 |
PDBsum entry 6dh6
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hydrolase/hydrolase inhibitor
|
PDB id
|
|
|
|
6dh6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
|
| |
|
DOI no:
|
ACS Infect Dis
5:316-325
(2019)
|
|
PubMed id:
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
Structural Adaptation of Darunavir Analogues against Primary Mutations in HIV-1 Protease.
|
|
G.J.Lockbaum,
F.Leidner,
L.N.Rusere,
M.Henes,
K.Kosovrasti,
G.S.Nachum,
E.A.Nalivaika,
A.Ali,
N.K.Yilmaz,
C.A.Schiffer.
|
|
|
|
| |
ABSTRACT
|
|
|
| |
|
HIV-1 protease is one of the prime targets of agents used in antiretroviral
therapy against HIV. However, under selective pressure of protease inhibitors,
primary mutations at the active site weaken inhibitor binding to confer
resistance. Darunavir (DRV) is the most potent HIV-1 protease inhibitor in
clinic; resistance is limited, as DRV fits well within the substrate envelope.
Nevertheless, resistance is observed due to hydrophobic changes at residues
including I50, V82, and I84 that line the S1/S1' pocket within the active site.
Through enzyme inhibition assays and a series of 12 crystal structures, we
interrogated susceptibility of DRV and two potent analogues to primary S1'
mutations. The analogues had modifications at the hydrophobic P1' moiety
compared to DRV to better occupy the unexploited space in the S1' pocket where
the primary mutations were located. Considerable losses of potency were observed
against protease variants with I84V and I50V mutations for all three inhibitors.
The crystal structures revealed an unexpected conformational change in the flap
region of I50V protease bound to the analogue with the largest P1' moiety,
indicating interdependency between the S1' subsite and the flap region.
Collective analysis of protease-inhibitor interactions in the crystal structures
using principle component analysis was able to distinguish inhibitor identity
and relative potency solely based on van der Waals contacts. Our results reveal
the complexity of the interplay between inhibitor P1' moiety and S1' mutations
and validate principle component analyses as a useful tool for distinguishing
resistance and inhibitor potency.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
');
}
}
 |