 |
PDBsum entry 2ywz
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Immune system
|
PDB id
|
|
|
|
2ywz
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
Contents |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* Residue conservation analysis
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
|
| |
|
DOI no:
|
Proteins
71:119-130
(2008)
|
|
PubMed id:
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
Shark IgNAR antibody mimotopes target a murine immunoglobulin through extended CDR3 loop structures.
|
|
D.P.Simmons,
V.A.Streltsov,
O.Dolezal,
P.J.Hudson,
A.M.Coley,
M.Foley,
D.F.Proll,
S.D.Nuttall.
|
|
|
|
| |
ABSTRACT
|
|
|
| |
|
Mimotopes mimic the three-dimensional topology of an antigen epitope, and are
frequently recognized by antibodies with affinities comparable to those obtained
for the original antibody-antigen interaction. Peptides and anti-idiotypic
antibodies are two classes of protein mimotopes that mimic the topology (but not
necessarily the sequence) of the parental antigen. In this study, we combine
these two classes by selecting mimotopes based on single domain IgNAR
antibodies, which display exceptionally long CDR3 loop regions (analogous to a
constrained peptide library) presented in the context of an immunoglobulin
framework with adjacent and supporting CDR1 loops. By screening an in vitro
phage-display library of IgNAR variable domains (V(NAR)s) against the target
antigen monoclonal antibody MAb5G8, we obtained four potential mimotopes. MAb5G8
targets a linear tripeptide epitope (AYP) in the flexible signal sequence of the
Plasmodium falciparum Apical Membrane Antigen-1 (AMA1), and this or similar
motifs were detected in the CDR loops of all four V(NAR)s. The V(NAR)s, 1-A-2,
-7, -11, and -14, were demonstrated to bind specifically to this paratope by
competition studies with an artificial peptide and all showed enhanced
affinities (3-46 nM) compared to the parental antigen (175 nM). Crystallographic
studies of recombinant proteins 1-A-7 and 1-A-11 showed that the SYP motifs on
these V(NAR)s presented at the tip of the exposed CDR3 loops, ideally positioned
within bulge-like structures to make contact with the MAb5G8 antibody. These
loops, in particular in 1-A-11, were further stabilized by inter- and intra-
loop disulphide bridges, hydrogen bonds, electrostatic interactions, and
aromatic residue packing. We rationalize the higher affinity of the V(NAR)s
compared to the parental antigen by suggesting that adjacent CDR1 and framework
residues contribute to binding affinity, through interactions with other CDR
regions on the antibody, though of course definitive support of this hypothesis
will rely on co-crystallographic studies. Alternatively, the selection of
mimotopes from a large (<4 x 10(8)) constrained library may have allowed
selection of variants with even more favorable epitope topologies than present
in the original antigenic structure, illustrating the power of in vivo selection
of mimotopes from phage-displayed molecular libraries.
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Selected figure(s)
|
|
|
| |
 |
 |
|
 |
|
 |
Figure 1.
Figure 1. Isolation of MAb5G8-specific V[NAR] domains. (A)
Pools of polyclonal IgNAR-bacteriophages displaying V[NAR]
domains were assayed for binding to MAb5G8 (selection antigen)
or 2% MPBS (nonspecific control) pre-pan and following one to
four rounds of library panning. Bound bacteriophages were
detected using an HRP conjugated anti-fd phage antibody, and
results represent the average of triplicate wells. The positive
control represents bacteriophages displaying the MAb5G8-specific
E2 peptide [^NEDENTLQHAYPID^C]. (B) Protein alignment of deduced
amino acid sequences for V[NAR]s 1-A-2, 1-A-7, 1-A-11, and
1-A-14. CDR1 and CDR3 regions are highlighted and identical
residues (dark shading) and conservative replacements (light
shading; I/V/L/M, D/E, K/R, A/G, T/S, Q/N, F/Y) indicated. (C)
Expanded comparison of V[NAR] 1-A-2, 1-A-7, 1-A-11, and 1-A-14
CDR regions. Potential peptide motifs for interaction with
MAb5G8 are underlined, and 1-A-11 cysteine residues positioned
to form an inter-loop disulphide linkage are highlighted in bold.
|
 |
Figure 4.
Figure 4. Comparative analysis of V[NAR] loop topologies. (A)
Superimposed VMD[58] ribbon representations of V[NAR] domain
crystallographic structures. Expanded CDR3 protein backbone
traces are shown in ribbon representation for Type 2 V[NAR]s
1-A-7 (green; this study), 1-A-11 (red; this study), 12A-9
(cyan; PDB 2COQ), 12Y-2 (yellow; PDB 1VES), and the Type 1
V[NAR] HEL-5A7 (blue; PDB 1SQ2). (B) Licorice representations of
the 1-A-7 CDR3 loop highlighting the potential mimotope at
residues ^95SYP. (C) Ribbon representation of the 1-A-7 CDR3
(green) and CDR1 (yellow) loop regions in 180° rotation from
(B). Loop stabilizing interactions are shown as dotted lines.
(D) Licorice representations of the 1-A-11 CDR3 loop
highlighting the potential mimotope at residues ^93SYP. (E)
Ribbon representation of the 1-A-11 CDR3 (green) and CDR1
(yellow) loop regions in 180° rotation from (C). Loop
stabilizing interactions are shown, including the inter-loop
disulphide bond between Cys^29 and Cys^91.
|
 |
|
|
|
| |
The above figures are
reprinted
by permission from John Wiley & Sons, Inc.:
Proteins
(2008,
71,
119-130)
copyright 2008.
|
|
| |
Figures were
selected
by the author.
|
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
Literature references that cite this PDB file's key reference
|
|
 |
| |
PubMed id
|
 |
Reference
|
 |
|
|
|
 |
A.Monegal,
D.Ami,
C.Martinelli,
H.Huang,
M.Aliprandi,
P.Capasso,
C.Francavilla,
G.Ossolengo,
and
A.de Marco
(2009).
Immunological applications of single-domain llama recombinant antibodies isolated from a naïve library.
|
| |
Protein Eng Des Sel,
22,
273-280.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
J.Wesolowski,
V.Alzogaray,
J.Reyelt,
M.Unger,
K.Juarez,
M.Urrutia,
A.Cauerhff,
W.Danquah,
B.Rissiek,
F.Scheuplein,
N.Schwarz,
S.Adriouch,
O.Boyer,
M.Seman,
A.Licea,
D.V.Serreze,
F.A.Goldbaum,
F.Haag,
and
F.Koch-Nolte
(2009).
Single domain antibodies: promising experimental and therapeutic tools in infection and immunity.
|
| |
Med Microbiol Immunol,
198,
157-174.
|
 |
|
 |
 |
|
The most recent references are shown first.
Citation data come partly from CiteXplore and partly
from an automated harvesting procedure. Note that this is likely to be
only a partial list as not all journals are covered by
either method. However, we are continually building up the citation data
so more and more references will be included with time.
|
');
}
}
 |