Figure 4 - full size

 

Figure 4.
Fig. 4. Comparison of the hypothetical hexamer model of RuvB with the electron microscopic image. (a) Projection image (Left) of negative stained RuvB complexed with a 30-bp DNA, obtained by averaging 140 top views in our previous work (15). The resolution of the averaged image was 30.0 Å. The top views of the hexamer model (Center and Right) were constructed by superimposing each ATPase domain of RuvB (AMPPNP form) (blue region) onto the corresponding regions of HslU crystal structure (25) and the NSF crystal structure (23), respectively. The domains N, M, C, labeled residues, and the bound nucleotides are represented with the same color code as defined in Fig. 1. (b) Projection image (Left) of RuvB-DNA obtained by averaging 266 side views. This image of the single ring was taken from one-half of the double ring, which encircles duplex DNA. The resolution of the averaged image was 34.3 Å. Side view of the hexamer model (Right). [Reproduced with permission from ref. 15 (Copyright 2000, Academic Press).