Figure 1 - full size

 

Figure 1.
Figure 1. The overall tertiary structure of the CST-benzamidine complex. CST was co-crystallized with benzamidine by equilibrating droplets containing 0.62 mM CST, 30 mM MgSO[4], 0.6 mM CaCl[2], 6.0 mM benzamidine, 50 mM Tris-HCl buffer (pH 8.15) against reservoir solutions containing 1.4 M MgSO[4] and 0.1 M Tris-HCl buffer (pH 8.5). A crystal adopting the form of a rectangular prism (0.15 mm×0.15 mm×0.3 mm) was obtained after four days. X-ray data were collected at room temperature on a DIP 2030H image plate detector (Mac Science Co., Ltd), using double-mirror focusing optics and Cu Ka radiation (l=1.5418 Å) generated by a Rigaku rotating anode generator RU-200BH operating at 45 kV and 75 mA. The data were processed and reduced with the programs Denzo & Scalepack.[22.] The structure of CST was determined by molecular replacement using AMoRe. [23.] Strong solutions were obtained from a rotation function (cc=0.38) and translation function (cc=0.65) calculated over the resolution range 20-4.0 Å using AST as the search model (PDB accession number 2TBS). Following rigid-body refinement (R-factor (20-3.0 Å)=0.28), the model was rebuilt using the program XFIT.[24.] Seven sequence differences with AST at positions 28, 125, 152, 153, 170, 235, and 244 and the deletion of two C-terminal residues were incorporated into the model of CST. Conventional crystallographic refinement was carried out using CNS. [25.] Water molecules were added to the model where the difference density exceeded 4s, and the peaks were within a reasonable distance of hydrogen-bonding partners on the enzyme (<3.3 Å). The statistics of the diffraction data and the final refinement cycle are listed in Table 1. Figure 1 and Figure 2 were prepared using MOLSCRIPT [26.] and Raster3D. [27.]

The above figure is reprinted by permission from Elsevier: J Mol Biol (2002, 324, 391-397) copyright 2002.