 |
PDBsum entry 3d24
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Transcription
|
PDB id
|
|
|
|
3d24
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
Contents |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* Residue conservation analysis
|
|
|
|
|
PDB id:
|
 |
|
 |
| Name: |
 |
Transcription
|
 |
|
Title:
|
 |
Crystal structure of ligand-binding domain of estrogen-related receptor alpha (erralpha) in complex with the peroxisome proliferators-activated receptor coactivator-1alpha box3 peptide (pgc-1alpha)
|
|
Structure:
|
 |
Steroid hormone receptor err1. Chain: a, c. Fragment: ligand binding domain: residues 278-519. Synonym: estrogen-related receptor alpha, err-alpha, estrogen receptor-like 1, nuclear receptor subfamily 3 group b member 1. Engineered: yes. Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma coactivator 1-alpha. Chain: b, d.
|
|
Source:
|
 |
Homo sapiens. Organism_taxid: 9606. Gene: esrra, err1, esrl1, nr3b1. Expressed in: escherichia coli. Synthetic: yes. Other_details: synthetic peptide with the sequence based on the fragment (residues 198-219) of human pgc-1-alpha, uniprot entry q9ubk2 (prgc1_human)
|
|
Resolution:
|
 |
|
2.11Å
|
R-factor:
|
0.212
|
R-free:
|
0.255
|
|
|
Authors:
|
 |
D.Moras,H.Greschik,R.Flaig,Y.Sato,N.Rochel,Structural Proteomics In Europe (Spine)
|
Key ref:
|
 |
H.Greschik
et al.
(2008).
Communication between the ERR{alpha} Homodimer Interface and the PGC-1{alpha} Binding Surface via the Helix 8-9 Loop.
J Biol Chem,
283,
20220-20230.
PubMed id:
DOI:
|
 |
|
Date:
|
 |
|
07-May-08
|
Release date:
|
10-Jun-08
|
|
|
|
|
|
PROCHECK
|
|
|
|
|
Headers
|
 |
|
|
References
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
P11474
(ERR1_HUMAN) -
Steroid hormone receptor ERR1 from Homo sapiens
|
|
|
|
Seq: Struc:
|
 |
 |
 |
423 a.a.
209 a.a.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
|
| |
|
DOI no:
|
J Biol Chem
283:20220-20230
(2008)
|
|
PubMed id:
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
Communication between the ERR{alpha} Homodimer Interface and the PGC-1{alpha} Binding Surface via the Helix 8-9 Loop.
|
|
H.Greschik,
M.Althage,
R.Flaig,
Y.Sato,
V.Chavant,
C.Peluso-Iltis,
L.Choulier,
P.Cronet,
N.Rochel,
R.Schüle,
P.E.Strömstedt,
D.Moras.
|
|
|
|
| |
ABSTRACT
|
|
|
| |
|
Although structural studies on the ligand-binding domain (LBD) have established
the general mode of nuclear receptor (NR)/coactivator interaction, determinants
of binding specificity are only partially understood. The LBD of estrogen
receptor-alpha (ERalpha), for example, interacts only with a region of
peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor coactivator (PGC)-1alpha, which
contains the canonical LXXLL motif (NR box2), whereas the LBD of
estrogen-related receptor-alpha (ERRalpha) also binds efficiently an untypical,
LXXYL-containing region (NR box3) of PGC-1alpha. Surprisingly, in a previous
structural study, the ERalpha LBD has been observed to bind NR box3 of
transcriptional intermediary factor (TIF)-2 untypically via LXXYL, whereas the
ERRalpha LBD binds this region of TIF-2 only poorly. Here we present a new
crystal structure of the ERRalpha LBD in complex with a PGC-1alpha box3 peptide.
In this structure, residues N-terminal of the PGC-1alpha LXXYL motif formed
contacts with helix 4, the loop connecting helices 8 and 9, and with the C
terminus of the ERRalpha LBD. Interaction studies using wild-type and mutant
PGC-1alpha and ERRalpha showed that these contacts are functionally relevant and
are required for efficient ERRalpha/PGC-1alpha interaction. Furthermore, a
structure comparison between ERRalpha and ERalpha and mutation analyses provided
evidence that the helix 8-9 loop, which differs significantly in both nuclear
receptors, is a major determinant of coactivator binding specificity. Finally,
our results revealed that in ERRalpha the helix 8-9 loop allosterically links
the LBD homodimer interface with the coactivator cleft, thus providing a
plausible explanation for distinct PGC-1alpha binding to ERRalpha monomers and
homodimers.
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Selected figure(s)
|
|
|
| |
 |
 |
|
 |
|
 |
Figure 1.
FIGURE 1. Interaction of CoA peptides with the ERR and the
ER LBD. Representations
complexed with a PGC-1 box3 peptide
(^198QQQKPQRRPCSELLKYLTTNDD^219)(A), the ERR LBD (subunit
C)·PGC-1 box 3 complex contoured
in electron density at 1 (B), the published ERR
LBD
(PDB ID: 1XB7 [PDB]
) in complex with a mutant PGC-1 box3 peptide
(^205RPASELLKYLTT^216; C207A) (C), and the published ER LBD (PDB
ID: 1GWR [PDB]
) co-crystallized with a TIF-2 box3 peptide
(^740KENALLRYLLDKDD^753)(D). In all three cases the CoA peptide
binds in the untypical LXXYL mode (probably representing a
crystal artifact in the case of the ER ·TIF-2 complex).
In A and B, residues of PGC-1 that N-terminally flank
the LXXYL helix (Arg-205, Pro-206, and Cys-207) interact with
the ERR surface, notably with
H4, the H8–H9 loop, and the C terminus. In comparison,
N-terminal flanking residues are not observed in C and D. In all
structures, the length of H12 and the conformation of the
C-terminal residues differ.
|
 |
Figure 5.
FIGURE 5. The H8–H9 loop region contributes to PGC-1 binding
selectivity. A, amino acid sequence alignment of selected parts
of the ERR and the ER LBD.
Residues involved in CoA binding are colored blue; amino acids
that differ between the CoA cleft of ERR and ER are
underlined. Regions that differ significantly between the two
receptors (H8–H9 loop and C terminus) and that have been
exchanged in the respective swap mutants are colored red. B,
superimposition of the CoA cleft and the H8–H9 loop region of
ERR and ER (PDP ID:
1QKU). H9 is longer in ER , and the H8–H9 loop
adopts a different conformation. Only selected residues that
have been mutated are depicted. C, superimposition of the
H8–H9 loop region of ER with the corresponding
part of ERR (molecule coloring as
in B). The representation illustrates that swapping of the
H8–H9 loop of ER into ERR perturbs
the homodimer interface and requires conformational adaptations
of side chains, mainly because of the presence of the bulky
Tyr-459. D, ER mutants probing the
contribution of residues to PGC-1 binding (E2,
estradiol). In ER (V376M-E380Q), residues
that differ in the CoA of ER and ERR have
been exchanged. In ER (SwapH8–H9), the
H8–H9 loop region (amino acids 457–468) has been replaced
with the corresponding region (amino acids 338–341) of ERR
.
ER (3mut) corresponds to
V376M-E380Q-SwapH8–H9-H373S-H377S. In ER (4mut),
His-547—Arg-548 of ER have, in addition, been
replaced with Met-421—Met-422—Asp-423 of ERR .
Mammalian two-hybrid interaction assays were done in BHK cells
using Gal4[(5)]-TATA-LUC, pCMX-Gal4-PGC-1 constructs, and
wild-type or mutant pCMX-VP16-ERR LBD. Normalized
luciferase activity observed with Gal4-PGC-1 ID and VP16-ERR LBD
served as the reference and was set to 100%. Bars represent the
mean ± S.D. (n 6). p values were
calculated for ERR mutants relative to the
corresponding values of wild-type ERR (^**, p 0.0001; ^*,
p 0.001).
|
 |
|
|
|
| |
The above figures are
reprinted
by permission from the ASBMB:
J Biol Chem
(2008,
283,
20220-20230)
copyright 2008.
|
|
| |
Figures were
selected
by an automated process.
|
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
Literature references that cite this PDB file's key reference
|
|
 |
| |
PubMed id
|
 |
Reference
|
 |
|
|
|
 |
L.Jin,
and
Y.Li
(2010).
Structural and functional insights into nuclear receptor signaling.
|
| |
Adv Drug Deliv Rev,
62,
1218-1226.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
S.N.Lewis,
J.Bassaganya-Riera,
and
D.R.Bevan
(2010).
Virtual Screening as a Technique for PPAR Modulator Discovery.
|
| |
PPAR Res,
2010,
861238.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
G.B.Rha,
G.Wu,
S.E.Shoelson,
and
Y.I.Chi
(2009).
Multiple binding modes between HNF4alpha and the LXXLL motifs of PGC-1alpha lead to full activation.
|
| |
J Biol Chem,
284,
35165-35176.
|
 |
|
PDB code:
|
 |
|
|
 |
 |
|
The most recent references are shown first.
Citation data come partly from CiteXplore and partly
from an automated harvesting procedure. Note that this is likely to be
only a partial list as not all journals are covered by
either method. However, we are continually building up the citation data
so more and more references will be included with time.
Where a reference describes a PDB structure, the PDB
code is
shown on the right.
|
');
}
}
 |
| |