spacer
spacer

PDBsum entry 2qfh

Go to PDB code: 
protein links
Immune system PDB id
2qfh
Contents
Protein chain
333 a.a.* *
* Residue conservation analysis
* C-alpha coords only
PDB id:
2qfh
Name: Immune system
Title: Solution structure of thE C-terminal scr-16/20 fragment of complement factor h.
Structure: Complement factor h. Chain: a. Fragment: scr domains 16-20 (residues 928-1231). Synonym: h factor 1. Engineered: yes
Source: Homo sapiens. Human. Organism_taxid: 9606. Gene: cfh, hf, hf1, hf2. Expressed in: pichia pastoris. Expression_system_taxid: 4922. Other_details: purified by nickel affinity and size exclusion chromatography.
Ensemble: 10 models
Authors: A.I.Okemefuna,H.E.Gilbert,K.M.Griggs,R.J.Ormsby,D.L.Gordon, S.J.Perkins
Key ref:
A.I.Okemefuna et al. (2008). The regulatory SCR-1/5 and cell surface-binding SCR-16/20 fragments of factor H reveal partially folded-back solution structures and different self-associative properties. J Mol Biol, 375, 80-101. PubMed id: 18005991 DOI: 10.1016/j.jmb.2007.09.026
Date:
27-Jun-07     Release date:   25-Sep-07    
 Headers
 References

Protein chain
Pfam   ArchSchema ?
P08603  (CFAH_HUMAN) -  Complement factor H from Homo sapiens
Seq:
Struc:
 
Seq:
Struc:
 
Seq:
Struc:
1231 a.a.
333 a.a.*
Key:    PfamA domain  Secondary structure
* PDB and UniProt seqs differ at 6 residue positions (black crosses)

 Enzyme reactions 
   Enzyme class: E.C.?
[IntEnz]   [ExPASy]   [KEGG]   [BRENDA]

 

 
DOI no: 10.1016/j.jmb.2007.09.026 J Mol Biol 375:80-101 (2008)
PubMed id: 18005991  
 
 
The regulatory SCR-1/5 and cell surface-binding SCR-16/20 fragments of factor H reveal partially folded-back solution structures and different self-associative properties.
A.I.Okemefuna, H.E.Gilbert, K.M.Griggs, R.J.Ormsby, D.L.Gordon, S.J.Perkins.
 
  ABSTRACT  
 
Factor H (FH) is a plasma glycoprotein that plays a central role in regulation of the alternative pathway of complement. It is composed of 20 short complement regulator (SCR) domains. The SCR-1/5 fragment is required for decay acceleration and cofactor activity, while the SCR-16/20 fragment possesses binding sites for complement C3d and heparin. X-ray scattering and analytical ultracentrifugation showed that SCR-1/5 was monomeric, while SCR-16/20 formed dimers. The Guinier radius of gyration R(G) of 4.3 nm for SCR-1/5 and those of 4.7 nm and about 7.8 nm for monomeric and dimeric SCR-16/20, respectively, showed that their structures are partially folded back and bent. The distance distribution function P(r) showed that SCR-1/5 has a maximum dimension of 15 nm while monomeric and dimeric SCR-16/20 are 17 nm and about 27 nm long, respectively. The sedimentation coefficient of 2.4 S for SCR-1/5 showed no concentration-dependence, while that for SCR-16/20 was 2.8 S for the monomer and 3.9 S for the dimer. Sedimentation equilibrium data showed that SCR-1/5 is monomeric while SCR-16/20 exhibited a weak monomer-dimer equilibrium with a dissociation constant of 16 microM. The constrained scattering and sedimentation modelling of SCR-1/5 and SCR-16/20 showed that partially folded-back and bent flexible SCR arrangements fitted both data sets better than extended linear arrangements, and that the dimer was best modelled in the SCR-16/20 model by an end-to-end association of two SCR-20 domains. The SCR-1/5 and SCR-16/20 models were conformationally similar to the previously determined partially folded-back structure for intact wild-type FH, hence suggesting a partial explanation of the intact FH structure. Comparison of the SCR-16/20 model with the crystal structure of C3b clarified reasons for the distribution of mutations leading to atypical haemolytic uraemic syndrome.
 
  Selected figure(s)  
 
Figure 4.
Figure 4. Distance distribution function P(r) analyses for SCR-1/5 and SCR-16/20. (a) For SCR-1/5, M represents the most frequent distance within the protein and is 3.5 nm at 0.21 mg/ml, and L represents its maximum dimension at 15 nm. (b) For SCR-16/20 at lower concentrations, M rises from 4.1 nm to 4.8 nm from 0.14 mg/ml to 0.55 mg/ml, and L increases from 17 nm to 19 nm. (c) For primarily dimeric SCR-16/20 at 0.72 mg/ml, 0.86 mg/ml and 1.15 mg/ml, M ranges from 5.1 nm to 5.8 nm and L ranges from 25 nm to 27 nm.
Figure 5.
Figure 5. Sedimentation velocity g(s*) analyses of SCR-1/5 and SCR-16/20 using DCDT+. (a) The 20 absorbance scans for SCR-1/5 at 0.09 mg/ml and 0.85 mg/ml and a rotor speed of 35,000 r.p.m. gave s^o[20,w] values of 2.50 S and 2.51 S, respectively. The intensity of the g(s*) curve at 0.09 mg/ml was increased threefold for clarity. (b) The corresponding 14 and 22 interference scans from the same SCR-1/5 experiment gave s^o[20,w] values of 2.39 S and 2.49 S, respectively. (c) Absorbance data for SCR-16/20 at 0.10 mg/ml (40,000 r.p.m.) and 0.62 mg/ml, 1.33 mg/ml and 1.48 mg/ml (50,000 r.p.m.) showed that the s^o[20,w] values increased from 2.8 S to 3.5 S as the concentration increased. The intensities of the g(s*) curves were equalised for reason of clarity. (d) The corresponding interference data sets for SCR-16/20 showed that the s^o[20,w] values likewise increased from 2.7 S to 3.5 S as the concentration increased.
 
  The above figures are reprinted by permission from Elsevier: J Mol Biol (2008, 375, 80-101) copyright 2008.  
  Figures were selected by an automated process.  

Literature references that cite this PDB file's key reference

  PubMed id Reference
21317894 H.P.Morgan, C.Q.Schmidt, M.Guariento, B.S.Blaum, D.Gillespie, A.P.Herbert, D.Kavanagh, H.D.Mertens, D.I.Svergun, C.M.Johansson, D.Uhrín, P.N.Barlow, and J.P.Hannan (2011).
Structural basis for engagement by complement factor H of C3b on a self surface.
  Nat Struct Mol Biol, 18, 463-470.
PDB code: 3oxu
21396937 R.Nan, I.Farabella, F.F.Schumacher, A.Miller, J.Gor, A.C.Martin, D.T.Jones, I.Lengyel, and S.J.Perkins (2011).
Zinc binding to the Tyr402 and His402 allotypes of complement factor H: possible implications for age-related macular degeneration.
  J Mol Biol, 408, 714-735.  
21256219 S.J.Perkins, R.Nan, K.Li, S.Khan, and Y.Abe (2011).
Analytical ultracentrifugation combined with X-ray and neutron scattering: Experiment and modelling.
  Methods, 54, 181-199.  
19850925 A.I.Okemefuna, R.Nan, A.Miller, J.Gor, and S.J.Perkins (2010).
Complement factor H binds at two independent sites to C-reactive protein in acute phase concentrations.
  J Biol Chem, 285, 1053-1065.  
19835885 C.Q.Schmidt, A.P.Herbert, H.D.Mertens, M.Guariento, D.C.Soares, D.Uhrin, A.J.Rowe, D.I.Svergun, and P.N.Barlow (2010).
The central portion of factor H (modules 10-15) is compact and contains a structurally deviant CCP module.
  J Mol Biol, 395, 105-122.
PDB code: 2kms
19503104 J.Wu, Y.Q.Wu, D.Ricklin, B.J.Janssen, J.D.Lambris, and P.Gros (2009).
Structure of complement fragment C3b-factor H and implications for host protection by complement regulators.
  Nat Immunol, 10, 728-733.
PDB code: 2wii
  19124749 M.K.Pangburn, N.Rawal, C.Cortes, M.N.Alam, V.P.Ferreira, and M.A.Atkinson (2009).
Polyanion-induced self-association of complement factor H.
  J Immunol, 182, 1061-1068.  
19605402 S.J.Perkins, A.I.Okemefuna, R.Nan, K.Li, and A.Bonner (2009).
Constrained solution scattering modelling of human antibodies and complement proteins reveals novel biological insights.
  J R Soc Interface, 6, S679-S696.  
19454698 V.P.Ferreira, A.P.Herbert, C.Cortés, K.A.McKee, B.S.Blaum, S.T.Esswein, D.Uhrín, P.N.Barlow, M.K.Pangburn, and D.Kavanagh (2009).
The binding of factor H to a complex of physiological polyanions and C3b on cells is impaired in atypical hemolytic uremic syndrome.
  J Immunol, 182, 7009-7018.  
18801437 H.Tsuruta, and T.C.Irving (2008).
Experimental approaches for solution X-ray scattering and fiber diffraction.
  Curr Opin Struct Biol, 18, 601-608.  
  19017999 Y.Huang, F.Qiao, C.Atkinson, V.M.Holers, and S.Tomlinson (2008).
A novel targeted inhibitor of the alternative pathway of complement and its therapeutic application in ischemia/reperfusion injury.
  J Immunol, 181, 8068-8076.  
The most recent references are shown first. Citation data come partly from CiteXplore and partly from an automated harvesting procedure. Note that this is likely to be only a partial list as not all journals are covered by either method. However, we are continually building up the citation data so more and more references will be included with time. Where a reference describes a PDB structure, the PDB code is shown on the right.

 

spacer

spacer