 |
PDBsum entry 5fj9
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Transcription
|
PDB id
|
|
|
|
5fj9
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
Contents |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1412 a.a.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1114 a.a.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
335 a.a.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
119 a.a.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
215 a.a.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
83 a.a.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
191 a.a.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
140 a.a.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
92 a.a.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
67 a.a.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
101 a.a.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
45 a.a.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
165 a.a.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
105 a.a.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
528 a.a.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
98 a.a.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
70 a.a.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Generate full PROCHECK analyses
|
PROCHECK summary for 5fj9
Ramachandran plot
PROCHECK statistics
1. Ramachandran Plot statistics
No. of
residues %-tage
------ ------
Most favoured regions [A,B,L] 3496 80.6%*
Additional allowed regions [a,b,l,p] 653 15.1%
Generously allowed regions [~a,~b,~l,~p] 132 3.0%
Disallowed regions [XX] 56 1.3%*
---- ------
Non-glycine and non-proline residues 4337 100.0%
End-residues (excl. Gly and Pro) 64
Glycine residues 268
Proline residues 211
----
Total number of residues 4880
Based on an analysis of 118 structures of resolution of at least 2.0 Angstroms and R-factor no greater than 20.0 a good
quality model would be expected to have over 90% in the most favoured regions [A,B,L].
2. G-Factors
Average
Parameter Score Score
--------- ----- -----
Dihedral angles:-
Phi-psi distribution -0.68*
Chi1-chi2 distribution -0.44
Chi1 only -0.10
Chi3 & chi4 0.55
Omega -0.41
-0.37
=====
Main-chain covalent forces:-
Main-chain bond lengths 0.69
Main-chain bond angles 0.56
0.62
=====
OVERALL AVERAGE 0.02
=====
G-factors provide a measure of how unusual, or out-of-the-ordinary, a property is.
Values below -0.5* - unusual
Values below -1.0** - highly unusual
Important note: The main-chain
bond-lengths and bond angles are compared with
the Engh & Huber (1991) ideal values derived
from small-molecule data. Therefore, structures
refined using different restraints may show
apparently large deviations from normality.
|
|
|
