 |
PDBsum entry 3w0i
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Transcription
|
PDB id
|
|
|
|
3w0i
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
PDB id:
|
 |
|
 |
| Name: |
 |
Transcription
|
 |
|
Title:
|
 |
Crystal structure of rat vdr ligand binding domain in complex with novel nonsecosteroidal ligands
|
|
Structure:
|
 |
Vitamin d3 receptor. Chain: a. Fragment: ligand binding domain, unp residues 121-159, 218-420. Synonym: vdr, 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin d3 receptor, nuclear receptor subfamily 1 group i member 1. Engineered: yes. Mediator of RNA polymerase ii transcription subunit 1. Chain: c. Fragment: drip 205 nr2 box peptide, unp residues 640-652.
|
|
Source:
|
 |
Rattus norvegicus. Rat. Organism_taxid: 10116. Gene: nr1i1, vdr. Expressed in: escherichia coli. Expression_system_taxid: 562. Synthetic: yes. Homo sapiens. Human.
|
|
Resolution:
|
 |
|
1.90Å
|
R-factor:
|
0.203
|
R-free:
|
0.279
|
|
|
Authors:
|
 |
T.Shimizu,L.Asano,N.Kuwabara,I.Ito,T.Waku,J.Yanagisawa,H.Miyachi
|
|
Key ref:
|
 |
L.Asano
et al.
(2013).
Structural basis for vitamin D receptor agonism by novel non-secosteroidal ligands.
Febs Lett,
587,
957-963.
PubMed id:
DOI:
|
 |
|
Date:
|
 |
|
30-Oct-12
|
Release date:
|
09-Oct-13
|
|
|
|
|
|
PROCHECK
|
|
|
|
|
Headers
|
 |
|
|
References
|
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
|
| |
|
DOI no:
|
Febs Lett
587:957-963
(2013)
|
|
PubMed id:
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
Structural basis for vitamin D receptor agonism by novel non-secosteroidal ligands.
|
|
L.Asano,
I.Ito,
N.Kuwabara,
T.Waku,
J.Yanagisawa,
H.Miyachi,
T.Shimizu.
|
|
|
|
| |
ABSTRACT
|
|
|
| |
|
Non-secosteroidal ligands for vitamin D receptor (VDR) have been developed for
the agonist with non-calcemic profiles. Here, we provide the structural
mechanism of VDR agonism by novel non-secosteroidal ligands. All ligands had the
similar efficacy, while two had the higher potency. Crystallographic analyses
revealed that all ligands interacted with helix H10 and the loop between helices
H6 and H7 in a similar manner, but also that the two ligands with higher potency
had different interaction modes. This study suggests that distinct ligand
potency depend upon differences in the formation and rearrangement of
hydrogen-bond networks induced by each ligand.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
');
}
}
 |
|