Figure 2 - full size

 

Figure 2.
Gα[o]–RGS16 contacts and the RGS domain GAP mechanism. (A) Stick-and-ribbons diagram of the Gα[o] GTP binding pocket occupied by the transition state analog of GTP hydrolysis; GDP·AlF[4] ^− is shown with Mg^2+ and the attacking water. Gα[o] is shown in green and orange (switch regions). RGS16 is shown in purple. RGS16 residues do not contact the GTP or attacking water directly; instead they buttress the endogenous catalytic residues of Gα[o], stabilizing their conformation in the transition state. (B) Comparative <4 Å electrostatic interaction matrix between RGS16 and Gα subunits. Electrostatic interactions between mouse Gα[o] and mouse RGS16 are indicated in green. Electrostatic interactions between human Gα[i1] and human RGS16 are indicated in yellow (PDB ID code 2IK8; see ref. 18). Gα switch residues are boxed in orange; helical domain residues are boxed in purple. Interactions that occur in one or both crystallographic protomers are included for both Gα[o]–RGS16 and Gα[i1]–RGS16.