24">24</xref>], but it can be also found in other experimental models of PD [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CR41">41</xref>] and identified in postmortem PD brains at autopsy [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CR42">42</xref>]. In addition, epidemiological data support that the regular use of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (e.g., ibuprofen) reduces the risk of developing PD [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CR43">43</xref>], a fact that gives an instrumental value to the control of inflammation in PD. Based on this idea, different anti-inflammatory agents have been investigated, at preclinical and even clinical levels, with variable success in PD. This includes inhibitors of iNOS or COX-2, non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, the antibiotic minocycline, piaglitazone and other PPARγ activators, purinergic P2X receptor antagonists, and immunosuppressants [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CR39">39</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CR42">42</xref>].</p><p id="Par55">Cannabinoids have been also investigated for the reduction of inflammatory events in PD using mainly selective CB<sub>2</sub> receptor agonists [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CR2">2</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CR44">44</xref>]. The rationale to do that is based on the frequent upregulatory responses elicited by these receptors, predominantly in microglial cells and infiltrated macrophages recruited at the CNS areas lesioned in PD [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CR4">4</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CR6">6</xref>], as well as on the anti-inflammatory and neuroprotective effects derived from the selective activation of these upregulated receptors [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CR4">4</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CR6">6</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CR7">7</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CR9">9</xref>]. However, another line of evidence may derive from the possibility to target PPARγ receptors with certain cannabinoids in PD. Such evidence is based on (i) the relevant role played by these nuclear receptors in the control of inflammation in numerous pathological conditions [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CR45">45</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CR46">46</xref>]; (ii) the well-described PPARγ-mediated anti-inflammatory activity of certain cannabinoids in different models of central and peripheral inflammation [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CR11">11</xref>]; and (iii) the effects of non-cannabinoid PPARγ activators (e.g., thiazolidinediones [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CR14">14</xref>]) in PD. PPAR receptors function as lipid sensors forming heterodimers with the retinoic acid X receptor and binding to regulatory DNA elements so-called peroxisome proliferator response elements (PPREs), then regulating transcription of a wide range of genes [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CR47">47</xref>]. The three different PPAR isotypes (-α, -β/δ, and -γ) are expressed in all cell types in the brain [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CR48">48</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CR49">49</xref>], and all of them, by functioning in an integrated manner as a complex system, so-called the PPAR triad, have been reported to have neuroprotective properties (reviewed recently in [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CR47">47</xref>]).</p><p id="Par56">In the present study, we attempted to activate PPARγ receptors using a CBG derivative, VCE-003.2, which has been previously found to be partial agonist at these receptors, and to investigate its potential in experimental models of PD. Thus, VCE-003.2 was investigated in a classic inflammatory rodent model of PD generated by intrastriatal application of LPS. This insult enhances reactive microgliosis, reflected by elevated Iba-1 and Cd68 immunostaining in the substantia nigra, in parallel to an elevation in the expression of proinflammatory markers in the striatum, including the cytokines TNF-α and IL-1β, and, in particular, iNOS. This is a pro-inflammatory enzyme which has been found to strongly contribute to deteriorate neuronal homeostasis in PD in conditions of reactive gliosis [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CR50">50</xref>–<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CR52">52</xref>], a fact reflected in the loss of TH-positive neurons found here. We previously reported that the same proinflammatory markers were strongly elevated by the LPS insult and such elevations were partially reversed by the selective activation of CB<sub>2</sub> receptors [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CR6">6</xref>]. Using VCE-003.2, which does not activate CB<sub>2</sub> receptors, we found the same response, reduction in the microglial reactivity in the substantia nigra and a marked reduction in the toxicity generated by these activated glial cells, which is reflected in the low levels of proinflammatory markers measured in the striatum of those LPS-lesioned animals treated with VCE-003.2. Such beneficial effects influenced the loss of TH-positive neurons in the substantia nigra, which was partially reduced. Our study also confirmed the involvement of an activation of PPARγ signaling in VCE-003.2 effects in LPS-lesioned mice, so in conditions of elevated glial reactivity and local inflammatory events. Such conclusion derives from the observation that the improvements reached with this CBG derivative in reactive microgliosis and the expression of proinflammatory markers disappeared when PPARγ receptors were blocked with a selective inhibitor that interacts with the canonical PPARγ LBP. Even, in some cases, the levels of reactive microgliosis and proinflammatory events appeared to be much higher after the blockade of PPARγ receptors, thus indicating the possible existence of an intrinsic endogenous activity of these nuclear receptors limiting inflammatory events that would disappear after the blockade with T0070907. A similar response was found in the study with VCE-003.2 conducted in experimental models of Huntington’s disease [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CR19">19</xref>]. In this sense, it has been shown that endogenous fatty acid ligands such as 15d-PGJ<sub>2</sub> and 5-oxo-ETE covalently bind to Cys285 in the PPARγ LBP and its transcriptional activities can be inhibited by T0070907 [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CR53">53</xref>]. Thus, it is conceivable that in brain inflammatory conditions, some eicosanoids are produced to limit neuronal damage, and therefore, blocking this protective response would result in a more exacerbated damage.</p><p id="Par57">Our in vivo study in LPS-lesioned mice was followed by investigation of the anti-inflammatory and neuroprotective properties of VCE-003.2 in a couple of in vitro experimental approaches using cultured LPS-exposed BV2 cells, alone or in combination with M-213 neuronal cells. Our objective was to confirm and, eventually, further explore in vitro the VCE-003.2-induced reduction in the LPS-induced generation of proinflammatory mediators, an objective that was completely attained with the first of the two in vitro approaches. Using only these microglia-related cells, we observed the expected increase in TNF-α, IL-1β, COX-2, and iNOS elicited by persistent exposure to LPS, which has been previously reported in other studies [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CR54">54</xref>] and how VCE-003.2 was able, in general, to attenuate these responses. The second in vitro approach used in this study was aimed at confirming the capability of VCE-003.2 to protect neurons against glia-driven inflammatory insults. We generated conditioned media from cultured BV2 cells overexposed to LPS and added these media to cultured M-213 neuronal cells in combination with VCE-003.2 to determine its effects on cell viability. Again, VCE-003.2, used at low concentrations, was able to provide neuroprotection. We found that the in vitro anti-inflammatory, neuroprotective, and transcriptional (see below) activities of VCE-003.2 were not inhibited by either GW9662 or T0070907, which are PPARγ antagonists commonly used to discriminate between PPARγ-dependent and PPARγ-independent activities. However, this assumption is no longer valid, as there is evidence of alternative binding sites in the PPARγ LBP that are functional and not affected by this class of PPARγ antagonists. Indeed, our docking and functional assays strongly suggest that VCE-003.2 is a PPARγ partial agonist that mediates biological functions but acting through canonical and alternative PPARγ pathways. Thus, it is not surprising to find that the blockade of PPARγ with either GW9662 or T0070907 did not prevent some of the effects of VCE-003.2, even they were potentiated in some cases. Accordingly, it has been shown that T0070907 enhances the ability of some partial PPARγ agonists such as BVT.13 and nTZDpa to bind the PPARγ coactivator TRAP220 [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CR20">20</xref>]. Equivalent data have been found for other biological activities [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CR36">36</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CR37">37</xref>], as has been indicated in the “<xref rid="Sec14" ref-type="sec">Results</xref>” section.</p><p id="Par58">There is experimental evidence in the literature indicating that persistent LPS exposure in BV2 cells causes a downregulation in the expression of PPARγ receptors, which has been proposed to be elicited by elevated TNF-α synthesis [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CR34">34</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CR35">35</xref>], as well as by an expected upregulation of NFκB signaling [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CR55">55</xref>]. We found that VCE-003.2, as well as RGZ, induces the expression of PPARγ at the protein level and prevented LPS-induced downregulation of this protein. Since PPARγ gene expression is also upregulated by PPARγ ligands, our results further support a role for PPARγ as a major pathway activated by VCE-003.2. Nevertheless, we cannot exclude that VCE-003.2 induces PPARγ-independent effects and preliminary results indicates that this CBG derivative is also a dual inhibitor of the FAAH and MAGL activity (unpublished data) and is also an antioxidant (see Additional file <xref rid="MOESM3" ref-type="media">3</xref>). Thus, further research is warranted to investigate the mechanism of action of VCE-003.2 in neuroinflammatory conditions and to fully understand the differences between the in vivo (LPS-lesioned mice) and in vitro results regarding blockade by classic PPARγ antagonists. A possible explanation may be based on the differences between in vivo (complete cytoarchitecture) and in vitro (isolated cell populations) models. In this sense, it has been shown that serotonin metabolites, an important neurotransmitter with a potential relevant role in PD, binds and activates PPARγ [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CR56">56</xref>], and it will be of interest to analyze the potential synergistic or additive activity of serotonin and VCE-003.2 on the PPARγ pathway. If the serotonin tone is lowered in PD patients, it will be possible to increase this tone in the presence of VCE-003.2, at least acting on PPARγ signaling.</p><p id="Par59">Lastly, our study also addressed an additional objective as investigating the neuroprotective potential of VCE-003.2 dependent on its antioxidant profile in an experimental model of PD having poor microglial reactivity (see Additional file <xref rid="MOESM3" ref-type="media">3</xref>). We used 6-hydroxydopamine-lesioned mice, in which, as mentioned above, several antioxidant phytocannabinoids, such as cannabidiol, Δ<sup>9</sup>-tetrahydrocannabinol and Δ<sup>9</sup>-tetrahydrocannabidivarin, had been able to preserve TH-positive neurons in the substantia nigra through effects dependent on their cannabinoid receptor-independent antioxidant properties [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CR7">7</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CR8">8</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CR21">21</xref>]. Our data indicated that this phytocannabinoid derivative was also beneficial in 6-hydroxydopamine-lesioned mice. However, contrarily, to the model of LPS lesions, its effects were more evident at the behavioral level (by improving motor impairment) than at the histopathological level. In fact, we were unable to detect a relevant effect on the preservation of TH-positive neurons and we found the expected lack of glial reactivity (see Additional file <xref rid="MOESM3" ref-type="media">3</xref>). We assume that these effects may reflect a certain protective effect based on the antioxidant activity of VCE.003-2, but it is possible that they simply reflect a mere symptom-relieving action not associated with preservation of nigral neurons.</p></sec><sec id="Sec21"><title>Conclusion</title><p id="Par60">In summary, we have demonstrated that VCE-003.2 is neuroprotective against inflammation-driven neuronal damage in an in vivo model of PD, acting through the activation of the canonic binding site in PPARγ receptors. In vitro cellular models reminiscent of the in vivo PD pathology, however, indicated that the effects of VCE-003.2 to limit inflammation may be also exerted through additional mechanisms, including the possibility that VCE-003.2 targets PPARγ by acting through two binding sites at the LBP, one that is sensitive to T0070907 (canonical binding site) and other that is not affected by this PPARγ antagonist (alternative binding site). Collectively, our data support the idea of VCE-003.2 as a useful neuroprotective agent in PD based on its multi-target properties.</p></sec><sec sec-type="supplementary-material"><title>Additional files</title><sec id="Sec22"><p>
<supplementary-material content-type="local-data" id="MOESM1" position="float" orientation="portrait"><media xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xlink:href="12974_2018_1060_MOESM1_ESM.pdf" position="float" orientation="portrait"><?suppdata-name 12974_2018_1060_MOESM1_ESM.pdf?><?suppdata-size 775727?><?suppdata-md5 a1ab353a9312414f6fa5aafaaac9ec7c?><?suppdata-image-server-status NEVER_LOAD?><?suppdata-mime-type application?><?suppdata-mime-sub-type pdf?><?suppdata-cloudpmc-urn urn:app:ee4d/5771072/a1ab353a9312/12974_2018_1060_MOESM1_ESM.pdf?><label>Additional file 1: Figure S1.</label><caption><p>Double immunofluorescence analysis of Cd68 (in green) and TH (in red) in the substantia nigra pars compacta of adult male mice at 3 weeks of being subjected to an intrastriatal injection of LPS. Top panels show both immunostainings in the contralateral (lesioned) and ipsilateral (non-lesioned) sides (scale bar = 50 μm), whereas bottom panels show the immunostaining for both markers and the merged image in the contralateral (lesioned) side (scale bar = 50 μm), proving the presence of Cd68 immunostaining associated with TH-positive cells, but a complete lack of overlapping, then demonstrating that they correspond to different cells (TH-positive neurons versus Cd68-positive microglial cells) (PDF 757 kb)</p></caption></media></supplementary-material>
<supplementary-material content-type="local-data" id="MOESM2" position="float" orientation="portrait"><media xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xlink:href="12974_2018_1060_MOESM2_ESM.pdf" position="float" orientation="portrait"><?suppdata-name 12974_2018_1060_MOESM2_ESM.pdf?><?suppdata-size 107999?><?suppdata-md5 5cfbd3a0a9aef82db2c89d2cd467f96b?><?suppdata-image-server-status NEVER_LOAD?><?suppdata-mime-type application?><?suppdata-mime-sub-type pdf?><?suppdata-cloudpmc-urn urn:app:ee4d/5771072/5cfbd3a0a9ae/12974_2018_1060_MOESM2_ESM.pdf?><label>Additional file 2: Figure S2.</label><caption><p>BV2 cells were seeded at 1 × 10<sup>5</sup> in 60-mm dishes and 24 h later treated with RGZ or VCE-003.2 in the absence or the presence of LPS (50 ng/mL) for 6 h and the steady state levels of endogenous PPARγ and β-actin detected by western blot (PDF 105 kb)</p></caption></media></supplementary-material>
<supplementary-material content-type="local-data" id="MOESM3" position="float" orientation="portrait"><media xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xlink:href="12974_2018_1060_MOESM3_ESM.pdf" position="float" orientation="portrait"><?suppdata-name 12974_2018_1060_MOESM3_ESM.pdf?><?suppdata-size 578017?><?suppdata-md5 4a41f602ce25e45b6c41ecf02262be77?><?suppdata-image-server-status NEVER_LOAD?><?suppdata-mime-type application?><?suppdata-mime-sub-type pdf?><?suppdata-cloudpmc-urn urn:app:ee4d/5771072/4a41f602ce25/12974_2018_1060_MOESM3_ESM.pdf?><label>Additional file 3:</label><caption><p>Supplementary information and Supplementary Figures S3–S5. Effects of VCE-003.2 in 6-hydroxydopamine-lesioned mice (PDF 564 kb)</p></caption></media></supplementary-material>
</p></sec></sec></body><back><glossary><title>Abbreviations</title><def-list><def-item><term>PPARγ</term><def><p id="Par5">Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-γ</p></def></def-item><def-item><term>PPARγ2</term><def><p id="Par6">PPARγ isoform 2</p></def></def-item><def-item><term>ADIPOQ</term><def><p id="Par7">Adiponectin</p></def></def-item><def-item><term>CB<sub>1</sub></term><def><p id="Par8">Cannabinoid receptor type-1</p></def></def-item><def-item><term>CB<sub>2</sub></term><def><p id="Par9">Cannabinoid receptor type-2</p></def></def-item><def-item><term>CBG</term><def><p id="Par10">Cannabigerol</p></def></def-item><def-item><term>CEBPA</term><def><p id="Par11">CCAAT/enhancer-binding protein-α</p></def></def-item><def-item><term>COX-2</term><def><p id="Par12">Cyclooxygenase-2</p></def></def-item><def-item><term>DMEM</term><def><p id="Par13">Dulbecco’s modified Eagle’s medium</p></def></def-item><def-item><term>FABP4</term><def><p id="Par14">Fatty acid-binding protein 4</p></def></def-item><def-item><term>FBS</term><def><p id="Par15">Fetal bovine serum</p></def></def-item><def-item><term>IL-1β</term><def><p id="Par16">Interleukin-1β</p></def></def-item><def-item><term>iNOS</term><def><p id="Par17">Inducible nitric oxide synthase</p></def></def-item><def-item><term>KPBS</term><def><p id="Par18">Potassium PBS</p></def></def-item><def-item><term>LBP</term><def><p id="Par19">Ligand-binding pocket</p></def></def-item><def-item><term>LPL</term><def><p id="Par20">Lipoprotein lipase</p></def></def-item><def-item><term>LPS</term><def><p id="Par21">Lipopolysaccharide</p></def></def-item><def-item><term>MSCs</term><def><p id="Par22">Mesenchymal stem cells</p></def></def-item><def-item><term>PBS</term><def><p id="Par23">Phosphate-buffered saline</p></def></def-item><def-item><term>PD</term><def><p id="Par24">Parkinson’s disease</p></def></def-item><def-item><term>PPREs</term><def><p id="Par25">Peroxisome proliferator response elements</p></def></def-item><def-item><term>RGZ</term><def><p id="Par26">Rosiglitazone</p></def></def-item><def-item><term>TH</term><def><p id="Par27">Tyrosine hydroxylase</p></def></def-item><def-item><term>TNF-α</term><def><p id="Par28">Tumor necrosis factor-α</p></def></def-item></def-list></glossary><fn-group><fn><p><bold>Electronic supplementary material</bold></p><p>The online version of this article (10.1186/s12974-018-1060-5) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.</p></fn></fn-group><ack><title>Acknowledgements</title><p>The authors are indebted to Yolanda García-Movellán for the administrative assistance.</p><sec id="FPar1"><title>Funding</title><p id="Par61">This work has been supported by grants from CIBERNED (CB06/05/0089), MINECO-Biomedicina (SAF2015-68580-C2-1-R), and MINECO Retos-Colaboración (RTC-2014-1877-1). These agencies had no further role in the study design; collection, analysis, and interpretation of data; writing of the report; or decision to submit the paper for publication.</p></sec><sec id="FPar2"><title>Availability of data and materials</title><p id="Par62">All data generated or analyzed during this study are included in this published article (and its supplementary information files).</p></sec></ack><notes notes-type="author-contribution"><title>Authors’ contributions</title><p>JFR, EM, and CG contributed to the study design, coordination, and supervision. MLB, EM, MGC, MGA, and MRP contributed to the VCE-003.2 synthesis and binding analyses. CG, YGG, SC, and JFH contributed to the studies in LPS-lesioned mice. CG and CP contributed to the studies in 6-hydroxydopamine-lesioned mice. CG, SB, and MGC contributed to the studies in cultured BV2 and M-213 cells. BP and CN contributed to the studies in cultured MSCs and transcriptional assays. CP and EM contributed to the docking analysis. JFR with CG, SC, CP, MGC, BP, and SB contributed to the statistical analysis of the data. JFR contributed to the manuscript writing with the revision and approval of all authors. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.</p></notes><notes notes-type="COI-statement"><sec id="FPar3"><title>Ethics approval and consent to participate</title><p id="Par63">All experiments with laboratory animals were conducted according to the European guidelines (directive 2010/63/EU) and approved by the “Comité de Experimentación Animal” of our university (ref. CEA-UCM 56/2012).</p></sec><sec id="FPar4"><title>Consent for publication</title><p id="Par64">Not applicable.</p></sec><sec id="FPar5"><title>Competing interests</title><p id="Par65">The authors declare that they have no competing interests.</p></sec><sec id="FPar6"><title>Publisher’s Note</title><p id="Par66">Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.</p></sec></notes><ref-list id="Bib1"><title>References</title><ref id="CR1"><label>1.</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name name-style="western"><surname>Lim</surname><given-names>S</given-names></name><name name-style="western"><surname>Chun</surname><given-names>Y</given-names></name><name name-style="western"><surname>Lee</surname><given-names>JS</given-names></name><name name-style="western"><surname>Lee</surname><given-names>SJ</given-names></name></person-group><article-title>Neuroinflammation in synucleinopathies</article-title><source>Brain Pathol</source><year>2016</year><volume>26</volume><fpage>404</fpage><lpage>409</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/bpa.12371</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">26940152</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmcid">PMC8028946</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="CR2"><label>2.</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name name-style="western"><surname>Fernández-Ruiz</surname><given-names>J</given-names></name><name name-style="western"><surname>Romero</surname><given-names>J</given-names></name><name name-style="western"><surname>Ramos</surname><given-names>JA</given-names></name></person-group><article-title>Endocannabinoids and neurodegenerative disorders: Parkinson’s disease, Huntington’s chorea, Alzheimer’s disease, and others</article-title><source>Handb Exp Pharmacol</source><year>2015</year><volume>231</volume><fpage>233</fpage><lpage>259</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/978-3-319-20825-1_8</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">26408163</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="CR3"><label>3.</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name name-style="western"><surname>Chiurchiù</surname><given-names>V</given-names></name><name name-style="western"><surname>Leuti</surname><given-names>A</given-names></name><name name-style="western"><surname>Maccarrone</surname><given-names>M</given-names></name></person-group><article-title>Cannabinoid signaling and neuroinflammatory diseases: a melting pot for the regulation of brain immune responses</article-title><source>J NeuroImmune Pharmacol</source><year>2015</year><volume>10</volume><fpage>268</fpage><lpage>280</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s11481-015-9584-2</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">25601726</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="CR4"><label>4.</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name name-style="western"><surname>Price</surname><given-names>DA</given-names></name><name name-style="western"><surname>Martinez</surname><given-names>AA</given-names></name><name name-style="western"><surname>Seillier</surname><given-names>A</given-names></name><name name-style="western"><surname>Koek</surname><given-names>W</given-names></name><name name-style="western"><surname>Acosta</surname><given-names>Y</given-names></name><name name-style="western"><surname>Fernández</surname><given-names>E</given-names></name><etal/></person-group><article-title>WIN55,212-2, a cannabinoid receptor agonist, protects against nigrostriatal cell loss in the 1-methyl-4-phenyl-1,2,3,6-tetrahydropyridine mouse model of Parkinson’s disease</article-title><source>Eur J Neurosci</source><year>2009</year><volume>29</volume><fpage>2177</fpage><lpage>2186</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/j.1460-9568.2009.06764.x</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">19490092</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmcid">PMC2755595</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="CR5"><label>5.</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name name-style="western"><surname>Chung</surname><given-names>YC</given-names></name><name name-style="western"><surname>Bok</surname><given-names>E</given-names></name><name name-style="western"><surname>Huh</surname><given-names>SH</given-names></name><name name-style="western"><surname>Park</surname><given-names>JY</given-names></name><name name-style="western"><surname>Yoon</surname><given-names>SH</given-names></name><name name-style="western"><surname>Kim</surname><given-names>SR</given-names></name><etal/></person-group><article-title>Cannabinoid receptor type 1 protects nigrostriatal dopaminergic neurons against MPTP neurotoxicity by inhibiting microglial activation</article-title><source>J Immunol</source><year>2011</year><volume>187</volume><fpage>6508</fpage><lpage>6517</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.4049/jimmunol.1102435</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">22079984</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="CR6"><label>6.</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name name-style="western"><surname>Gómez-Gálvez</surname><given-names>Y</given-names></name><name name-style="western"><surname>Palomo-Garo</surname><given-names>C</given-names></name><name name-style="western"><surname>Fernández-Ruiz</surname><given-names>J</given-names></name><name name-style="western"><surname>García</surname><given-names>C</given-names></name></person-group><article-title>Potential of the cannabinoid CB2 receptor as a pharmacological target against inflammation in Parkinson’s disease</article-title><source>Prog Neuro-Psychopharmacol Biol Psychiatry</source><year>2016</year><volume>64</volume><fpage>200</fpage><lpage>208</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.pnpbp.2015.03.017</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">25863279</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="CR7"><label>7.</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name name-style="western"><surname>García</surname><given-names>C</given-names></name><name name-style="western"><surname>Palomo-Garo</surname><given-names>C</given-names></name><name name-style="western"><surname>García-Arencibia</surname><given-names>M</given-names></name><name name-style="western"><surname>Ramos</surname><given-names>J</given-names></name><name name-style="western"><surname>Pertwee</surname><given-names>R</given-names></name><name name-style="western"><surname>Fernández-Ruiz</surname><given-names>J</given-names></name></person-group><article-title>Symptom-relieving and neuroprotective effects of the phytocannabinoid Δ<sup>9</sup>-THCV in animal models of Parkinson’s disease</article-title><source>Br J Pharmacol</source><year>2011</year><volume>163</volume><fpage>1495</fpage><lpage>1506</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/j.1476-5381.2011.01278.x</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">21323909</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmcid">PMC3165958</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="CR8"><label>8.</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name name-style="western"><surname>García-Arencibia</surname><given-names>M</given-names></name><name name-style="western"><surname>González</surname><given-names>S</given-names></name><name name-style="western"><surname>de Lago</surname><given-names>E</given-names></name><name name-style="western"><surname>Ramos</surname><given-names>JA</given-names></name><name name-style="western"><surname>Mechoulam</surname><given-names>R</given-names></name><name name-style="western"><surname>Fernández-Ruiz</surname><given-names>J</given-names></name></person-group><article-title>Evaluation of the neuroprotective effect of cannabinoids in a rat model of Parkinson’s disease: importance of antioxidant and cannabinoid receptor-independent properties</article-title><source>Brain Res</source><year>2007</year><volume>1134</volume><fpage>162</fpage><lpage>170</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.brainres.2006.11.063</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">17196181</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="CR9"><label>9.</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name name-style="western"><surname>Concannon</surname><given-names>RM</given-names></name><name name-style="western"><surname>Okine</surname><given-names>BN</given-names></name><name name-style="western"><surname>Finn</surname><given-names>DP</given-names></name><name name-style="western"><surname>Dowd</surname><given-names>E</given-names></name></person-group><article-title>Differential upregulation of the cannabinoid CB<sub>2</sub> receptor in neurotoxic and inflammation-driven rat models of Parkinson’s disease</article-title><source>Exp Neurol</source><year>2015</year><volume>269</volume><fpage>133</fpage><lpage>141</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.expneurol.2015.04.007</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">25895887</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="CR10"><label>10.</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name name-style="western"><surname>Ternianov</surname><given-names>A</given-names></name><name name-style="western"><surname>Pérez-Ortiz</surname><given-names>JM</given-names></name><name name-style="western"><surname>Solesio</surname><given-names>ME</given-names></name><name name-style="western"><surname>García-Gutiérrez</surname><given-names>MS</given-names></name><name name-style="western"><surname>Ortega-Alvaro</surname><given-names>A</given-names></name><name name-style="western"><surname>Navarrete</surname><given-names>F</given-names></name><etal/></person-group><article-title>Overexpression of CB<sub>2</sub> cannabinoid receptors results in neuroprotection against behavioral and neurochemical alterations induced by intracaudate administration of 6-hydroxydopamine</article-title><source>Neurobiol Aging</source><year>2012</year><volume>33</volume><fpage>421 e1</fpage><lpage>421e16</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2010.09.012</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">20980074</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="CR11"><label>11.</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name name-style="western"><surname>O'Sullivan</surname><given-names>SE</given-names></name><name name-style="western"><surname>Kendall</surname><given-names>DA</given-names></name></person-group><article-title>Cannabinoid activation of peroxisome proliferator-activated receptors: potential for modulation of inflammatory disease</article-title><source>Immunobiology</source><year>2010</year><volume>215</volume><fpage>611</fpage><lpage>616</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.imbio.2009.09.007</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">19833407</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="CR12"><label>12.</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name name-style="western"><surname>Fidaleo</surname><given-names>M</given-names></name><name name-style="western"><surname>Fanelli</surname><given-names>F</given-names></name><name name-style="western"><surname>Ceru</surname><given-names>MP</given-names></name><name name-style="western"><surname>Moreno</surname><given-names>S</given-names></name></person-group><article-title>Neuroprotective properties of peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-α (PPARα) and its lipid ligands</article-title><source>Curr Med Chem</source><year>2014</year><volume>21</volume><fpage>2803</fpage><lpage>2821</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.2174/0929867321666140303143455</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">24606520</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="CR13"><label>13.</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name name-style="western"><surname>Agarwal</surname><given-names>S</given-names></name><name name-style="western"><surname>Yadav</surname><given-names>A</given-names></name><name name-style="western"><surname>Chaturvedi</surname><given-names>RK</given-names></name></person-group><article-title>Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptors (PPARs) as therapeutic target in neurodegenerative disorders</article-title><source>Biochem Biophys Res Commun</source><year>2017</year><volume>483</volume><fpage>1166</fpage><lpage>1177</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.bbrc.2016.08.043</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">27514452</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="CR14"><label>14.</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name name-style="western"><surname>Carta</surname><given-names>AR</given-names></name><name name-style="western"><surname>Simuni</surname><given-names>T</given-names></name></person-group><article-title>Thiazolidinediones under preclinical and early clinical development for the treatment of Parkinson’s disease</article-title><source>Expert Opin Investig Drugs</source><year>2015</year><volume>24</volume><fpage>219</fpage><lpage>227</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1517/13543784.2015.963195</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">25227476</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="CR15"><label>15.</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name name-style="western"><surname>Pistis</surname><given-names>M</given-names></name><name name-style="western"><surname>Melis</surname><given-names>M</given-names></name></person-group><article-title>From surface to nuclear receptors: the endocannabinoid family extends its assets</article-title><source>Curr Med Chem</source><year>2010</year><volume>17</volume><fpage>1450</fpage><lpage>1467</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.2174/092986710790980014</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">20166922</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="CR16"><label>16.</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name name-style="western"><surname>Fernández-Ruiz</surname><given-names>J</given-names></name><name name-style="western"><surname>Sagredo</surname><given-names>O</given-names></name><name name-style="western"><surname>Pazos</surname><given-names>MR</given-names></name><name name-style="western"><surname>García</surname><given-names>C</given-names></name><name name-style="western"><surname>Pertwee</surname><given-names>R</given-names></name><name name-style="western"><surname>Mechoulam</surname><given-names>R</given-names></name><etal/></person-group><article-title>Cannabidiol for neurodegenerative disorders: important new clinical applications for this phytocannabinoid?</article-title><source>Br J Clin Pharmacol</source><year>2013</year><volume>75</volume><fpage>323</fpage><lpage>333</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/j.1365-2125.2012.04341.x</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">22625422</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmcid">PMC3579248</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="CR17"><label>17.</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name name-style="western"><surname>Granja</surname><given-names>AG</given-names></name><name name-style="western"><surname>Carrillo-Salinas</surname><given-names>F</given-names></name><name name-style="western"><surname>Pagani</surname><given-names>A</given-names></name><name name-style="western"><surname>Gómez-Cañas</surname><given-names>M</given-names></name><name name-style="western"><surname>Negri</surname><given-names>R</given-names></name><name name-style="western"><surname>Navarrete</surname><given-names>C</given-names></name><etal/></person-group><article-title>A cannabigerol quinone alleviates neuroinflammation in a chronic model of multiple sclerosis</article-title><source>J NeuroImmune Pharmacol</source><year>2012</year><volume>7</volume><fpage>1002</fpage><lpage>1016</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s11481-012-9399-3</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">22971837</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="CR18"><label>18.</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name name-style="western"><surname>Carrillo-Salinas</surname><given-names>FJ</given-names></name><name name-style="western"><surname>Navarrete</surname><given-names>C</given-names></name><name name-style="western"><surname>Mecha</surname><given-names>M</given-names></name><name name-style="western"><surname>Feliú</surname><given-names>A</given-names></name><name name-style="western"><surname>Collado</surname><given-names>JA</given-names></name><name name-style="western"><surname>Cantarero</surname><given-names>I</given-names></name><etal/></person-group><article-title>A cannabigerol derivative suppresses immune responses and protects mice from experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis</article-title><source>PLoS One</source><year>2014</year><volume>9</volume><fpage>e94733</fpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1371/journal.pone.0094733</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">24727978</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmcid">PMC3984273</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="CR19"><label>19.</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name name-style="western"><surname>Díaz-Alonso</surname><given-names>J</given-names></name><name name-style="western"><surname>Paraíso-Luna</surname><given-names>J</given-names></name><name name-style="western"><surname>Navarrete</surname><given-names>C</given-names></name><name name-style="western"><surname>Del Río</surname><given-names>C</given-names></name><name name-style="western"><surname>Cantarero</surname><given-names>I</given-names></name><name name-style="western"><surname>Palomares</surname><given-names>B</given-names></name><etal/></person-group><article-title>VCE-003.2, a novel cannabigerol derivative, enhances neuronal progenitor cell survival and alleviates symptomatology in murine models of Huntington’s disease</article-title><source>Sci Rep</source><year>2016</year><volume>6</volume><fpage>29789</fpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1038/srep29789</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">27430371</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmcid">PMC4949444</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="CR20"><label>20.</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name name-style="western"><surname>Hughes</surname><given-names>TS</given-names></name><name name-style="western"><surname>Giri</surname><given-names>PK</given-names></name><name name-style="western"><surname>de Vera</surname><given-names>IM</given-names></name><name name-style="western"><surname>Marciano</surname><given-names>DP</given-names></name><name name-style="western"><surname>Kuruvilla</surname><given-names>DS</given-names></name><name name-style="western"><surname>Shin</surname><given-names>Y</given-names></name><etal/></person-group><article-title>An alternate binding site for PPARγ ligands</article-title><source>Nat Commun</source><year>2014</year><volume>5</volume><fpage>3571</fpage><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">24705063</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="doi" assigning-authority="pmc">10.1038/ncomms4571</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmcid">PMC4070320</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="CR21"><label>21.</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name name-style="western"><surname>Lastres-Becker</surname><given-names>I</given-names></name><name name-style="western"><surname>Molina-Holgado</surname><given-names>F</given-names></name><name name-style="western"><surname>Ramos</surname><given-names>JA</given-names></name><name name-style="western"><surname>Mechoulam</surname><given-names>R</given-names></name><name name-style="western"><surname>Fernández-Ruiz</surname><given-names>J</given-names></name></person-group><article-title>Cannabinoids provide neuroprotection against 6-hydroxydopamine toxicity in vivo and in vitro: relevance to Parkinson’s disease</article-title><source>Neurobiol Dis</source><year>2005</year><volume>19</volume><fpage>96</fpage><lpage>107</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.nbd.2004.11.009</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">15837565</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="CR22"><label>22.</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name name-style="western"><surname>Gómez-Cañas</surname><given-names>M</given-names></name><name name-style="western"><surname>Morales</surname><given-names>P</given-names></name><name name-style="western"><surname>García-Toscano</surname><given-names>L</given-names></name><name name-style="western"><surname>Navarrete</surname><given-names>C</given-names></name><name name-style="western"><surname>Muñoz</surname><given-names>E</given-names></name><name name-style="western"><surname>Jagerovic</surname><given-names>N</given-names></name><etal/></person-group><article-title>Biological characterization of PM226, a chromenoisoxazole, as a selective CB2 receptor agonist with neuroprotective profile</article-title><source>Pharmacol Res</source><year>2016</year><volume>110</volume><fpage>205</fpage><lpage>215</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.phrs.2016.03.021</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">27013280</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="CR23"><label>23.</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name name-style="western"><surname>Chiang</surname><given-names>MC</given-names></name><name name-style="western"><surname>Cheng</surname><given-names>YC</given-names></name><name name-style="western"><surname>Chen</surname><given-names>HM</given-names></name><name name-style="western"><surname>Liang</surname><given-names>YJ</given-names></name><name name-style="western"><surname>Yen</surname><given-names>CH</given-names></name></person-group><article-title>Rosiglitazone promotes neurite outgrowth and mitochondrial function in N2A cells via PPARgamma pathway</article-title><source>Mitochondrion</source><year>2014</year><volume>14</volume><fpage>7</fpage><lpage>17</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.mito.2013.12.003</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">24370585</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="CR24"><label>24.</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name name-style="western"><surname>Hunter</surname><given-names>RL</given-names></name><name name-style="western"><surname>Cheng</surname><given-names>B</given-names></name><name name-style="western"><surname>Choi</surname><given-names>DY</given-names></name><name name-style="western"><surname>Liu</surname><given-names>M</given-names></name><name name-style="western"><surname>Liu</surname><given-names>S</given-names></name><name name-style="western"><surname>Cass</surname><given-names>WA</given-names></name><etal/></person-group><article-title>Intrastriatal lipopolysaccharide injection induces parkinsonism in C57/B6 mice</article-title><source>J Neurosci Res</source><year>2009</year><volume>87</volume><fpage>1913</fpage><lpage>1921</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1002/jnr.22012</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">19224579</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmcid">PMC2692550</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="CR25"><label>25.</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name name-style="western"><surname>Burton</surname><given-names>JD</given-names></name><name name-style="western"><surname>Goldenberg</surname><given-names>DM</given-names></name><name name-style="western"><surname>Blumenthal</surname><given-names>RD</given-names></name></person-group><article-title>Potential of peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma antagonist compounds as therapeutic agents for a wide range of cancer types</article-title><source>PPAR Res</source><year>2008</year><volume>2008</volume><fpage>494161</fpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1155/2008/494161</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">18779871</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmcid">PMC2528255</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="CR26"><label>26.</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other">Palkovits M, Brownstein J. Maps and guide to microdissection of the rat brain. Elsevier, 1988.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="CR27"><label>27.</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name name-style="western"><surname>Morris</surname><given-names>GM</given-names></name><name name-style="western"><surname>Huey</surname><given-names>R</given-names></name><name name-style="western"><surname>Lindstrom</surname><given-names>W</given-names></name><name name-style="western"><surname>Sanner</surname><given-names>MF</given-names></name><name name-style="western"><surname>Belew</surname><given-names>RK</given-names></name><name name-style="western"><surname>Goodsell</surname><given-names>DS</given-names></name><etal/></person-group><article-title>AutoDock4 and AutoDockTools4: automated docking with selective receptor flexibility</article-title><source>J Comput Chem</source><year>2009</year><volume>30</volume><fpage>2785</fpage><lpage>2791</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1002/jcc.21256</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">19399780</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmcid">PMC2760638</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="CR28"><label>28.</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name name-style="western"><surname>Trott</surname><given-names>O</given-names></name><name name-style="western"><surname>Olson</surname><given-names>AJ</given-names></name></person-group><article-title>AutoDock Vina: improving the speed and accuracy of docking with a new scoring function, efficient optimization, and multithreading</article-title><source>J Comput Chem</source><year>2010</year><volume>31</volume><fpage>455</fpage><lpage>461</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">19499576</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="doi" assigning-authority="pmc">10.1002/jcc.21334</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmcid">PMC3041641</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="CR29"><label>29.</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name name-style="western"><surname>Wolf</surname><given-names>LK</given-names></name></person-group><article-title>New software and websites for the chemical enterprise</article-title><source>Chem Eng News</source><year>2009</year><volume>87</volume><fpage>31</fpage></element-citation></ref><ref id="CR30"><label>30.</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name name-style="western"><surname>Baugh</surname><given-names>EH</given-names></name><name name-style="western"><surname>Lyskov</surname><given-names>S</given-names></name><name name-style="western"><surname>Weitzner</surname><given-names>BD</given-names></name><name name-style="western"><surname>Gray</surname><given-names>JJ</given-names></name></person-group><article-title>Real-time PyMOL visualization for Rosetta and PyRosetta</article-title><source>PLoS One</source><year>2011</year><volume>6</volume><fpage>e21931</fpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1371/journal.pone.0021931</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">21857909</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmcid">PMC3156697</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="CR31"><label>31.</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name name-style="western"><surname>Liberato</surname><given-names>MV</given-names></name><name name-style="western"><surname>Nascimento</surname><given-names>AS</given-names></name><name name-style="western"><surname>Ayers</surname><given-names>SD</given-names></name><name name-style="western"><surname>Lin</surname><given-names>JZ</given-names></name><name name-style="western"><surname>Cvoro</surname><given-names>A</given-names></name><name name-style="western"><surname>Silveira</surname><given-names>RL</given-names></name><etal/></person-group><article-title>Medium chain fatty acids are selective peroxisome proliferator activated receptor (PPAR) γ activators and pan-PPAR partial agonists</article-title><source>PLoS One</source><year>2012</year><volume>7</volume><fpage>e36297</fpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1371/journal.pone.0036297</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">22649490</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmcid">PMC3359336</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="CR32"><label>32.</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name name-style="western"><surname>Izzo</surname><given-names>AA</given-names></name><name name-style="western"><surname>Borrelli</surname><given-names>F</given-names></name><name name-style="western"><surname>Capasso</surname><given-names>R</given-names></name><name name-style="western"><surname>Di Marzo</surname><given-names>V</given-names></name><name name-style="western"><surname>Mechoulam</surname><given-names>R</given-names></name></person-group><article-title>Non-psychotropic plant cannabinoids: new therapeutic opportunities from an ancient herb</article-title><source>Trends Pharmacol Sci</source><year>2009</year><volume>30</volume><fpage>515</fpage><lpage>527</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.tips.2009.07.006</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">19729208</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="CR33"><label>33.</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name name-style="western"><surname>Martin</surname><given-names>HL</given-names></name><name name-style="western"><surname>Mounsey</surname><given-names>RB</given-names></name><name name-style="western"><surname>Mustafa</surname><given-names>S</given-names></name><name name-style="western"><surname>Sathe</surname><given-names>K</given-names></name><name name-style="western"><surname>Teismann</surname><given-names>P</given-names></name></person-group><article-title>Pharmacological manipulation of peroxisome proliferator activated receptor γ (PPARγ) reveals a role for anti-oxidant protection in a model of Parkinson’s disease</article-title><source>Exp Neurol</source><year>2012</year><volume>235</volume><fpage>528</fpage><lpage>538</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.expneurol.2012.02.017</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">22417924</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmcid">PMC3350857</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="CR34"><label>34.</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name name-style="western"><surname>Zhou</surname><given-names>M</given-names></name><name name-style="western"><surname>Wu</surname><given-names>R</given-names></name><name name-style="western"><surname>Dong</surname><given-names>W</given-names></name><name name-style="western"><surname>Jacob</surname><given-names>A</given-names></name><name name-style="western"><surname>Wang</surname><given-names>P</given-names></name></person-group><article-title>Endotoxin downregulates peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-γ via the increase in TNF-α release</article-title><source>Am J Phys Regul Integr Comp Phys</source><year>2008</year><volume>294</volume><fpage>R84</fpage><lpage>R92</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi" assigning-authority="pmc">10.1152/ajpregu.00340.2007</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">17989144</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="CR35"><label>35.</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name name-style="western"><surname>Corsi</surname><given-names>L</given-names></name><name name-style="western"><surname>Dongmo</surname><given-names>BM</given-names></name><name name-style="western"><surname>Avallone</surname><given-names>R</given-names></name></person-group><article-title>Supplementation of omega 3 fatty acids improves oxidative stress in activated BV2 microglial cell line</article-title><source>Int J Food Sci Nutr</source><year>2015</year><volume>66</volume><fpage>293</fpage><lpage>299</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3109/09637486.2014.986073</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">25582176</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="CR36"><label>36.</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name name-style="western"><surname>Zizzo</surname><given-names>G</given-names></name><name name-style="western"><surname>Cohen</surname><given-names>PL</given-names></name></person-group><article-title>The PPAR-γ antagonist GW9662 elicits differentiation of M2c-like cells and upregulation of the MerTK/Gas6 axis: a key role for PPAR-γ in human macrophage polarization</article-title><source>Inflamm (Lond)</source><year>2015</year><volume>12</volume><fpage>36</fpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1186/s12950-015-0081-4</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmcid">PMC4429687</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">25972766</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="CR37"><label>37.</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name name-style="western"><surname>Seargent</surname><given-names>JM</given-names></name><name name-style="western"><surname>Yates</surname><given-names>EA</given-names></name><name name-style="western"><surname>Gill</surname><given-names>JH</given-names></name></person-group><article-title>GW9662, a potent antagonist of PPARγ, inhibits growth of breast tumour cells and promotes the anticancer effects of the PPARγ agonist rosiglitazone, independently of PPARγ activation</article-title><source>Br J Pharmacol</source><year>2004</year><volume>143</volume><fpage>933</fpage><lpage>937</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1038/sj.bjp.0705973</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">15533890</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmcid">PMC1575954</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="CR38"><label>38.</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name name-style="western"><surname>Hughes</surname><given-names>TS</given-names></name><name name-style="western"><surname>Chalmers</surname><given-names>MJ</given-names></name><name name-style="western"><surname>Novick</surname><given-names>S</given-names></name><name name-style="western"><surname>Kuruvilla</surname><given-names>DS</given-names></name><name name-style="western"><surname>Chang</surname><given-names>MR</given-names></name><name name-style="western"><surname>Kamenecka</surname><given-names>TM</given-names></name><etal/></person-group><article-title>Ligand and receptor dynamics contribute to the mechanism of graded PPARγ agonism</article-title><source>Structure</source><year>2012</year><volume>20</volume><fpage>139</fpage><lpage>150</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.str.2011.10.018</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">22244763</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmcid">PMC3278220</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="CR39"><label>39.</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name name-style="western"><surname>Tansey</surname><given-names>MG</given-names></name><name name-style="western"><surname>Goldberg</surname><given-names>MS</given-names></name></person-group><article-title>Neuroinflammation in Parkinson’s disease: its role in neuronal death and implications for therapeutic intervention</article-title><source>Neurobiol Dis</source><year>2010</year><volume>37</volume><fpage>510</fpage><lpage>518</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.nbd.2009.11.004</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">19913097</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmcid">PMC2823829</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="CR40"><label>40.</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name name-style="western"><surname>Ouchi</surname><given-names>Y</given-names></name><name name-style="western"><surname>Yoshikawa</surname><given-names>E</given-names></name><name name-style="western"><surname>Sekine</surname><given-names>Y</given-names></name><name name-style="western"><surname>Futatsubashi</surname><given-names>M</given-names></name><name name-style="western"><surname>Kanno</surname><given-names>T</given-names></name><name name-style="western"><surname>Ogusu</surname><given-names>T</given-names></name><etal/></person-group><article-title>Microglial activation and dopamine terminal loss in early Parkinson’s disease</article-title><source>Ann Neurol</source><year>2005</year><volume>57</volume><fpage>168</fpage><lpage>175</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1002/ana.20338</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">15668962</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="CR41"><label>41.</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name name-style="western"><surname>Gao</surname><given-names>X</given-names></name><name name-style="western"><surname>Hu</surname><given-names>X</given-names></name><name name-style="western"><surname>Qian</surname><given-names>L</given-names></name><name name-style="western"><surname>Yang</surname><given-names>S</given-names></name><name name-style="western"><surname>Zhang</surname><given-names>W</given-names></name><name name-style="western"><surname>Zhang</surname><given-names>D</given-names></name><etal/></person-group><article-title>Formyl-methionyl-leucyl-phenylalanine-induced dopaminergic neurotoxicity via microglial activation: a mediator between peripheral infection and neurodegeneration?</article-title><source>Environ Health Perspect</source><year>2008</year><volume>116</volume><fpage>593</fpage><lpage>598</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1289/ehp.11031</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">18470306</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmcid">PMC2367670</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="CR42"><label>42.</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name name-style="western"><surname>Hirsch</surname><given-names>EC</given-names></name><name name-style="western"><surname>Hunot</surname><given-names>S</given-names></name></person-group><article-title>Neuroinflammation in Parkinson’s disease: a target for neuroprotection?</article-title><source>Lancet Neurol</source><year>2009</year><volume>8</volume><fpage>382</fpage><lpage>397</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/S1474-4422(09)70062-6</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">19296921</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="CR43"><label>43.</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name name-style="western"><surname>Chen</surname><given-names>H</given-names></name><name name-style="western"><surname>Jacobs</surname><given-names>E</given-names></name><name name-style="western"><surname>Schwarzschild</surname><given-names>MA</given-names></name><name name-style="western"><surname>McCullough</surname><given-names>ML</given-names></name><name name-style="western"><surname>Calle</surname><given-names>EE</given-names></name><name name-style="western"><surname>Thun</surname><given-names>MJ</given-names></name><etal/></person-group><article-title>Nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drug use and the risk for Parkinson’s disease</article-title><source>Ann Neurol</source><year>2005</year><volume>58</volume><fpage>963</fpage><lpage>967</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1002/ana.20682</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">16240369</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="CR44"><label>44.</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name name-style="western"><surname>Fernández-Ruiz</surname><given-names>J</given-names></name><name name-style="western"><surname>Moro</surname><given-names>MA</given-names></name><name name-style="western"><surname>Martínez-Orgado</surname><given-names>J</given-names></name></person-group><article-title>Cannabinoids in neurodegenerative disorders and stroke/brain trauma: from preclinical models to clinical applications</article-title><source>Neurotherapeutics</source><year>2015</year><volume>12</volume><fpage>793</fpage><lpage>806</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s13311-015-0381-7</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">26260390</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmcid">PMC4604192</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="CR45"><label>45.</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name name-style="western"><surname>Laganà</surname><given-names>AS</given-names></name><name name-style="western"><surname>Vitale</surname><given-names>SG</given-names></name><name name-style="western"><surname>Nigro</surname><given-names>A</given-names></name><name name-style="western"><surname>Sofo</surname><given-names>V</given-names></name><name name-style="western"><surname>Salmeri</surname><given-names>FM</given-names></name><name name-style="western"><surname>Rossetti</surname><given-names>P</given-names></name><etal/></person-group><article-title>Pleiotropic actions of peroxisome proliferator-activated receptors (PPARs) in dysregulated metabolic homeostasis, inflammation and cancer: current evidence and future perspectives</article-title><source>Int J Mol Sci</source><year>2016</year><volume>17</volume><fpage>E999</fpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3390/ijms17070999</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">27347932</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmcid">PMC4964375</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="CR46"><label>46.</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name name-style="western"><surname>Croasdell</surname><given-names>A</given-names></name><name name-style="western"><surname>Duffney</surname><given-names>PF</given-names></name><name name-style="western"><surname>Kim</surname><given-names>N</given-names></name><name name-style="western"><surname>Lacy</surname><given-names>SH</given-names></name><name name-style="western"><surname>Sime</surname><given-names>PJ</given-names></name><name name-style="western"><surname>Phipps</surname><given-names>RP</given-names></name></person-group><article-title>PPARγ and the innate immune system mediate the resolution of inflammation</article-title><source>PPAR Res</source><year>2015</year><volume>2015</volume><fpage>549691</fpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1155/2015/549691</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">26713087</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmcid">PMC4680113</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="CR47"><label>47.</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name name-style="western"><surname>Aleshin</surname><given-names>S</given-names></name><name name-style="western"><surname>Strokin</surname><given-names>M</given-names></name><name name-style="western"><surname>Sergeeva</surname><given-names>M</given-names></name><name name-style="western"><surname>Reiser</surname><given-names>G</given-names></name></person-group><article-title>Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor (PPAR)β/δ, a possible nexus of PPARα- and PPARγ-dependent molecular pathways in neurodegenerative diseases: review and novel hypotheses</article-title><source>Neurochem Int</source><year>2013</year><volume>63</volume><fpage>322</fpage><lpage>330</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.neuint.2013.06.012</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">23811400</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="CR48"><label>48.</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name name-style="western"><surname>Hall</surname><given-names>MG</given-names></name><name name-style="western"><surname>Quignodon</surname><given-names>L</given-names></name><name name-style="western"><surname>Desvergne</surname><given-names>B</given-names></name></person-group><article-title>Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor β/δ in the brain: facts and hypothesis</article-title><source>PPAR Res</source><year>2008</year><volume>2008</volume><fpage>780452</fpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1155/2008/780452</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">19009042</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmcid">PMC2581793</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="CR49"><label>49.</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name name-style="western"><surname>Heneka</surname><given-names>MT</given-names></name><name name-style="western"><surname>Landreth</surname><given-names>GE</given-names></name></person-group><article-title>PPARs in the brain</article-title><source>Biochim Biophys Acta</source><year>2007</year><volume>1771</volume><fpage>1031</fpage><lpage>1045</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.bbalip.2007.04.016</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">17569578</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="CR50"><label>50.</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name name-style="western"><surname>Arimoto</surname><given-names>T</given-names></name><name name-style="western"><surname>Bing</surname><given-names>G</given-names></name></person-group><article-title>Up-regulation of inducible nitric oxide synthase in the substantia nigra by lipopolysaccharide causes microglial activation and neurodegeneration</article-title><source>Neurobiol Dis</source><year>2003</year><volume>12</volume><fpage>35</fpage><lpage>45</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/S0969-9961(02)00017-7</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">12609487</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="CR51"><label>51.</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name name-style="western"><surname>Liberatore</surname><given-names>GT</given-names></name><name name-style="western"><surname>Jackson-Lewis</surname><given-names>V</given-names></name><name name-style="western"><surname>Vukosavic</surname><given-names>S</given-names></name><name name-style="western"><surname>Mandir</surname><given-names>AS</given-names></name><name name-style="western"><surname>Vila</surname><given-names>M</given-names></name><name name-style="western"><surname>McAuliffe</surname><given-names>WG</given-names></name><etal/></person-group><article-title>Inducible nitric oxide synthase stimulates dopaminergic neurodegeneration in the MPTP model of Parkinson disease</article-title><source>Nat Med</source><year>1999</year><volume>5</volume><fpage>1403</fpage><lpage>1409</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1038/70978</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">10581083</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="CR52"><label>52.</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name name-style="western"><surname>Knott</surname><given-names>C</given-names></name><name name-style="western"><surname>Stern</surname><given-names>G</given-names></name><name name-style="western"><surname>Wilkin</surname><given-names>GP</given-names></name></person-group><article-title>Inflammatory regulators in Parkinson’s disease: iNOS, lipocortin-1, and cyclooxygenases-1 and -2</article-title><source>Mol Cell Neurosci</source><year>2000</year><volume>16</volume><fpage>724</fpage><lpage>739</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1006/mcne.2000.0914</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">11124893</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="CR53"><label>53.</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name name-style="western"><surname>Itoh</surname><given-names>T</given-names></name><name name-style="western"><surname>Fairall</surname><given-names>L</given-names></name><name name-style="western"><surname>Amin</surname><given-names>K</given-names></name><name name-style="western"><surname>Inaba</surname><given-names>Y</given-names></name><name name-style="western"><surname>Szanto</surname><given-names>A</given-names></name><name name-style="western"><surname>Balint</surname><given-names>BL</given-names></name><etal/></person-group><article-title>Structural basis for the activation of PPARγ by oxidized fatty acids</article-title><source>Nat Struct Mol Biol</source><year>2008</year><volume>15</volume><fpage>924</fpage><lpage>931</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1038/nsmb.1474</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">19172745</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmcid">PMC2939985</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="CR54"><label>54.</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other">Oh YT, Lee JY, Lee J, Lee JH, Kim JE, Ha J et al. Oleamide suppresses lipopolysaccharide-induced expression of iNOS and COX-2 through inhibition of NFκB activation in BV2 murine microglial cells. Neurosci Lett 2010; 474: 148-153.<pub-id pub-id-type="doi" assigning-authority="pmc">10.1016/j.neulet.2010.03.026</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">20298753</pub-id></mixed-citation></ref><ref id="CR55"><label>55.</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name name-style="western"><surname>Necela</surname><given-names>BM</given-names></name><name name-style="western"><surname>Su</surname><given-names>W</given-names></name><name name-style="western"><surname>Thompson</surname><given-names>EA</given-names></name></person-group><article-title>Toll-like receptor 4 mediates cross-talk between peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma and nuclear factor-κB in macrophages</article-title><source>Immunology</source><year>2008</year><volume>125</volume><fpage>344</fpage><lpage>358</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/j.1365-2567.2008.02849.x</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">18422969</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmcid">PMC2669138</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="CR56"><label>56.</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name name-style="western"><surname>Waku</surname><given-names>T</given-names></name><name name-style="western"><surname>Shiraki</surname><given-names>T</given-names></name><name name-style="western"><surname>Oyama</surname><given-names>T</given-names></name><name name-style="western"><surname>Maebara</surname><given-names>K</given-names></name><name name-style="western"><surname>Nakamori</surname><given-names>R</given-names></name><name name-style="western"><surname>Morikawa</surname><given-names>K</given-names></name></person-group><article-title>The nuclear receptor PPARγ individually responds to serotonin- and fatty acid-metabolites</article-title><source>EMBO J</source><year>2010</year><volume>29</volume><fpage>3395</fpage><lpage>3407</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1038/emboj.2010.197</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">20717101</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmcid">PMC2957204</pub-id></element-citation></ref></ref-list></back></article>