Figure 1 - full size

 

Figure 1.
Fig. 1. Comparison of the inactive G ß heterotrimer and the G [i/q]-GRK2-Gß complex. (A) Side view of G [q]ß . G [q]ß was homology modeled by using the structure of G [i]ß[1] [2] (5). The expected membrane surface is modeled as a gray rectangle that extends out from the plane of the figure (31), and the heterotrimer is oriented as proposed in (6). G [q] is cyan with orange ß-strands, Gß is blue, and G is green. The three switch regions (labeled I, II, and III) and the N-terminal helix of G [q] are red and yellow, respectively. GDP and G [q]-Cys9 and Cys10, which can be palmitoylated, are shown as ball-and-stick models. (B) Top view of G [q]ß from the perspective of the modeled membrane surface. (C) Side view of the G [i/q]-GRK2-Gß complex. For purposes of comparison, GRK2-bound Gß was centered in the same position as Gß in panel (A). The chimeric N-terminal helix of GRK2-bound G [i/q] is disordered in the crystal structure. The kinase domain of GRK2 is yellow with olive ß strands, the RH domain is purple, and the PH domain is tan. Mg2+ (black sphere) and AIF[4]^- (green and magenta) are bound in the active site of G [i/q]. (D) Top view of the G [i/q]-GRK2-Gß complex from the same orientation as (B). Residues 114 to 121 in 5 of GRK2 (shaded pink) alter their conformation upon docking with the effector-binding pocket of G [i/q] (see SOM text).

The above figure is reprinted by permission from the AAAs: Science (2005, 310, 1686-1690) copyright 2005.