 |
PDBsum entry 2xkx
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Structural protein
|
PDB id
|
|
|
|
2xkx
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
References listed in PDB file
|
 |
|
Key reference
|
 |
|
Title
|
 |
Self-Directed assembly and clustering of the cytoplasmic domains of inwardly rectifying kir2.1 potassium channels on association with psd-95.
|
 |
|
Authors
|
 |
S.Fomina,
T.D.Howard,
O.K.Sleator,
M.Golovanova,
L.O'Ryan,
M.L.Leyland,
J.G.Grossmann,
R.F.Collins,
S.M.Prince.
|
 |
|
Ref.
|
 |
Biochim Biophys Acta, 2011,
1808,
2374-2389.
|
 |
|
PubMed id
|
 |
|
 |
 |
|
Abstract
|
 |
|
No abstract given.
|
 |
|
Secondary reference #1
|
 |
|
Title
|
 |
Supramodular structure and synergistic target binding of the n-Terminal tandem pdz domains of psd-95.
|
 |
|
Authors
|
 |
J.F.Long,
H.Tochio,
P.Wang,
J.S.Fan,
C.Sala,
M.Niethammer,
M.Sheng,
M.Zhang.
|
 |
|
Ref.
|
 |
J Mol Biol, 2003,
327,
203-214.
[DOI no: ]
|
 |
|
PubMed id
|
 |
|
 |
 |
|
|
 |
 |
 |
|
 |
|
 |
Figure 1.
Figure 1. Structure of PSD-95 PDZ1 determined by NMR
spectroscopy. (A) Stereoview showing the best-fit superposition
of the backbone atoms (N, C^a, and C') of the final 20
structures of PSD-95 PDZ1. The structures are superimposed
against the average structure using the residues 64-148. The
structural statistics are summarized in Table 1. (B) Ribbon
diagram presentation of PSD-95 PDZ1. The secondary structure
elements are labelled following the scheme used in the crystal
structure of PSD-95 PDZ3. [7] (C) Comparison of the 3D
structures of PDZ1 and PDZ2 of PSD-95. The backbone traces (N,
C^a, and C') of PDZ1 (gold) and PDZ2 (yellow) are superimposed.
The two structures were fit to each other by excluding the
GLGF-loop, bB/bC loop and the two termini. The rmsd between the
backbones of the two PDZ domains is 1.35 Å.
|
 |
Figure 5.
Figure 5. Functional role of conformation-restrained tandem
PDZ repeats in PSD-95. (A) Extending the PDZ12 linker by
introducing flexible amino acid residues reduces the size of the
Kv1.4 channel clusters mediated by N-PDZ12. Myc-tagged
constructs N-PDZ1-2 wild-type (N-PDZ12), the deletion mutant of
N-PDZ12 (N-PDZ12Del) and the insertion mutant of N-PDZ12
(N-PDZ1-2Ins) were co-transfected in COS7 cells with potassium
channel subunit Kv1.4. Cells cotransfected with different
constructs, as indicated, were fixed two days after transfection
and stained with Kv1.4 antibodies to visualize the potassium
channel clusters. The schematics of the deletions and insertion
mutations used in this study are shown. Insets show
higher-magnification views of Kv1.4 clusters. (B) Frequency
distribution (left) and mean values (right) of Kv1.4 cluster
areas mediated by N-PDZ12, N-PDZ12(Del) and N-PDZ12(Ins),
measured from at least ten cells for each construct. The scale
bars represent 5 µm or 15 µm for the insets. An
asterisk (*) indicates significance at p <0.01 in an unpaired,
two-tailed Student's t-test.
|
 |
|
 |
 |
|
The above figures are
reproduced from the cited reference
with permission from Elsevier
|
 |
|
Secondary reference #2
|
 |
|
Title
|
 |
Solution structure and backbone dynamics of the second pdz domain of postsynaptic density-95.
|
 |
|
Authors
|
 |
H.Tochio,
F.Hung,
M.Li,
D.S.Bredt,
M.Zhang.
|
 |
|
Ref.
|
 |
J Mol Biol, 2000,
295,
225-237.
[DOI no: ]
|
 |
|
PubMed id
|
 |
|
 |
 |
|
|
 |
 |
 |
|
 |
|
 |
Figure 2.
Figure 2. Stereoview showing the best-fit superposition of the backbone atoms (N, C
a
, and C0) of the final 20 struc-
tures of PSD-95 PDZ2. The structures are superimposed against the average structure using the residues 158-246. The
program MOLMOL (Koradi et al., 1996) was used to generate the Figure.
|
 |
Figure 6.
Figure 6. Model of the PSD-95
PDZ2 and the nNOS PDZ complex.
In this model, PSD-95 PDZ2
(green) is superimposed on the a1-
syntrophin PDZ domain (red)
(Hillier et al., 1999). The nNOS PDZ
domain is shown in blue. The
Figure was generated using MOL-
SCRIPT and Raster3D.
|
 |
|
 |
 |
|
The above figures are
reproduced from the cited reference
with permission from Elsevier
|
 |
|
Secondary reference #3
|
 |
|
Title
|
 |
Structure of the third pdz domain of psd-95 protein complexed with kketwv peptide ligand
|
 |
|
Authors
|
 |
D.Saro,
Z.Wawrzak,
P.Martin,
J.Vickrey,
A.Paredes,
L.Kovarm.Spaller.
|
 |
|
Ref.
|
 |
TO BE PUBLISHED ...
|
 |
 |
|
Secondary reference #4
|
 |
|
Title
|
 |
Structure of the sh3-Guanylate kinase module from psd-95 suggests a mechanism for regulated assembly of maguk scaffolding proteins.
|
 |
|
Authors
|
 |
A.W.Mcgee,
S.R.Dakoji,
O.Olsen,
D.S.Bredt,
W.A.Lim,
K.E.Prehoda.
|
 |
|
Ref.
|
 |
Mol Cell, 2001,
8,
1291-1301.
[DOI no: ]
|
 |
|
PubMed id
|
 |
|
 |
 |
|
|
 |
 |
 |
|
 |
|
 |
Figure 4.
Figure 4. Comparison of the PSD-95 Split SH3 Structure with
Canonical SH3 Domain Structure(A) Stereo ribbon diagrams of the
PSD-95 SH3 fold (upper), including the intervening hinge region
and the additional β strand F, and the C-terminal SH3 domain of
SEM-5 (lower) complexed with a peptide ligand (Lim et al.,
1994b). In PSD-95, a tyrosine (523) from the separated E β
strand packs into the hydrophobic core of the SH3 fold, in place
of a valine normally observed in canonical SH3 domains (Val 208
in SEM-5). The position of the 3[10] helix in SEM-5 is
indicated. The β strands for PSD-95 and SEM-5 are labeled A–F
and A–E, respectively.(B) Secondary structure diagrams of
PSD-95 and SEM-5 reveal the conserved overall topology. The
hinge region in PSD-95, which separates β strands D and E,
occludes the canonical peptide binding surface. The GK domain is
inserted between β strands E and F. The positions of the
various loops and the conserved segment of 3[10] helix are shown
in SEM-5.(C) Schematic comparison of the peptide ligand binding
surfaces for PSD-95 and SEM-5. Aromatic side chains critical for
ligand recognition are represented as planar projections. PSD-95
lacks the central conserved tyrosine residue. A docked
polyproline II (PPII) helical ligand is shown for the canonical
SH3 domain.
|
 |
Figure 6.
Figure 6. The Hinge Region Is Variable and Can Modulate
Inter- Versus Intramolecular SH3 Assembly(A) Schematic
representations of intramolecular SH3 assembly (upper), a 3D
domain swapped open oligomeric chain (left), and a closed dimer
(right).(B) Alignment of the PSD-95 SH3 fold (red) with the
structures of eight canonical SH3 domains (black) shows that the
hinge insert replaces a conserved segment of 3[10] helix
(bold).(C) The hinge region is variable in length and is the
site of protein binding and alternative splicing. Calmodulin and
protein 4.1 bind some MAGUKs within the hinge region. Two
mutations in Drosophila DLG that are capable of interallelic
complementation are indicated with arrows.(D) Schematic
representations of the SH3-GK mutant proteins used to probe the
role of the hinge region in SH3 3D-domain swapped assembly.(E)
Elution profiles for the proteins diagrammed in (D). Unlike the
wt and other mutants, the Pro[5]-Δhinge protein elutes with a
significant peak corresponding to the dimer species.
|
 |
|
 |
 |
|
The above figures are
reproduced from the cited reference
with permission from Cell Press
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
Headers
|
 |
|
|
|
 |