Figure 3 - full size

 

Figure 3.
Figure 3. The generated Hfq model. The SWISS-MODEL server[49] was used to generate the structure of the Hfq monomeric form. Since automated construction requires 30% identity between the query and target sequences, the determined X-ray structure of human Sm D3-B (PDB entry 1D3B) [16] was used with its amino acid sequences mutated according to the alignments ( Figure 2(b)). The model was then the subject of EEF1 energy minimisation. [50] The EEF1 energy model combines the CHARMM19 polar hydrogen potential energy function and a simple Gaussian model for the solvation free energy. [50] The resulting structure was used as a template for generating the complex following the symmetry operations of the human Sm 1D3B crystal. The hexamer was minimised for 1500 steps using the EEF1 energy model and the resulting structure satisfied all PROCHECK stereochemical verifications. [51] (a) Structure of the E. coli Hfq hexamer. The molecules are shown as ribbons of different colours showing a helix and b strand. (b) Dimer contacts in the Hfq hexamer: the b4 strand in one monomer interacts with the b5 strand of a neighbouring subunit. (c) Left, the Hfq putative base-binding pocket with the conserved residues Phe42 and Lys56; right, X-ray structure of the base-binding pocket within the RNA-Af-Sm1 complex.[26] The Figures were produced with the RASMOL software package. [52] (d) Electrostatic surface charge potential showing the two faces of the six ring-shaped structure. The left picture corresponding to the top view shown in (a) emphasises the positively charged cavity of the ring as indicated by the blue colour. The right picture points to the continuously positive surface potential of the other side. The Figure was produced by GRASP. [53]

The above figure is reprinted by permission from Elsevier: J Mol Biol (2002, 320, 705-712) copyright 2002.