 |
PDBsum entry 2v1w
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Structural protein
|
PDB id
|
|
|
|
2v1w
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
References listed in PDB file
|
 |
|
Key reference
|
 |
|
Title
|
 |
Unusual binding interactions in pdz domain crystal structures help explain binding mechanisms.
|
 |
|
Authors
|
 |
J.M.Elkins,
C.Gileadi,
L.Shrestha,
C.Phillips,
J.Wang,
J.R.Muniz,
D.A.Doyle.
|
 |
|
Ref.
|
 |
Protein Sci, 2010,
19,
731-741.
|
 |
|
PubMed id
|
 |
|
 |
|
|
 |
 |
|
Abstract
|
 |
|
PDZ domains most commonly bind the C-terminus of their protein targets.
Typically the C-terminal four residues of the protein target are considered as
the binding motif, particularly the C-terminal residue (P0) and third-last
residue (P-2) that form the major contacts with the PDZ domain's "binding
groove". We solved crystal structures of seven human PDZ domains, including
five of the seven PDLIM family members. The structures of GRASP, PDLIM2, PDLIM5,
and PDLIM7 show a binding mode with only the C-terminal P0 residue bound in the
binding groove. Importantly, in some cases, the P-2 residue formed interactions
outside of the binding groove, providing insight into the influence of residues
remote from the binding groove on selectivity. In the GRASP structure, we
observed both canonical and noncanonical binding in the two molecules present in
the asymmetric unit making a direct comparison of these binding modes possible.
In addition, structures of the PDZ domains from PDLIM1 and PDLIM4 also presented
here allow comparison with canonical binding for the PDLIM PDZ domain family.
Although influenced by crystal packing arrangements, the structures nevertheless
show that changes in the positions of PDZ domain side-chains and the alpha B
helix allow noncanonical binding interactions. These interactions may be
indicative of intermediate states between unbound and fully bound PDZ domain and
target protein. The noncanonical "perpendicular" binding observed
potentially represents the general form of a kinetic intermediate. Comparison
with canonical binding suggests that the rearrangement during binding involves
both the PDZ domain and its ligand.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |