 |
PDBsum entry 2sem
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Signaling protein/inhibitor
|
PDB id
|
|
|
|
2sem
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
Contents |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* Residue conservation analysis
|
|
|
|
|
References listed in PDB file
|
 |
|
Key reference
|
 |
|
Title
|
 |
Exploiting the basis of proline recognition by sh3 and ww domains: design of n-Substituted inhibitors.
|
 |
|
Authors
|
 |
J.T.Nguyen,
C.W.Turck,
F.E.Cohen,
R.N.Zuckermann,
W.A.Lim.
|
 |
|
Ref.
|
 |
Science, 1998,
282,
2088-2092.
[DOI no: ]
|
 |
|
PubMed id
|
 |
|
 |
 |
|
Abstract
|
 |
|
Src homology 3 (SH3) and WW protein interaction domains bind specific
proline-rich sequences. However, instead of recognizing critical prolines on the
basis of side chain shape or rigidity, these domains broadly accepted amide
N-substituted residues. Proline is apparently specifically selected in vivo,
despite low complementarity, because it is the only endogenous N-substituted
amino acid. This discriminatory mechanism explains how these domains achieve
specific but low-affinity recognition, a property that is necessary for
transient signaling interactions. The mechanism can be exploited: screening a
series of ligands in which key prolines were replaced by nonnatural
N-substituted residues yielded a ligand that selectively bound the Grb2 SH3
domain with 100 times greater affinity.
|
 |
 |
 |
|
 |
|
 |
Figure 1.
Fig. 1. Backbone substitution requirements for SH3 and WW
domain recognition. (A) Structural mapping of alanine and
sarcosine scanning results (Table 1). Peptide/domain complex
interfaces (8, 9) shown schematically. Ligands adopt a PPII
conformation, depicted schematically as a triangular prism.
Residue positions (spheres) are color-coded by class:
white--does not require either C^ - or
N-substitution (alanine and sarcosine tolerant); green--requires
C^ -substitution
(alanine tolerant, sarcosine intolerant); orange--requires
N-substitution (sarcosine tolerant, alanine intolerant). (B)
Minimally sufficient recognition unit for SH3 and WW domain
binding grooves. Schematic view of a single binding groove
cross-section, looking down the PPII helical axis (viewed from
left side of Fig. 1A). Minimally required atoms defined in this
study, a sequential pair of C^ - and
N-substituted residues, are solid black. The van der Waals
binding surface that these atoms present is shaded. (C) Distinct
mechanisms of proline recognition. Proline can be recognized by
a lock and key mechanism, utilizing the full chemical potential
of the side chain. In contrast, SH3 and WW domains recognized
key prolines based on N-substitution. This mechanism utilizes
relatively little of the binding potential of ligand or protein
(hatched surface) but is still highly discriminatory for proline
among natural amino acids.
|
 |
Figure 3.
Fig. 3. Structural basis of peptoid recognition. (A)
Structure of wild-type Sos peptide (PPPVPPRRR) bound to Crk SH3
domain (20). Proline-rich core binding grooves are indicated by
dashed boxes. Highly conserved surface residues among the four
SH3 domains studied here (one or two conservative amino acid
types) are green. Variable surface residues (3+ amino acid
types) are brown. The ligand PXXP core binds at the most
conserved surface on the protein. (B) Structure of peptide 34
bound to Crk SH3 domain. N-(S)-1-Phenylethyl peptoid side chain
(orange) bound at site P[2]. Close-up view from the same
perspective as above. (C) Structure of peptide 39 bound to the
Sem5 SH3 domain. N-Cyclopropylmethyl peptoid side chain (orange)
bound at site P[ 1].
Close-up view from the same perspective as above.
|
 |
|
 |
 |
|
The above figures are
reprinted
by permission from the AAAs:
Science
(1998,
282,
2088-2092)
copyright 1998.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |