 |
PDBsum entry 2i0c
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Membrane protein
|
PDB id
|
|
|
|
2i0c
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
References listed in PDB file
|
 |
|
Key reference
|
 |
|
Title
|
 |
Conformational restriction blocks glutamate receptor desensitization.
|
 |
|
Authors
|
 |
M.C.Weston,
P.Schuck,
A.Ghosal,
C.Rosenmund,
M.L.Mayer.
|
 |
|
Ref.
|
 |
Nat Struct Mol Biol, 2006,
13,
1120-1127.
[DOI no: ]
|
 |
|
PubMed id
|
 |
|
 |
 |
|
Abstract
|
 |
|
Desensitization is a universal feature of ligand-gated ion channels. Using the
crystal structure of the GluR2 L483Y mutant channel as a guide, we attempted to
build non-desensitizing kainate-subtype glutamate receptors. Success was
achieved for GluR5, GluR6 and GluR7 with intermolecular disulfide cross-links
but not by engineering the dimer interface. Crystallographic analysis of the
GluR6 Y490C L752C dimer revealed relaxation from the active conformation, which
functional studies reveal is not sufficient to trigger desensitization. The
equivalent non-desensitizing cross-linked GluR2 mutant retained weak sensitivity
to a positive allosteric modulator, which had no effect on GluR2 L483Y. These
results establish that the active conformation of AMPA and kainate receptors is
conserved and further show that their desensitization requires dimer
rearrangements, that subtle structural differences account for their diverse
functional properties and that the ligand-binding core dimer is a powerful
regulator of ion-channel activity.
|
 |
 |
 |
|
 |
|
 |
Figure 4.
Figure 4. Non-desensitizing glutamate receptors created by
ligand-binding core disulfide bond cross-links. Responses to
10 mM glutamate, recorded from outside-out patches from HEK
cells transfected with the indicated cDNA species, are shown for
wild-type GluR2 and the kainate receptors GluR5, GluR6 and GluR7
(left charts) and for their ligand-binding core double cysteine
mutants (right charts). Upper traces in each panel show open-tip
responses recorded at the end of the experiment.
|
 |
Figure 6.
Figure 6. Analysis of disulfide bond–cross-linked receptors.
(a) Crystal structure of the GluR6 Y490C L752C mutant
cross-linked dimer assembly. C positions
of Ser761 and Ile653 are show as black spheres at the top and
bottom of each subunit, respectively. (b) Electron density for
[A]-weighted
F[o] – F[c] omit maps at 2.25-Å resolution, contoured at
3.25 calculated
with the Y490C L752C residues omitted from the F[c] calculation.
(c) Crystal structure of the GluR6 ELKQ mutant dimer,
illustrating the change in separation of Ser761 and Ile653
compared with the disulfide bond–cross-linked receptor. (d)
Superimposed responses to 10 mM glutamate (black bars above
traces) recorded in the absence or presence of cyclothiazide
(white bar; asterisks mark traces in the presence of
cyclothiazide), from outside-out patches from HEK cells
transfected with cDNAs for GluR2 L483C L752C (left) and GluR2
L483Y (right).
|
 |
|
 |
 |
|
The above figures are
reprinted
by permission from Macmillan Publishers Ltd:
Nat Struct Mol Biol
(2006,
13,
1120-1127)
copyright 2006.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |