 |
PDBsum entry 4wrc
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sugar binding protein
|
PDB id
|
|
|
|
4wrc
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
References listed in PDB file
|
 |
|
Key reference
|
 |
|
Title
|
 |
Differential ligand binding specificities of the pulmonary collectins are determined by the conformational freedom of a surface loop.
|
 |
|
Authors
|
 |
M.J.Rynkiewicz,
H.Wu,
T.R.Cafarella,
N.M.Nikolaidis,
J.F.Head,
B.A.Seaton,
F.X.Mccormack.
|
 |
|
Ref.
|
 |
Biochemistry, 2017,
56,
4095-4105.
[DOI no: ]
|
 |
|
PubMed id
|
 |
|
 |
|
Note: In the PDB file this reference is
annotated as "TO BE PUBLISHED". The citation details given above have
been manually determined.
|
 |
 |
|
Abstract
|
 |
|
Lung surfactant proteins (SPs) play critical roles in surfactant function and
innate immunity. SP-A and SP-D, members of the collectin family of C-type
lectins, exhibit distinct ligand specificities, effects on surfactant structure,
and host defense functions despite extensive structural homology. SP-A binds to
dipalmitoylphosphatidylcholine (DPPC), the major surfactant lipid component, but
not phosphatidylinositol (PI), whereas SP-D shows the opposite preference.
Additionally, SP-A and SP-D recognize widely divergent pathogen-associated
molecular patterns. Previous studies suggested that a ligand-induced surface
loop conformational change unique to SP-A contributes to lipid binding affinity.
To test this hypothesis and define the structural features of SP-A and SP-D that
determine their ligand binding specificities, a structure-guided approach was
used to introduce key features of SP-D into SP-A. A quadruple mutant
(E171D/P175E/R197N/K203D) that introduced an SP-D-like loop-stabilizing calcium
binding site into the carbohydrate recognition domain was found to interconvert
SP-A ligand binding preferences to an SP-D phenotype, exchanging DPPC for PI
specificity, and resulting in the loss of lipid A binding and the acquisition of
more avid mannan binding properties. Mutants with constituent single or triple
mutations showed alterations in their lipid and sugar binding properties that
were intermediate between those of SP-A and SP-D. Structures of mutant complexes
with inositol or methyl-mannose revealed an attenuation of the ligand-induced
conformational change relative to wild-type SP-A. These studies suggest that
flexibility in a key surface loop supports the distinctive lipid binding
functions of SP-A, thus contributing to its multiple functions in surfactant
structure and regulation, and host defense.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |