|
|
|
|
 |
Contents |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* Residue conservation analysis
|
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
|
| |
|
DOI no:
|
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A
104:14923-14928
(2007)
|
|
PubMed id:
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
Structural insights into the Slit-Robo complex.
|
|
C.Morlot,
N.M.Thielens,
R.B.Ravelli,
W.Hemrika,
R.A.Romijn,
P.Gros,
S.Cusack,
A.A.McCarthy.
|
|
|
|
| |
ABSTRACT
|
|
|
| |
|
Slits are large multidomain leucine-rich repeat (LRR)-containing proteins that
provide crucial guidance cues in neuronal and vascular development. More
recently, Slits have been implicated in heart morphogenesis, angiogenesis, and
tumor metastasis. Slits are ligands for the Robo (Roundabout) receptors, which
belong to the Ig superfamily of transmembrane signaling molecules. The Slit-Robo
interaction is mediated by the second LRR domain of Slit and the two N-terminal
Ig domains of Robo, but the molecular details of this interaction and how it
induces signaling remain unclear. Here we describe the crystal structures of the
second LRR domain of human Slit2 (Slit2 D2), the first two Ig domains of its
receptor Robo1 (Ig1-2), and the minimal complex between these proteins (Slit2
D2-Robo1 Ig1). Slit2 D2 binds with its concave surface to the side of Ig1 with
electrostatic and hydrophobic contact regions mediated by residues that are
conserved in other family members. Surface plasmon resonance experiments and a
mutational analysis of the interface confirm that Ig1 is the primary domain for
binding Slit2. These structures provide molecular insight into Slit-Robo complex
formation and will be important for the development of novel cancer therapeutics.
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Selected figure(s)
|
|
|
| |
 |
 |
|
 |
|
 |
Figure 1.
Fig. 1. Structure of human Robo1 Ig1–2. (A) Ribbon
diagram. The disulfide bridges are in yellow, and the box
indicates the region highlighted in B. (B) Residues involved in
interdomain contacts of the Ig1-Ig2 interface. (C) Ribbon
diagram of the two Ig1–2 crystal forms showing the hinge
movement of Ig2. (D) Sequence alignment of Ig1 domains of human
Robo1, -2, -3, and -4 and of the Ig2 domain of human Robo1.
Residue numbering is for Robo1 Ig1 (above) and Robo1 Ig2
(below). Slit2 D2-binding residues selected for mutagenesis are
marked with a star, and residues strictly conserved between the
Ig1 domain of human Robo1, -2, -3, and -4 are shown in red.
|
 |
Figure 2.
Fig. 2. Structure of Slit2 D2 bound to Robo1 Ig1. Ig1 is in
green; Slit2 D2 N- and C-terminal caps are in purple and blue,
respectively; LRRs 1–6 are in orange; and the disulfide
bridges are in yellow. Interacting residues are shown in stick
representation. (A) Ribbon diagram of the complex in two
orthogonal orientations. (B) Electrostatic region of the Slit2
D2-Ig1 interface. (C) Hydrophobic region of the Slit2 D2-Ig1
interface. (D) Relative Slit2 D2-binding capacity of Robo1 Ig1
variants. Results are expressed as maximal Slit2 D2-binding,
normalized with respect to the maximal Slit2 D2-binding capacity
of wild-type Robo1 Ig1.
|
 |
|
|
| |
Figures were
selected
by an automated process.
|
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
Literature references that cite this PDB file's key reference
|
|
 |
| |
PubMed id
|
 |
Reference
|
 |
|
|
|
 |
B.H.Biersmith,
M.Hammel,
E.R.Geisbrecht,
and
S.Bouyain
(2011).
The immunoglobulin-like domains 1 and 2 of the protein tyrosine phosphatase LAR adopt an unusual horseshoe-like conformation.
|
| |
J Mol Biol,
408,
616-627.
|
 |
|
PDB codes:
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
A.E.Denk,
S.Kaufmann,
K.Stark,
J.Schedel,
T.Lowin,
T.Schubert,
and
A.K.Bosserhoff
(2010).
Slit3 inhibits Robo3-induced invasion of synovial fibroblasts in rheumatoid arthritis.
|
| |
Arthritis Res Ther,
12,
R45.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
R.H.Adams,
and
A.Eichmann
(2010).
Axon guidance molecules in vascular patterning.
|
| |
Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol,
2,
a001875.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
C.E.Shiau,
and
M.Bronner-Fraser
(2009).
N-cadherin acts in concert with Slit1-Robo2 signaling in regulating aggregation of placode-derived cranial sensory neurons.
|
| |
Development,
136,
4155-4164.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
E.Seiradake,
A.C.von Philipsborn,
M.Henry,
M.Fritz,
H.Lortat-Jacob,
M.Jamin,
W.Hemrika,
M.Bastmeyer,
S.Cusack,
and
A.A.McCarthy
(2009).
Structure and functional relevance of the Slit2 homodimerization domain.
|
| |
EMBO Rep,
10,
736-741.
|
 |
|
PDB code:
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
F.Shen,
X.Liu,
J.G.Geng,
and
S.W.Guo
(2009).
Increased immunoreactivity to SLIT/ROBO1 in ovarian endometriomas: a likely constituent biomarker for recurrence.
|
| |
Am J Pathol,
175,
479-488.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
K.L.Hindle,
J.Bella,
and
S.C.Lovell
(2009).
Quantitative analysis and prediction of curvature in leucine-rich repeat proteins.
|
| |
Proteins,
77,
342-358.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
S.Zu,
Z.Bartik,
S.Zhao,
U.Sillen,
and
A.Nordenskjöld
(2009).
Mutations in the ROBO2 and SLIT2 genes are rare causes of familial vesico-ureteral reflux.
|
| |
Pediatr Nephrol,
24,
1501-1508.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
C.A.Jones,
N.R.London,
H.Chen,
K.W.Park,
D.Sauvaget,
R.A.Stockton,
J.D.Wythe,
W.Suh,
F.Larrieu-Lahargue,
Y.S.Mukouyama,
P.Lindblom,
P.Seth,
A.Frias,
N.Nishiya,
M.H.Ginsberg,
H.Gerhardt,
K.Zhang,
and
D.Y.Li
(2008).
Robo4 stabilizes the vascular network by inhibiting pathologic angiogenesis and endothelial hyperpermeability.
|
| |
Nat Med,
14,
448-453.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
J.A.Legg,
J.M.Herbert,
P.Clissold,
and
R.Bicknell
(2008).
Slits and Roundabouts in cancer, tumour angiogenesis and endothelial cell migration.
|
| |
Angiogenesis,
11,
13-21.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
N.Fukuhara,
J.A.Howitt,
S.A.Hussain,
and
E.Hohenester
(2008).
Structural and functional analysis of slit and heparin binding to immunoglobulin-like domains 1 and 2 of Drosophila Robo.
|
| |
J Biol Chem,
283,
16226-16234.
|
 |
|
PDB codes:
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
Q.R.Fan,
and
W.A.Hendrickson
(2008).
Comparative structural analysis of the binding domain of follicle stimulating hormone receptor.
|
| |
Proteins,
72,
393-401.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
S.Kaur,
G.V.Samant,
K.Pramanik,
P.W.Loscombe,
M.L.Pendrak,
D.D.Roberts,
and
R.Ramchandran
(2008).
Silencing of directional migration in roundabout4 knockdown endothelial cells.
|
| |
BMC Cell Biol,
9,
61.
|
 |
|
 |
 |
|
The most recent references are shown first.
Citation data come partly from CiteXplore and partly
from an automated harvesting procedure. Note that this is likely to be
only a partial list as not all journals are covered by
either method. However, we are continually building up the citation data
so more and more references will be included with time.
Where a reference describes a PDB structure, the PDB
codes are
shown on the right.
|
');
}
}
 |