
<!DOCTYPE article
  PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Archiving and Interchange DTD with MathML3 v1.4 20241031//EN" "JATS-archivearticle1-4-mathml3.dtd">
<article article-type="review-article" xml:lang="en" dtd-version="1.4"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="nlm-ta">Insights Imaging</journal-id><journal-id journal-id-type="iso-abbrev">Insights Imaging</journal-id><journal-id journal-id-type="pmc-domain-id">365</journal-id><journal-id journal-id-type="pmc-domain">springeropen</journal-id><journal-id journal-id-type="nlm-id">101532453</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title xml:lang="en">Insights into Imaging</journal-title></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">1869-4101</issn><?publisher_abbrev springer?><custom-meta-group><custom-meta><meta-name>pmc-is-collection-domain</meta-name><meta-value>yes</meta-value></custom-meta><custom-meta><meta-name>pmc-collection-title</meta-name><meta-value>Springer</meta-value></custom-meta></custom-meta-group></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="pmcid">PMC3314733</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="pmcid-ver">PMC3314733.2</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="pmcaid">3314733</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="pmcaiid">3314809</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="pmid">22696044</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s13244-011-0145-9</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">145</article-id><article-version article-version-type="pmc-version">2</article-version><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Pictorial Review</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>Multidetector CT cystography for imaging colovesical fistulas and iatrogenic bladder leaks</article-title></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes"><name name-style="western"><surname>Tonolini</surname><given-names initials="M">Massimo</given-names></name><address><phone>+39-02-39043063</phone><fax>+39-02-39042560</fax><email>mtonolini@sirm.org</email></address><xref ref-type="aff" rid="Aff1"/></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author"><name name-style="western"><surname>Bianco</surname><given-names initials="R">Roberto</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="Aff1"/></contrib><aff id="Aff1">Department of Radiology, “Luigi Sacco” University Hospital, Via G.B. Grassi 74, 20157 Milan, Italy </aff></contrib-group><pub-date pub-type="epub"><day>4</day><month>2</month><year>2012</year></pub-date><pub-date pub-type="collection"><month>4</month><year>2012</year></pub-date><volume>3</volume><issue>2</issue><issue-id pub-id-type="pmc-issue-id">207247</issue-id><fpage>181</fpage><lpage>187</lpage><history><date date-type="received"><day>6</day><month>7</month><year>2011</year></date><date date-type="rev-recd"><day>6</day><month>11</month><year>2011</year></date><date date-type="accepted"><day>19</day><month>12</month><year>2011</year></date></history><pub-history><event event-type="pmc-release"><date><day>04</day><month>02</month><year>2012</year></date></event><event event-type="pmc-live"><date><day>05</day><month>04</month><year>2012</year></date></event><event event-type="pmc-last-change"><date iso-8601-date="2026-04-17 12:11:02.733"><day>17</day><month>04</month><year>2026</year></date></event><event event-type="pmc-version" specific-use="live"><article-id pub-id-type="pmcaiid">3314733</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s13244-011-0145-9</article-id><article-version>1</article-version><pub-date><day>04</day><month>02</month><year>2012</year></pub-date></event><event event-type="pmc-version" specific-use="live"><article-id pub-id-type="pmcaiid">3314809</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s13244-011-0145-9</article-id><article-version>2</article-version><pub-date><day>04</day><month>02</month><year>2012</year></pub-date></event></pub-history><permissions><copyright-statement>© European Society of Radiology 2012</copyright-statement></permissions><self-uri xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" content-type="pmc-pdf" xlink:href="13244_2011_Article_145.pdf"><?pdf-name 13244_2011_Article_145.pdf?><?pdf-size 507406?><?pdf-md5 b728707cf1068a11fa757a9bcf22f570?><?pdf-image-server-status NEVER_LOAD?><?pdf-cloudpmc-urn urn:app:9aa8/3314809/b728707cf106/13244_2011_Article_145.pdf?></self-uri><abstract id="Abs1"><p>Multidetector computed tomography (MDCT) cystography currently represents the modality of choice to image the urinary bladder in traumatized patients. In this review we present our experience with MDCT cystography applications outside the trauma setting, particularly for diagnosing bladder fistulas and leaks. A detailed explanation is provided concerning exam preparation, acquisition technique, image reconstruction and interpretation. Colovesical fistulas most commonly occur as a complication of sigmoid diverticular disease, and often remain occult after extensive diagnostic work-up including cystoscopy and contrast-enhanced CT. We consistently achieved accurate preoperative visualization of colovesical fistulas using MDCT cystography. Urinary leaks and injuries represent a non-negligible occurrence after pelvic surgery, particularly obstetric and gynaecological procedures: in our experience MDCT cystography is useful to investigate iatrogenic bladder leaks or fistulas. In our opinion, MDCT cystography should be recommended as the first line modality for direct visualization or otherwise confident exclusion of both spontaneous enterovesical fistulas and bladder injuries following instrumentation procedures, obstetric or surgical interventions.</p><p><italic>Main Messages</italic></p><p>• <italic>Explanation of exam preparation, acquisition technique, image reconstruction and interpretation.</italic></p><p>• <italic>Preoperative visualization of colovesical fistulas, usually secondary to sigmoid diverticulitis.</italic></p><p>• <italic>Visualization or exclusion of iatrogenic bladder injuries following instrumentation or surgery.</italic></p></abstract><kwd-group><title>Keywords</title><kwd>Computed tomography (CT)</kwd><kwd>Urinary bladder</kwd><kwd>Urinary bladder fistula</kwd><kwd>Colonic diverticulitis</kwd><kwd>Postoperative complications</kwd></kwd-group><custom-meta-group><custom-meta><meta-name>pmc-status-qastatus</meta-name><meta-value>0</meta-value></custom-meta><custom-meta><meta-name>pmc-status-live</meta-name><meta-value>yes</meta-value></custom-meta><custom-meta><meta-name>pmc-status-embargo</meta-name><meta-value>no</meta-value></custom-meta><custom-meta><meta-name>pmc-status-released</meta-name><meta-value>yes</meta-value></custom-meta><custom-meta><meta-name>pmc-prop-open-access</meta-name><meta-value>yes</meta-value></custom-meta><custom-meta><meta-name>pmc-prop-olf</meta-name><meta-value>no</meta-value></custom-meta><custom-meta><meta-name>pmc-prop-manuscript</meta-name><meta-value>no</meta-value></custom-meta><custom-meta><meta-name>pmc-prop-legally-suppressed</meta-name><meta-value>no</meta-value></custom-meta><custom-meta><meta-name>pmc-prop-has-pdf</meta-name><meta-value>yes</meta-value></custom-meta><custom-meta><meta-name>pmc-prop-has-supplement</meta-name><meta-value>no</meta-value></custom-meta><custom-meta><meta-name>pmc-prop-pdf-only</meta-name><meta-value>no</meta-value></custom-meta><custom-meta><meta-name>pmc-prop-suppress-copyright</meta-name><meta-value>no</meta-value></custom-meta><custom-meta><meta-name>pmc-prop-is-real-version</meta-name><meta-value>no</meta-value></custom-meta><custom-meta><meta-name>pmc-prop-is-scanned-article</meta-name><meta-value>no</meta-value></custom-meta><custom-meta><meta-name>pmc-prop-preprint</meta-name><meta-value>no</meta-value></custom-meta><custom-meta><meta-name>pmc-prop-in-epmc</meta-name><meta-value>yes</meta-value></custom-meta><custom-meta><meta-name>issue-copyright-statement</meta-name><meta-value>© European Society of Radiology 2012</meta-value></custom-meta></custom-meta-group></article-meta></front><body><sec id="Sec1" sec-type="introduction"><title>Introduction</title><p>In the past, suspected bladder injuries were investigated by means of conventional radiographic cystography, a time-consuming and cumbersome procedure in traumatized patients that provides very limited information on surrounding pelvic structures.</p><p>During the 1990s, computed tomography (CT) cystography was developed to complement body CT in patients with possible traumatic bladder lesions. Early experiences reported this technique to be at least as accurate as radiographic studies in the assessment of bladder integrity. Besides bladder configuration and lumen, CT provides extensive information on bones, rectosigmoid, genital organs, peritoneal cul-de-sac and extraperitoneal spaces [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CR1">1</xref>–<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CR5">5</xref>].</p><p>Recently, volumetric CT cystography acquisition on multidetector (MD) scanners benefited from improved spatial resolution and image reconstruction on arbitrary planes. Allowing identification of small urine leaks in every possible direction, MDCT cystography approaches absolute sensitivity and specificity with no false-negative results reported [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CR6">6</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CR7">7</xref>].</p><p>Multiplanar reformations represent a highly valuable complement to axial images in providing better anatomic delineation of the rupture site, and their similar orientation to surgical anatomy is appealing to most surgeons. Therefore, MDCT cystography is currently the most recommended imaging technique to detect and classify traumatic bladder lesions, including contusion (without extravesical leak), intraperitoneal, extraperitoneal or combined rupture [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CR6">6</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CR7">7</xref>].</p></sec><sec id="Sec2"><title>MDCT cystography technique and interpretation</title><p>Just before MDCT cystography, diluted iodinated contrast is prepared by removing 40 ml from a 500-ml normal saline bag and injecting a similar amount of non-ionic contrast agent (such as 350 mgI/ml iomeprol or 370 mgI/ml iopromide). Standard intravenous infusion tubing is then connected to the bag and filled with diluted contrast to avoid instilling air in the bladder.</p><p>With the patient supine on the CT scanner table, the bladder is completely emptied by placing on the floor the Foley catheter bag, which is then disposed. Preliminary unenhanced scans are optional, since recent abdominal-pelvic CT or CT urography is available for most patients.</p><p>Tubing is then connected to the Foley catheter, with the diluted contrast bag positioned 50-60 cm higher than table level. When the flow control device is opened, retrograde drip infusion of diluted contrast starts. Pressure injection and bag squeezing are strongly discouraged since bladder injury may worsen. Some serial CT scanograms may be acquired to verify progressive bladder distension and opacification. At least 300 ml of diluted contrast medium is injected into the bladder, unless the patient complains of intolerable bladder distension or flow stops. The estimated amount of instilled contrast mixture is recorded in the radiology report.</p><p>Then, volumetric pelvic CT is acquired at maximum bladder distension. During initial experience, acquisition parameters on our four-slice MDCT included 120 kV tube voltage, 245-280 mA tube current, 4 × 2.5 mm collimation, 7.5 mm/gantry rotation table feed (pitch 0.75), and 2.5/1.25 mm slice thickness/reconstruction index. Currently, acquisition on a 64-slice scanner involves tube current adjusted to body weight using automatic dose modulation, 64 × 0.625 mm collimation, 0.891 MD pitch, and 2/1 mm slice thickness/reconstruction index. Additionally, intravenous contrast medium may be used, particularly when looking for neoplastic or inflammatory processes.</p><p>Multiplanar reformations along coronal and sagittal planes are routinely performed; images are viewed at CT angiography window settings (width 600-900 HU, level 150-300 HU). Further image processing using multiplanar thick-slab sliding MIP or volume rendering techniques helps visualization of thin fistulas or leaks (such as in Fig. <xref rid="Fig1" ref-type="fig">1</xref>). A normal MDCT cystogram includes a well-distended urinary bladder with thin walls, uniformly opacified (attenuation values in the range 270-320 HU) without streaky artefacts nor evidence of extraluminal contrast [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CR4">4</xref>].<fig id="Fig1" position="float" orientation="portrait"><label>Fig. 1</label><caption><p>A 79-year-old woman complaining of hypogastric pain, dysuria and fecaluria. Cystoscopy did not identify fistulous orifices. Abdomino-pelvic CT showed sigmoid diverticulosis with mild signs of perivisceral and fascial inflammation, focally adherent to the thickened left bladder wall (<bold>a</bold>). Some air in the bladder lumen without previous catheterization suggested a probable colovesical fistula, which was not directly visualized during excretory phase acquisition (focused sagittal MIP image in <bold>b</bold>). At MDCT cystography, significant leakage of diluted contrast agent in the sigmoid colon was observed through a short fistula, effectively depicted (<italic>arrowheads</italic>) on axial (<bold>c</bold>) and oblique-coronal reformatted (<bold>d</bold>) images. Elective surgery included segmental resection of the sigmoid colon, resection and repair of the bladder dome</p></caption><graphic xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" id="MO1" position="float" orientation="portrait" xlink:href="13244_2011_145_Fig1_HTML.jpg"><?image-name 13244_2011_145_Fig1_HTML.jpg?><?image-size 177513?><?image-md5 4d4290c936d97865d2cc1527cdccdfa4?><?image-image-server-status LOAD_COMPLETED?><?image-original-height 608?><?image-original-width 609?><?image-scaled-height 608?><?image-scaled-width 609?><?image-cloudpmc-urn urn:cdn:blobs/9aa8/3314809/4d4290c936d9/13244_2011_145_Fig1_HTML.jpg?><?thumb-name 13244_2011_145_Fig1_HTML.gif?><?thumb-size 7063?><?thumb-md5 4073fbe9635141776b092bb77be1d8fe?><?thumb-image-server-status NEVER_LOAD?><?thumb-scaled-height 100?><?thumb-scaled-width 100?><?thumb-cloudpmc-urn urn:cdn:blobs/9aa8/3314809/4073fbe96351/13244_2011_145_Fig1_HTML.gif?></graphic></fig></p><p>Borrowing from previous experiences with conventional cystography, it has been reported that bladder wall integrity may be confirmed, ruling out possible leakages, when retrograde filling with at least 250 ml of diluted contrast is obtained. The only recognized pitfall of this technique is the possible occlusion of a small tear located at the bladder trigone by the Foley catheter balloon [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CR6">6</xref>].</p></sec><sec id="Sec3"><title>Colovesical fistulas in diverticulitis</title><p>Although rare, colovesical fistulas represent the most common form (65% of cases) of an acquired bladder–enteric fistula and most frequently occur between the recto-sigmoid and the bladder dome [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CR8">8</xref>]. Diverticular disease represents their major cause (two-thirds of cases), followed by colorectal carcinoma, whereas uncommon aetiologies include Crohn’s disease, bladder or uterine neoplasms, previous irradiation, female pelvic inflammatory diseases, periappendiceal abscesses penetrating trauma or foreign bodies [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CR9">9</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CR10">10</xref>].</p><p>Clinical presentation of colovesical fistulas includes pneumaturia and fecaluria as the most pathognomonic complaints, along with variable degrees of fever, abdominal pain and weight loss [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CR11">11</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CR12">12</xref>]. Treatment includes primary surgical resection of the involved bowel segment (most usually the sigmoid) and colorectal anastomosis, plus closure of the bladder defect or vesical windowectomy; sometimes a protective colostomy is created [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CR8">8</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CR11">11</xref>]. Recently, safe and effective resection of diverticulitis complicated by enteric fistulae has been performed laparoscopically [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CR13">13</xref>].</p><p>Despite an easy clinical diagnosis, precise identification of colovesical fistulas is often challenging and is obtained in only 55% of patients after extensive work-ups. Cystoscopy, conventional cystography, colonic enema, sigmoidoscopy and colonoscopy have very limited accuracy in identifying these fistulas [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CR9">9</xref>–<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CR11">11</xref>].</p><p>Contrast-enhanced CT with excretory phase or urographic acquisition is commonly used as the primary imaging technique to investigate suspected colovesical fistulas. Reported accuracy is variable and often limited, since tracks are directly identifiable only when filled by air, fluid or enteral contrast [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CR10">10</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CR14">14</xref>]. Most commonly, fistulization is indirectly suggested by bowel-to-bladder adherence, focal bladder mural thickening and/or intraluminal air. Extraluminal CT findings such as bowel wall thickening, diverticula or an extravesical soft tissue mass corresponding to diverticulitis or carcinoma hint at the aetiology of the fistula [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CR9">9</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CR10">10</xref>].</p><p>In our Department, MDCT cystography has been successfully employed to detect and visualize colovesical fistulas in patients with colonic diverticular disease. In our experience, retrograde bladder distension with at least 250 ml diluted contrast medium achieves opening and opacification of thin yet patent colovesical fistulas. Multiplanar reformations, also using MIP algorithms, are invaluable in precisely depicting these short, small-calibre fistulous tracks, thus enabling an accurate preoperative planning (Figs. <xref rid="Fig1" ref-type="fig">1</xref>, <xref rid="Fig2" ref-type="fig">2</xref>).<fig id="Fig2" position="float" orientation="portrait"><label>Fig. 2</label><caption><p>An 80-year-old woman undergoing routine body CT for long-standing, unexplained fever. Air was present in the urinary bladder, with Foley catheter balloon in place (<bold>a</bold>). MDCT cystography (axial, sagittal reformatted and oblique coronal images in <bold>b</bold>, <bold>c</bold>, and <bold>d</bold> respectively) obtained adequate bladder distension with instillation of 300 ml diluted contrast medium, and visualization (<italic>arrowheads</italic>) of a subtle, initially unsuspected colovesical fistula due to colonic diverticular disease</p></caption><graphic xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" id="MO2" position="float" orientation="portrait" xlink:href="13244_2011_145_Fig2_HTML.jpg"><?image-name 13244_2011_145_Fig2_HTML.jpg?><?image-size 189526?><?image-md5 d4b6acf0715e283d5b8e7a51e7548acc?><?image-image-server-status LOAD_COMPLETED?><?image-original-height 609?><?image-original-width 609?><?image-scaled-height 609?><?image-scaled-width 609?><?image-cloudpmc-urn urn:cdn:blobs/9aa8/3314809/d4b6acf0715e/13244_2011_145_Fig2_HTML.jpg?><?thumb-name 13244_2011_145_Fig2_HTML.gif?><?thumb-size 6909?><?thumb-md5 1030d5d2bfd823f5fcca8be40a1313c1?><?thumb-image-server-status NEVER_LOAD?><?thumb-scaled-height 100?><?thumb-scaled-width 100?><?thumb-cloudpmc-urn urn:cdn:blobs/9aa8/3314809/1030d5d2bfd8/13244_2011_145_Fig2_HTML.gif?></graphic></fig></p><p>Recently, sigmoid–vesical fistulas have been preoperatively investigated using MRI with high accuracy in correct identification of the underlying disease, even though the fistulous tract might not be clearly identified [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CR12">12</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CR15">15</xref>]. Although magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) represents an attractive technique when radiation dose is a concern, its use in the emergency setting is largely limited by cost, availability and lengthy examination time. Our experience recommends MDCT cystography as a fast, cheaper and highly accurate technique to depict colovesical fistulization, particularly when planning for surgical or laparoscopic treatment. Also, ileovesical (most often caused by Crohn’s disease) and rectovesical (associated with tumours or following trauma) fistulas can also be effectively imaged using the same modality.</p></sec><sec id="Sec4"><title>Iatrogenic and postoperative lesions</title><p>Because of embryological development and anatomical proximity to the genital organs, most (61.5%) iatrogenic bladder injuries occur as complications of gynaecological surgery, such as hysterectomy, pelvic masses resection, Caesarean section, diagnostic laparoscopy, anti-incontinence or laparoscopically assisted vaginal procedures [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CR16">16</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CR17">17</xref>]. Predisposing factors include distortion of the pelvic anatomy by post-surgical adhesions, radiation therapy, pelvic inflammatory disease, large uterine fibroids and advanced-stage malignancies, obesity, diabetes and postoperative surgical infection [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CR17">17</xref>–<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CR19">19</xref>].</p><p>More rarely, lower urinary tract iatrogenic lesions may occur during general surgery (particularly for colorectal cancer, diverticulitis or inflammatory bowel disease), vascular and urological interventions (such as prostatectomy and ureteral reimplantation during renal transplant) with variable reported injury rates according to their complexity [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CR16">16</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CR17">17</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CR20">20</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CR21">21</xref>].</p><p>Most iatrogenic bladder lesions are full-thickness tears, commonly located at the bladder dome, and half of them are identified and treated intraoperatively. Conversely, the diagnosis of urological complications is often made postoperatively following complaints of unexplained or persistent haematuria, fever, abdominal pain and oliguria [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CR16">16</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CR20">20</xref>].</p><p>Imaging plays a key role in the diagnosis of urological postsurgical complications and often proves invaluable to the surgeon in choosing the correct therapeutic option [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CR17">17</xref>]. Since a urethral catheter is often present postoperatively, in the past conventional radiographic cystography was employed to visualize suspected bladder lacerations, with significant limitations related to obtaining an adequate distension and to superimposition of bowel and bony structures [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CR2">2</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CR17">17</xref>]. Largely used to investigate postoperative pelvic abnormalities, CT can detect and classify fluid collections such as lymphocele, haematoma, abscess and urinoma with their relationship to the surrounding structures [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CR22">22</xref>]. Recently, MDCT cystography has been proposed to assess the integrity of the vesicourethral anastomosis after radical prostatectomy, allowing to identify very small urine leaks [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CR23">23</xref>].</p><p>With its intrinsic advantages, including speed, thin collimation and multiplanarity, MDCT cystography has in our experience proved useful to exclude (Fig. <xref rid="Fig3" ref-type="fig">3</xref>) or document iatrogenic bladder leakages following instrumentation procedures (Fig. <xref rid="Fig4" ref-type="fig">4</xref>) or surgical interventions (Fig. <xref rid="Fig5" ref-type="fig">5</xref>) with extremely high accuracy.<fig id="Fig3" position="float" orientation="portrait"><label>Fig. 3</label><caption><p>A 61-year-old patient undergoing laparotomic surgery for Stage II (FIGO) bilateral ovarian cystoadenocarcinoma (preoperative staging CT image in <bold>a</bold>). MDCT cystography was performed 4 h after surgery because the gynaecological surgeon suspected intraoperative bladder rupture. Multiplanar assessment (axial, sagittal and coronal images in <bold>a</bold>, <bold>b</bold> and <bold>c</bold>, respectively) with adequate bladder filling detected some extraperitoneal air without extravasated contrast in the perivesical spaces, allowed confident exclusion of bladder rupture with urine leak and possible vesico-vaginal fistula. The patient recovered well and was discharged from hospital</p></caption><graphic xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" id="MO3" position="float" orientation="portrait" xlink:href="13244_2011_145_Fig3_HTML.jpg"><?image-name 13244_2011_145_Fig3_HTML.jpg?><?image-size 182763?><?image-md5 1f82859b5ec85075858486b426ddff50?><?image-image-server-status LOAD_COMPLETED?><?image-original-height 609?><?image-original-width 609?><?image-scaled-height 609?><?image-scaled-width 609?><?image-cloudpmc-urn urn:cdn:blobs/9aa8/3314809/1f82859b5ec8/13244_2011_145_Fig3_HTML.jpg?><?thumb-name 13244_2011_145_Fig3_HTML.gif?><?thumb-size 6859?><?thumb-md5 9151369c54027067681bbc200b2ac6dc?><?thumb-image-server-status NEVER_LOAD?><?thumb-scaled-height 100?><?thumb-scaled-width 100?><?thumb-cloudpmc-urn urn:cdn:blobs/9aa8/3314809/9151369c5402/13244_2011_145_Fig3_HTML.gif?></graphic></fig><fig id="Fig4" position="float" orientation="portrait"><label>Fig. 4</label><caption><p>An elderly, 86-year-old woman with multiple medical problems, hospitalized for right femur fracture. CT urography requested for clinical suspicion of acute pyelonephritis detected extensive presence of air in the bladder (<bold>a</bold>), but no extravesical urine leak was identified even on coronal MIP reformations (<bold>b</bold>). MDCT cystography (sagittal and coronal reformatted images in <bold>c</bold> and <bold>d</bold>, respectively) clearly opacified a tear in the upper posterior aspect of the bladder (<italic>arrowheads</italic>), which was retrospectively attributed to difficult emergency catheterization manoeuvres</p></caption><graphic xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" id="MO4" position="float" orientation="portrait" xlink:href="13244_2011_145_Fig4_HTML.jpg"><?image-name 13244_2011_145_Fig4_HTML.jpg?><?image-size 208366?><?image-md5 caf60fc26ce5bbc34ebe736175c5644a?><?image-image-server-status LOAD_COMPLETED?><?image-original-height 609?><?image-original-width 609?><?image-scaled-height 609?><?image-scaled-width 609?><?image-cloudpmc-urn urn:cdn:blobs/9aa8/3314809/caf60fc26ce5/13244_2011_145_Fig4_HTML.jpg?><?thumb-name 13244_2011_145_Fig4_HTML.gif?><?thumb-size 8093?><?thumb-md5 915f13d592836fd7e79e34d00abc9d5f?><?thumb-image-server-status NEVER_LOAD?><?thumb-scaled-height 100?><?thumb-scaled-width 100?><?thumb-cloudpmc-urn urn:cdn:blobs/9aa8/3314809/915f13d59283/13244_2011_145_Fig4_HTML.gif?></graphic></fig><fig id="Fig5" position="float" orientation="portrait"><label>Fig. 5</label><caption><p>A 23-year-old female investigated with conventional cystography by the attending radiologist, shortly after troublesome Caesarean section, with confirmation of bladder rupture including a fairly large right-sided pseudo-diverticular outpouching (<bold>a</bold>). MDCT cystography was requested for clarification and operative treatment planning, and revealed another large extravasation on the left upper bladder aspect (<bold>b</bold>) and fistulization from the bladder dome towards the ileum (<italic>arrowhead</italic> in <bold>c</bold>). After surgical repair, postoperative configuration of the urinary bladder was documented with radiographic cystography (<bold>d</bold>)</p></caption><graphic xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" id="MO5" position="float" orientation="portrait" xlink:href="13244_2011_145_Fig5_HTML.jpg"><?image-name 13244_2011_145_Fig5_HTML.jpg?><?image-size 132972?><?image-md5 a21a07b062da4adccaa0ecadcf9356d7?><?image-image-server-status LOAD_COMPLETED?><?image-original-height 609?><?image-original-width 609?><?image-scaled-height 609?><?image-scaled-width 609?><?image-cloudpmc-urn urn:cdn:blobs/9aa8/3314809/a21a07b062da/13244_2011_145_Fig5_HTML.jpg?><?thumb-name 13244_2011_145_Fig5_HTML.gif?><?thumb-size 6171?><?thumb-md5 2bad4c71d7a318b845cb9139dab22a5c?><?thumb-image-server-status NEVER_LOAD?><?thumb-scaled-height 100?><?thumb-scaled-width 100?><?thumb-cloudpmc-urn urn:cdn:blobs/9aa8/3314809/2bad4c71d7a3/13244_2011_145_Fig5_HTML.gif?></graphic></fig></p></sec><sec id="Sec5" sec-type="conclusion"><title>Conclusion</title><p>Based on our experience, MDCT cystography should be recommended as the most effective and accurate technique for direct visualization or exclusion of both spontaneous enterovesical fistulas and bladder leaks or fistulas following instrumentation procedures, obstetric or surgical interventions.</p></sec></body><back><ack><title>Acknowledgements</title><p>We would like to thank the professional nurses Nerea Bevilacqua, Claudio Bonomi, Eugenia Ferron, M. Teresa Meloni and Giacomo Nocera for their valuable contribution in developing and performing the MDCT cystography technique, as well as for their daily care of our patients in the Radiology Department.</p></ack><ref-list id="Bib1"><title>References</title><ref id="CR1"><label>1.</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name name-style="western"><surname>Lis</surname><given-names>LE</given-names></name><name name-style="western"><surname>Cohen</surname><given-names>AJ</given-names></name></person-group><article-title>CT cystography in the evaluation of bladder trauma</article-title><source>J Comput Assist Tomogr</source><year>1990</year><volume>14</volume><fpage>386</fpage><lpage>389</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1097/00004728-199005000-00012</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">2335605</pub-id></mixed-citation></ref><ref id="CR2"><label>2.</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name name-style="western"><surname>Peng</surname><given-names>MY</given-names></name><name name-style="western"><surname>Parisky</surname><given-names>YR</given-names></name><name name-style="western"><surname>Cornwell</surname><given-names>EE</given-names><suffix>3rd</suffix></name><etal/></person-group><article-title>CT cystography versus conventional cystography in evaluation of bladder injury</article-title><source>AJR Am J Roentgenol</source><year>1999</year><volume>173</volume><fpage>1269</fpage><lpage>1272</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">10541103</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="doi" assigning-authority="pmc">10.2214/ajr.173.5.10541103</pub-id></mixed-citation></ref><ref id="CR3"><label>3.</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name name-style="western"><surname>Morgan</surname><given-names>DE</given-names></name><name name-style="western"><surname>Nallamala</surname><given-names>LK</given-names></name><name name-style="western"><surname>Kenney</surname><given-names>PJ</given-names></name><etal/></person-group><article-title>CT cystography: radiographic and clinical predictors of bladder rupture</article-title><source>AJR Am J Roentgenol</source><year>2000</year><volume>174</volume><fpage>89</fpage><lpage>95</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">10628460</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="doi" assigning-authority="pmc">10.2214/ajr.174.1.1740089</pub-id></mixed-citation></ref><ref id="CR4"><label>4.</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name name-style="western"><surname>Vaccaro</surname><given-names>JP</given-names></name><name name-style="western"><surname>Brody</surname><given-names>JM</given-names></name></person-group><article-title>CT cystography in the evaluation of major bladder trauma</article-title><source>Radiographics</source><year>2000</year><volume>20</volume><fpage>1373</fpage><lpage>1381</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">10992026</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="doi" assigning-authority="pmc">10.1148/radiographics.20.5.g00se111373</pub-id></mixed-citation></ref><ref id="CR5"><label>5.</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name name-style="western"><surname>Deck</surname><given-names>AJ</given-names></name><name name-style="western"><surname>Shaves</surname><given-names>S</given-names></name><name name-style="western"><surname>Talner</surname><given-names>L</given-names></name><etal/></person-group><article-title>Computerized tomography cystography for the diagnosis of traumatic bladder rupture</article-title><source>J Urol</source><year>2000</year><volume>164</volume><fpage>43</fpage><lpage>46</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/S0022-5347(05)67445-9</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">10840421</pub-id></mixed-citation></ref><ref id="CR6"><label>6.</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name name-style="western"><surname>Chan</surname><given-names>DP</given-names></name><name name-style="western"><surname>Abujudeh</surname><given-names>HH</given-names></name><name name-style="western"><surname>Cushing</surname><given-names>GL</given-names><suffix>Jr</suffix></name><etal/></person-group><article-title>CT cystography with multiplanar reformation for suspected bladder rupture: experience in 234 cases</article-title><source>AJR Am J Roentgenol</source><year>2006</year><volume>187</volume><fpage>1296</fpage><lpage>1302</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.2214/AJR.05.0971</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">17056919</pub-id></mixed-citation></ref><ref id="CR7"><label>7.</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name name-style="western"><surname>Ishak</surname><given-names>C</given-names></name><name name-style="western"><surname>Kanth</surname><given-names>N</given-names></name></person-group><article-title>Bladder trauma: multidetector computed tomography cystography</article-title><source>Emerg Radiol</source><year>2011</year><volume>18</volume><fpage>321</fpage><lpage>327</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s10140-011-0947-6</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">21523470</pub-id></mixed-citation></ref><ref id="CR8"><label>8.</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name name-style="western"><surname>Carvajal Balaguera</surname><given-names>J</given-names></name><name name-style="western"><surname>Camunas Segovia</surname><given-names>J</given-names></name><name name-style="western"><surname>Pena Gamarra</surname><given-names>L</given-names></name><etal/></person-group><article-title>Colovesical fistula complicating diverticular disease: one-stage resection</article-title><source>Int Surg</source><year>2006</year><volume>91</volume><fpage>17</fpage><lpage>23</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">16706097</pub-id></mixed-citation></ref><ref id="CR9"><label>9.</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name name-style="western"><surname>Yu</surname><given-names>NC</given-names></name><name name-style="western"><surname>Raman</surname><given-names>SS</given-names></name><name name-style="western"><surname>Patel</surname><given-names>M</given-names></name><etal/></person-group><article-title>Fistulas of the genitourinary tract: a radiologic review</article-title><source>Radiographics</source><year>2004</year><volume>24</volume><fpage>1331</fpage><lpage>1352</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1148/rg.245035219</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">15371612</pub-id></mixed-citation></ref><ref id="CR10"><label>10.</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name name-style="western"><surname>Goldman</surname><given-names>SM</given-names></name><name name-style="western"><surname>Fishman</surname><given-names>EK</given-names></name><name name-style="western"><surname>Gatewood</surname><given-names>OM</given-names></name><etal/></person-group><article-title>CT in the diagnosis of enterovesical fistulae</article-title><source>AJR Am J Roentgenol</source><year>1985</year><volume>144</volume><fpage>1229</fpage><lpage>1233</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">3873806</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="doi" assigning-authority="pmc">10.2214/ajr.144.6.1229</pub-id></mixed-citation></ref><ref id="CR11"><label>11.</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name name-style="western"><surname>Melchior</surname><given-names>S</given-names></name><name name-style="western"><surname>Cudovic</surname><given-names>D</given-names></name><name name-style="western"><surname>Jones</surname><given-names>J</given-names></name><etal/></person-group><article-title>Diagnosis and surgical management of colovesical fistulas due to sigmoid diverticulitis</article-title><source>J Urol</source><year>2009</year><volume>182</volume><fpage>978</fpage><lpage>982</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.juro.2009.05.022</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">19616793</pub-id></mixed-citation></ref><ref id="CR12"><label>12.</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name name-style="western"><surname>Ravichandran</surname><given-names>S</given-names></name><name name-style="western"><surname>Ahmed</surname><given-names>HU</given-names></name><name name-style="western"><surname>Matanhelia</surname><given-names>SS</given-names></name><etal/></person-group><article-title>Is there a role for magnetic resonance imaging in diagnosing colovesical fistulas?</article-title><source>Urology</source><year>2008</year><volume>72</volume><fpage>832</fpage><lpage>837</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.urology.2008.06.036</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">18718640</pub-id></mixed-citation></ref><ref id="CR13"><label>13.</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name name-style="western"><surname>Nguyen</surname><given-names>SQ</given-names></name><name name-style="western"><surname>Divino</surname><given-names>CM</given-names></name><name name-style="western"><surname>Vine</surname><given-names>A</given-names></name><etal/></person-group><article-title>Laparoscopic surgery for diverticular disease complicated by fistulae</article-title><source>JSLS</source><year>2006</year><volume>10</volume><fpage>166</fpage><lpage>168</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">16882413</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmcid">PMC3016132</pub-id></mixed-citation></ref><ref id="CR14"><label>14.</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name name-style="western"><surname>Werner</surname><given-names>A</given-names></name><name name-style="western"><surname>Diehl</surname><given-names>SJ</given-names></name><name name-style="western"><surname>Farag-Soliman</surname><given-names>M</given-names></name><etal/></person-group><article-title>Multi-slice spiral CT in routine diagnosis of suspected acute left-sided colonic diverticulitis: a prospective study of 120 patients</article-title><source>Eur Radiol</source><year>2003</year><volume>13</volume><fpage>2596</fpage><lpage>2603</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s00330-003-1887-7</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">12740709</pub-id></mixed-citation></ref><ref id="CR15"><label>15.</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name name-style="western"><surname>Koketsu</surname><given-names>S</given-names></name><name name-style="western"><surname>Watanabe</surname><given-names>T</given-names></name><name name-style="western"><surname>Minami</surname><given-names>M</given-names></name><etal/></person-group><article-title>Preoperative evaluation of enterovesical fistula using magnetic resonance imaging: case report</article-title><source>Hepatogastroenterology</source><year>2009</year><volume>56</volume><fpage>696</fpage><lpage>698</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">19621683</pub-id></mixed-citation></ref><ref id="CR16"><label>16.</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name name-style="western"><surname>Siow</surname><given-names>A</given-names></name><name name-style="western"><surname>Nikam</surname><given-names>YA</given-names></name><name name-style="western"><surname>Ng</surname><given-names>C</given-names></name><etal/></person-group><article-title>Urological complications of laparoscopic hysterectomy: a four-year review at KK Women’s and Children’s Hospital, Singapore</article-title><source>Singapore Med J</source><year>2007</year><volume>48</volume><fpage>217</fpage><lpage>221</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">17342290</pub-id></mixed-citation></ref><ref id="CR17"><label>17.</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name name-style="western"><surname>Paspulati</surname><given-names>RM</given-names></name><name name-style="western"><surname>Dalal</surname><given-names>TA</given-names></name></person-group><article-title>Imaging of complications following gynecologic surgery</article-title><source>Radiographics</source><year>2010</year><volume>30</volume><fpage>625</fpage><lpage>642</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1148/rg.303095129</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">20462985</pub-id></mixed-citation></ref><ref id="CR18"><label>18.</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name name-style="western"><surname>Armenakas</surname><given-names>NA</given-names></name><name name-style="western"><surname>Pareek</surname><given-names>G</given-names></name><name name-style="western"><surname>Fracchia</surname><given-names>JA</given-names></name></person-group><article-title>Iatrogenic bladder perforations: longterm followup of 65 patients</article-title><source>J Am Coll Surg</source><year>2004</year><volume>198</volume><fpage>78</fpage><lpage>82</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2003.08.022</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">14698314</pub-id></mixed-citation></ref><ref id="CR19"><label>19.</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name name-style="western"><surname>Ostrzenski</surname><given-names>A</given-names></name><name name-style="western"><surname>Ostrzenska</surname><given-names>KM</given-names></name></person-group><article-title>Bladder injury during laparoscopic surgery</article-title><source>Obstet Gynecol Surv</source><year>1998</year><volume>53</volume><fpage>175</fpage><lpage>180</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1097/00006254-199803000-00023</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">9513988</pub-id></mixed-citation></ref><ref id="CR20"><label>20.</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name name-style="western"><surname>Gilmour</surname><given-names>DT</given-names></name><name name-style="western"><surname>Dwyer</surname><given-names>PL</given-names></name><name name-style="western"><surname>Carey</surname><given-names>MP</given-names></name></person-group><article-title>Lower urinary tract injury during gynecologic surgery and its detection by intraoperative cystoscopy</article-title><source>Obstet Gynecol</source><year>1999</year><volume>94</volume><fpage>883</fpage><lpage>889</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/S0029-7844(99)00456-1</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">10546778</pub-id></mixed-citation></ref><ref id="CR21"><label>21.</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name name-style="western"><surname>Lind</surname><given-names>MY</given-names></name><name name-style="western"><surname>Hazebroek</surname><given-names>EJ</given-names></name><name name-style="western"><surname>Kirkels</surname><given-names>WJ</given-names></name><etal/></person-group><article-title>Laparoscopic versus open donor nephrectomy: ureteral complications in recipients</article-title><source>Urology</source><year>2004</year><volume>63</volume><fpage>36</fpage><lpage>39</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.urology.2003.07.025</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">14751343</pub-id></mixed-citation></ref><ref id="CR22"><label>22.</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name name-style="western"><surname>Gayer</surname><given-names>G</given-names></name><name name-style="western"><surname>Zissin</surname><given-names>R</given-names></name><name name-style="western"><surname>Apter</surname><given-names>S</given-names></name><etal/></person-group><article-title>Urinomas caused by ureteral injuries: CT appearance</article-title><source>Abdom Imaging</source><year>2002</year><volume>27</volume><fpage>88</fpage><lpage>92</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s00261-001-0052-5</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">11740616</pub-id></mixed-citation></ref><ref id="CR23"><label>23.</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name name-style="western"><surname>Lee</surname><given-names>HJ</given-names></name><name name-style="western"><surname>Shin</surname><given-names>CI</given-names></name><name name-style="western"><surname>Hwang</surname><given-names>SI</given-names></name><etal/></person-group><article-title>MDCT cystography for detection of vesicourethral leak after prostatectomy</article-title><source>AJR Am J Roentgenol</source><year>2008</year><volume>191</volume><fpage>1847</fpage><lpage>1851</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.2214/AJR.07.3755</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">19020258</pub-id></mixed-citation></ref></ref-list></back></article>