 |
PDBsum entry 2v5m
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cell adhesion
|
PDB id
|
|
|
|
2v5m
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
Contents |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* Residue conservation analysis
|
|
|
|
|
PDB id:
|
 |
|
 |
| Name: |
 |
Cell adhesion
|
 |
|
Title:
|
 |
Structural basis for dscam isoform specificity
|
|
Structure:
|
 |
Dscam. Chain: a. Fragment: n-terminal four domains (d1, d2, d3 and d4), residues 36- 423. Synonym: down syndrome cell adhesion molecule dscam. Engineered: yes. Other_details: isoform 4.1/6.34
|
|
Source:
|
 |
Drosophila melanogaster. Fruit fly. Organism_taxid: 7227. Variant: splicing variant 4.1/6.34. Organ: brain. Expressed in: spodoptera frugiperda. Expression_system_taxid: 7108. Expression_system_cell_line: sf9.
|
|
Resolution:
|
 |
|
1.95Å
|
R-factor:
|
0.171
|
R-free:
|
0.205
|
|
|
Authors:
|
 |
R.Meijers,R.Puettmann-Holgado,G.Skiniotis,J.-H.Liu,T.Walz, D.Schmucker,J.-H.Wang
|
Key ref:
|
 |
R.Meijers
et al.
(2007).
Structural basis of Dscam isoform specificity.
Nature,
449,
487-491.
PubMed id:
DOI:
|
 |
|
Date:
|
 |
|
06-Jul-07
|
Release date:
|
11-Sep-07
|
|
|
|
|
|
PROCHECK
|
|
|
|
|
Headers
|
 |
|
|
References
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Q0E9H9
(Q0E9H9_DROME) -
Cell adhesion molecule Dscam1 from Drosophila melanogaster
|
|
|
|
Seq: Struc:
|
 |
 |
 |
2016 a.a.
388 a.a.*
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
|
|
Key: |
 |
PfamA domain |
 |
 |
 |
Secondary structure |
 |
 |
CATH domain |
 |
|
*
PDB and UniProt seqs differ
at 21 residue positions (black
crosses)
|
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
|
| |
|
DOI no:
|
Nature
449:487-491
(2007)
|
|
PubMed id:
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
Structural basis of Dscam isoform specificity.
|
|
R.Meijers,
R.Puettmann-Holgado,
G.Skiniotis,
J.H.Liu,
T.Walz,
J.H.Wang,
D.Schmucker.
|
|
|
|
| |
ABSTRACT
|
|
|
| |
|
The Dscam gene gives rise to thousands of diverse cell surface receptors thought
to provide homophilic and heterophilic recognition specificity for neuronal
wiring and immune responses. Mutually exclusive splicing allows for the
generation of sequence variability in three immunoglobulin ecto-domains, D2, D3
and D7. We report X-ray structures of the amino-terminal four immunoglobulin
domains (D1-D4) of two distinct Dscam isoforms. The structures reveal a
horseshoe configuration, with variable residues of D2 and D3 constituting two
independent surface epitopes on either side of the receptor. Both isoforms
engage in homo-dimerization coupling variable domain D2 with D2, and D3 with D3.
These interactions involve symmetric, antiparallel pairing of identical peptide
segments from epitope I that are unique to each isoform. Structure-guided
mutagenesis and swapping of peptide segments confirm that epitope I, but not
epitope II, confers homophilic binding specificity of full-length Dscam
receptors. Phylogenetic analysis shows strong selection of matching peptide
sequences only for epitope I. We propose that peptide complementarity of
variable residues in epitope I of Dscam is essential for homophilic binding
specificity.
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Selected figure(s)
|
|
|
| |
 |
 |
|
 |
|
 |
Figure 1.
Figure 1: Structure of the N-terminal four-domain fragment of
Dscam. a, Representative class averages from negatively
stained Dscam D1–D8[1.34.30] show that the molecule can adopt
different conformations but retains the horseshoe configuration
of the N-terminal D1–D4 domains. Scale bar, 10 nm. b,
Representative class averages from negatively stained Dscam
D1–D4[1.34] show that the four domains of Dscam D1–D4[1.34]
are arranged in a horseshoe configuration. Scale bar, 5 nm. c,
Ribbon diagram of Dscam D1–D4[1.34] coloured according to
sequence variability; conserved residues are coloured cyan,
variable residues are green and hypervariable residues are red.
The variability was calculated using Shannon's uncertainty^22,
and residues were classified as hypervariable if the uncertainty
value exceeded two-thirds of the highest value observed for all
residues from exons 4 and 6. d, e, Surface representation of
epitope I (left) and II (right) on either side of the horseshoe
for Dscam D1–D4[1.34] (d) and Dscam D1–D4[9.9] (e). Colour
codes are as in c. The figure was prepared using PyMOL
(http://www.pymol.org).
|
 |
Figure 2.
Figure 2: Homophilic dimers observed in the crystal lattice.
a, b, Ribbon diagram of the dimer in Dscam D1–D4[1.34] (a) and
Dscam D1–D4[9.9 ](b). D1 and D4, green; D2 and D3, blue for
monomer A; D1 and D4, yellow; D2 and D3, cyan for monomer B.
Residues at symmetry centre are underlined. The isoform-specific
interaction elements are shown as red and orange in molecules A
and B, respectively, and are displayed in more detail along
their respective twofold axes: c, the D2^A–D2^B interface of
Dscam D1–D4[1.34]; d, the D2^A–D2^B interface of Dscam
D1–D4[9.9] (blue and cyan residues are constant); e, the
D3^A–D3^B interface of Dscam D1–D4[1.34]; f, the D3^A–D3^B
interface of Dscam D1–D4[9.9]. Residues involved in
dimer-sustaining hydrogen bonds are labelled and the dyad axes
are displayed as black ellipsoids. The figure was prepared using
PyMOL (http://www.pymol.org).
|
 |
|
|
|
| |
The above figures are
reprinted
by permission from Macmillan Publishers Ltd:
Nature
(2007,
449,
487-491)
copyright 2007.
|
|
| |
Figures were
selected
by the author.
|
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
Literature references that cite this PDB file's key reference
|
|
 |
| |
PubMed id
|
 |
Reference
|
 |
|
|
|
 |
B.H.Biersmith,
M.Hammel,
E.R.Geisbrecht,
and
S.Bouyain
(2011).
The immunoglobulin-like domains 1 and 2 of the protein tyrosine phosphatase LAR adopt an unusual horseshoe-like conformation.
|
| |
J Mol Biol,
408,
616-627.
|
 |
|
PDB codes:
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
K.Zhu,
Y.Xu,
J.Liu,
Q.Xu,
and
H.Ye
(2011).
Down syndrome cell adhesion molecule and its functions in neural development.
|
| |
Neurosci Bull,
27,
45-52.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
C.Lee,
N.Kim,
M.Roy,
and
B.R.Graveley
(2010).
Massive expansions of Dscam splicing diversity via staggered homologous recombination during arthropod evolution.
|
| |
RNA,
16,
91.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
D.F.Kelly,
R.J.Lake,
T.C.Middelkoop,
H.Y.Fan,
S.Artavanis-Tsakonas,
and
T.Walz
(2010).
Molecular structure and dimeric organization of the Notch extracellular domain as revealed by electron microscopy.
|
| |
PLoS One,
5,
e10532.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
M.K.Schäfer,
and
P.Altevogt
(2010).
L1CAM malfunction in the nervous system and human carcinomas.
|
| |
Cell Mol Life Sci,
67,
2425-2437.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
O.Schmidt,
K.Söderhäll,
U.Theopold,
and
I.Faye
(2010).
Role of adhesion in arthropod immune recognition.
|
| |
Annu Rev Entomol,
55,
485-504.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
S.Bouyain,
and
D.J.Watkins
(2010).
The protein tyrosine phosphatases PTPRZ and PTPRG bind to distinct members of the contactin family of neural recognition molecules.
|
| |
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A,
107,
2443-2448.
|
 |
|
PDB codes:
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
S.L.Zipursky,
and
J.R.Sanes
(2010).
Chemoaffinity revisited: dscams, protocadherins, and neural circuit assembly.
|
| |
Cell,
143,
343-353.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
C.J.Tsai,
B.Ma,
and
R.Nussinov
(2009).
Protein-protein interaction networks: how can a hub protein bind so many different partners?
|
| |
Trends Biochem Sci,
34,
594-600.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
D.Hattori,
Y.Chen,
B.J.Matthews,
L.Salwinski,
C.Sabatti,
W.B.Grueber,
and
S.L.Zipursky
(2009).
Robust discrimination between self and non-self neurites requires thousands of Dscam1 isoforms.
|
| |
Nature,
461,
644-648.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
J.Back,
E.L.Malchiodi,
S.Cho,
L.Scarpellino,
P.Schneider,
M.C.Kerzic,
R.A.Mariuzza,
and
W.Held
(2009).
Distinct conformations of Ly49 natural killer cell receptors mediate MHC class I recognition in trans and cis.
|
| |
Immunity,
31,
598-608.
|
 |
|
PDB codes:
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
M.Shionyu,
A.Yamaguchi,
K.Shinoda,
K.Takahashi,
and
M.Go
(2009).
AS-ALPS: a database for analyzing the effects of alternative splicing on protein structure, interaction and network in human and mouse.
|
| |
Nucleic Acids Res,
37,
D305-D309.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
M.Telonis-Scott,
A.Kopp,
M.L.Wayne,
S.V.Nuzhdin,
and
L.M.McIntyre
(2009).
Sex-specific splicing in Drosophila: widespread occurrence, tissue specificity and evolutionary conservation.
|
| |
Genetics,
181,
421-434.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
T.S.Dermody,
E.Kirchner,
K.M.Guglielmi,
and
T.Stehle
(2009).
Immunoglobulin superfamily virus receptors and the evolution of adaptive immunity.
|
| |
PLoS Pathog,
5,
e1000481.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
T.Schwabe,
A.C.Gontang,
and
T.R.Clandinin
(2009).
More than just glue: the diverse roles of cell adhesion molecules in the Drosophila nervous system.
|
| |
Cell Adh Migr,
3,
36-42.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
Y.Dong,
and
G.Dimopoulos
(2009).
Anopheles fibrinogen-related proteins provide expanded pattern recognition capacity against bacteria and malaria parasites.
|
| |
J Biol Chem,
284,
9835-9844.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
Y.He,
G.J.Jensen,
and
P.J.Bjorkman
(2009).
Cryo-electron tomography of homophilic adhesion mediated by the neural cell adhesion molecule L1.
|
| |
Structure,
17,
460-471.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
A.Ly,
A.Nikolaev,
G.Suresh,
Y.Zheng,
M.Tessier-Lavigne,
and
E.Stein
(2008).
DSCAM is a netrin receptor that collaborates with DCC in mediating turning responses to netrin-1.
|
| |
Cell,
133,
1241-1254.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
D.Brites,
S.McTaggart,
K.Morris,
J.Anderson,
K.Thomas,
I.Colson,
T.Fabbro,
T.J.Little,
D.Ebert,
and
L.Du Pasquier
(2008).
The Dscam homologue of the crustacean Daphnia is diversified by alternative splicing like in insects.
|
| |
Mol Biol Evol,
25,
1429-1439.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
D.Hattori,
S.S.Millard,
W.M.Wojtowicz,
and
S.L.Zipursky
(2008).
Dscam-mediated cell recognition regulates neural circuit formation.
|
| |
Annu Rev Cell Dev Biol,
24,
597-620.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
L.M.Stuart,
and
R.A.Ezekowitz
(2008).
Phagocytosis and comparative innate immunity: learning on the fly.
|
| |
Nat Rev Immunol,
8,
131-141.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
M.L.Tress,
B.Bodenmiller,
R.Aebersold,
and
A.Valencia
(2008).
Proteomics studies confirm the presence of alternative protein isoforms on a large scale.
|
| |
Genome Biol,
9,
R162.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
M.R.Sawaya,
W.M.Wojtowicz,
I.Andre,
B.Qian,
W.Wu,
D.Baker,
D.Eisenberg,
and
S.L.Zipursky
(2008).
A double S shape provides the structural basis for the extraordinary binding specificity of Dscam isoforms.
|
| |
Cell,
134,
1007-1018.
|
 |
|
PDB code:
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
P.G.Fuerst,
A.Koizumi,
R.H.Masland,
and
R.W.Burgess
(2008).
Neurite arborization and mosaic spacing in the mouse retina require DSCAM.
|
| |
Nature,
451,
470-474.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
W.Held,
and
R.A.Mariuzza
(2008).
Cis interactions of immunoreceptors with MHC and non-MHC ligands.
|
| |
Nat Rev Immunol,
8,
269-278.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
X.Chen,
H.Liu,
A.H.Shim,
P.J.Focia,
and
X.He
(2008).
Structural basis for synaptic adhesion mediated by neuroligin-neurexin interactions.
|
| |
Nat Struct Mol Biol,
15,
50-56.
|
 |
|
PDB code:
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
A.R.Aricescu,
and
E.Y.Jones
(2007).
Immunoglobulin superfamily cell adhesion molecules: zippers and signals.
|
| |
Curr Opin Cell Biol,
19,
543-550.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
D.Schmucker
(2007).
Molecular diversity of Dscam: recognition of molecular identity in neuronal wiring.
|
| |
Nat Rev Neurosci,
8,
915-920.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
T.Hummel
(2007).
Neuronal development: neighbors have to be different.
|
| |
Curr Biol,
17,
R1050-R1052.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
W.M.Wojtowicz,
W.Wu,
I.Andre,
B.Qian,
D.Baker,
and
S.L.Zipursky
(2007).
A vast repertoire of Dscam binding specificities arises from modular interactions of variable Ig domains.
|
| |
Cell,
130,
1134-1145.
|
 |
|
 |
 |
|
The most recent references are shown first.
Citation data come partly from CiteXplore and partly
from an automated harvesting procedure. Note that this is likely to be
only a partial list as not all journals are covered by
either method. However, we are continually building up the citation data
so more and more references will be included with time.
Where a reference describes a PDB structure, the PDB
codes are
shown on the right.
|
');
}
}
 |