 |
PDBsum entry 2ojt
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Membrane protein
|
PDB id
|
|
|
|
2ojt
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
References listed in PDB file
|
 |
|
Key reference
|
 |
|
Title
|
 |
Structure and mechanism of kainate receptor modulation by anions.
|
 |
|
Authors
|
 |
A.J.Plested,
M.L.Mayer.
|
 |
|
Ref.
|
 |
Neuron, 2007,
53,
829-841.
[DOI no: ]
|
 |
|
PubMed id
|
 |
|
 |
 |
|
Abstract
|
 |
|
L-glutamate, the major excitatory neurotransmitter in the human brain, activates
a family of ligand-gated ion channels, the major subtypes of which are named
AMPA, kainate, and NMDA receptors. In common with many signal transduction
proteins, glutamate receptors are modulated by ions and small molecules,
including Ca(2+), Mg(2+), Zn(2+), protons, polyamines, and steroids. Strikingly,
the activation of kainate receptors by glutamate requires the presence of both
Na(+) and Cl(-) in the extracellular solution, and in the absence of these ions,
receptor activity is abolished. Here, we identify the site and mechanism of
action of anions. Surprisingly, we find that Cl(-) ions are essential structural
components of kainate receptors. Cl(-) ions bind in a cavity formed at the
interface between subunits in a dimer pair. In the absence of Cl(-), dimer
stability is reduced, the rate of desensitization increases, and the fraction of
receptors competent for activation by glutamate drops precipitously.
|
 |
 |
 |
|
 |
|
 |
Figure 4.
Figure 4. The Anion Binding Site Is Located in the Ligand
Binding Core (A) Cartoon of a kainate receptor subunit
illustrating creation of the ATD(−) deletion construct and the
block of desensitization when disulfide bond crosslinks are
introduced in a ligand binding domain dimer assembly. (B)
Anion modulation of glutamate-evoked peak current amplitude,
relative to the response in Cl^− (left) and desensitization
rate (right), is similar in wild-type GluR6 and the ATD(−)
construct. Data points show the mean ± SEM for at least
five separate observations. (C) Nondesensitizing kainate
receptors formed by disulfide crosslinking the ligand binding
domains of GluR6 are insensitive to modulation by anions. The
bar plots show peak amplitude and percentage of desensitization
for responses to glutamate recorded from the GluR6 Y490C L752C
crosslinked mutant with fluoride, chloride, iodide, nitrate, or
methanesulfonate as the extracellular anion. Data points show
the mean ± SEM for at least five separate observations
per condition.
|
 |
Figure 5.
Figure 5. Molecular Structure of the Chloride Ion Binding
Site (A) Anomalous difference electron density map at 1.96
Å resolution for the GluR5 ligand binding core bromide
complex contoured at 6 σ (purple). The Br^− ion sits on the
molecular 2-fold between two subunits, colored red and blue
respectively, for which helices J and D are labeled. Side chains
that form salt bridges at the base and top of the anion binding
site are drawn in stick configuration. (B) Sigma A-weighted
mF[o] − DF[c] electron density map at 2.11 Å resolution
for the GluR5 ligand binding core sulfate complex contoured at 3
σ (blue); sulfate was omitted from the F[c] calculation. Note
the altered conformation of Arg760 and the associated switch of
salt bridges from intermolecular to intramolecular contacts.
(C) Stereo view of the GluR5 chloride complex rotated by
90° from the view in (A) with a sigma A-weighted mF[o] −
DF[c] electron density map at 1.74 Å resolution contoured
at 5 σ for the Cl^− ion (green), side chains (gray), and
water molecules (blue); atoms drawn in stick configuration were
omitted from the F[c] calculation. (D) Molecular surface
for domain 1 of the ligand binding core for one subunit in a
GluR5 dimer assembly colored by surface curvature (concave
green); the view is face-on to the anion binding site. (E)
Electrostatic surface potential map for the GluR5 anion binding
site calculated with Cl^− removed from its binding site; the
view is the same orientation as in (D). (F) Amino acid
sequence alignment and Cα movements (in Å) for the GluR5
and GluR2[flop] dimer crystal structures relative to the crystal
structure of the R/G site unedited GluR2[flip]. AMPA receptor
dimer structure.
|
 |
|
 |
 |
|
The above figures are
reprinted
by permission from Cell Press:
Neuron
(2007,
53,
829-841)
copyright 2007.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |