 |
PDBsum entry 2o72
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cell adhesion, metal binding protein
|
PDB id
|
|
|
|
2o72
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
Contents |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* Residue conservation analysis
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
|
| |
|
DOI no:
|
J Mol Biol
373:401-411
(2007)
|
|
PubMed id:
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
The Crystal Structure of Human E-cadherin Domains 1 and 2, and Comparison with other Cadherins in the Context of Adhesion Mechanism.
|
|
E.Parisini,
J.M.Higgins,
J.H.Liu,
M.B.Brenner,
J.H.Wang.
|
|
|
|
| |
ABSTRACT
|
|
|
| |
|
Cell adhesion mediated by type I cadherins involves homophilic "trans"
interactions that are thought to be brought about by a strand exchange mechanism
involving the N-terminal extracellular domain. Here, we present the
high-resolution crystal structure of the N-terminal two domains of human
E-cadherin. Comparison of this structure with other type I cadherin structures
reveals features that are likely to be critical to facilitate dimerization by
strand exchange as well as dimer flexibility. We integrate this structural
knowledge to provide a model for type I cadherin adhesive interactions.
Intra-molecular docking of the conserved N-terminal "adhesion arm"
into the acceptor pocket in monomeric E-cadherin appears largely identical to
inter-molecular docking of the adhesion arm in adhesive trans dimers. A strained
conformation of the adhesion arm in the monomer, however, may create an
equilibrium between "open" and "closed" forms that primes
the cadherin for formation of adhesive interactions, which are then stabilized
by additional dimer-specific contacts. By contrast, in type II cadherins, strain
in the adhesion arm appears absent and a much larger surface area is involved in
trans adhesion, which may compensate the activation energy required to peel off
the intra-molecularly docked arm. It seems that evolution has selected slightly
different adhesion mechanisms for type I and type II cadherins.
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Selected figure(s)
|
|
|
| |
 |
 |
|
 |
|
 |
Figure 2.
Figure 2. Detailed interactions between the N-terminal
portion of molecule A (magenta) and the hydrophobic acceptor
pocket of molecule B (green) within a strand-dimer. Broken lines
show the salt bridge between the N-terminal ^AAsp1-NH[3]^+ and
^BGlu89 as well as the hydrogen bond between N^εH of ^ATrp2 and
the carbonyl group of ^BAsp90. The stacking arrangement of
residues ^BGlu89, ^ATrp2 and ^BMet92 (see inset on top left
corner) is also likely to contribute to the stabilization of
this “key-keyhole” interaction observed in all cadherin
structures.
|
 |
Figure 4.
Figure 4. Variable conformation of the N-terminal adhesion
arm. (a) Superposition of the EC1 domains of human E-cadherin
EC1–EC2 (adhesive form; green), mouse E-cadherin EC1–EC2
(closed; 1FF5, yellow), Xenopus C-cadherin EC1–EC5 (adhesive;
1L3W, light grey) and mouse E-cadherin EC1–EC2 adhesive form
(1Q1P, red). The major portion of these molecules is well
superimposed. By striking contrast, there is a spectrum of
variable swing angles in their N-terminal segments. Such
conformational variability suggests that this region confers
necessary flexibility to the cadherin molecule to facilitate
cell adhesion. (b) Superposition of the human E-cadherin
EC1–EC2 structure (green) and the mouse E-cadherin EC1–EC2
structure (1Q1P, red), highlighting the orientation variation of
their strand-dimer counterparts (magenta and yellow,
respectively). The calcium ions present in all structures are
omitted for clarity. (c) Detail of the hydrophobic interactions
of Ile4 in the closed form of mouse E-cadherin (1FF5, pale
yellow). (d) As for (c) but showing the adhesive dimer of human
E-cadherin (green and magenta). (e) As for (d) but showing the
adhesive dimer of mouse E-cadherin (1Q1P, red and yellow).
|
 |
|
|
|
| |
The above figures are
reprinted
from an Open Access publication published by Elsevier:
J Mol Biol
(2007,
373,
401-411)
copyright 2007.
|
|
| |
Figures were
selected
by an automated process.
|
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
Literature references that cite this PDB file's key reference
|
|
 |
| |
PubMed id
|
 |
Reference
|
 |
|
|
|
 |
J.Brasch,
O.J.Harrison,
G.Ahlsen,
S.M.Carnally,
R.M.Henderson,
B.Honig,
and
L.Shapiro
(2011).
Structure and binding mechanism of vascular endothelial cadherin: a divergent classical cadherin.
|
| |
J Mol Biol,
408,
57-73.
|
 |
|
PDB code:
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
J.Vendome,
S.Posy,
X.Jin,
F.Bahna,
G.Ahlsen,
L.Shapiro,
and
B.Honig
(2011).
Molecular design principles underlying β-strand swapping in the adhesive dimerization of cadherins.
|
| |
Nat Struct Mol Biol,
18,
693-700.
|
 |
|
PDB code:
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
C.Ciatto,
F.Bahna,
N.Zampieri,
H.C.VanSteenhouse,
P.S.Katsamba,
G.Ahlsen,
O.J.Harrison,
J.Brasch,
X.Jin,
S.Posy,
J.Vendome,
B.Ranscht,
T.M.Jessell,
B.Honig,
and
L.Shapiro
(2010).
T-cadherin structures reveal a novel adhesive binding mechanism.
|
| |
Nat Struct Mol Biol,
17,
339-347.
|
 |
|
PDB codes:
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
O.J.Harrison,
F.Bahna,
P.S.Katsamba,
X.Jin,
J.Brasch,
J.Vendome,
G.Ahlsen,
K.J.Carroll,
S.R.Price,
B.Honig,
and
L.Shapiro
(2010).
Two-step adhesive binding by classical cadherins.
|
| |
Nat Struct Mol Biol,
17,
348-357.
|
 |
|
PDB codes:
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
Y.Wu,
X.Jin,
O.Harrison,
L.Shapiro,
B.H.Honig,
and
A.Ben-Shaul
(2010).
Cooperativity between trans and cis interactions in cadherin-mediated junction formation.
|
| |
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A,
107,
17592-17597.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
L.Raptis,
R.Arulanandam,
A.Vultur,
M.Geletu,
S.Chevalier,
and
H.Feracci
(2009).
Beyond structure, to survival: activation of Stat3 by cadherin engagement.
|
| |
Biochem Cell Biol,
87,
835-843.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
L.Shapiro,
and
W.I.Weis
(2009).
Structure and biochemistry of cadherins and catenins.
|
| |
Cold Spring Harbor Perspect Biol,
1,
a003053.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
P.Katsamba,
K.Carroll,
G.Ahlsen,
F.Bahna,
J.Vendome,
S.Posy,
M.Rajebhosale,
S.Price,
T.M.Jessell,
A.Ben-Shaul,
L.Shapiro,
and
B.H.Honig
(2009).
Linking molecular affinity and cellular specificity in cadherin-mediated adhesion.
|
| |
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A,
106,
11594-11599.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
S.Nakamura,
K.Kuroki,
I.Ohki,
K.Sasaki,
M.Kajikawa,
T.Maruyama,
M.Ito,
Y.Kameda,
M.Ikura,
K.Yamamoto,
N.Matsumoto,
and
K.Maenaka
(2009).
Molecular basis for E-cadherin recognition by killer cell lectin-like receptor G1 (KLRG1).
|
| |
J Biol Chem,
284,
27327-27335.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
T.A.Cutler,
B.M.Mills,
D.J.Lubin,
L.T.Chong,
and
S.N.Loh
(2009).
Effect of interdomain linker length on an antagonistic folding-unfolding equilibrium between two protein domains.
|
| |
J Mol Biol,
386,
854-868.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
Y.Li,
M.Hofmann,
Q.Wang,
L.Teng,
L.K.Chlewicki,
H.Pircher,
and
R.A.Mariuzza
(2009).
Structure of natural killer cell receptor KLRG1 bound to E-cadherin reveals basis for MHC-independent missing self recognition.
|
| |
Immunity,
31,
35-46.
|
 |
|
PDB codes:
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
S.Posy,
L.Shapiro,
and
B.Honig
(2008).
Sequence and structural determinants of strand swapping in cadherin domains: do all cadherins bind through the same adhesive interface?
|
| |
J Mol Biol,
378,
954-968.
|
 |
|
 |
 |
|
The most recent references are shown first.
Citation data come partly from CiteXplore and partly
from an automated harvesting procedure. Note that this is likely to be
only a partial list as not all journals are covered by
either method. However, we are continually building up the citation data
so more and more references will be included with time.
Where a reference describes a PDB structure, the PDB
code is
shown on the right.
|
');
}
}
 |