 |
PDBsum entry 2p4r
|
|
|
|
 |
Contents |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* Residue conservation analysis
|
|
|
 |
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
Enzyme class 1:
|
 |
Chain A:
E.C.?
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
Enzyme class 2:
|
 |
Chain T:
E.C.2.3.2.26
- HECT-type E3 ubiquitin transferase.
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
Reaction:
|
 |
S-ubiquitinyl-[E2 ubiquitin-conjugating enzyme]-L-cysteine + [acceptor protein]-L-lysine = [E2 ubiquitin-conjugating enzyme]-L-cysteine + N6- ubiquitinyl-[acceptor protein]-L-lysine
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
Note, where more than one E.C. class is given (as above), each may
correspond to a different protein domain or, in the case of polyprotein
precursors, to a different mature protein.
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
|
| |
|
DOI no:
|
J Biol Chem
282:28893-28903
(2007)
|
|
PubMed id:
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
A novel interaction between atrophin-interacting protein 4 and beta-p21-activated kinase-interactive exchange factor is mediated by an SH3 domain.
|
|
J.M.Janz,
T.P.Sakmar,
K.C.Min.
|
|
|
|
| |
ABSTRACT
|
|
|
| |
|
Cross-talk between G protein-coupled receptors and receptor tyrosine kinase
signaling pathways is crucial to the efficient relay and integration of cellular
information. Here we identify and define the novel binding interaction of the E3
ubiquitin ligase atrophin-interacting protein 4 (AIP4) with the GTP exchange
factor beta-p21-activated kinase-interactive exchange factor (beta PIX). We
demonstrate that this interaction is mediated in part by the beta PIX-SH3 domain
binding to a proline-rich stretch of AIP4. Analysis of the interaction by
isothermal calorimetry is consistent with a heterotrimeric complex with one
AIP4-derived peptide binding to two beta PIX-SH3 domains. We determined the
crystal structure of the beta PIX-SH3.AIP4 complex to 2.0-A resolution. In
contrast to the calorimetry results, the crystal structure shows a monomeric
complex in which AIP4 peptide binds the beta PIX-SH3 domain as a canonical Class
I ligand with an additional type II polyproline helix that makes extensive
contacts with another face of beta PIX. Taken together, the novel interaction
between AIP4 and beta PIX represents a new regulatory node for G protein-coupled
receptor and receptor tyrosine kinase signal integration. Our structure of the
beta PIX-SH3.AIP4 complex provides important insight into the mechanistic basis
for beta PIX scaffolding of signaling components, especially those involved in
cross-talk.
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Selected figure(s)
|
|
|
| |
 |
 |
|
 |
|
 |
Figure 3.
AIP4 binds to βPIX-SH3 as a Class I ligand.A, AIP4 peptide
binds to a largely hydrophobic surface of βPIX between the RT
(depicted in magenta) and n-src (depicted in cyan) loops. In the
left-hand view the SH3 ligand-binding surface is seen from above
with the peptide lying on the surface. In the right-hand view,
the model has been rotated at on oblique angle to give a better
view of the second PPII helix. Electron density for the peptide
was seen for residues 209-224, although an Ala was placed for
the C-terminal Arg, because the side-chain density was not
observed. There are two left-handed PPII helices, from residues
209-215 and from 217-223. The second helix represents the core
SH3 ligand with Arg-217 occupying the P[-3] specificity pocket,
and Pro-220 and Pro-223 occupying the obligate Pro-preferring
P[0] and P[3] pockets. A better view of the first PPII helix is
seen in the right-hand view. One Arg residue, Arg-214, lies near
a negatively charged surface, Arg-211 appears to form a salt
bridge with βPIX-SH3, and again two Pro residues, Pro-212 and
Pro-215, are buried in shallow pockets on this surface of
βPIX-SH3. In the asymmetric unit the N terminus of the peptide
appears to point into empty space, but D shows that this end of
the peptide interacts closely with a symmetry mate. The surface
is colored to show the electrostatic potential as calculated in
GRASP, with positive charge represented in blue and negative
charge shaded in red. Underlying the surface is a schematic
representation of the SH3 backbone. B, a representative section
of the calculated electron 2f[o] - f[c] density map is shown at
1.2 σ in a stereo view. AIP4 peptide residues are represented
with yellow carbons, whereas those from βPIX-SH3 are shown in
green. Arg-217 of AIP4 is shown in this view in close proximity
to Glu-24 of βPIX-SH3. C, the N-terminal region of the AIP4
peptide is shown in gray in this view with the symmetry mates as
packed in the crystal. The corresponding βPIX-SH3 is shown as
molecular surface also in gray with the protein atoms shown also
in stick representation. The various symmetry mates are colored
so that the corresponding peptide carbon atoms correspond to the
color of the molecular surface. Several of the crystal contacts
between βPIX-SH3 domains appear to be mediated by electrostatic
interactions, whereas this region of AIP4 peptide appears to lie
across a hydrophobic surface of a βPIX-SH3 symmetry mate. D, a
schematic representation of ligand binding as generated by
LIGPLOT. Hydrogen bonds with three AIP4 backbone carbonyl atoms,
one of them water-mediated, are shown in the core SH3 ligand
(residues 217-223). In addition, the second PPII helix also has
one hydrogen bond with a backbone carbonyl, and Arg-211 forms a
charge-stabilized hydrogen bond with βPIX-SH3. The peptide is
shown with bonds in purple. βPIX-SH3 residues, which form
hydrogen bonds with the peptide, are shown with yellow bonds,
whereas Van der Waals interactions are depicted by half circles.
There is one water-mediated hydrogen bond shown with a cyan
sphere representing the water molecule.
|
 |
Figure 5.
Proposed schematic arrangement of dimer interface of βPIX
with AIP4 peptide. An alignment of the core binding regions of
the AIP4 and Cbl-b peptides is shown relative to the shallow
hydrophobic binding pockets as sites P[-3] to P[+3] as defined
previously in two orientations. Below the peptide sequences are
the positions of the residues with respect to the structure
reported in this report for the AIP4·βPIX complex and
for the Class I orientation for the Cbl-b·βPIX complex.
Above the peptide sequences are the same positions in the Class
II orientation as described in the Cbl-b·βPIX complex,
and the proposed Class II orientation of an additional βPIX-SH3
domain based on the ITC data and an analysis of the sequence for
AIP4. The proposed interaction of AIP4 in a class II orientation
would result in Thr-222 occupying the P[-1] site, which normally
favors the presence of a Pro residue. The core sequences are
residues 217-224 for AIP4 and 904-911 for Cbl-b, respectively.
Underneath each residue are the respective φ/ψ angles, which
show how the PPII helix in the case of Cbl-b and PAK2 are
distorted. The pockets that favor the presence of Pro residues
are indicated by gray squares drawn around the residues.
|
 |
|
|
|
| |
The above figures are
reprinted
by permission from the ASBMB:
J Biol Chem
(2007,
282,
28893-28903)
copyright 2007.
|
|
| |
Figures were
selected
by an automated process.
|
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
Literature references that cite this PDB file's key reference
|
|
 |
| |
PubMed id
|
 |
Reference
|
 |
|
|
|
 |
C.Baumann,
C.K.Lindholm,
D.Rimoldi,
and
F.Lévy
(2010).
The E3 ubiquitin ligase Itch regulates sorting nexin 9 through an unconventional substrate recognition domain.
|
| |
FEBS J,
277,
2803-2814.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
O.Aitio,
M.Hellman,
A.Kazlauskas,
D.F.Vingadassalom,
J.M.Leong,
K.Saksela,
and
P.Permi
(2010).
Recognition of tandem PxxP motifs as a unique Src homology 3-binding mode triggers pathogen-driven actin assembly.
|
| |
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A,
107,
21743-21748.
|
 |
|
PDB code:
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
D.Bhandari,
S.L.Robia,
and
A.Marchese
(2009).
The E3 ubiquitin ligase atrophin interacting protein 4 binds directly to the chemokine receptor CXCR4 via a novel WW domain-mediated interaction.
|
| |
Mol Biol Cell,
20,
1324-1339.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
K.Missy,
B.Hu,
K.Schilling,
A.Harenberg,
V.Sakk,
K.Kuchenbecker,
K.Kutsche,
and
K.D.Fischer
(2008).
AlphaPIX Rho GTPase guanine nucleotide exchange factor regulates lymphocyte functions and antigen receptor signaling.
|
| |
Mol Cell Biol,
28,
3776-3789.
|
 |
|
 |
 |
|
The most recent references are shown first.
Citation data come partly from CiteXplore and partly
from an automated harvesting procedure. Note that this is likely to be
only a partial list as not all journals are covered by
either method. However, we are continually building up the citation data
so more and more references will be included with time.
Where a reference describes a PDB structure, the PDB
code is
shown on the right.
|
');
}
}
 |
|