spacer
spacer

PDBsum entry 3cfv

Go to PDB code: 
protein ligands Protein-protein interface(s) links
Histone/chaperone PDB id
3cfv

 

 

 

 

Loading ...

 
JSmol PyMol  
Contents
Protein chains
393 a.a. *
18 a.a. *
14 a.a. *
Ligands
ARS ×2
Waters ×275
* Residue conservation analysis
PDB id:
3cfv
Name: Histone/chaperone
Title: Structural basis of the interaction of rbap46/rbap48 with histone h4
Structure: Histone-binding protein rbbp7. Chain: b, a. Synonym: retinoblastoma-binding protein 7, rbbp-7, retinoblastoma- binding protein p46, histone acetyltransferase type b subunit 2, nucleosome-remodeling factor subunit rbap46. Engineered: yes. Histone h4 peptide. Chain: e, f. Fragment: unp residues 25 to 42.
Source: Homo sapiens. Human. Gene: rbbp7, rbap46. Expressed in: spodoptera frugiperda. Expression_system_cell_line: sf9. Synthetic: yes. Other_details: the peptide is chemically synthesized.
Resolution:
2.60Å     R-factor:   0.202     R-free:   0.257
Authors: X.-Y.Pei,N.V.Murzina,W.Zhang,S.Mclaughlin,A.Verreault,B.F.Luisi, E.D.Laue
Key ref:
N.V.Murzina et al. (2008). Structural basis for the recognition of histone H4 by the histone-chaperone RbAp46. Structure, 16, 1077-1085. PubMed id: 18571423 DOI: 10.1016/j.str.2008.05.006
Date:
04-Mar-08     Release date:   10-Jun-08    
PROCHECK
Go to PROCHECK summary
 Headers
 References

Protein chains
Pfam   ArchSchema ?
Q16576  (RBBP7_HUMAN) -  Histone-binding protein RBBP7 from Homo sapiens
Seq:
Struc:
425 a.a.
393 a.a.
Protein chain
Pfam   ArchSchema ?
P62805  (H4_HUMAN) -  Histone H4 from Homo sapiens
Seq:
Struc:
103 a.a.
18 a.a.
Protein chain
Pfam   ArchSchema ?
P62805  (H4_HUMAN) -  Histone H4 from Homo sapiens
Seq:
Struc:
103 a.a.
14 a.a.
Key:    PfamA domain  Secondary structure  CATH domain

 

 
DOI no: 10.1016/j.str.2008.05.006 Structure 16:1077-1085 (2008)
PubMed id: 18571423  
 
 
Structural basis for the recognition of histone H4 by the histone-chaperone RbAp46.
N.V.Murzina, X.Y.Pei, W.Zhang, M.Sparkes, J.Vicente-Garcia, J.V.Pratap, S.H.McLaughlin, T.R.Ben-Shahar, A.Verreault, B.F.Luisi, E.D.Laue.
 
  ABSTRACT  
 
RbAp46 and RbAp48 (pRB-associated proteins p46 and p48, also known as RBBP7 and RBBP4, respectively) are highly homologous histone chaperones that play key roles in establishing and maintaining chromatin structure. We report here the crystal structure of human RbAp46 bound to histone H4. RbAp46 folds into a seven-bladed beta propeller structure and binds histone H4 in a groove formed between an N-terminal alpha helix and an extended loop inserted into blade six. Surprisingly, histone H4 adopts a different conformation when interacting with RbAp46 than it does in either the nucleosome or in the complex with ASF1, another histone chaperone. Our structural and biochemical results suggest that when a histone H3/H4 dimer (or tetramer) binds to RbAp46 or RbAp48, helix 1 of histone H4 unfolds to interact with the histone chaperone. We discuss the implications of our findings for the assembly and function of RbAp46 and RbAp48 complexes.
 
  Selected figure(s)  
 
Figure 2.
Figure 2. Histone H4 Recognition by the RbAp46-Binding Pocket
(A) Electrostatic surface potential of RbAp46 contoured and color coded at −91 kT (red) and +91 kT (blue). The potential was calculated and displayed with the program PyMol (DeLano, 2002). The histone H4 peptide is shown as a stick model. The histone H4-binding pocket in RbAp46 is mainly formed by the negatively charged PP loop (which terminates in Pro-362 and Pro-363) and a hydrophobic surface on the N-terminal α helix (helix 1). The interaction of histone H4 residues (Gln-27, Lys-31, Ile-34, Arg-35, Arg-36, Leu-37, Arg-39, and Arg-40) is shown.
(B) Detailed view showing the interactions of the hydrophobic Ile-34 and Leu-37 histone H4 residues with Phe-29 and Leu-30 in helix 1 of RbAp46, as well as the positively charged Arg-36, Arg-39, and Arg-40 histone H4 residues with the backbone carbonyl groups in the PP loop and a cluster of acidic residues (Glu-356, Asp-357, and Asp-360) in RbAp46.
(C) Site-directed mutagenesis of RbAp46 in either the charged PP loop (E356Q + D357N + E359Q + D360N), the hydrophobic surface of helix 1 (L30Y), or both simultaneously all disrupt the interaction with histone H4 in pull-down experiments with GST-histone H4 1–48.
(D) In reciprocal experiments, mutation of histone H4 residues interacting with either the charged PP loop (R39V + R40N), or of residues interacting with both helix 1 and the charged PP loop (I34T + L37D + R35S) and (L37D + R39V + R40N) also disrupt the binding. In both (C) and (D), the top panel shows an autoradiogram illustrating the amount of ^35S-labeled RbAp46 pulled down in each experiment, whereas the lower panel shows a Coomassie blue-stained gel indicating the amount of either GST or GST-histone H4 (1–48) used. In each experiment, the input lane contains 30% of the ^35S-labeled RbAp46 protein used in each of the pull-down assays. The experiments were carried out in 300 mM NaCl, 20 mM Tris (pH 8.0), 5 mM DTT, and 0.1% (v/v) NP-40.
Figure 3.
Figure 3. Interaction of Histones H3 and H4 with RbAp46
(A) Analytical size-exclusion chromatography of the recombinant histone H3/H4 complex used in the biochemical experiments described in this paper. The inset panel shows a Coomassie blue-stained 4%–12% NuPAGE gel used to analyze the fractions. In the conditions used here (2 M NaCl and 20 mM HEPES [pH 7.5], on a Superdex 75 PC3.2/30 column), histones H3 and H4 are present as tetramers, but at lower ionic strengths (as used in the binding experiments) these dissociate to form a mixture of dimers and tetramers (Banks and Gloss, 2003).
(B) Pull-down of either wild-type or mutant RbAp46 by histones H3 and H4 crosslinked to DynaBeads, in the absence or presence of the N-terminal histone H4 peptide (residues 16–41). (The experiments were carried out as described in Figure 2. The positively charged lysozyme protein was also crosslinked to beads in separate experiments and was used as a negative control.)
(C) Comparison of the interactions of Ile-34, Leu-37, and Ala-38 in helix 1 of histone H4 with (i) the N-terminal helix of RbAp46 in the RbAp46/histone H4 peptide structure, (ii) α helices 2 of histone H3 and H4 in one (of the two) H3/H4 dimer in the nucleosome core particle (Davey et al., 2002; PDB code: 1KX5), and (iii) α helices 2 of histone H3 and H4 in the ASF1-histone H3/H4 complex ([English et al., 2006] and [Natsume et al., 2007]; PDB code: 2HUE). In (i), (ii), and (iii), the view is down the axis of helix 1 of histone H4. Because similar contacts are made between histones H3 and H4 in the complex with ASF1 and in both copies of histones H3 and H4 in the nucleosome core particle, it is likely that isolated histones H3 and H4 also interact with each other in a similar manner. Histone H4 is colored blue in all three structures, whereas histone H3 is yellow in the nucleosome core particle and pink in the ASF1 complex.
 
  The above figures are reprinted from an Open Access publication published by Cell Press: Structure (2008, 16, 1077-1085) copyright 2008.  
  Figures were selected by an automated process.  

Literature references that cite this PDB file's key reference

  PubMed id Reference
23178455 W.Zhang, M.Tyl, R.Ward, F.Sobott, J.Maman, A.S.Murthy, A.A.Watson, O.Fedorov, A.Bowman, T.Owen-Hughes, H.El Mkami, N.V.Murzina, D.G.Norman, and E.D.Laue (2013).
Structural plasticity of histones H3-H4 facilitates their allosteric exchange between RbAp48 and ASF1.
  Nat Struct Mol Biol, 20, 29-35.  
22231400 V.Migliori, J.Müller, S.Phalke, D.Low, M.Bezzi, W.C.Mok, S.K.Sahu, J.Gunaratne, P.Capasso, C.Bassi, V.Cecatiello, A.De Marco, W.Blackstock, V.Kuznetsov, B.Amati, M.Mapelli, and E.Guccione (2012).
Symmetric dimethylation of H3R2 is a newly identified histone mark that supports euchromatin maintenance.
  Nat Struct Mol Biol, 19, 136-144.
PDB code: 4a7j
21118997 A.Ejlassi-Lassallette, E.Mocquard, M.C.Arnaud, and C.Thiriet (2011).
H4 replication-dependent diacetylation and Hat1 promote S-phase chromatin assembly in vivo.
  Mol Biol Cell, 22, 245-255.  
21734722 A.Y.Lai, and P.A.Wade (2011).
Cancer biology and NuRD: a multifaceted chromatin remodelling complex.
  Nat Rev Cancer, 11, 588-596.  
21468892 C.Xu, and J.Min (2011).
Structure and function of WD40 domain proteins.
  Protein Cell, 2, 202-214.
PDB codes: 3e0c 3fm0 3i2n 3ow8
21549310 F.W.Schmitges, A.B.Prusty, M.Faty, A.Stützer, G.M.Lingaraju, J.Aiwazian, R.Sack, D.Hess, L.Li, S.Zhou, R.D.Bunker, U.Wirth, T.Bouwmeester, A.Bauer, N.Ly-Hartig, K.Zhao, H.Chan, J.Gu, H.Gut, W.Fischle, J.Müller, and N.H.Thomä (2011).
Histone Methylation by PRC2 Is Inhibited by Active Chromatin Marks.
  Mol Cell, 42, 330-341.
PDB codes: 2yb8 2yba
21423274 M.Yun, J.Wu, J.L.Workman, and B.Li (2011).
Readers of histone modifications.
  Cell Res, 21, 564-578.  
21243712 P.Voigt, and D.Reinberg (2011).
Histone tails: ideal motifs for probing epigenetics through chemical biology approaches.
  Chembiochem, 12, 236-252.  
21047798 S.Lejon, S.Y.Thong, A.Murthy, S.AlQarni, N.V.Murzina, G.A.Blobel, E.D.Laue, and J.P.Mackay (2011).
Insights into association of the NuRD complex with FOG-1 from the crystal structure of an RbAp48·FOG-1 complex.
  J Biol Chem, 286, 1196-1203.
PDB code: 2xu7
20520775 A.Aslam, and C.Logie (2010).
Histone H3 serine 57 and lysine 56 interplay in transcription elongation and recovery from S-phase stress.
  PLoS One, 5, e10851.  
19914933 A.Bowman, R.Ward, H.El-Mkami, T.Owen-Hughes, and D.G.Norman (2010).
Probing the (H3-H4)2 histone tetramer structure using pulsed EPR spectroscopy combined with site-directed spin labelling.
  Nucleic Acids Res, 38, 695-707.  
20167597 A.Osakabe, H.Tachiwana, T.Matsunaga, T.Shiga, R.S.Nozawa, C.Obuse, and H.Kurumizaka (2010).
Nucleosome formation activity of human somatic nuclear autoantigenic sperm protein (sNASP).
  J Biol Chem, 285, 11913-11921.  
20444609 C.Das, J.K.Tyler, and M.E.Churchill (2010).
The histone shuffle: histone chaperones in an energetic dance.
  Trends Biochem Sci, 35, 476-489.  
20451393 C.U.Stirnimann, E.Petsalaki, R.B.Russell, and C.W.Müller (2010).
WD40 proteins propel cellular networks.
  Trends Biochem Sci, 35, 565-574.  
20974918 C.Xu, C.Bian, W.Yang, M.Galka, H.Ouyang, C.Chen, W.Qiu, H.Liu, A.E.Jones, F.MacKenzie, P.Pan, S.S.Li, H.Wang, and J.Min (2010).
Binding of different histone marks differentially regulates the activity and specificity of polycomb repressive complex 2 (PRC2).
  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A, 107, 19266-19271.
PDB codes: 3jpx 3jzg 3jzh 3jzn 3k26 3k27
20953179 E.I.Campos, J.Fillingham, G.Li, H.Zheng, P.Voigt, W.H.Kuo, H.Seepany, Z.Gao, L.A.Day, J.F.Greenblatt, and D.Reinberg (2010).
The program for processing newly synthesized histones H3.1 and H4.
  Nat Struct Mol Biol, 17, 1343-1351.  
20923397 K.L.Yap, and M.M.Zhou (2010).
Keeping it in the family: diverse histone recognition by conserved structural folds.
  Crit Rev Biochem Mol Biol, 45, 488-505.  
20141833 M.Ransom, B.K.Dennehey, and J.K.Tyler (2010).
Chaperoning histones during DNA replication and repair.
  Cell, 140, 183-195.  
20080577 M.Shuaib, K.Ouararhni, S.Dimitrov, and A.Hamiche (2010).
HJURP binds CENP-A via a highly conserved N-terminal domain and mediates its deposition at centromeres.
  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A, 107, 1349-1354.  
20017116 R.L.Rich, and D.G.Myszka (2010).
Grading the commercial optical biosensor literature-Class of 2008: 'The Mighty Binders'.
  J Mol Recognit, 23, 1.  
19234478 A.V.Probst, E.Dunleavy, and G.Almouzni (2009).
Epigenetic inheritance during the cell cycle.
  Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol, 10, 192-206.  
19609323 A.W.Oliver, S.Swift, C.J.Lord, A.Ashworth, and L.H.Pearl (2009).
Structural basis for recruitment of BRCA2 by PALB2.
  EMBO Rep, 10, 990-996.
PDB codes: 2w18 3eu7
19410545 E.M.Dunleavy, D.Roche, H.Tagami, N.Lacoste, D.Ray-Gallet, Y.Nakamura, Y.Daigo, Y.Nakatani, and G.Almouzni-Pettinotti (2009).
HJURP is a cell-cycle-dependent maintenance and deposition factor of CENP-A at centromeres.
  Cell, 137, 485-497.  
19862764 E.Saade, U.Mechold, A.Kulyyassov, D.Vertut, M.Lipinski, and V.Ogryzko (2009).
Analysis of interaction partners of H4 histone by a new proteomics approach.
  Proteomics, 9, 4934-4943.  
19345089 J.Müller, and P.Verrijzer (2009).
Biochemical mechanisms of gene regulation by polycomb group protein complexes.
  Curr Opin Genet Dev, 19, 150-158.  
19903202 M.Sakamoto, S.Noguchi, S.Kawashima, Y.Okada, T.Enomoto, M.Seki, and M.Horikoshi (2009).
Global analysis of mutual interaction surfaces of nucleosomes with comprehensive point mutants.
  Genes Cells, 14, 1271-1330.  
19767730 R.Margueron, N.Justin, K.Ohno, M.L.Sharpe, J.Son, W.J.Drury, P.Voigt, S.R.Martin, W.R.Taylor, V.De Marco, V.Pirrotta, D.Reinberg, and S.J.Gamblin (2009).
Role of the polycomb protein EED in the propagation of repressive histone marks.
  Nature, 461, 762-767.
PDB codes: 3iiw 3iiy 3ij0 3ij1 3ijc
20514218 Y.Nie, C.Viola, C.Bieniossek, S.Trowitzsch, L.S.Vijay-Achandran, M.Chaillet, F.Garzoni, and I.Berger (2009).
Getting a grip on complexes.
  Curr Genomics, 10, 558-572.  
19079580 A.Norris, M.A.Bianchet, and J.D.Boeke (2008).
Compensatory interactions between Sir3p and the nucleosomal LRS surface imply their direct interaction.
  PLoS Genet, 4, e1000301.  
18782834 H.Wang, S.T.Walsh, and M.R.Parthun (2008).
Expanded binding specificity of the human histone chaperone NASP.
  Nucleic Acids Res, 36, 5763-5772.  
The most recent references are shown first. Citation data come partly from CiteXplore and partly from an automated harvesting procedure. Note that this is likely to be only a partial list as not all journals are covered by either method. However, we are continually building up the citation data so more and more references will be included with time. Where a reference describes a PDB structure, the PDB code is shown on the right.

 

spacer

spacer