 |
PDBsum entry 6tut
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Transcription
|
PDB id
|
|
|
|
6tut
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
Contents |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1390 a.a.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1097 a.a.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
334 a.a.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
104 a.a.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
215 a.a.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
83 a.a.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
199 a.a.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
146 a.a.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
43 a.a.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
67 a.a.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
102 a.a.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
45 a.a.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
166 a.a.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
125 a.a.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
551 a.a.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
196 a.a.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
79 a.a.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
142 a.a.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Generate full PROCHECK analyses
|
PROCHECK summary for 6tut
Ramachandran plot
PROCHECK statistics
1. Ramachandran Plot statistics
No. of
residues %-tage
------ ------
Most favoured regions [A,B,L] 3756 83.1%*
Additional allowed regions [a,b,l,p] 746 16.5%
Generously allowed regions [~a,~b,~l,~p] 19 0.4%
Disallowed regions [XX] 1 0.0%*
---- ------
Non-glycine and non-proline residues 4522 100.0%
End-residues (excl. Gly and Pro) 63
Glycine residues 278
Proline residues 221
----
Total number of residues 5084
Based on an analysis of 118 structures of resolution of at least 2.0 Angstroms and R-factor no greater than 20.0 a good
quality model would be expected to have over 90% in the most favoured regions [A,B,L].
2. G-Factors
Average
Parameter Score Score
--------- ----- -----
Dihedral angles:-
Phi-psi distribution -0.57*
Chi1-chi2 distribution 0.03
Chi1 only 0.12
Chi3 & chi4 0.50
Omega -0.81*
-0.36
=====
Main-chain covalent forces:-
Main-chain bond lengths 0.63
Main-chain bond angles 0.35
0.47
=====
OVERALL AVERAGE -0.03
=====
G-factors provide a measure of how unusual, or out-of-the-ordinary, a property is.
Values below -0.5* - unusual
Values below -1.0** - highly unusual
Important note: The main-chain
bond-lengths and bond angles are compared with
the Engh & Huber (1991) ideal values derived
from small-molecule data. Therefore, structures
refined using different restraints may show
apparently large deviations from normality.
|
|
|
