|
|
|
|
 |
Contents |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* Residue conservation analysis
|
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
|
| |
|
DOI no:
|
J Mol Biol
284:351-361
(1998)
|
|
PubMed id:
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
Engrailed homeodomain-DNA complex at 2.2 A resolution: a detailed view of the interface and comparison with other engrailed structures.
|
|
E.Fraenkel,
M.A.Rould,
K.A.Chambers,
C.O.Pabo.
|
|
|
|
| |
ABSTRACT
|
|
|
| |
|
We report the 2.2 A resolution structure of the Drosophila engrailed homeodomain
bound to its optimal DNA site. The original 2.8 A resolution structure of this
complex provided the first detailed three-dimensional view of how homeodomains
recognize DNA, and has served as the basis for biochemical studies, structural
studies and molecular modeling. Our refined structure confirms the principal
conclusions of the original structure, but provides important new details about
the recognition interface. Biochemical and NMR studies of other homeodomains had
led to the notion that Gln50 was an especially important determinant of
specificity. However, our refined structure shows that this side-chain makes no
direct hydrogen bonds to the DNA. The structure does reveal an extensive network
of ordered water molecules which mediate contacts to several bases and
phosphates (including contacts from Gln50), and our model provides a basis for
detailed comparison with the structure of an engrailed Q50K altered-specificity
variant. Comparing our structure with the crystal structure of the free protein
confirms that the N and C termini of the homeodomain become ordered upon
DNA-binding. However, we also find that several key DNA contact residues in the
recognition helix have the same conformation in the free and bound protein, and
that several water molecules also are "preorganized" to contact the
DNA. Our structure helps provide a more complete basis for the detailed analysis
of homeodomain-DNA interactions.
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Selected figure(s)
|
|
|
| |
 |
 |
|
 |
|
 |
Figure 2.
Figure 2. A, Diagram showing major groove contacts made by
wild-type and Q50K engrailed [Tucker-Kellogg et al 1997]. The
DNA is represented as a cylindrical projection with phosphates
shown as circles; phosphates contacted by the protein are
shaded. Contacts from the protein backbone to the DNA are
indicated by an oval around the name of the residue. Water
molecules in the structure of wild-type engrailed that were also
observed in the structure of the free protein are enclosed in
boxes. Superimposing the free and bound proteins gives an rms
distance. of 0.55 Å for these six water molecules. Those
water molecules which surround Ala54 are shaded gray. B, Stereo
view of the protein-DNA interface in the wild-type engrailed-DNA
complex. DNA is shown in blue with the protein in red. Water
molecules are indicated by light blue spheres and hydrogen bonds
by broken lines.
|
 |
Figure 3.
Figure 3. Stereo view showing interactions of the
recognition helix in the major groove of engrailed. The backbone
of residues 47 to 54 from the recognition helix is shown in red,
and base-pairs 3 to 7 are shown in blue. Side-chains of Ile47,
Gln50, Asn51 and Ala54 are yellow, with water molecules shown in
light blue. Hydrogen bonds are indicated by golden spheres.
|
 |
|
|
|
| |
The above figures are
reprinted
by permission from Elsevier:
J Mol Biol
(1998,
284,
351-361)
copyright 1998.
|
|
| |
Figures were
selected
by an automated process.
|
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
Literature references that cite this PDB file's key reference
|
|
 |
| |
PubMed id
|
 |
Reference
|
 |
|
|
|
 |
P.L.Privalov,
A.I.Dragan,
and
C.Crane-Robinson
(2011).
Interpreting protein/DNA interactions: distinguishing specific from non-specific and electrostatic from non-electrostatic components.
|
| |
Nucleic Acids Res,
39,
2483-2491.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
A.N.Temiz,
P.V.Benos,
and
C.J.Camacho
(2010).
Electrostatic hot spot on DNA-binding domains mediates phosphate desolvation and the pre-organization of specificity determinant side chains.
|
| |
Nucleic Acids Res,
38,
2134-2144.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
K.Miyazono,
Y.Zhi,
Y.Takamura,
K.Nagata,
K.Saigo,
T.Kojima,
and
M.Tanokura
(2010).
Cooperative DNA-binding and sequence-recognition mechanism of aristaless and clawless.
|
| |
EMBO J,
29,
1613-1623.
|
 |
|
PDB codes:
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
L.Marchetti,
L.Comelli,
B.D'Innocenzo,
L.Puzzi,
S.Luin,
D.Arosio,
M.Calvello,
R.Mendoza-Maldonado,
F.Peverali,
F.Trovato,
S.Riva,
G.Biamonti,
G.Abdurashidova,
F.Beltram,
and
A.Falaschi
(2010).
Homeotic proteins participate in the function of human-DNA replication origins.
|
| |
Nucleic Acids Res,
38,
8105-8119.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
P.Agius,
A.Arvey,
W.Chang,
W.S.Noble,
and
C.Leslie
(2010).
High resolution models of transcription factor-DNA affinities improve in vitro and in vivo binding predictions.
|
| |
PLoS Comput Biol,
6,
0.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
B.J.Lesch,
A.R.Gehrke,
M.L.Bulyk,
and
C.I.Bargmann
(2009).
Transcriptional regulation and stabilization of left-right neuronal identity in C. elegans.
|
| |
Genes Dev,
23,
345-358.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
M.Torrado,
J.Revuelta,
C.Gonzalez,
F.Corzana,
A.Bastida,
and
J.L.Asensio
(2009).
Role of conserved salt bridges in homeodomain stability and DNA binding.
|
| |
J Biol Chem,
284,
23765-23779.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
C.W.Chiang,
A.Derti,
D.Schwartz,
M.F.Chou,
J.N.Hirschhorn,
and
C.T.Wu
(2008).
Ultraconserved elements: analyses of dosage sensitivity, motifs and boundaries.
|
| |
Genetics,
180,
2277-2293.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
M.B.Noyes,
R.G.Christensen,
A.Wakabayashi,
G.D.Stormo,
M.H.Brodsky,
and
S.A.Wolfe
(2008).
Analysis of homeodomain specificities allows the family-wide prediction of preferred recognition sites.
|
| |
Cell,
133,
1277-1289.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
M.E.McCully,
D.A.Beck,
and
V.Daggett
(2008).
Microscopic reversibility of protein folding in molecular dynamics simulations of the engrailed homeodomain.
|
| |
Biochemistry,
47,
7079-7089.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
M.F.Berger,
G.Badis,
A.R.Gehrke,
S.Talukder,
A.A.Philippakis,
L.Peña-Castillo,
T.M.Alleyne,
S.Mnaimneh,
O.B.Botvinnik,
E.T.Chan,
F.Khalid,
W.Zhang,
D.Newburger,
S.A.Jaeger,
Q.D.Morris,
M.L.Bulyk,
and
T.R.Hughes
(2008).
Variation in homeodomain DNA binding revealed by high-resolution analysis of sequence preferences.
|
| |
Cell,
133,
1266-1276.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
T.L.Religa
(2008).
Comparison of multiple crystal structures with NMR data for engrailed homeodomain.
|
| |
J Biomol NMR,
40,
189-202.
|
 |
|
PDB code:
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
D.A.Beck,
and
V.Daggett
(2007).
A one-dimensional reaction coordinate for identification of transition states from explicit solvent P(fold)-like calculations.
|
| |
Biophys J,
93,
3382-3391.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
P.L.Privalov,
A.I.Dragan,
C.Crane-Robinson,
K.J.Breslauer,
D.P.Remeta,
and
C.A.Minetti
(2007).
What drives proteins into the major or minor grooves of DNA?
|
| |
J Mol Biol,
365,
1-9.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
R.Joshi,
J.M.Passner,
R.Rohs,
R.Jain,
A.Sosinsky,
M.A.Crickmore,
V.Jacob,
A.K.Aggarwal,
B.Honig,
and
R.S.Mann
(2007).
Functional specificity of a Hox protein mediated by the recognition of minor groove structure.
|
| |
Cell,
131,
530-543.
|
 |
|
PDB codes:
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
X.Zhao,
M.Sun,
J.Zhao,
J.A.Leyva,
H.Zhu,
W.Yang,
X.Zeng,
Y.Ao,
Q.Liu,
G.Liu,
W.H.Lo,
E.W.Jabs,
L.M.Amzel,
X.Shan,
and
X.Zhang
(2007).
Mutations in HOXD13 underlie syndactyly type V and a novel brachydactyly-syndactyly syndrome.
|
| |
Am J Hum Genet,
80,
361-371.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
M.H.Quentien,
A.Barlier,
J.L.Franc,
I.Pellegrini,
T.Brue,
and
A.Enjalbert
(2006).
Pituitary transcription factors: from congenital deficiencies to gene therapy.
|
| |
J Neuroendocrinol,
18,
633-642.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
S.W.Wong-Deyrup,
Y.Kim,
and
S.J.Franklin
(2006).
Sequence preference in DNA binding: de novo designed helix-turn-helix metallopeptides recognize a family of DNA target sites.
|
| |
J Biol Inorg Chem,
11,
17-25.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
A.V.Morozov,
J.J.Havranek,
D.Baker,
and
E.D.Siggia
(2005).
Protein-DNA binding specificity predictions with structural models.
|
| |
Nucleic Acids Res,
33,
5781-5798.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
M.S.Yousef,
and
B.W.Matthews
(2005).
Structural basis of Prospero-DNA interaction: implications for transcription regulation in developing cells.
|
| |
Structure,
13,
601-607.
|
 |
|
PDB code:
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
A.Gutmanas,
and
M.Billeter
(2004).
Specific DNA recognition by the Antp homeodomain: MD simulations of specific and nonspecific complexes.
|
| |
Proteins,
57,
772-782.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
M.D.Simon,
K.Sato,
G.A.Weiss,
and
K.M.Shokat
(2004).
A phage display selection of engrailed homeodomain mutants and the importance of residue Q50.
|
| |
Nucleic Acids Res,
32,
3623-3631.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
J.Aishima,
and
C.Wolberger
(2003).
Insights into nonspecific binding of homeodomains from a structure of MATalpha2 bound to DNA.
|
| |
Proteins,
51,
544-551.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
N.A.LaRonde-LeBlanc,
and
C.Wolberger
(2003).
Structure of HoxA9 and Pbx1 bound to DNA: Hox hexapeptide and DNA recognition anterior to posterior.
|
| |
Genes Dev,
17,
2060-2072.
|
 |
|
PDB code:
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
T.Grüne,
J.Brzeski,
A.Eberharter,
C.R.Clapier,
D.F.Corona,
P.B.Becker,
and
C.W.Müller
(2003).
Crystal structure and functional analysis of a nucleosome recognition module of the remodeling factor ISWI.
|
| |
Mol Cell,
12,
449-460.
|
 |
|
PDB code:
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
W.Flader,
B.Wellenzohn,
R.H.Winger,
A.Hallbrucker,
E.Mayer,
and
K.R.Liedl
(2003).
Stepwise induced fit in the pico- to nanosecond time scale governs the complexation of the even-skipped transcriptional repressor homeodomain to DNA.
|
| |
Biopolymers,
68,
139-149.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
A.E.Maris,
M.R.Sawaya,
M.Kaczor-Grzeskowiak,
M.R.Jarvis,
S.M.Bearson,
M.L.Kopka,
I.Schröder,
R.P.Gunsalus,
and
R.E.Dickerson
(2002).
Dimerization allows DNA target site recognition by the NarL response regulator.
|
| |
Nat Struct Biol,
9,
771-778.
|
 |
|
PDB code:
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
J.Iwahara,
M.Iwahara,
G.W.Daughdrill,
J.Ford,
and
R.T.Clubb
(2002).
The structure of the Dead ringer-DNA complex reveals how AT-rich interaction domains (ARIDs) recognize DNA.
|
| |
EMBO J,
21,
1197-1209.
|
 |
|
PDB code:
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
T.K.Chiu,
C.Sohn,
R.E.Dickerson,
and
R.C.Johnson
(2002).
Testing water-mediated DNA recognition by the Hin recombinase.
|
| |
EMBO J,
21,
801-814.
|
 |
|
PDB codes:
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
M.Dlakić,
A.V.Grinberg,
D.A.Leonard,
and
T.K.Kerppola
(2001).
DNA sequence-dependent folding determines the divergence in binding specificities between Maf and other bZIP proteins.
|
| |
EMBO J,
20,
828-840.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
T.Stockner,
C.Plugariu,
G.Koraimann,
G.Högenauer,
W.Bermel,
S.Prytulla,
and
H.Sterk
(2001).
Solution structure of the DNA-binding domain of TraM.
|
| |
Biochemistry,
40,
3370-3377.
|
 |
|
PDB code:
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
K.Raha,
A.M.Wollacott,
M.J.Italia,
and
J.R.Desjarlais
(2000).
Prediction of amino acid sequence from structure.
|
| |
Protein Sci,
9,
1106-1119.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
R.A.Grant,
M.A.Rould,
J.D.Klemm,
and
C.O.Pabo
(2000).
Exploring the role of glutamine 50 in the homeodomain-DNA interface: crystal structure of engrailed (Gln50 --> ala) complex at 2.0 A.
|
| |
Biochemistry,
39,
8187-8192.
|
 |
|
PDB code:
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
V.Dave,
C.Zhao,
F.Yang,
C.S.Tung,
and
J.Ma
(2000).
Reprogrammable recognition codes in bicoid homeodomain-DNA interaction.
|
| |
Mol Cell Biol,
20,
7673-7684.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
D.E.Piper,
A.H.Batchelor,
C.P.Chang,
M.L.Cleary,
and
C.Wolberger
(1999).
Structure of a HoxB1-Pbx1 heterodimer bound to DNA: role of the hexapeptide and a fourth homeodomain helix in complex formation.
|
| |
Cell,
96,
587-597.
|
 |
|
PDB code:
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
G.Tell,
R.Acquaviva,
S.Formisano,
F.Fogolari,
C.Pucillo,
and
G.Damante
(1999).
Comparative stability analysis of the thyroid transcription factor 1 and Antennapedia homeodomains: evidence for residue 54 in controlling the structural stability of the recognition helix.
|
| |
Int J Biochem Cell Biol,
31,
1339-1353.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
T.Schwartz,
M.A.Rould,
K.Lowenhaupt,
A.Herbert,
and
A.Rich
(1999).
Crystal structure of the Zalpha domain of the human editing enzyme ADAR1 bound to left-handed Z-DNA.
|
| |
Science,
284,
1841-1845.
|
 |
|
PDB code:
|
 |
|
|
 |
 |
|
The most recent references are shown first.
Citation data come partly from CiteXplore and partly
from an automated harvesting procedure. Note that this is likely to be
only a partial list as not all journals are covered by
either method. However, we are continually building up the citation data
so more and more references will be included with time.
Where a reference describes a PDB structure, the PDB
codes are
shown on the right.
|
');
}
}
 |