Figure 5 - full size

 

Figure 5.
Figure 5. Common Binding Mode for MutSα Substrates
(A) Interactions between a G•T mispair and an adjacent base pair with MSH6 domain 1 (shown as sticks under a semitransparent electrostatic surface).
(B) Protein-mispair contacts in a MutSα/G•dU/DNA complex. Putative hydrogen bonds are shown as dashed lines. Interacting residues (defined with LIGPLOT [Wallace et al., 1995]) are labeled. Orientation is rotated vert, similar 90° from (A).
(C) Protein mispair contacts in a MutSα/O^6-methyl-guanine/DNA complex, colored, labeled, and oriented as in (B).
(D) Interactions between a single base T insert substrate (cyan carbons) or a G•T mispair (green carbons) substrate and MSH6 domain 1 (blue surface). Hydrogen bonds are shown as dashed lines. Orientation is approximately the same as (A).
(E) Protein-DNA interactions in the MutSα-DNA complex. Amino acids that make hydrogen bonding (red lines) or van der Waals interactions (gray lines) are indicated with blue text (MSH6) or red text (MSH2). Dashed lines group the amino acids by protein domain as indicated. Interactions were classified by using Probe (Word et al., 1999).
(F) Structures with G•T (red), T insert (green) were superimposed on domain 1 of MSH6. DNAs from both complexes are shown as sticks, and backbone traces of MSH2 are shown as ribbons and surfaces. The arrow indicates the movement of domains 4 and 3 of MSH2 in the insert structure that compensates for the slight change in the DNA substrate register.

The above figure is reprinted by permission from Cell Press: Mol Cell (2007, 26, 579-592) copyright 2007.