 |
PDBsum entry 2r15
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Contractile protein
|
PDB id
|
|
|
|
2r15
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
Contents |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* Residue conservation analysis
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
|
| |
|
DOI no:
|
EMBO J
27:253-264
(2008)
|
|
PubMed id:
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
Molecular basis of the C-terminal tail-to-tail assembly of the sarcomeric filament protein myomesin.
|
|
N.Pinotsis,
S.Lange,
J.C.Perriard,
D.I.Svergun,
M.Wilmanns.
|
|
|
|
| |
ABSTRACT
|
|
|
| |
|
Sarcomeric filament proteins display extraordinary properties in terms of
protein length and mechanical elasticity, requiring specific anchoring and
assembly mechanisms. To establish the molecular basis of terminal filament
assembly, we have selected the sarcomeric M-band protein myomesin as a
prototypic filament model. The crystal structure of the myomesin C-terminus,
comprising a tandem array of two immunoglobulin (Ig) domains My12 and My13,
reveals a dimeric end-to-end filament of 14.3 nm length. Although the two
domains share the same fold, an unexpected rearrangement of one beta-strand
reveals how they are evolved into unrelated functions, terminal filament
assembly (My13) and filament propagation (My12). The two domains are connected
by a six-turn alpha-helix, of which two turns are void of any interactions with
other protein parts. Thus, the overall structure of the assembled myomesin
C-terminus resembles a three-body beads-on-the-string model with potentially
elastic properties. We predict that the found My12-helix-My13 domain topology
may provide a structural template for the filament architecture of the entire
C-terminal Ig domain array My9-My13 of myomesin.
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Selected figure(s)
|
|
|
| |
 |
 |
|
 |
|
 |
Figure 3.
Figure 3 Semitransparent surface presentation of (A) My12 and
(B) My13. The interface areas with the My12–My13-connecting
helix and the My13 dimerization interface are colored in green
and blue, respectively, demonstrating overlapping interface
areas in My12 and My13. The ribbon of each domain is in gray,
except -strand
A' (yellow) that swaps in My12 in terms of -sheet
association. Those structural elements that are involved in
interface surfaces are labeled.
|
 |
Figure 8.
Figure 8 Prediction of a myomesin filament beads-on-the-string
model, consisting of 2 5
Ig domains that are connected by -helical
linkers and end-to-end C-terminal assembly. (A)
Beads-on-the-string presentation of the crystal structure of the
My12–My13 dimeric assembly of the myomesin C-terminus (cp.
Figure 1). (B) Schematic model of the My9–My13 C-terminal
filament, in which adjacent domains are connected by -helical
linkers. (C) Prediction of -helical
segments at repetitive sequence intervals, interspersed myomesin
domains My9, My10, My11, My12 and My13, using PredictProtein
(Rost et al, 2004). The starting residue number, the sequence
interval with respect to the previous predicted -helical
segment and the sequence of each predicted -helix
segment are presented. Residues that are predicted to be -helical
by PROF (for details, see PredictProtein) are shown in capital
characters, and those that are predicted with a confidence level
of at least 82% are shown by small characters. The predicted
helix length, using the two categories, is indicated (second
number in parentheses). For comparison, the experimentally
determined My12–My13-connecting helix is highlighted in green.
(D) Circular dichroism curves of My12–My13 (blue) and
My9–My13 (magenta). The estimates for secondary structural
elements for My12–My13 and My9–My13 are as follows: helix,
0.23/0.19; strand, 0.26/0.36; turn, 0.18/0.13; unordered,
0.33/0.34.
|
 |
|
|
|
| |
The above figures are
reprinted
by permission from Macmillan Publishers Ltd:
EMBO J
(2008,
27,
253-264)
copyright 2008.
|
|
| |
Figures were
selected
by an automated process.
|
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
Literature references that cite this PDB file's key reference
|
|
 |
| |
PubMed id
|
 |
Reference
|
 |
|
|
|
 |
M.Gautel
(2011).
The sarcomeric cytoskeleton: who picks up the strain?
|
| |
Curr Opin Cell Biol,
23,
39-46.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
D.I.Svergun
(2010).
Small-angle X-ray and neutron scattering as a tool for structural systems biology.
|
| |
Biol Chem,
391,
737-743.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
S.Pernigo,
A.Fukuzawa,
M.Bertz,
M.Holt,
M.Rief,
R.A.Steiner,
and
M.Gautel
(2010).
Structural insight into M-band assembly and mechanics from the titin-obscurin-like-1 complex.
|
| |
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A,
107,
2908-2913.
|
 |
|
PDB codes:
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
N.Pinotsis,
P.Abrusci,
K.Djinović-Carugo,
and
M.Wilmanns
(2009).
Terminal assembly of sarcomeric filaments by intermolecular beta-sheet formation.
|
| |
Trends Biochem Sci,
34,
33-39.
|
 |
|
 |
 |
|
The most recent references are shown first.
Citation data come partly from CiteXplore and partly
from an automated harvesting procedure. Note that this is likely to be
only a partial list as not all journals are covered by
either method. However, we are continually building up the citation data
so more and more references will be included with time.
Where a reference describes a PDB structure, the PDB
codes are
shown on the right.
|
');
}
}
 |