Figure 3 - full size

 

Figure 3.
Fig. 3. Structure of Kap95p–RanGDP complex. (a) Two views of the Kap95p–RanGDP structure, related by a 90° rotation around the x-axis. Kap95p is shown in cyan, Ran is shown in pink, and the basic patch region is highlighted in red. (b) Superposition of free RanGDP (PDB ID 1BYU^18) and RanGDP in complex with Kap95p. Switch regions are highlighted in light blue (switch I), magenta (switch II), and pink (basic patch) for free RanGDP, and in blue (switch I), purple (switch II), and red (basic patch) for RanGDP in complex with Kap95p. (c) Superposition of RanGDP and RanGTP (PDB ID 2BKU^5) in complex with Kap95p; RanGDP switch regions are blue (switch I), purple (switch II), and red (basic patch); RanGTP switch regions are light blue (switch I), magenta (switch II), and pink (basic patch). (d) Structural comparison of Kap95p–RanGTP,^5 Kap95p–RanGDP, and HEAT repeats 1–11 of importin-β in complex with PTHrP.^27 The schematic diagrams summarize the conformational differences. The conformational shift in the basic patch region of Ran exposes a part of Kap95p HEAT repeat 7 that is important for binding NLS-containing importin-β cargoes including PTHrP,^27 SREBP-2,^28 and importin α.^12 It is unlikely that the observed structural differences between Kap95p–RanGTP and Kap95p–RanGDP are the result of crystal packing, because they both possessed an equivalent arrangement of the protein molecules.

The above figure is reprinted by permission from Elsevier: J Mol Biol (2008, 383, 772-782) copyright 2008.