 |
PDBsum entry 5fyw
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Transcription
|
PDB id
|
|
|
|
5fyw
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
Contents |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1398 a.a.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1157 a.a.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
262 a.a.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
157 a.a.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
213 a.a.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
83 a.a.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
171 a.a.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
136 a.a.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
116 a.a.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
65 a.a.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
112 a.a.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
45 a.a.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
231 a.a.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
180 a.a.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
148 a.a.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
199 a.a.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
92 a.a.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
100 a.a.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
168 a.a.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
143 a.a.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Generate full PROCHECK analyses
|
PROCHECK summary for 5fyw
Ramachandran plot
PROCHECK statistics
1. Ramachandran Plot statistics
No. of
residues %-tage
------ ------
Most favoured regions [A,B,L] 4177 91.3%
Additional allowed regions [a,b,l,p] 331 7.2%
Generously allowed regions [~a,~b,~l,~p] 62 1.4%
Disallowed regions [XX] 7 0.2%*
---- ------
Non-glycine and non-proline residues 4577 100.0%
End-residues (excl. Gly and Pro) 98
Glycine residues 287
Proline residues 214
----
Total number of residues 5176
Based on an analysis of 118 structures of resolution of at least 2.0 Angstroms and R-factor no greater than 20.0 a good
quality model would be expected to have over 90% in the most favoured regions [A,B,L].
2. G-Factors
Average
Parameter Score Score
--------- ----- -----
Dihedral angles:-
Phi-psi distribution -0.22
Chi1-chi2 distribution 0.38
Chi1 only 0.33
Chi3 & chi4 0.64
Omega -0.49
-0.06
=====
Main-chain covalent forces:-
Main-chain bond lengths 0.63
Main-chain bond angles 0.39
0.49
=====
OVERALL AVERAGE 0.16
=====
G-factors provide a measure of how unusual, or out-of-the-ordinary, a property is.
Values below -0.5* - unusual
Values below -1.0** - highly unusual
Important note: The main-chain
bond-lengths and bond angles are compared with
the Engh & Huber (1991) ideal values derived
from small-molecule data. Therefore, structures
refined using different restraints may show
apparently large deviations from normality.
|
|
 |