 |
PDBsum entry 4q66
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Protein transport
|
PDB id
|
|
|
|
4q66
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
Contents |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
226 a.a.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
158 a.a.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
211 a.a.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
171 a.a.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
593 a.a.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
557 a.a.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
507 a.a.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
338 a.a.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
146 a.a.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
139 a.a.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
134 a.a.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
86 a.a.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Generate full PROCHECK analyses
|
PROCHECK summary for 4q66
Ramachandran plot
PROCHECK statistics
1. Ramachandran Plot statistics
No. of
residues %-tage
------ ------
Most favoured regions [A,B,L] 2528 89.5%*
Additional allowed regions [a,b,l,p] 265 9.4%
Generously allowed regions [~a,~b,~l,~p] 18 0.6%
Disallowed regions [XX] 14 0.5%*
---- ------
Non-glycine and non-proline residues 2825 100.0%
End-residues (excl. Gly and Pro) 203
Glycine residues 123
Proline residues 115
----
Total number of residues 3266
Based on an analysis of 118 structures of resolution of at least 2.0 Angstroms and R-factor no greater than 20.0 a good
quality model would be expected to have over 90% in the most favoured regions [A,B,L].
2. G-Factors
Average
Parameter Score Score
--------- ----- -----
Dihedral angles:-
Phi-psi distribution -0.10
Chi1-chi2 distribution 0.10
Chi1 only 0.26
Chi3 & chi4 0.62
Omega 0.22
0.15
=====
Main-chain covalent forces:-
Main-chain bond lengths 0.70
Main-chain bond angles 0.66
0.68
=====
OVERALL AVERAGE 0.36
=====
G-factors provide a measure of how unusual, or out-of-the-ordinary, a property is.
Values below -0.5* - unusual
Values below -1.0** - highly unusual
Important note: The main-chain
bond-lengths and bond angles are compared with
the Engh & Huber (1991) ideal values derived
from small-molecule data. Therefore, structures
refined using different restraints may show
apparently large deviations from normality.
|
|
|
