spacer
spacer

PDBsum entry 2rbl

Go to PDB code: 
protein Protein-protein interface(s) links
Cell adhesion PDB id
2rbl

 

 

 

 

Loading ...

 
JSmol PyMol  
Contents
Protein chains
89 a.a. *
80 a.a. *
* Residue conservation analysis
PDB id:
2rbl
Name: Cell adhesion
Title: High resolution design of a protein loop
Structure: Tenascin. Chain: a, b, m. Fragment: unp residues 802-896. Synonym: tn, tenascin-c, tn-c, hexabrachion, cytotactin, neuronectin, gmem, ji, myotendinous antigen, glioma- associated-extracellular matrix antigen, gp 150-225. Engineered: yes. Mutation: yes
Source: Homo sapiens. Human. Organism_taxid: 9606. Expressed in: escherichia coli. Expression_system_taxid: 562.
Resolution:
2.10Å     R-factor:   0.250     R-free:   0.300
Authors: X.Hu,H.Wang,H.Ke,B.Kuhlman
Key ref:
X.Hu et al. (2007). High-resolution design of a protein loop. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A, 104, 17668-17673. PubMed id: 17971437 DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0707977104
Date:
19-Sep-07     Release date:   20-Nov-07    
PROCHECK
Go to PROCHECK summary
 Headers
 References

Protein chains
Pfam   ArchSchema ?
P24821  (TENA_HUMAN) -  Tenascin from Homo sapiens
Seq:
Struc:
 
Seq:
Struc:
 
Seq:
Struc:
 
Seq:
Struc:
 
Seq:
Struc:
2201 a.a.
89 a.a.*
Protein chain
Pfam   ArchSchema ?
P24821  (TENA_HUMAN) -  Tenascin from Homo sapiens
Seq:
Struc:
 
Seq:
Struc:
 
Seq:
Struc:
 
Seq:
Struc:
 
Seq:
Struc:
2201 a.a.
80 a.a.*
Key:    PfamA domain  Secondary structure  CATH domain
* PDB and UniProt seqs differ at 9 residue positions (black crosses)

 

 
DOI no: 10.1073/pnas.0707977104 Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 104:17668-17673 (2007)
PubMed id: 17971437  
 
 
High-resolution design of a protein loop.
X.Hu, H.Wang, H.Ke, B.Kuhlman.
 
  ABSTRACT  
 
Despite having irregular structure, protein loops often adopt specific conformations that are critical to protein function. Most studies in de novo protein design have focused on creating proteins with regular elements of secondary structure connected by very short loops or turns. To design longer protein loops that adopt specific conformations, we have developed a protocol within the Rosetta molecular modeling program that iterates between optimizing the sequence and conformation of a loop in search of low-energy sequence-structure pairs. We have tested the procedure by designing 10-residue loops for the connection between the second and third strand in the beta-sandwich protein tenascin. Three low-energy designs from 7,200 flexible backbone trajectories were selected for experimental characterization. All three designs, called LoopA, LoopB, and LoopC, adopt stable folded structures. High-resolution crystal structures of LoopA and LoopB have been solved. LoopB adopts a structure very similar to the design model (0.46 A rmsd), and all but one of the side chains are modeled in the correct rotamers. LoopA crystallized at low pH in a structure that differs dramatically from our design model. It forms a strand-swapped dimer mediated by hydrogen bonds to protonated glutamic acids. Gel filtration indicates that the protein is not a dimer at neutral pH. These results suggest that the high-resolution design of protein loops is possible; however, they also highlight how small changes in protein energetics can dramatically perturb the low free energy structure of a protein.
 
  Selected figure(s)  
 
Figure 5.
Fig. 5. Structural alignment between the crystal structure and the design model. (A) The crystal structure of LoopB (green) aligned with the design model of LoopB (mauve). The backbone atoms of residues 4–8, 20–31, 48–55, and 72–74 were used for the alignment. (B) Close-up of glutamine 26.
Figure 6.
Fig. 6. The crystal structure of LoopA at low pH. (A) The repeating unit contains a domain-swapped dimer (cyan, chain 1; green, chain 2) and a monomer (purple). Electron density is not present for the redesigned loop in the monomer. In the dimer, the loop opens up, and strands 1 and 2 insert into the partner molecule. (B) The designed loop appears to be stabilized by protonated glutamic acid residues.
 
  Figures were selected by an automated process.  

Literature references that cite this PDB file's key reference

  PubMed id Reference
21287621 J.E.Donald, D.W.Kulp, and W.F.DeGrado (2011).
Salt bridges: geometrically specific, designable interactions.
  Proteins, 79, 898-915.  
21045132 B.D.Allen, A.Nisthal, and S.L.Mayo (2010).
Experimental library screening demonstrates the successful application of computational protein design to large structural ensembles.
  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A, 107, 19838-19843.  
19731375 G.V.Nikiforovich, C.M.Taylor, G.R.Marshall, and T.J.Baranski (2010).
Modeling the possible conformations of the extracellular loops in G-protein-coupled receptors.
  Proteins, 78, 271-285.  
20670934 J.J.Havranek (2010).
Specificity in computational protein design.
  J Biol Chem, 285, 31095-31099.  
19397368 A.L.Asmundson, A.M.Taber, A.van der Walde, D.H.Lin, J.S.Olson, and S.J.Anthony-Cahill (2009).
Coexpression of human alpha- and circularly permuted beta-globins yields a hemoglobin with normal R state but modified T state properties.
  Biochemistry, 48, 5456-5465.  
19841629 D.J.Mandell, and T.Kortemme (2009).
Computer-aided design of functional protein interactions.
  Nat Chem Biol, 5, 797-807.  
19646858 J.Karanicolas, and B.Kuhlman (2009).
Computational design of affinity and specificity at protein-protein interfaces.
  Curr Opin Struct Biol, 19, 458-463.  
19299503 K.Sato, C.Li, I.Salard, A.J.Thompson, M.J.Banfield, and C.Dennison (2009).
Metal-binding loop length and not sequence dictates structure.
  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A, 106, 5616-5621.
PDB codes: 3fs9 3fsa 3fsv 3fsw 3fsz 3ft0
19074157 L.A.Clark, P.A.Boriack-Sjodin, E.Day, J.Eldredge, C.Fitch, M.Jarpe, S.Miller, Y.Li, K.Simon, and H.W.van Vlijmen (2009).
An antibody loop replacement design feasibility study and a loop-swapped dimer structure.
  Protein Eng Des Sel, 22, 93.
PDB code: 3eot
19422060 M.Schneider, X.Fu, and A.E.Keating (2009).
X-ray vs. NMR structures as templates for computational protein design.
  Proteins, 77, 97.  
19606500 M.Tyagi, A.Bornot, B.Offmann, and A.G.de Brevern (2009).
Analysis of loop boundaries using different local structure assignment methods.
  Protein Sci, 18, 1869-1881.  
19696883 P.Liu, F.Zhu, D.N.Rassokhin, and D.K.Agrafiotis (2009).
A self-organizing algorithm for modeling protein loops.
  PLoS Comput Biol, 5, e1000478.  
19470646 P.M.Murphy, J.M.Bolduc, J.L.Gallaher, B.L.Stoddard, and D.Baker (2009).
Alteration of enzyme specificity by computational loop remodeling and design.
  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A, 106, 9215-9220.
PDB code: 3e0l
18931413 P.Prabakaran, B.K.Vu, J.Gan, Y.Feng, D.S.Dimitrov, and X.Ji (2008).
Structure of an isolated unglycosylated antibody C(H)2 domain.
  Acta Crystallogr D Biol Crystallogr, 64, 1062-1067.
PDB code: 3dj9
The most recent references are shown first. Citation data come partly from CiteXplore and partly from an automated harvesting procedure. Note that this is likely to be only a partial list as not all journals are covered by either method. However, we are continually building up the citation data so more and more references will be included with time. Where a reference describes a PDB structure, the PDB codes are shown on the right.

 

spacer

spacer