1780ckjClinical Kidney JournalClin Kidney JOxford University PressPMC1333994913339949133399494241583210.1093/ckj/sfag170Efficacy and safety of dapagliflozin in patients receiving dialysis: a post-hoc analysis of the DAPA-CKD trialBakkerWisanne M1JongsNiels2ChertowGlenn M3Correa-RotterRicardo4RossingPeter56TotoRobert D7WheelerDavid C8HeerspinkHiddo J L910✉GansevoortRon T11 Department of Nephrology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands Department of Clinical Pharmacy and Pharmacology, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands Departments of Medicine and Epidemiology and Population Health, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, USA The National Medical Science and Nutrition Institute Salvador Zubiran, Mexico City, Mexico Steno Diabetes Center Copenhagen, Gentofte, Denmark Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark Department of Internal Medicine, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA Department of Renal Medicine, University College London, London, UK Department of Clinical Pharmacy and Pharmacology, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands The George Institute for Global Health, University New South Wales, Sydney, Australia Department of Nephrology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands

Correspondence to: Hiddo J.L. Heerspink; E-mail: h.j.lambers.heerspink@umcg.nl

2552026197sfag170sfag170872026© The Author(s) 2026. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the ERA.This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.statusreleaseddisplay-pdfyesis-olfnois-manuscriptnois-preprintnois-journal-matternois-scannednois-retractedno

Received 2026 May 20; Accepted 2026 May 22; Collection date 2026 Jul.

To the Editor,

Patients receiving maintenance dialysis are known to be at high risk for cardiovascular disease and mortality, but therapeutic options to reduce these risks are limited. Over the past years, clinical trials showed the beneficial effects of sodium glucose co-transporter 2 (SGLT2) inhibitors on kidney and cardiovascular outcomes as well as mortality in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) [1, 2]. It has been assumed that SGLT2 inhibitors may be less effective in patients with advanced CKD owing to the presence of fewer functional nephrons, with fewer proximal tubular SGLT2 transporters available to inhibit. However, recent experimental evidence suggests that SGLT2 inhibitors may improve clinical outcomes also in these patients via effects independent of functional nephron mass [2].

To explore the effects of SGLT2 inhibition among patients receiving maintenance dialysis, we conducted a post-hoc analysis of the DAPA-CKD (Dapagliflozin And Prevention of Adverse Outcomes in Chronic Kidney Disease) trial in the subgroup of participants who initiated dialysis during the trial. The primary endpoint of the DAPA-CKD trial was a composite including incident kidney failure, which, of course, cannot be assessed in patients already receiving dialysis. Thus, in the current analysis, we focused on the effects of dapagliflozin on all-cause mortality and safety. A detailed description of the Methods can be found in the (Supplementary material, Item S1).

Out of the total study population of the DAPA-CKD trial (n = 4304), 167 participants initiated dialysis during the study. Of these patients 68 were originally assigned to dapagliflozin and 99 to placebo at randomization. Characteristics at start of dialysis are provided in Table S1. Treatment with study drug was continued in 28 (41%) participants in the dapagliflozin group and in 36 (36%) participants in the placebo group (Supplementary material, Table S2). The mean eGFR at start of dialysis was 14.5 ± 10.4 ml/min/1.73m2 for the patients in the dapagliflozin group and 13.8 ± 7.3 ml/min/1.73m2 in the placebo group, P = 0.63. The mean urinary albumin-to-creatinine ratio (UACR) at dialysis initiation was 3260.8 ± 2463.5 mg/g for the dapagliflozin group versus 4049.6 ± 2538.2 mg/g in the placebo group, P = 0.047 (Supplementary material, Table S1).

Because patient characteristics differed between groups at dialysis initiation, the effects of dapagliflozin on mortality thereafter was adjusted for age, sex, HbA1c, eGFR and UACR. Participants in the dapagliflozin group had significantly lower all-cause mortality (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR] 0.47, 95% CI: 0.23–0.98, Figure 1). When the cause of death was investigated, more participants appeared to have died from a non-cardiovascular cause when compared to a cardiovascular cause (25 versus 12, respectively). Non-CV mortality was significantly reduced in the dapagliflozin group (aHR 0.27, 95% CI: 0.10–0.73), whereas there was no significant effect on cardiovascular mortality (aHR 1.33, 95% CI: 0.40–4.40, Figure 1). The adjusted hazard ratios for these efficacy outcomes according to treatment status are also given in the Supplementary material (Supplementary material, Figure S1).

Efficacy after initiation of dialysis.

Forrest plot depicting all-cause mortality, cardiovascular death and non- cardiovascular death for patients treated with dapagliflozin or placebo, showing significantly lower all-cause mortality and non-cardiovascular death for participants in the dapagliflozin group.

Our findings regarding safety of SGLT-2 inhibitors in patients on dialysis are in line with previously published studies [3, 4] and add further evidence suggesting that SGLT2 inhibitors can be safely used in patients receiving maintenance dialysis (Supplementary material, Table S3).

Overall, these findings suggest favourable effects for dapagliflozin in dialysis patients on all-cause mortality driven by effects on non-cv mortality. Of course, these data should be interpreted with caution as the number of patients included in this analysis was low, and due to the non-randomized post-hoc design characteristics of subjects at start of dialysis differed between both study groups. Nevertheless, these findings are hypothesis generating and suggest that dapagliflozin may be beneficial and safe in hemodialysis patients.

This hypothesis will be tested in the prospective, randomized Renal Lifecycle trial (NCT 05374291) that will determine the effects of dapagliflozin 10 mg once daily on risks of mortality, heart failure admission and incident kidney failure as well as safety in patients with advanced CKD (eGFR <25 mL/min/1.73m2), a kidney transplant and around 600 patients receiving maintenance dialysis [5]. This trial that started in 2022 is expected to be completed in due course. Hopefully, its results will provide the necessary evidence to address the current knowledge gaps in these specific subgroups with advanced CKD.

Supplementary MaterialACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

The authors thank all investigators, trial teams, and patients for their participation in the trial. The trial is registered under the Identifier: NCT03036150 on ClinicalTrials.gov and the EudraCT Number is 2016–003896-24. This work was supported by AstraZeneca.

Contributor Information

Wisanne M Bakker, Department of Nephrology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands.

Niels Jongs, Department of Clinical Pharmacy and Pharmacology, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands.

Glenn M Chertow, Departments of Medicine and Epidemiology and Population Health, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, USA.

Ricardo Correa-Rotter, The National Medical Science and Nutrition Institute Salvador Zubiran, Mexico City, Mexico.

Peter Rossing, Steno Diabetes Center Copenhagen, Gentofte, Denmark; Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.

Robert D Toto, Department of Internal Medicine, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA.

David C Wheeler, Department of Renal Medicine, University College London, London, UK.

Hiddo J L Heerspink, Department of Clinical Pharmacy and Pharmacology, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands; The George Institute for Global Health, University New South Wales, Sydney, Australia.

Ron T Gansevoort, Department of Nephrology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands.

CONFLICT OF INTEREST STATEMENT

W.M. Bakker declares that wages were paid by AstraZeneca. All payments were made to the institution. N. Jongs has nothing to disclose. G.M. Chertow has served on the Board of Directors of Satellite Healthcare, a non-profit dialysis provider. He has served as Chair or Co-Chair of Trial Steering Committees with Akebia, AstraZeneca, CSL Behring, and Vertex. He has served as an Advisor to Alebund, Avvio, CalciMedica, GSK, Panoramic, Renibus, Sidera, Toku, Unicycive, and Vera. He has served on Data Safety Monitoring Boards with Aethlon, Bayer, Biogen, Corxel, and Mineralys. R. Correa-Rotter received fees for consultancy/advisory work and/or grants for research from AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, Janssen, Takeda. P. Rossing received fees for consultancy/advisory work and/or grants for research from AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, Eli Lilly, MSD, Astellas, Mundipharma. R.D. Toto received fees for consultancy/advisory work and/or grants for research from AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim. DC. Wheeler received fees for consultancy/advisory work and/or grants for research from AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, Janssen, Astellas, MSD, Mundipharma. H.J.L. Heerspink has received support from AstraZeneca to his institution for the DAPACKD trial; as a consultant for, AstraZeneca, Alexion, Amgen, Alnylum, Bayer, Boehringer Ingelheim, Dimerix, Eli-Lilly, Novartis, Novo Nordisk, Roche, and Travere Pharmaceuticals; research support from, AstraZeneca, Bayer, Boehringer Ingelheim, and Novo Nordisk; and for Speakers Bureau from AstraZeneca. R.T Gansevoort received fees for consultancy/advisory work and/or grants for research from AstraZeneca, Abbvie, Bayer. Money is paid to the employing institution.

FUNDING

The DAPA-CKD trial was funded by AstraZeneca.

DATA AVAILABILITY STATEMENT

The data supporting this study may be obtained in accordance with AstraZeneca’s data sharing policy described at https://astrazenecagrouptrials.pharmacm.com/ST/submission/Disclosure.

REFERENCES Heerspink  HJL, Stefánsson  BV, Correa-Rotter  R  et al.  Dapagliflozin in Patients with Chronic Kidney Disease. N Engl J Med. 2020;383:1436–46. 10.1056/NEJMoa2024816. Rastogi  A, Januzzi  JL  Pleiotropic effects of Sodium-Glucose Cotransporter-2 Inhibitors in Cardiovascular Disease and Chronic Kidney Disease. JCM. 2023;12:1–21. 10.3390/jcm12082824. De  L, Flor  JC, Villa  D  et al.  Efficacy and Safety of the use of SGLT2 inhibitors on incremental Hemodialyis: maximizing residual renal function, is there a role for SGLT2 inhibitors?. Biomedicines. 2023;11:1–15. Barreto  J, Borges  C, Rodrigues  TB  et al.  Pharmacokinetic properties of dapagliflozin in hemodialysis and peritoneal dialysis patients. CJASN. 2023;18:1051–8. 10.2215/CJN.0000000000000196. Bakker  WM, Heerspink  HJL, Berger  SP  et al.  Rationale and design of the Renal Lifecycle trial assessing the effect of dapagliflozin on cardiorenal outcomes in severe chronic kidney disease. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2025;0:1–10.Associated DataSupplementary MaterialsData Availability Statement

The data supporting this study may be obtained in accordance with AstraZeneca’s data sharing policy described at https://astrazenecagrouptrials.pharmacm.com/ST/submission/Disclosure.