The pioneering study by Jacobsson et al. in 2000 unveiled that CBD demonstrated a notable anti-tumor effect after six days of co-cultivation with the rat C6 glioma cell line [19]. This phenomenon was further substantiated by Massi and colleagues in 2004, revealing that CBD, at an IC₅₀ of 25 μM, inhibited the proliferation of glioma cells (U-87MG and U-373MG) in a time- and dose-dependent manner by inducing apoptosis [20]. For the first time, the authors proposed that CBD induces apoptosis by activating the CB2 receptor, triggering cellular oxidative stress-manifested by the generation of reactive oxygen species (ROS) and depletion of glutathione, thereby activating caspase-8, caspase-9, and caspase-3 to induce cell death [21]. Recent studies have identified an upregulation of CB1, CB2, and transient receptor potential vanilloid 2 (TRPV2) receptors in gliomas, suggesting that phytocannabinoids such as CBD may exert antitumor effects through interactions with these receptors [22]. Previous research has demonstrated that, in vivo, THC can inhibit cancer cell proliferation and invasion, and induce apoptosis by activating CB1 and CB2 receptors [23]. Although CBD has a relatively low affinity for cannabinoid receptors, its potential to exert antitumor effects via CB1 and CB2 receptor interactions warrants further investigation [24]. Further investigations using animal models and cellular experiments revealed that CBD's antiproliferative action might also rely on the lipoxygenase (LOX) pathway. Specifically, CBD treatment suppressed the expression of 5-LOX and increased the production of fatty acid amide hydrolase (FAAH), which led to a reduction in anandamide (AEA) synthesis, ultimately inhibiting the viability of glioma cells [25]. Additionally, CBD-treated glioma cells exhibited oxidative stress, typically evidenced by increased ROS production. To counteract this damage, cells upregulated a plethora of heat shock protein (HSP) superfamily genes, whose increased expression diminished the cytotoxic effects of CBD. The introduction of HSP protein inhibitors could restore the cytotoxic efficacy of CBD [26].

Mitochondria, the cellular powerhouses responsible for ATP production, play a pivotal role in cell cycle regulation, cell death, and signal transduction. In cancer cells, alterations in mitochondrial function and dynamics are closely associated with tumor growth, metabolic reprogramming, drug resistance formation, and immune regulation. Furthermore, endoplasmic reticulum (ER), the critical site for protein folding and post-translational modifications, its dysfunction (ER stress) is linked to the onset and progression of tumors. ER stress, an important target for antitumor drugs, its activation can induce cell autophagy and apoptosis, which are important for maintaining intracellular homeostasis and regulating tumor cell survival and death.

Gross and colleagues discovered that CBD induces apoptosis in glioma cells mediated by caspase activation and triggers mitochondrial dysfunction mediated by cellular toxicity through activating the voltage-dependent anion channel 1 (VDAC1) on the outer mitochondrial membrane, leading to mitochondrial calcium homeostasis imbalance [27]. Huang and others found that CBD activates the TRPV4, causing extracellular calcium influx that induces ER stress and mitochondrial autophagy in glioma cells through ATF4-DDIT3-TRIB3-AKT-mTOR axis, ultimately leading to lethal autophagic cell death [28]. Rupprecht and team demonstrated that CBD + THC inhibited glioma cellular energy metabolism and exerts the anti-tumor effect by affecting the mitochondrial electron transport chain through inhibition of subunits in mitochondrial complexes I and IV, impacting mitochondrial respiration [29]. Moreover, CBD induces ER stress by triggering cellular oxidative stress and causing calcium ion imbalance within the endoplasmic reticulum, thereby inhibiting glioma cellular proliferation and inducing apoptosis [30]. Collectively, it can be inferred that the structural and functional impairments of mitochondria induced by CBD, such as changes in mitochondrial energy metabolism, occupy an important value in its anti-tumor mechanism; the pathways of cell apoptosis and autophagy on which CBD's anti-glioma activity depends are not isolated but interconnected.

Gliomas, particularly GBM, pose a grave threat to patient survival. These tumors are notorious for their rapid proliferation and their propensity to invade neighboring brain regions, rendering treatment exceedingly challenging. Thus, delving into and deciphering the mechanisms and strategies that can curb the migration, invasion, and angiogenesis of these tumor cells is of paramount importance. In this realm, the research on CBD is particularly promising.

Studies conducted by Vaccani et al. using Boyden chamber assays have revealed that CBD, in concentrations ranging from 0.01 to 9 μM, inhibits the migration of the U-87MG glioma cell line without relying on the endogenous cannabinoid receptor mechanism [31]. Furthermore, investigations by Solinas et al. have shown that even at low concentrations (1–12 μM), CBD significantly curtails the invasiveness of GBM. CBD treatment results in the downregulation of key proteins associated with tumor invasion and angiogenesis, such as matrix metalloproteinase-9 (MMP-9), tissue inhibitors of metalloproteinase 1 and 4 (TIMP1/4), urokinase plasminogen activator (uPA), SerpinE1-plasminogen activator inhibitor type-1 (Ser-PAI-1), vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), transforming growth factor-β1 (TGF-β1), C-X-C motif chemokine 16 (CXCL-16), platelet-derived growth factor-AA (PDGF-AA), monocyte chemotactic protein-1 (MCP-1), angiogenin, and hypoxia-inducible factor-1α (HIF-1α) [32]. Additionally, the deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA)-binding inhibitor ID-1, which is associated with glioma invasiveness, is also inhibited by CBD [33, 34]. The regulation of these molecules by CBD reflects its capacity to inhibit tumor progression through a multi-targeted effect.

The therapeutic approaches for glioma are currently at an impasse, stagnant and unprogressive. Although immunotherapy, as a burgeoning treatment modality, has shown the remarkable promise. GBM, characterized as an immunologically "cold" tumor, demonstrates inherent systemic and localized immunosuppression, particularly evident in the scarcity of tumor-infiltrating T cells. This characteristic significantly diminishes the efficacy of existing immunotherapeutic interventions for GBM [35]. However, recent scientific advancements have shed light on CBD's potential role in modulating systemic immune responses and the tumor microenvironment, offering novel insights into surmounting this challenge.

Zhou and colleagues’ research elucidates that CBD may enhance the immunological landscape of GBM through the stimulation of T-cell proliferation and the activation of antigen-presenting cells [36]. Moreover, CBD's ability to augment the expression of CD103 and antigen presentation further amplifies the immune response of CD8 + T cells. By inhibiting P-selectin, apelin, and interleukin-8, as well as obstructing the immune checkpoint indoleamine 2,3-dioxygenase (IDO), CBD is posited to alter tumor microenvironment dynamics within mice bearing intracranial GBM, heralding a significant stride towards immunotherapeutic breakthroughs in glioma therapy [37].

GSCs, owing to their distinctive properties such as their capacity for self-renewal, their role in reshaping the tumor microenvironment, their mechanisms of resistance to treatment, and their contributions to tumor angiogenesis and cellular heterogeneity, occupy a pivotal position in initiation, progression, recurrence, and drug resistance of glioma [38, 39]. The ability of GSCs to perpetually divide and generate novel tumor cells underpins and propels tumor growth. These cells exhibit a profound resistance to current treatment modalities, including radiotherapy and chemotherapy, largely attributable to their enhanced DNA repair capabilities, representing a key obstacle to the successful treatment of glioma and a significant factor in treatment failure and disease recurrence. Therefore, the development of targeted therapeutic strategies against GSCs is of paramount importance in the battle against glioma [40]. Such strategies might encompass the development of drugs that can specifically eliminate GSCs or inhibit their function, the utilization of immunotherapeutic approaches to activate immune responses against GSCs, or the development of treatments that disrupt the interactions between GSCs and their microenvironment. Recent research into the effects of CBD on GSCs has undoubtedly illuminated a path toward the conclusion of this battle.

Investigations by Singer and colleagues into primary GSCs have demonstrated that CBD can inhibit the vitality and stem-like characteristics of GSCs by inducing the generation of ROS, activating the p38 pathway, and downregulating Sox2, Id1 and p-STAT3 [41]. Additionally, CBD can activate TRPV2 and induce autophagy in GSCs through the PI3K-AKT-RPS6KB1/PTEN pathway, as well as promote GSCs differentiation by upregulating Aml-1a. Given that GSCs retain the ability to respond to physiological signals that induce the differentiation of neural stem cells (NSCs) into neurons, astrocytes, and oligodendrocytes, mechanism-induced differentiation may present a promising strategy for eradicating this tumor-driving cell population. Activation of TRPV2 channels can negatively regulate glioma cell survival and proliferation, while also promoting the differentiation of glioma stem cells. These actions collectively result in the inhibition of GSC proliferation [42]. CBD also facilitates the DNA binding of the glioma cell NF-κB subunit RELA, while preventing the phosphorylation of RELA on Serine-311 through the downregulation of protein kinase C ζ (PKCζ), with the sustained DNA binding of non-phosphorylated Serine-311 RELA mediating GSC cytotoxicity. Remarkably, in CBD-sensitive GSCs, the in vitro concentration and time course of CBD outperformed the chemotherapeutic drug TMZ. Furthermore, widespread sensitivity to CBD was observed in GSC cohorts with low levels of ROS, whereas high ROS content inhibited CBD-induced GSCs’ death, which proposed that ROS level could serve as the predictive biomarker for CBD-sensitive tumors and that the combined administration of a BBB-permeable ROS scavenger (such as the anti-hypertension drug captopril, acting as a thiol donor) might enhance the therapeutic efficacy of CBD [43].

Chemotherapy and radiotherapy hold critical positions in the treatment of gliomas. However, the gradual development of resistance by tumor cells to these treatments poses a significant challenge in the management of gliomas [44, 45]. CBD also presents a potential solution to this issue.

Nabissi and colleagues found that CBD enhanced the uptake and sensitivity of cells to chemotherapeutic drugs (such as doxorubicin) by increasing TRPV2 expression and activating the TRPV2 channel [46]. Research by Torres et al. indicates that a combination of CBD, THC, and TMZ exhibits a synergistic effect, inducing autophagy-mediated apoptosis in glioma cell lines (such as U-87MG and T98G) and overcoming TMZ resistance in orthotopic xenografts of glioma in nude mice [47]. In vivo, the synergistic anti-glioma action of CBD and THC was further confirmed in a subcutaneous tumor xenograft model in athymic nude mice using U-87MG cells, demonstrated by anti-tumor cell proliferation (identified by Ki-67), induction of apoptosis (identified by TUNEL), and anti-tumor angiogenesis (identified by CD31 immunostaining) [48].

Neurons, endothelial cells, and NSCs exhibit high sensitivity to ionizing radiation, whether applied alone or in combination with chemotherapy. Clinical observations and animal studies have demonstrated that cranial irradiation can lead to severe cognitive deficits due to damage to neurons and endothelial cells, as well as inhibition of NSC proliferation and induction of cell death [49, 50]. Scott and colleagues discovered that pre-treating various glioma cell lines (T98G, U-87MG and GL261) with THC and CBD for 4 h increased their radiosensitivity, a change associated with increased autophagy (indicated by elevated LC3B-II) and apoptosis [51]. This enhancement in radiosensitivity was also correlated with the upregulation of p-JNK1/2 and MAPK p-p38 levels and the downregulation of p-ERK1/2 and p-AKT1 levels [52].

Marcu et al. demonstrated that CBD and THC have a synergistic effect in vitro on glioblastoma cell lines (U-87MG, U251 and SF126), manifested by inhibiting glioma cellular proliferation (through downregulating pERK), activating apoptosis induced by CB2 receptor activation and ROS generation, and blocking the cell cycle [23]. Despite the promising outcomes of combining CBD with THC against gliomas, the psychoactive properties of THC necessitate consideration of its psychiatric side effects and potential for addiction as a medication. Seeking an alternative to THC, Lah and colleagues discovered that cannabigerol (CBG) exhibits broad anti-cancer activity in glioblastoma. The combination of CBD and CBG was more effective than CBD with THC, inducing caspase-dependent apoptosis and inhibiting glioma cellular invasiveness [53, 54].

These studies indicate that the combination of CBD with THC/CBG can produce a synergistic effect against glioma and sensitize to radiotherapy and chemotherapy. This has significant implications for glioma treatment: maintaining the same or even better therapeutic effects while reducing treatment doses could minimize toxic side effects and improve treatment tolerance.

In the realm of glioma treatment research, the application of cannabidiol continues to expand, encompassing a range of innovative mechanisms and strategies. Recent studies have unveiled several emerging mechanisms of action, which further enhance the potential of CBD in the treatment of glioma.

One such emerging mechanism involves the interaction of CBD with stress granules (SGs), a type of biomolecular condensate (BMC), which plays a crucial role in cellular stress responses and has been implicated in anti-glioma activity. SGs, also known as ribonucleic acid (RNA)-protein complexes, were first described as dense cytoplasmic granules appearing in mammalian cells subjected to heat shock [55, 56]. SGs influence mRNA translation and stability, and are associated with apoptosis, signal transduction, and gene regulation; additionally, they are closely linked to tumorigenesis, tumor progression, and drug resistance [57, 58]. Recent pioneering research by Wang et al. demonstrated that CBD treatment significantly upregulates SGs in GBM, and bioinformatic analyses suggest that CBD may regulate the formation and increase of SGs in GBM through related receptors and genes, as well as induce translational stalling, thereby exerting its anti-glioma effects; furthermore, some research indicates that SGs can affect tumor angiogenesis and stemness expression during cancer progression, areas where previous research has confirmed CBD's efficacy [59]. Thus, the authors propose that SGs could be a potential therapeutic target for GBM. It is reasonable to hypothesize that the dynamic changes in SG formation within GBM may serve as a mediator and concrete manifestation of CBD's complex, multi-pathway anti-glioma functions.

Additionally, CBD has been found to induce ferroptosis in GBM through ROS and p-ERK pathways, a regulated cell death mechanism driven by iron-dependent lipid peroxidation, thus providing a novel therapeutic avenue for glioma treatment [60].

These innovative strategies highlight the expanding therapeutic potential of CBD and underscore the importance of continued research to fully elucidate its mechanisms and optimize its clinical application in glioma management.

Prior discussions highlighted the potential of CBD in combating gliomas through various mechanisms, such as anti-proliferation and anti-invasion, with its antitumor effects seemingly sparing normal neuronal cells [61, 62]. However, the specific molecular underpinnings of these processes remain partially obscure, fueling ongoing debates.

For instance, it has been discovered that, when CBD is used in conjunction with chemotherapy agents, a notable issue arises: its cytotoxic effects on tumor cells lack specificity, potentially posing a risk to the CNS. Moreover, the synergy between CBD and chemotherapy manifests within a remarkably narrow dosage window, with antagonistic effects potentially occurring at dominant concentration levels [63].

Another contention revolves around whether CBD primarily induces apoptosis or autophagy in glioma cells, leading to cytotoxicity. The role of autophagy in glioma cells-as either a protective or toxic mechanism-varies, with researchers holding differing perspectives, and a consensus remains elusive. Autophagy has long been regarded as a double-edged sword in cell survival and death. On one hand, autophagy enhances cell survival by removing damaged intracellular components, thereby improving the cell's ability to withstand various stresses, and, in cancer cells, autophagy may facilitate survival during various treatments [64, 65]. Therefore, some studies have suggested that inhibiting autophagy can enhance the sensitivity of tumor cells to chemotherapeutic agents [66]. On the other hand, upregulation of autophagy can lead to the degradation of essential organelles, thereby inducing apoptotic cell death [67, 68]. This is a process of quantitative change leading to qualitative change. It is also an interwoven process. There is crosstalk between autophagy and apoptosis: autophagy can inhibit the induction of apoptosis, while apoptosis can suppress the protective autophagic process. Interestingly, at the molecular level, we also observe crosstalk between autophagy and apoptosis. Beclin 1, a key protein promoting autophagy, exhibits anti-apoptotic effects in various contexts. Conversely, caspases, which are essential proteins in apoptosis, can cleave Beclin 1 during apoptosis, thereby impairing its autophagic function [69, 70]. Additionally, autophagy can directly induce the death of glioma cells through autophagy cell death (ACD) [71]. The fate of cells varies depending on the specific intervention points of drug-induced autophagic flux.

CBD's actions may encompass both the promotion of apoptosis and the induction of autophagy, with the specific mechanisms likely dependent on cell type (cellular heterogeneity), influenced by drug dosage and duration of exposure, and possibly regulated by the interplay of intracellular signaling pathways, or more so, the crosstalk between CBD-induced autophagy and apoptosis pathways. Hence, the scientific discourse surrounding these functions of CBD and how they synergize to induce death in glioma cells persists. To unravel the enigma of these actions, further studies are imperative to elucidate these complex processes. Additionally, considering the discrepancy between cellular models and solid tumors, the models may not fully replicate the intricate microenvironment and biological behaviors of solid tumors, necessitating further precisely designed randomized controlled trials to optimize therapeutic strategies for specific glioma types and unique backgrounds.

GW Pharmaceuticals conducted a pivotal phase Ib clinical trial (NCT01812603, NCT01812616) in 2014, aiming to assess the safety, tolerability, and efficacy of a sublingual spray, Sativex^® (containing 27 mg/ml THC and 25 mg/ml CBD), in combination with dose-intense temozolomide (DIT) therapy in patients with recurrent GBM [6]. The trial comprised two parts: the initial segment was a non-randomized, open-label design intended to evaluate the safety and side effects of combining Sativex^® with TMZ, involving six patients with grade IV GBM who had undergone radiotherapy and TMZ treatment after their first recurrence. Sativex^® was administered through gradual dose escalation to the maximum tolerated dose (100 μl per spray, up to 12 sprays/day) applied to the oral mucosa in conjunction with TMZ treatment. Results indicated that 50% of the patients discontinued treatment due to adverse events, with the most common adverse events being mild to moderate fatigue, dizziness, headache, and vomiting. The subsequent randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled portion included 21 patients, divided into an experimental group receiving Sativex^® + TMZ and a control group receiving placebo + TMZ. Findings showed that the 1-year survival rate in the Sativex^® group (83.3%) was significantly higher than that in the placebo group (44.4%, p = 0.042), albeit with a higher severity of adverse events. Sativex^® did not affect the pharmacokinetics of TMZ, suggesting that combined administration is feasible. Overall, the trial demonstrated that the personalized dosing regimen of Sativex^® in combination with DIT has good safety and tolerability in patients with recurrent GBM, potentially contributing to an increase in survival rates (the first part achieved a 6-month progression-free survival (PFS6) of 16.7% and a 1-year survival rate of 50.0%; the second part had a PFS6 of 33.3% and a 1-year survival rate of 83.3%). This contrasts sharply with the previously reported poorer PFS6 (9%) and 1-year survival rate (14%) in patients with recurrent GBM [72]. However, despite these conceptually revolutionary results, limitations of the trial include a small sample size and the potential for confounding factors between different cohorts that could affect outcomes. Future clinical trials are needed to replicate these findings in a larger patient population and further investigate the mechanisms and optimal treatment protocols.

In the pursuit of understanding the potential applications of CBD in various cancer treatments, Julian et al. embarked on a four-year open-label clinical trial [73]. This study engaged 119 cancer patients, encompassing a spectrum of cancers such as prostate, breast, esophageal, and gliomas. Within this trial, participants received synthetic pharmaceutical-grade CBD oil droplets provided by STI Pharmaceuticals, with each droplet containing 1 mg of CBD and a total concentration of 5% (w/v). The administration followed a cyclic regimen: three days of dosing followed by a three-day hiatus, with an average dosage of 10 mg per administration, twice daily, and, if necessary, escalated to a maximum of 30 mg per dose. The research findings indicate that a significant therapeutic effect of CBD necessitates no less than a six-month treatment duration, during which no notable adverse effects were observed. Particularly for glioma patients, out of ten individuals, seven were diagnosed with GBM; the authors noted that four exhibited an extension in median survival time, while three showed a trend towards slowed tumor progression. For patients with anaplastic ependymoma, three participants in the trial also experienced an extended median survival time. Additionally, unique case reports highlighted the individual responses of a five-year-old boy and a fifty-year-old patient, both of whom demonstrated improvements after transitioning to CBD treatment following other therapeutic interventions. Nevertheless, the study is marked by significant limitations: The absence of a randomized control group undermines the objectivity and accuracy of CBD's efficacy; case data lacks comprehensive quantitative analysis, and the clarity and transparency of dosage adjustments and administration standards are insufficient; Moreover, the relatively small sample size and the lack of thorough analysis of heterogeneity among different cancer types constrain the generalizability of the conclusions.

Several clinical trials concerning the treatment of gliomas with CBD are currently underway, including: the Spanish Neuro-Oncology Group (GEINO) is conducting the GEINO-1601 trial (NCT03529448); a Phase I clinical trial (NCT03246113); the ARISTOCRAT II (NCT05629702); a study conducted by Leaf Vertical Inc (NCT03607643). (see Table 1 for more details).

CBD inhibits the cytochrome P450 enzyme system (CYP450), particularly the CYP3A4 and CYP2C19 enzymes, which play a crucial role in drug metabolism [107]. Consequently, CBD may alter the plasma concentrations of other drugs metabolized by these enzymes, as previously discussed in Sect.  3.2.1. For instance, antiepileptic drugs like clobazam and antidepressants such as fluoxetine depend on the CYP450 system for metabolism. Co-administration with CBD may lead to increased drug concentrations, thereby enhancing therapeutic effects or elevating the risk of side effects [108, 109]. Additionally, certain anti-glioma medications, such as etoposide and irinotecan, are metabolized by CYP3A4, and CBD may impact their metabolic clearance, thereby affecting their anticancer efficacy [110, 111].

Furthermore, P-glycoprotein (P-gp) is a significant drug efflux transporter present in tissues such as the intestines, liver, kidneys, and the blood–brain barrier. It functions by expelling drugs from cells, thereby influencing their absorption, distribution, and excretion. CBD has been shown to inhibit P-glycoprotein activity, potentially increasing the intracellular concentrations of certain anti-glioma drugs like temozolomide, and vincristine [112–114].

CBD is generally regarded as relatively safe. In a Phase III clinical trial aimed at reducing seizures in Dravet syndrome, dosages ranging from 600 mg/day to 3000 mg/day demonstrated good tolerability; in a Phase I clinical trial, dosages even reached up to 6000 mg/day [115]. Nevertheless, the potential side effects and adverse reactions of CBD warrant attention.

In animal models, reported adverse reactions include developmental toxicity, hepatocellular injury, and reproductive system damage; and in humans, common side effects encompass fatigue, diarrhea, changes in appetite, drowsiness, and vomiting [116]. At higher dosages, CBD may induce more severe side effects, such as elevated liver enzyme levels. Particularly for patients with impaired liver function, CBD might further burden the liver, necessitating caution in this patient population [117].

Moreover, CBD may cause hypotension and dizziness, which in certain instances could lead to falls and injuries [118]. CBD might also affect immune system function, although its exact mechanisms and clinical significance remain not entirely clear. This poses a potential risk for cancer patients with already compromised immune function. Therefore, when considering CBD for therapeutic use, both physicians and patients should fully account for these potential side effects and risks.

While CBD does not exhibit the pronounced psychoactive properties of THC, its potential for abuse still warrants attention. Globally, there remains ambiguity regarding whether this substance should be regulated [119]. Current research indicates that the addiction risk associated with CBD is exceedingly low [120]. In fact, CBD may even mitigate cannabis addiction and help restore normal brain function in addicts [121, 122]. However, the variability in the quality and purity of CBD products available on the market may increase the risk of abuse [123].

Presently, numerous countries permit the purchase of various CBD products through over-the-counter (OTC) channels or online platforms, including CBD oils, capsules and tinctures for systemic use and topical ointments [119]. However, the quality of CBD products on the market is inconsistent, lacking uniform standards and regulation. Some products may contain unlisted THC or other impurities, which could not only affect efficacy but also pose legal and health risks [123]. Legally, despite the 2014 U.S. Agricultural Act distinguishing industrial hemp (defined as Cannabis sativa L. and any part of such plant, whether growing or not, with a delta-9-THC content of no more than 0.3% on a dry weight basis, while the EU sets this threshold at less than 0.2%) from marijuana, the interstate trade of CBD-containing food and dietary supplements remains illegal; furthermore, in certain states, the sale of CBD products and hemp oil is also prohibited [123]. Nonetheless, industry and regulatory trends increasingly favor the use of high-purity cannabidiol for medical purposes. Variations in production processes and extraction methods, as well as differences in the parts of the plant used, can result in significant discrepancies in CBD content, complicating precise dosage control. For clinical applications, standardized CBD formulations and stringent quality control are paramount to ensuring efficacy and safety.

Moreover, the optimal dosage and administration route of CBD in the treatment of gliomas have not been established. The dosage range commonly reported for CBD in patients with other diseases is < 1–50 mg/kg/day; and Epidiolex^® (which contains CBD at a concentration of 100 mg/mL), approved by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) in 2018 for the treatment of Dravet syndrome and Lennox-Gastaut syndrome, is typically administered at a dosage of approximately 20 mg/kg/day [115]. Additionally, the potential for long-term, high-dose use to cause tolerance or dependence, as well as its impact on overall patient survival and quality of life, still requires further investigation. Therefore, long-term follow-up studies and large-scale clinical trials are crucial for assessing these long-term effects.

Not applicable.

Not applicable.

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Data sharing is not applicable to this article as no datasets were generated or analysed during the current study.