spacer
spacer

PDBsum entry 2o72

Go to PDB code: 
protein metals links
Cell adhesion, metal binding protein PDB id
2o72

 

 

 

 

Loading ...

 
JSmol PyMol  
Contents
Protein chain
213 a.a. *
Metals
_CA ×5
Waters ×245
* Residue conservation analysis
PDB id:
2o72
Name: Cell adhesion, metal binding protein
Title: Crystal structure analysis of human e-cadherin (1-213)
Structure: Epithelial-cadherin. Chain: a. Fragment: n-terminal domains 1 and 2, residues 155-317. Engineered: yes. Mutation: yes
Source: Homo sapiens. Human. Organism_taxid: 9606. Gene: cdh1, cdhe, uvo. Expressed in: escherichia coli. Expression_system_taxid: 562.
Resolution:
2.00Å     R-factor:   0.193     R-free:   0.234
Authors: E.Parisini,J.-H.Wang
Key ref:
E.Parisini et al. (2007). The Crystal Structure of Human E-cadherin Domains 1 and 2, and Comparison with other Cadherins in the Context of Adhesion Mechanism. J Mol Biol, 373, 401-411. PubMed id: 17850815 DOI: 10.1016/j.jmb.2007.08.011
Date:
09-Dec-06     Release date:   09-Oct-07    
PROCHECK
Go to PROCHECK summary
 Headers
 References

Protein chain
Pfam   ArchSchema ?
P12830  (CADH1_HUMAN) -  Cadherin-1 from Homo sapiens
Seq:
Struc:
 
Seq:
Struc:
882 a.a.
213 a.a.*
Key:    PfamA domain  Secondary structure  CATH domain
* PDB and UniProt seqs differ at 1 residue position (black cross)

 

 
DOI no: 10.1016/j.jmb.2007.08.011 J Mol Biol 373:401-411 (2007)
PubMed id: 17850815  
 
 
The Crystal Structure of Human E-cadherin Domains 1 and 2, and Comparison with other Cadherins in the Context of Adhesion Mechanism.
E.Parisini, J.M.Higgins, J.H.Liu, M.B.Brenner, J.H.Wang.
 
  ABSTRACT  
 
Cell adhesion mediated by type I cadherins involves homophilic "trans" interactions that are thought to be brought about by a strand exchange mechanism involving the N-terminal extracellular domain. Here, we present the high-resolution crystal structure of the N-terminal two domains of human E-cadherin. Comparison of this structure with other type I cadherin structures reveals features that are likely to be critical to facilitate dimerization by strand exchange as well as dimer flexibility. We integrate this structural knowledge to provide a model for type I cadherin adhesive interactions. Intra-molecular docking of the conserved N-terminal "adhesion arm" into the acceptor pocket in monomeric E-cadherin appears largely identical to inter-molecular docking of the adhesion arm in adhesive trans dimers. A strained conformation of the adhesion arm in the monomer, however, may create an equilibrium between "open" and "closed" forms that primes the cadherin for formation of adhesive interactions, which are then stabilized by additional dimer-specific contacts. By contrast, in type II cadherins, strain in the adhesion arm appears absent and a much larger surface area is involved in trans adhesion, which may compensate the activation energy required to peel off the intra-molecularly docked arm. It seems that evolution has selected slightly different adhesion mechanisms for type I and type II cadherins.
 
  Selected figure(s)  
 
Figure 2.
Figure 2. Detailed interactions between the N-terminal portion of molecule A (magenta) and the hydrophobic acceptor pocket of molecule B (green) within a strand-dimer. Broken lines show the salt bridge between the N-terminal ^AAsp1-NH[3]^+ and ^BGlu89 as well as the hydrogen bond between N^εH of ^ATrp2 and the carbonyl group of ^BAsp90. The stacking arrangement of residues ^BGlu89, ^ATrp2 and ^BMet92 (see inset on top left corner) is also likely to contribute to the stabilization of this “key-keyhole” interaction observed in all cadherin structures.
Figure 4.
Figure 4. Variable conformation of the N-terminal adhesion arm. (a) Superposition of the EC1 domains of human E-cadherin EC1–EC2 (adhesive form; green), mouse E-cadherin EC1–EC2 (closed; 1FF5, yellow), Xenopus C-cadherin EC1–EC5 (adhesive; 1L3W, light grey) and mouse E-cadherin EC1–EC2 adhesive form (1Q1P, red). The major portion of these molecules is well superimposed. By striking contrast, there is a spectrum of variable swing angles in their N-terminal segments. Such conformational variability suggests that this region confers necessary flexibility to the cadherin molecule to facilitate cell adhesion. (b) Superposition of the human E-cadherin EC1–EC2 structure (green) and the mouse E-cadherin EC1–EC2 structure (1Q1P, red), highlighting the orientation variation of their strand-dimer counterparts (magenta and yellow, respectively). The calcium ions present in all structures are omitted for clarity. (c) Detail of the hydrophobic interactions of Ile4 in the closed form of mouse E-cadherin (1FF5, pale yellow). (d) As for (c) but showing the adhesive dimer of human E-cadherin (green and magenta). (e) As for (d) but showing the adhesive dimer of mouse E-cadherin (1Q1P, red and yellow).
 
  The above figures are reprinted from an Open Access publication published by Elsevier: J Mol Biol (2007, 373, 401-411) copyright 2007.  
  Figures were selected by an automated process.  

Literature references that cite this PDB file's key reference

  PubMed id Reference
21269602 J.Brasch, O.J.Harrison, G.Ahlsen, S.M.Carnally, R.M.Henderson, B.Honig, and L.Shapiro (2011).
Structure and binding mechanism of vascular endothelial cadherin: a divergent classical cadherin.
  J Mol Biol, 408, 57-73.
PDB code: 3ppe
21572446 J.Vendome, S.Posy, X.Jin, F.Bahna, G.Ahlsen, L.Shapiro, and B.Honig (2011).
Molecular design principles underlying β-strand swapping in the adhesive dimerization of cadherins.
  Nat Struct Mol Biol, 18, 693-700.
PDB code: 3qrb
20190755 C.Ciatto, F.Bahna, N.Zampieri, H.C.VanSteenhouse, P.S.Katsamba, G.Ahlsen, O.J.Harrison, J.Brasch, X.Jin, S.Posy, J.Vendome, B.Ranscht, T.M.Jessell, B.Honig, and L.Shapiro (2010).
T-cadherin structures reveal a novel adhesive binding mechanism.
  Nat Struct Mol Biol, 17, 339-347.
PDB codes: 3k5r 3k5s 3k6d 3k6f 3k6i
20190754 O.J.Harrison, F.Bahna, P.S.Katsamba, X.Jin, J.Brasch, J.Vendome, G.Ahlsen, K.J.Carroll, S.R.Price, B.Honig, and L.Shapiro (2010).
Two-step adhesive binding by classical cadherins.
  Nat Struct Mol Biol, 17, 348-357.
PDB codes: 3lnd 3lne 3lnf 3lng 3lnh 3lni
20876147 Y.Wu, X.Jin, O.Harrison, L.Shapiro, B.H.Honig, and A.Ben-Shaul (2010).
Cooperativity between trans and cis interactions in cadherin-mediated junction formation.
  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A, 107, 17592-17597.  
19935869 L.Raptis, R.Arulanandam, A.Vultur, M.Geletu, S.Chevalier, and H.Feracci (2009).
Beyond structure, to survival: activation of Stat3 by cadherin engagement.
  Biochem Cell Biol, 87, 835-843.  
  20066110 L.Shapiro, and W.I.Weis (2009).
Structure and biochemistry of cadherins and catenins.
  Cold Spring Harbor Perspect Biol, 1, a003053.  
19553217 P.Katsamba, K.Carroll, G.Ahlsen, F.Bahna, J.Vendome, S.Posy, M.Rajebhosale, S.Price, T.M.Jessell, A.Ben-Shaul, L.Shapiro, and B.H.Honig (2009).
Linking molecular affinity and cellular specificity in cadherin-mediated adhesion.
  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A, 106, 11594-11599.  
19654330 S.Nakamura, K.Kuroki, I.Ohki, K.Sasaki, M.Kajikawa, T.Maruyama, M.Ito, Y.Kameda, M.Ikura, K.Yamamoto, N.Matsumoto, and K.Maenaka (2009).
Molecular basis for E-cadherin recognition by killer cell lectin-like receptor G1 (KLRG1).
  J Biol Chem, 284, 27327-27335.  
19038264 T.A.Cutler, B.M.Mills, D.J.Lubin, L.T.Chong, and S.N.Loh (2009).
Effect of interdomain linker length on an antagonistic folding-unfolding equilibrium between two protein domains.
  J Mol Biol, 386, 854-868.  
19604491 Y.Li, M.Hofmann, Q.Wang, L.Teng, L.K.Chlewicki, H.Pircher, and R.A.Mariuzza (2009).
Structure of natural killer cell receptor KLRG1 bound to E-cadherin reveals basis for MHC-independent missing self recognition.
  Immunity, 31, 35-46.
PDB codes: 3ff7 3ff8 3ff9
18395225 S.Posy, L.Shapiro, and B.Honig (2008).
Sequence and structural determinants of strand swapping in cadherin domains: do all cadherins bind through the same adhesive interface?
  J Mol Biol, 378, 954-968.  
The most recent references are shown first. Citation data come partly from CiteXplore and partly from an automated harvesting procedure. Note that this is likely to be only a partial list as not all journals are covered by either method. However, we are continually building up the citation data so more and more references will be included with time. Where a reference describes a PDB structure, the PDB code is shown on the right.

 

spacer

spacer