 |
PDBsum entry 2oeh
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Transcription/DNA
|
PDB id
|
|
|
|
2oeh
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
Contents |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* Residue conservation analysis
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
|
| |
|
|
Biochemistry
46:4943-4950
(2007)
|
|
PubMed id:
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
Determination of the three-dimensional structure of the Mrf2-DNA complex using paramagnetic spin labeling.
|
|
S.Cai,
L.Zhu,
Z.Zhang,
Y.Chen.
|
|
|
|
| |
ABSTRACT
|
|
|
| |
|
Understanding the mechanism of protein-DNA interactions at the molecular level
is one of the main focuses in structural and molecular biological
investigations. At present, NMR spectroscopy is the only approach that can
provide atomic details of protein-DNA recognition in solution. However,
determining the structures of protein-DNA complexes using NMR spectroscopy has
been dependent on the observation of intermolecular nuclear Overhauser effects
(NOE) and their assignments, which are difficult to obtain in many cases. In
this study, we have shown that intermolecular distance constraints derived from
a single spin-label in combination with docking calculations have defined many
specific contacts of the complex between the AT-rich interaction domain (ARID)
of Mrf2 and its target DNA. Mrf2 contacts DNA mainly using the two flexible
loops, L1 and L2. While the L1 loop contacts the phosphate backbone, L2 and
several residues in the adjacent helices interact with AT base pairs in the
major groove of DNA. Despite the structural diversity in the ARID family of
DNA-binding proteins, Mrf2 maintains contacts with DNA similar to those observed
in the homologous Dri-DNA complex.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
Literature references that cite this PDB file's key reference
|
|
 |
| |
PubMed id
|
 |
Reference
|
 |
|
|
|
 |
C.Dominguez,
M.Schubert,
O.Duss,
S.Ravindranathan,
and
F.H.Allain
(2011).
Structure determination and dynamics of protein-RNA complexes by NMR spectroscopy.
|
| |
Prog Nucl Magn Reson Spectrosc,
58,
1.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
P.H.Keizers,
and
M.Ubbink
(2011).
Paramagnetic tagging for protein structure and dynamics analysis.
|
| |
Prog Nucl Magn Reson Spectrosc,
58,
88-96.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
C.C.Chou,
M.Rajasekaran,
and
C.Chen
(2010).
An effective approach for generating a three-Cys2His2 zinc-finger-DNA complex model by docking.
|
| |
BMC Bioinformatics,
11,
334.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
M.van Dijk,
and
A.M.Bonvin
(2010).
Pushing the limits of what is achievable in protein-DNA docking: benchmarking HADDOCK's performance.
|
| |
Nucleic Acids Res,
38,
5634-5647.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
G.M.Clore,
and
J.Iwahara
(2009).
Theory, practice, and applications of paramagnetic relaxation enhancement for the characterization of transient low-population states of biological macromolecules and their complexes.
|
| |
Chem Rev,
109,
4108-4139.
|
 |
|
 |
 |
|
The most recent references are shown first.
Citation data come partly from CiteXplore and partly
from an automated harvesting procedure. Note that this is likely to be
only a partial list as not all journals are covered by
either method. However, we are continually building up the citation data
so more and more references will be included with time.
|
');
}
}
 |