|
|
|
|
 |
Contents |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
798 a.a.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
135 a.a.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
155 a.a.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
* Residue conservation analysis
|
|
|
|
|
PDB id:
|
 |
|
 |
| Name: |
 |
Contractile protein
|
 |
|
Title:
|
 |
Rigor-like structures of muscle myosins reveal key mechanical elements in the transduction pathways of this allosteric motor
|
|
Structure:
|
 |
Myosin heavy chain. Chain: a. Fragment: myosin heavy chain. Myosin regulatory light chain. Chain: b. Fragment: myosin rlc. Myosin essential light chain. Chain: c. Fragment: myosin elc
|
|
Source:
|
 |
Placopecten magellanicus. Sea scallop. Organism_taxid: 6577. Organism_taxid: 6577
|
|
Resolution:
|
 |
|
3.27Å
|
R-factor:
|
0.281
|
R-free:
|
0.314
|
|
|
Authors:
|
 |
Y.Yang,S.Gourinath,C.Cohen,J.H.Brown
|
Key ref:
|
 |
Y.Yang
et al.
(2007).
Rigor-like Structures from Muscle Myosins Reveal Key Mechanical Elements in the Transduction Pathways of This Allosteric Motor.
Structure,
15,
553-564.
PubMed id:
DOI:
|
 |
|
Date:
|
 |
|
05-Feb-07
|
Release date:
|
29-May-07
|
|
|
|
|
|
PROCHECK
|
|
|
|
|
Headers
|
 |
|
|
References
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Q26080
(Q26080_PLAMG) -
Myosin heavy chain from Placopecten magellanicus
|
|
|
|
Seq: Struc:
|
 |
 |
 |
1950 a.a.
798 a.a.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
|
| |
|
DOI no:
|
Structure
15:553-564
(2007)
|
|
PubMed id:
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
Rigor-like Structures from Muscle Myosins Reveal Key Mechanical Elements in the Transduction Pathways of This Allosteric Motor.
|
|
Y.Yang,
S.Gourinath,
M.Kovács,
L.Nyitray,
R.Reutzel,
D.M.Himmel,
E.O'neall-Hennessey,
L.Reshetnikova,
A.G.Szent-Györgyi,
J.H.Brown,
C.Cohen.
|
|
|
|
| |
ABSTRACT
|
|
|
| |
|
Unlike processive cellular motors such as myosin V, whose structure has recently
been determined in a "rigor-like" conformation, myosin II from
contracting muscle filaments necessarily spends most of its time detached from
actin. By using squid and sea scallop sources, however, we have now obtained
similar rigor-like atomic structures for muscle myosin heads (S1). The
significance of the hallmark closed actin-binding cleft in these crystal
structures is supported here by actin/S1-binding studies. These structures
reveal how different duty ratios, and hence cellular functions, of the myosin
isoforms may be accounted for, in part, on the basis of detailed differences in
interdomain contacts. Moreover, the rigor-like position of switch II turns out
to be unique for myosin V. The overall arrangements of subdomains in the motor
are relatively conserved in each of the known contractile states, and we explore
qualitatively the energetics of these states.
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Selected figure(s)
|
|
|
| |
 |
 |
|
 |
|
 |
Figure 2.
Figure 2. Comparison of the Rigor-like and Post-Rigor States
of Muscle Myosin S1 and Its Active Site (A and B) Detailed
legends for all figures are supplied in Supplemental Data. (A)
Schematic overlay of (squid) S1 in the two states (see text).
The rigor-like state is shown in green, and the post-rigor state
is shown in red. Thicker lines indicate proximity to the reader.
The overall conformational differences between these (and the
pre-power stroke) states are generally conserved in the
different isoforms. The locations of interdomain interactions
that nevertheless appear to preferentially stabilize the
high-duty ratio non-muscle myosin V in a rigor-like conformation
and some of the low-duty ratio myosin II isoforms in a
non-rigor-like (actin-detached) conformation are indicated here
with blue and red asterisks, respectively (also see text and
Figure 3, Figure 4 and Figure 5). (B) The rigor-like location of
switch II in the various myosin II and VI structures (green),
which have small side chains at (squid) position 465, differs
from that in myosin V (blue), in which 465 is a tyrosine. The
locations of both switch I and switch II away from the
nucleotide and near each other force the tyrosine to adopt a
“g−” rotamer. The myosin V switch II is displaced toward
the P loop of the N-terminal subdomain in the rigor-like state
to avoid a clash of this rotamer with helix W (not shown). In
the post-rigor state (red), switch I (including Ser246) is near
the nucleotide and relatively far from switch II. Here, the
tyrosine has room to adopt the “g+” rotamer and does not
perturb the arrangement of the active site elements.
|
 |
Figure 3.
Figure 3. Conserved and Variable Features of the Rigor-like
50 kDa Cleft (A–E) The schematic S1 inset on this and
subsequent figures shows the region that is magnified (box) and
the viewpoint (arrow). Squid sequence numbering is used. (A)
Displayed are selected interactions between the upper (dark
green) and lower (light green) 50 kDa subdomains made in the
squid rigor-like structure that are also made (with identical or
homologous residues) in the other isoforms studied when the
corresponding part of their cleft is also fully closed.
Interactions include H-bonded/electrostatic contacts (dotted
lines) and extensive burial of certain apolar residues
(underlined labels). (B–E) Variations in crosscleft contacts,
as well as in the orientations of the upper and lower 50 kDa
subdomains or of subregions within them, help determine the
extent of inner and outer cleft closure in the various isoforms
(the green, dashed line shows squid for comparison.) (B) Myosin
V displays the most closed cleft in the strut region (also see
Table 1), perhaps due to a “complex H-bond link” (blue,
dotted lines) between Asn424, Lys601, and Glu598 not seen in any
other isoform; position 598 is aspartate in squid and sea
scallop, and 424 is serine in Dictyostelium (see below for
myosin VI). (C) A slightly modified orientation of helix HR
relative to helix HQ yields a fully closed outer but
incompletely closed inner cleft in catch and striated sea
scallop S1. (D) Curvature of helix HO about a
Dictyostelium-specific glycine at 435 contributes to its fully
closed inner but partially open outer cleft. (E) The entire
cleft of myosin VI is incompletely closed. A myosin VI-specific
lysine at position 650 appears to disrupt the interdomain
602-274-431 complex salt link made from the strut.
|
 |
|
|
|
| |
The above figures are
reprinted
by permission from Cell Press:
Structure
(2007,
15,
553-564)
copyright 2007.
|
|
| |
Figures were
selected
by an automated process.
|
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
Literature references that cite this PDB file's key reference
|
|
 |
| |
PubMed id
|
 |
Reference
|
 |
|
|
|
 |
V.Caorsi,
D.S.Ushakov,
T.G.West,
N.Setta-Kaffetzi,
and
M.A.Ferenczi
(2011).
FRET characterisation for cross-bridge dynamics in single-skinned rigor muscle fibres.
|
| |
Eur Biophys J,
40,
13-27.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
A.Málnási-Csizmadia,
and
M.Kovács
(2010).
Emerging complex pathways of the actomyosin powerstroke.
|
| |
Trends Biochem Sci,
35,
684-690.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
C.V.Sindelar,
and
K.H.Downing
(2010).
An atomic-level mechanism for activation of the kinesin molecular motors.
|
| |
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A,
107,
4111-4116.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
H.Brzeska,
J.Guag,
K.Remmert,
S.Chacko,
and
E.D.Korn
(2010).
An experimentally based computer search identifies unstructured membrane-binding sites in proteins: application to class I myosins, PAKS, and CARMIL.
|
| |
J Biol Chem,
285,
5738-5747.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
H.L.Sweeney,
and
A.Houdusse
(2010).
Structural and functional insights into the Myosin motor mechanism.
|
| |
Annu Rev Biophys,
39,
539-557.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
J.J.Frye,
V.A.Klenchin,
C.R.Bagshaw,
and
I.Rayment
(2010).
Insights into the importance of hydrogen bonding in the gamma-phosphate binding pocket of myosin: structural and functional studies of serine 236.
|
| |
Biochemistry,
49,
4897-4907.
|
 |
|
PDB codes:
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
M.Cecchini,
Y.Alexeev,
and
M.Karplus
(2010).
Pi release from myosin: a simulation analysis of possible pathways.
|
| |
Structure,
18,
458-470.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
M.Lorenz,
and
K.C.Holmes
(2010).
The actin-myosin interface.
|
| |
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A,
107,
12529-12534.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
V.Ovchinnikov,
B.L.Trout,
and
M.Karplus
(2010).
Mechanical coupling in myosin V: a simulation study.
|
| |
J Mol Biol,
395,
815-833.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
D.M.Himmel,
S.Mui,
E.O'Neall-Hennessey,
A.G.Szent-Györgyi,
and
C.Cohen
(2009).
The on-off switch in regulated myosins: different triggers but related mechanisms.
|
| |
J Mol Biol,
394,
496-505.
|
 |
|
PDB codes:
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
A.C.Knowles,
R.E.Ferguson,
B.D.Brandmeier,
Y.B.Sun,
D.R.Trentham,
and
M.Irving
(2008).
Orientation of the essential light chain region of myosin in relaxed, active, and rigor muscle.
|
| |
Biophys J,
95,
3882-3891.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
J.C.Klein,
A.R.Burr,
B.Svensson,
D.J.Kennedy,
J.Allingham,
M.A.Titus,
I.Rayment,
and
D.D.Thomas
(2008).
Actin-binding cleft closure in myosin II probed by site-directed spin labeling and pulsed EPR.
|
| |
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A,
105,
12867-12872.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
J.H.Brown,
Y.Yang,
L.Reshetnikova,
S.Gourinath,
D.Süveges,
J.Kardos,
F.Hóbor,
R.Reutzel,
L.Nyitray,
and
C.Cohen
(2008).
An unstable head-rod junction may promote folding into the compact off-state conformation of regulated myosins.
|
| |
J Mol Biol,
375,
1434-1443.
|
 |
|
PDB codes:
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
J.Ménétrey,
P.Llinas,
J.Cicolari,
G.Squires,
X.Liu,
A.Li,
H.L.Sweeney,
and
A.Houdusse
(2008).
The post-rigor structure of myosin VI and implications for the recovery stroke.
|
| |
EMBO J,
27,
244-252.
|
 |
|
PDB codes:
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
L.A.Amos
(2008).
Molecular motors: not quite like clockwork.
|
| |
Cell Mol Life Sci,
65,
509-515.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
L.Alamo,
W.Wriggers,
A.Pinto,
F.Bártoli,
L.Salazar,
F.Q.Zhao,
R.Craig,
and
R.Padrón
(2008).
Three-dimensional reconstruction of tarantula myosin filaments suggests how phosphorylation may regulate myosin activity.
|
| |
J Mol Biol,
384,
780-797.
|
 |
|
PDB code:
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
M.Cecchini,
A.Houdusse,
and
M.Karplus
(2008).
Allosteric communication in myosin V: from small conformational changes to large directed movements.
|
| |
PLoS Comput Biol,
4,
e1000129.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
M.Gyimesi,
B.Kintses,
A.Bodor,
A.Perczel,
S.Fischer,
C.R.Bagshaw,
and
A.Málnási-Csizmadia
(2008).
The mechanism of the reverse recovery step, phosphate release, and actin activation of Dictyostelium myosin II.
|
| |
J Biol Chem,
283,
8153-8163.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
M.Sun,
M.B.Rose,
S.K.Ananthanarayanan,
D.J.Jacobs,
and
C.M.Yengo
(2008).
Characterization of the pre-force-generation state in the actomyosin cross-bridge cycle.
|
| |
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A,
105,
8631-8636.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
C.Cohen,
and
C.Cohen
(2007).
Seeing and knowing in structural biology.
|
| |
J Biol Chem,
282,
32529-32538.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
C.R.Bagshaw
(2007).
Myosin mechanochemistry.
|
| |
Structure,
15,
511-512.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
J.Ménétrey,
P.Llinas,
M.Mukherjea,
H.L.Sweeney,
and
A.Houdusse
(2007).
The structural basis for the large powerstroke of myosin VI.
|
| |
Cell,
131,
300-308.
|
 |
|
PDB code:
|
 |
|
|
 |
 |
|
The most recent references are shown first.
Citation data come partly from CiteXplore and partly
from an automated harvesting procedure. Note that this is likely to be
only a partial list as not all journals are covered by
either method. However, we are continually building up the citation data
so more and more references will be included with time.
Where a reference describes a PDB structure, the PDB
codes are
shown on the right.
|
');
}
}
 |
|