 |
PDBsum entry 2rbl
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cell adhesion
|
PDB id
|
|
|
|
2rbl
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
References listed in PDB file
|
 |
|
Key reference
|
 |
|
Title
|
 |
High-Resolution design of a protein loop.
|
 |
|
Authors
|
 |
X.Hu,
H.Wang,
H.Ke,
B.Kuhlman.
|
 |
|
Ref.
|
 |
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A, 2007,
104,
17668-17673.
[DOI no: ]
|
 |
|
PubMed id
|
 |
|
 |
 |
|
Abstract
|
 |
|
Despite having irregular structure, protein loops often adopt specific
conformations that are critical to protein function. Most studies in de novo
protein design have focused on creating proteins with regular elements of
secondary structure connected by very short loops or turns. To design longer
protein loops that adopt specific conformations, we have developed a protocol
within the Rosetta molecular modeling program that iterates between optimizing
the sequence and conformation of a loop in search of low-energy
sequence-structure pairs. We have tested the procedure by designing 10-residue
loops for the connection between the second and third strand in the
beta-sandwich protein tenascin. Three low-energy designs from 7,200 flexible
backbone trajectories were selected for experimental characterization. All three
designs, called LoopA, LoopB, and LoopC, adopt stable folded structures.
High-resolution crystal structures of LoopA and LoopB have been solved. LoopB
adopts a structure very similar to the design model (0.46 A rmsd), and all but
one of the side chains are modeled in the correct rotamers. LoopA crystallized
at low pH in a structure that differs dramatically from our design model. It
forms a strand-swapped dimer mediated by hydrogen bonds to protonated glutamic
acids. Gel filtration indicates that the protein is not a dimer at neutral pH.
These results suggest that the high-resolution design of protein loops is
possible; however, they also highlight how small changes in protein energetics
can dramatically perturb the low free energy structure of a protein.
|
 |
 |
 |
|
 |
|
 |
Figure 5.
Fig. 5. Structural alignment between the crystal structure
and the design model. (A) The crystal structure of LoopB (green)
aligned with the design model of LoopB (mauve). The backbone
atoms of residues 4–8, 20–31, 48–55, and 72–74 were used
for the alignment. (B) Close-up of glutamine 26.
|
 |
Figure 6.
Fig. 6. The crystal structure of LoopA at low pH. (A) The
repeating unit contains a domain-swapped dimer (cyan, chain 1;
green, chain 2) and a monomer (purple). Electron density is not
present for the redesigned loop in the monomer. In the dimer,
the loop opens up, and strands 1 and 2 insert into the partner
molecule. (B) The designed loop appears to be stabilized by
protonated glutamic acid residues.
|
 |
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
 |