 |
PDBsum entry 2iyl
|
|
|
|
References listed in PDB file
|
 |
|
Key reference
|
 |
|
Title
|
 |
X-Ray structure of the t. Aquaticus ftsy:gdp complex suggests functional roles for the c-Terminal helix of the srp gtpases.
|
 |
|
Authors
|
 |
J.Gawronski-Salerno,
J.S.Coon,
P.J.Focia,
D.M.Freymann.
|
 |
|
Ref.
|
 |
Proteins, 2007,
66,
984-995.
[DOI no: ]
|
 |
|
PubMed id
|
 |
|
 |
|
Note In the PDB file this reference is
annotated as "TO BE PUBLISHED".
The citation details given above were identified by an automated
search of PubMed on title and author
names, giving a
perfect match.
|
 |
 |
|
Abstract
|
 |
|
FtsY and Ffh are structurally similar prokaryotic Signal Recognition Particle
GTPases that play an essential role in the Signal Recognition Particle
(SRP)-mediated cotranslational targeting of proteins to the membrane. The two
GTPases assemble in a GTP-dependent manner to form a heterodimeric SRP targeting
complex. We report here the 2.1 A X-ray structure of FtsY from T. aquaticus
bound to GDP. The structure of the monomeric protein reveals, unexpectedly,
canonical binding interactions for GDP. A comparison of the structures of the
monomeric and complexed FtsY NG GTPase domain suggests that it undergoes a
conformational change similar to that of Ffh NG during the assembly of the
symmetric heterodimeric complex. However, in contrast to Ffh, in which the
C-terminal helix shifts independently of the other subdomains, the C-terminal
helix and N domain of T. aquaticus FtsY together behave as a rigid body during
assembly, suggesting distinct mechanisms by which the interactions of the NG
domain "module" are regulated in the context of the two SRP GTPases.
|
 |
 |
 |
|
 |
|
 |
Figure 3.
Figure 3. Common features of the structures of FtsY from
different species. (A) Structures of FtsY from T. aquaticus, E.
coli, M. mycoides, and T. maritima are aligned using a
superimposition based on the motif I P-loop; the 1
helix that follows the motif is vertical at the center of each
image. The 4
helix (labeled) defines the interface between the N and G
subdomains. The C-terminal helix (highlighted in red) adopts a
similar configuration in each of the structures, despite the
slightly different orientation of each N domain. In the
structures of the apo M. mycoides and T. maritima FtsY an
N-terminal helix extension ( N1
,
highlighted in blue) packs between the C-terminal helix and the
N/G interface. In the E. coli structure the N-terminal
polypeptide is poorly structured (blue coil) but appears to play
a similar role. The GDP in the T. aquaticus FtsY complex is
indicated with a CPK model. In each structure of the apo or
GDP-bound state of FtsY shown here, the motif II and motif III
loops (labeled) adopt distinct (or disordered) conformations.
(B) The N/G linker peptide packs across a crystal contact,
occupying space that would accommodate the N1
N-terminal
helix seen in other structures of FtsY. The position of the N1
helix is indicated by a ghosted cylinder. The backbone atoms of
the linker splayed across the crystal contact are shown as
sticks; the hydrophobic sidechains of Leu^88, Phe^90, and Pro^92
(ball-and-stick) pack into a conserved hydrophobic pocket at the
interface. The orientation of the C-terminal helix, C,
is indicated by an axis line. The ribbon representation includes
helices N2
and N4
of the N domain, and the 4
helix, the motif IV/DARGG loop that precedes it, and the closing
loop (bottom) of the G domain, which together contribute to the
hydrophobic pocket at the N/G interface.
|
 |
Figure 5.
Figure 5. The nucleotide position slips between the GDP and
GMPPCP states. Following superposition of the FtsY:GDP monomeric
and FtsY:GMPPCP complexed states of FtsY over the motif I P-loop
(at right), the -
and -phosphate
groups of GDP and GMPPCP (labeled) remain fixed relative to each
other, but the ribose and the guanine base shift by 1
Å between the two structures (1.04 Å at the 2-amino
nitrogen, as indicated). This slip is tracked by movement of the
motif IV loop and by the specificity determining carboxylate
sidechain of Asp^258.
|
 |
|
 |
 |
|
The above figures are
reprinted
by permission from John Wiley & Sons, Inc.:
Proteins
(2007,
66,
984-995)
copyright 2007.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |