 |
PDBsum entry 2vrr
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cell cycle/ligase
|
PDB id
|
|
|
|
2vrr
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
References listed in PDB file
|
 |
|
Key reference
|
 |
|
Title
|
 |
Ubc9 sumoylation regulates sumo target discrimination.
|
 |
|
Authors
|
 |
P.Knipscheer,
A.Flotho,
H.Klug,
J.V.Olsen,
W.J.Van dijk,
A.Fish,
E.S.Johnson,
M.Mann,
T.K.Sixma,
A.Pichler.
|
 |
|
Ref.
|
 |
Mol Cell, 2008,
31,
371-382.
[DOI no: ]
|
 |
|
PubMed id
|
 |
|
 |
 |
|
Abstract
|
 |
|
Posttranslational modification with small ubiquitin-related modifier, SUMO, is a
widespread mechanism for rapid and reversible changes in protein function.
Considering the large number of known targets, the number of enzymes involved in
modification seems surprisingly low: a single E1, a single E2, and a few
distinct E3 ligases. Here we show that autosumoylation of the mammalian
E2-conjugating enzyme Ubc9 at Lys14 regulates target discrimination. While not
altering its activity toward HDAC4, E2-25K, PML, or TDG, sumoylation of Ubc9
impairs its activity on RanGAP1 and strongly activates sumoylation of the
transcriptional regulator Sp100. Enhancement depends on a SUMO-interacting motif
(SIM) in Sp100 that creates an additional interface with the SUMO conjugated to
the E2, a mechanism distinct from Ubc9 approximately SUMO thioester recruitment.
The crystal structure of sumoylated Ubc9 demonstrates how the newly created
binding interface can provide a gain in affinity otherwise provided by E3
ligases.
|
 |
 |
 |
|
 |
|
 |
Figure 6.
Figure 6. Crystal Structure of Ubc9^*SUMO (A) The
Ubc9^*SUMO structure. Covalent linkage between Ubc9 Lys14 and
the SUMO C terminus. (B) The interface between Ubc9 and
SUMO (H bonds: gray dotted lines, interface side chains as
sticks). (C) Superposition of Ubc9^*SUMO and E2-25K^*SUMO.
(D) Buried surface area between E2 and SUMO plotted against
the sequences of Ubc9 and E2-25K. (E) Model of the
Ubc9^Δhairpin mutant. Deleted β-hairpin is in gray. (F)
Thioester formation for Ubc9^Δhairpin (670 nM) versus
Ubc9^Δhairpin*SUMO (670 nM) assay as in Figure 3, with 260 nM
Aos1-Uba2, 6.7 μM SUMO, and immunoblotting with α-Ubc9. Colors
are as follows: blue Ubc9 (yellow catalytic Cys) with yellow
SUMO, cyan E2-25K with pink SUMO.
|
 |
Figure 7.
Figure 7. Model of Ubc9 Target Discrimination via Gain in
Affinities The increased affinity can be a result of an
additional binding interface mediated by an E3 (right panel) or
by direct interaction of the target with Ubc9 (either free,
thioester, or conjugated to SUMO) (left panel). (Top) Cartoon of
Ubc9 thioester-target interactions, mediated either through the
target, conjugated SUMO, or an E3 ligase. (Bottom) Shown are the
Ubc9 surfaces involved in these interactions; interaction
between the catalytic cleft in Ubc9 with the SUMO consensus
motif (light green). Additional binding interfaces (dark green)
enhance affinity and hence modification. Sumoylation of Ubc9
increases the interaction of targets with a SIM (Song et al.,
2005) at a defined distance as seen for Sp100 in this study
(left panel). Alternatively, the target can recruit the SUMO
vert,
similar Ubc9 thioester (picture according to Reverter and Lima
[2005]) in, e.g., Daxx and TDG (Figure S5 and ([Hochstrasser,
2007], [Lin et al., 2006] and [Takahashi et al., 2005]). RanGAP1
itself has two binding interfaces (Bernier-Villamor et al.,
2002) (middle panel) and is an unusually efficient SUMO
substrate. ELK1 contains a negatively charged amino
acid-dependent sumoylation motif (Yang et al., 2006). Similarly,
the SP-RING E3 ligases (model based on E2-RING complex in the
ubiquitin SCF system [Zheng et al., 2000]) stabilize the
interaction between the target and Ubc9, resulting in enhanced
modification (right panel).
|
 |
|
 |
 |
|
The above figures are
reprinted
by permission from Cell Press:
Mol Cell
(2008,
31,
371-382)
copyright 2008.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |