 |
PDBsum entry 3sem
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Signaling protein/inhibitor
|
PDB id
|
|
|
|
3sem
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
Contents |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* Residue conservation analysis
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
|
| |
|
DOI no:
|
Science
282:2088-2092
(1998)
|
|
PubMed id:
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
Exploiting the basis of proline recognition by SH3 and WW domains: design of N-substituted inhibitors.
|
|
J.T.Nguyen,
C.W.Turck,
F.E.Cohen,
R.N.Zuckermann,
W.A.Lim.
|
|
|
|
| |
ABSTRACT
|
|
|
| |
|
Src homology 3 (SH3) and WW protein interaction domains bind specific
proline-rich sequences. However, instead of recognizing critical prolines on the
basis of side chain shape or rigidity, these domains broadly accepted amide
N-substituted residues. Proline is apparently specifically selected in vivo,
despite low complementarity, because it is the only endogenous N-substituted
amino acid. This discriminatory mechanism explains how these domains achieve
specific but low-affinity recognition, a property that is necessary for
transient signaling interactions. The mechanism can be exploited: screening a
series of ligands in which key prolines were replaced by nonnatural
N-substituted residues yielded a ligand that selectively bound the Grb2 SH3
domain with 100 times greater affinity.
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Selected figure(s)
|
|
|
| |
 |
 |
|
 |
|
 |
Figure 1.
Fig. 1. Backbone substitution requirements for SH3 and WW
domain recognition. (A) Structural mapping of alanine and
sarcosine scanning results (Table 1). Peptide/domain complex
interfaces (8, 9) shown schematically. Ligands adopt a PPII
conformation, depicted schematically as a triangular prism.
Residue positions (spheres) are color-coded by class:
white--does not require either C^ - or
N-substitution (alanine and sarcosine tolerant); green--requires
C^ -substitution
(alanine tolerant, sarcosine intolerant); orange--requires
N-substitution (sarcosine tolerant, alanine intolerant). (B)
Minimally sufficient recognition unit for SH3 and WW domain
binding grooves. Schematic view of a single binding groove
cross-section, looking down the PPII helical axis (viewed from
left side of Fig. 1A). Minimally required atoms defined in this
study, a sequential pair of C^ - and
N-substituted residues, are solid black. The van der Waals
binding surface that these atoms present is shaded. (C) Distinct
mechanisms of proline recognition. Proline can be recognized by
a lock and key mechanism, utilizing the full chemical potential
of the side chain. In contrast, SH3 and WW domains recognized
key prolines based on N-substitution. This mechanism utilizes
relatively little of the binding potential of ligand or protein
(hatched surface) but is still highly discriminatory for proline
among natural amino acids.
|
 |
Figure 3.
Fig. 3. Structural basis of peptoid recognition. (A)
Structure of wild-type Sos peptide (PPPVPPRRR) bound to Crk SH3
domain (20). Proline-rich core binding grooves are indicated by
dashed boxes. Highly conserved surface residues among the four
SH3 domains studied here (one or two conservative amino acid
types) are green. Variable surface residues (3+ amino acid
types) are brown. The ligand PXXP core binds at the most
conserved surface on the protein. (B) Structure of peptide 34
bound to Crk SH3 domain. N-(S)-1-Phenylethyl peptoid side chain
(orange) bound at site P[2]. Close-up view from the same
perspective as above. (C) Structure of peptide 39 bound to the
Sem5 SH3 domain. N-Cyclopropylmethyl peptoid side chain (orange)
bound at site P[ 1].
Close-up view from the same perspective as above.
|
 |
|
|
|
| |
The above figures are
reprinted
by permission from the AAAs:
Science
(1998,
282,
2088-2092)
copyright 1998.
|
|
| |
Figures were
selected
by an automated process.
|
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
Literature references that cite this PDB file's key reference
|
|
 |
| |
PubMed id
|
 |
Reference
|
 |
|
|
|
 |
T.Kondo,
K.Yokomine,
A.Nakagawa,
and
Y.Sakagami
(2011).
Analogs of the CLV3 Peptide: Synthesis and Structure-Activity Relationships Focused on Proline Residues.
|
| |
Plant Cell Physiol,
52,
30-36.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
C.A.Olsen
(2010).
Peptoid-Peptide hybrid backbone architectures.
|
| |
Chembiochem,
11,
152-160.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
J.L.Alvarez,
D.Petzhold,
I.Pankonien,
J.Behlke,
M.Kouno,
G.Vassort,
I.Morano,
and
H.Haase
(2010).
Ahnak1 modulates L-type Ca(2+) channel inactivation of rodent cardiomyocytes.
|
| |
Pflugers Arch,
460,
719-730.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
O.Aitio,
M.Hellman,
A.Kazlauskas,
D.F.Vingadassalom,
J.M.Leong,
K.Saksela,
and
P.Permi
(2010).
Recognition of tandem PxxP motifs as a unique Src homology 3-binding mode triggers pathogen-driven actin assembly.
|
| |
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A,
107,
21743-21748.
|
 |
|
PDB code:
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
S.Havrylov,
M.Jolanta Redowicz,
and
V.L.Buchman
(2010).
Emerging roles of Ruk/CIN85 in vesicle-mediated transport, adhesion, migration and malignancy.
|
| |
Traffic,
11,
721-731.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
S.Hong,
T.Chung,
and
D.Kim
(2010).
SH3 domain-peptide binding energy calculations based on structural ensemble and multiple peptide templates.
|
| |
PLoS One,
5,
e12654.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
B.Baptiste,
F.Godde,
and
I.Huc
(2009).
How can folded biopolymers and synthetic foldamers recognize each other?
|
| |
Chembiochem,
10,
1765-1767.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
J.Kapitán,
D.Gallo,
N.Goasdoué,
M.Nicaise,
M.Desmadril,
L.Hecht,
G.Leclercq,
L.D.Barron,
and
Y.Jacquot
(2009).
Identification of a human estrogen receptor alpha-derived antiestrogenic peptide that adopts a polyproline II conformation.
|
| |
J Pept Sci,
15,
455-464.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
S.A.Fowler,
and
H.E.Blackwell
(2009).
Structure-function relationships in peptoids: recent advances toward deciphering the structural requirements for biological function.
|
| |
Org Biomol Chem,
7,
1508-1524.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
A.Giubellino,
T.R.Burke,
and
D.P.Bottaro
(2008).
Grb2 signaling in cell motility and cancer.
|
| |
Expert Opin Ther Targets,
12,
1021-1033.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
A.Zhang,
and
Y.Guo
(2008).
High stability of the polyproline II helix in polypeptide bottlebrushes.
|
| |
Chemistry,
14,
8939-8946.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
B.C.Lee,
T.K.Chu,
K.A.Dill,
and
R.N.Zuckermann
(2008).
Biomimetic nanostructures: creating a high-affinity zinc-binding site in a folded nonbiological polymer.
|
| |
J Am Chem Soc,
130,
8847-8855.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
F.Liu,
A.G.Stephen,
A.A.Waheed,
M.J.Aman,
E.O.Freed,
R.J.Fisher,
and
T.R.Burke
(2008).
SAR by oxime-containing peptide libraries: application to Tsg101 ligand optimization.
|
| |
Chembiochem,
9,
2000-2004.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
S.Ren,
V.N.Uversky,
Z.Chen,
A.K.Dunker,
and
Z.Obradovic
(2008).
Short Linear Motifs recognized by SH2, SH3 and Ser/Thr Kinase domains are conserved in disordered protein regions.
|
| |
BMC Genomics,
9,
S26.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
S.V.Fiacco,
and
R.W.Roberts
(2008).
N-Methyl scanning mutagenesis generates protease-resistant g protein ligands with improved affinity and selectivity.
|
| |
Chembiochem,
9,
2200-2203.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
B.Bommarius,
D.Maxwell,
A.Swimm,
S.Leung,
A.Corbett,
W.Bornmann,
and
D.Kalman
(2007).
Enteropathogenic Escherichia coli Tir is an SH2/3 ligand that recruits and activates tyrosine kinases required for pedestal formation.
|
| |
Mol Microbiol,
63,
1748-1768.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
E.Leithe,
and
E.Rivedal
(2007).
Ubiquitination of gap junction proteins.
|
| |
J Membr Biol,
217,
43-51.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
G.J.Mizejewski
(2007).
The alpha-fetoprotein-derived growth inhibitory peptide 8-mer fragment: review of a novel anticancer agent.
|
| |
Cancer Biother Radiopharm,
22,
73-98.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
M.Meiyappan,
G.Birrane,
and
J.A.Ladias
(2007).
Structural basis for polyproline recognition by the FE65 WW domain.
|
| |
J Mol Biol,
372,
970-980.
|
 |
|
PDB codes:
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
N.Kannan,
N.Haste,
S.S.Taylor,
and
A.F.Neuwald
(2007).
The hallmark of AGC kinase functional divergence is its C-terminal tail, a cis-acting regulatory module.
|
| |
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A,
104,
1272-1277.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
S.Casares,
E.Ab,
H.Eshuis,
O.Lopez-Mayorga,
N.A.van Nuland,
and
F.Conejero-Lara
(2007).
The high-resolution NMR structure of the R21A Spc-SH3:P41 complex: understanding the determinants of binding affinity by comparison with Abl-SH3.
|
| |
BMC Struct Biol,
7,
22.
|
 |
|
PDB codes:
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
S.J.Wrenn,
R.M.Weisinger,
D.R.Halpin,
and
P.B.Harbury
(2007).
Synthetic ligands discovered by in vitro selection.
|
| |
J Am Chem Soc,
129,
13137-13143.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
S.Lowey,
L.D.Saraswat,
H.Liu,
N.Volkmann,
and
D.Hanein
(2007).
Evidence for an interaction between the SH3 domain and the N-terminal extension of the essential light chain in class II myosins.
|
| |
J Mol Biol,
371,
902-913.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
F.Liu,
A.G.Stephen,
C.S.Adamson,
K.Gousset,
M.J.Aman,
E.O.Freed,
R.J.Fisher,
and
T.R.Burke
(2006).
Hydrazone- and hydrazide-containing N-substituted glycines as peptoid surrogates for expedited library synthesis: application to the preparation of Tsg101-directed HIV-1 budding antagonists.
|
| |
Org Lett,
8,
5165-5168.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
P.Ruzza,
G.Siligardi,
A.Donella-Deana,
A.Calderan,
R.Hussain,
C.Rubini,
L.Cesaro,
A.Osler,
A.Guiotto,
L.A.Pinna,
and
G.Borin
(2006).
4-Fluoroproline derivative peptides: effect on PPII conformation and SH3 affinity.
|
| |
J Pept Sci,
12,
462-471.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
S.Park,
and
D.G.Jeong
(2006).
Ribosomal protein L10 interacts with the SH3 domain and regulates GDNF-induced neurite growth in SH-SY-5y cells.
|
| |
J Cell Biochem,
99,
624-634.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
A.Rath,
A.R.Davidson,
and
C.M.Deber
(2005).
The structure of "unstructured" regions in peptides and proteins: role of the polyproline II helix in protein folding and recognition.
|
| |
Biopolymers,
80,
179-185.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
L.Funke,
S.Dakoji,
and
D.S.Bredt
(2005).
Membrane-associated guanylate kinases regulate adhesion and plasticity at cell junctions.
|
| |
Annu Rev Biochem,
74,
219-245.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
L.J.Ball,
R.Kühne,
J.Schneider-Mergener,
and
H.Oschkinat
(2005).
Recognition of Proline-Rich Motifs by Protein-Protein-Interaction Domains.
|
| |
Angew Chem Int Ed Engl,
44,
2852-2869.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
S.Inglis,
R.Jones,
D.Fritz,
C.Stojkoski,
G.Booker,
and
S.Pyke
(2005).
Synthesis of 5-, 6- and 7-substituted-2-aminoquinolines as SH3 domain ligands.
|
| |
Org Biomol Chem,
3,
2543-2557.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
J.Karanicolas,
and
C.L.Brooks
(2004).
Integrating folding kinetics and protein function: biphasic kinetics and dual binding specificity in a WW domain.
|
| |
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A,
101,
3432-3437.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
M.R.Ferguson,
X.Fan,
M.Mukherjee,
J.Luo,
R.Khan,
J.C.Ferreon,
V.J.Hilser,
R.E.Shope,
and
R.O.Fox
(2004).
Directed discovery of bivalent peptide ligands to an SH3 domain.
|
| |
Protein Sci,
13,
626-632.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
A.Frankel,
S.W.Millward,
and
R.W.Roberts
(2003).
Encodamers: unnatural peptide oligomers encoded in RNA.
|
| |
Chem Biol,
10,
1043-1050.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
A.Sharma,
I.Sharma,
D.Kogkasuriyachai,
and
N.Kumar
(2003).
Structure of a gametocyte protein essential for sexual development in Plasmodium falciparum.
|
| |
Nat Struct Biol,
10,
197-203.
|
 |
|
PDB code:
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
E.O.Freed
(2003).
The HIV-TSG101 interface: recent advances in a budding field.
|
| |
Trends Microbiol,
11,
56-59.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
Q.Liu,
D.Berry,
P.Nash,
T.Pawson,
C.J.McGlade,
and
S.S.Li
(2003).
Structural basis for specific binding of the Gads SH3 domain to an RxxK motif-containing SLP-76 peptide: a novel mode of peptide recognition.
|
| |
Mol Cell,
11,
471-481.
|
 |
|
PDB code:
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
S.M.Feller,
G.Tuchscherer,
and
J.Voss
(2003).
High affinity molecules disrupting GRB2 protein complexes as a therapeutic strategy for chronic myelogenous leukaemia.
|
| |
Leuk Lymphoma,
44,
411-427.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
Y.Chen,
L.Deng,
Y.Maeno-Hikichi,
M.Lai,
S.Chang,
G.Chen,
and
J.F.Zhang
(2003).
Formation of an endophilin-Ca2+ channel complex is critical for clathrin-mediated synaptic vesicle endocytosis.
|
| |
Cell,
115,
37-48.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
A.Douangamath,
F.V.Filipp,
A.T.Klein,
P.Barnett,
P.Zou,
T.Voorn-Brouwer,
M.C.Vega,
O.M.Mayans,
M.Sattler,
B.Distel,
and
M.Wilmanns
(2002).
Topography for independent binding of alpha-helical and PPII-helical ligands to a peroxisomal SH3 domain.
|
| |
Mol Cell,
10,
1007-1017.
|
 |
|
PDB codes:
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
B.J.McFarland,
and
C.Beeson
(2002).
Binding interactions between peptides and proteins of the class II major histocompatibility complex.
|
| |
Med Res Rev,
22,
168-203.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
G.Scapin
(2002).
Structural biology in drug design: selective protein kinase inhibitors.
|
| |
Drug Discov Today,
7,
601-611.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
K.Kami,
R.Takeya,
H.Sumimoto,
and
D.Kohda
(2002).
Diverse recognition of non-PxxP peptide ligands by the SH3 domains from p67(phox), Grb2 and Pex13p.
|
| |
EMBO J,
21,
4268-4276.
|
 |
|
PDB code:
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
O.Pornillos,
S.L.Alam,
D.R.Davis,
and
W.I.Sundquist
(2002).
Structure of the Tsg101 UEV domain in complex with the PTAP motif of the HIV-1 p6 protein.
|
| |
Nat Struct Biol,
9,
812-817.
|
 |
|
PDB codes:
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
R.Ruijtenbeek,
C.Versluis,
A.J.Heck,
F.A.Redegeld,
F.P.Nijkamp,
and
R.M.Liskamp
(2002).
Characterization of a phosphorylated peptide and peptoid and peptoid-peptide hybrids by mass spectrometry.
|
| |
J Mass Spectrom,
37,
47-55.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
A.G.Cochran
(2001).
Protein-protein interfaces: mimics and inhibitors.
|
| |
Curr Opin Chem Biol,
5,
654-659.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
A.W.McGee,
S.R.Dakoji,
O.Olsen,
D.S.Bredt,
W.A.Lim,
and
K.E.Prehoda
(2001).
Structure of the SH3-guanylate kinase module from PSD-95 suggests a mechanism for regulated assembly of MAGUK scaffolding proteins.
|
| |
Mol Cell,
8,
1291-1301.
|
 |
|
PDB code:
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
C.M.Pickart
(2001).
Mechanisms underlying ubiquitination.
|
| |
Annu Rev Biochem,
70,
503-533.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
E.A.Kersteen,
and
R.T.Raines
(2001).
Contribution of tertiary amides to the conformational stability of collagen triple helices.
|
| |
Biopolymers,
59,
24-28.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
G.Tuchscherer,
D.Grell,
Y.Tatsu,
P.Durieux,
J.Fernandez-Carneado,
B.Hengst,
C.Kardinal,
and
S.Feller
(2001).
Targeting Molecular Recognition: Exploring the Dual Role of Functional Pseudoprolines in the Design of SH3 Ligands This work was supported by the Swiss National Science Foundation.
|
| |
Angew Chem Int Ed Engl,
40,
2844-2848.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
G.Wang,
J.M.McCaffery,
B.Wendland,
S.Dupré,
R.Haguenauer-Tsapis,
and
J.M.Huibregtse
(2001).
Localization of the Rsp5p ubiquitin-protein ligase at multiple sites within the endocytic pathway.
|
| |
Mol Cell Biol,
21,
3564-3575.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
H.Reiersen,
and
A.R.Rees
(2001).
The hunchback and its neighbours: proline as an environmental modulator.
|
| |
Trends Biochem Sci,
26,
679-684.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
K.V.Kishan,
M.E.Newcomer,
T.H.Rhodes,
and
S.D.Guilliot
(2001).
Effect of pH and salt bridges on structural assembly: molecular structures of the monomer and intertwined dimer of the Eps8 SH3 domain.
|
| |
Protein Sci,
10,
1046-1055.
|
 |
|
PDB codes:
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
M.Nishida,
K.Nagata,
Y.Hachimori,
M.Horiuchi,
K.Ogura,
V.Mandiyan,
J.Schlessinger,
and
F.Inagaki
(2001).
Novel recognition mode between Vav and Grb2 SH3 domains.
|
| |
EMBO J,
20,
2995-3007.
|
 |
|
PDB codes:
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
M.Vidal,
V.Gigoux,
and
C.Garbay
(2001).
SH2 and SH3 domains as targets for anti-proliferative agents.
|
| |
Crit Rev Oncol Hematol,
40,
175-186.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
R.Ruijtenbeek,
J.A.Kruijtzer,
W.van de Wiel,
M.J.Fischer,
M.Flück,
F.A.Redegeld,
R.M.Liskamp,
and
F.P.Nijkamp
(2001).
Peptoid - peptide hybrids that bind Syk SH2 domains involved in signal transduction.
|
| |
Chembiochem,
2,
171-179.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
A.D.Frankel
(2000).
Fitting peptides into the RNA world.
|
| |
Curr Opin Struct Biol,
10,
332-340.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
A.G.Cochran
(2000).
Antagonists of protein-protein interactions.
|
| |
Chem Biol,
7,
R85-R94.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
B.M.Baker,
S.J.Gagnon,
W.E.Biddison,
and
D.C.Wiley
(2000).
Conversion of a T cell antagonist into an agonist by repairing a defect in the TCR/peptide/MHC interface: implications for TCR signaling.
|
| |
Immunity,
13,
475-484.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
C.Garbay,
W.Q.Liu,
M.Vidal,
and
B.P.Roques
(2000).
Inhibitors of Ras signal transduction as antitumor agents.
|
| |
Biochem Pharmacol,
60,
1165-1169.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
D.Vakharia,
and
G.J.Mizejewski
(2000).
Human alpha-fetoprotein peptides bind estrogen receptor and estradiol, and suppress breast cancer.
|
| |
Breast Cancer Res Treat,
63,
41-52.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
J.Kolafa,
J.W.Perram,
and
R.P.Bywater
(2000).
Essential motions and energetic contributions of individual residues in a peptide bound to an SH3 domain.
|
| |
Biophys J,
79,
646-655.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
P.A.Dalby,
R.H.Hoess,
and
W.F.DeGrado
(2000).
Evolution of binding affinity in a WW domain probed by phage display.
|
| |
Protein Sci,
9,
2366-2376.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
S.A.Burchett
(2000).
Regulators of G protein signaling: a bestiary of modular protein binding domains.
|
| |
J Neurochem,
75,
1335-1351.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
Z.S.Zhao,
E.Manser,
and
L.Lim
(2000).
Interaction between PAK and nck: a template for Nck targets and role of PAK autophosphorylation.
|
| |
Mol Cell Biol,
20,
3906-3917.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
B.Aghazadeh,
and
M.K.Rosen
(1999).
Ligand recognition by SH3 and WW domains: the role of N-alkylation in PPII helices.
|
| |
Chem Biol,
6,
R241-R246.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
B.Goodson,
A.Ehrhardt,
S.Ng,
J.Nuss,
K.Johnson,
M.Giedlin,
R.Yamamoto,
W.H.Moos,
A.Krebber,
M.Ladner,
M.B.Giacona,
C.Vitt,
and
J.Winter
(1999).
Characterization of novel antimicrobial peptoids.
|
| |
Antimicrob Agents Chemother,
43,
1429-1434.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
K.D.Stigers,
M.J.Soth,
and
J.S.Nowick
(1999).
Designed molecules that fold to mimic protein secondary structures.
|
| |
Curr Opin Chem Biol,
3,
714-723.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
K.E.Prehoda,
D.J.Lee,
and
W.A.Lim
(1999).
Structure of the enabled/VASP homology 1 domain-peptide complex: a key component in the spatial control of actin assembly.
|
| |
Cell,
97,
471-480.
|
 |
|
PDB code:
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
S.L.Beaudenon,
M.R.Huacani,
G.Wang,
D.P.McDonnell,
and
J.M.Huibregtse
(1999).
Rsp5 ubiquitin-protein ligase mediates DNA damage-induced degradation of the large subunit of RNA polymerase II in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.
|
| |
Mol Cell Biol,
19,
6972-6979.
|
 |
|
 |
 |
|
The most recent references are shown first.
Citation data come partly from CiteXplore and partly
from an automated harvesting procedure. Note that this is likely to be
only a partial list as not all journals are covered by
either method. However, we are continually building up the citation data
so more and more references will be included with time.
Where a reference describes a PDB structure, the PDB
code is
shown on the right.
|
');
}
}
 |