 |
PDBsum entry 2hkx
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Transcription regulator
|
PDB id
|
|
|
|
2hkx
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
Contents |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* Residue conservation analysis
|
|
|
 |
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
Enzyme class:
|
 |
Chains A, B:
E.C.?
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
|
| |
|
DOI no:
|
Acta Crystallogr D Biol Crystallogr
63:282-287
(2007)
|
|
PubMed id:
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
Structure-based hypothesis on the activation of the CO-sensing transcription factor CooA.
|
|
M.Borjigin,
H.Li,
N.D.Lanz,
R.L.Kerby,
G.P.Roberts,
T.L.Poulos.
|
|
|
|
| |
ABSTRACT
|
|
|
| |
|
The CooA family of proteins are prokaryotic CO-sensing transcription factors
that regulate the expression of genes involved in the utilization of CO as an
energy source. They are homodimeric proteins that contain two hemes. Each
monomer contains an N-terminal heme-binding domain and a C-terminal DNA-binding
domain. Binding of CO to the heme leads to activation by a large reorientation
of the DNA-binding domain such that the DNA-binding domain is in position for
specific DNA recognition. The crystal structure of CooA from Rhodospirillum
rubrum [RrCooA; Lanzilotta et al. (2000), Nature Struct. Biol. 7, 876-880] in
the inactive CO-free off-state shows that the N-terminal Pro residue of monomer
A coordinates the heme of monomer B and vice versa. It now appears that the CO
replaces the Pro ligand and that this change is coupled to the activation
process. However, precisely how the replacement of the Pro ligand by CO results
in structural changes some 25 A from the CO-binding site remains unknown. Here,
the structure of a CooA variant from the thermophilic bacterium Carboxydothermus
hydrogenoformans (ChCooA) is reported in which one monomer is fully in the
on-state. The N-terminal region that is displaced by CO binding is now
positioned between the heme-binding and DNA-binding domains, which requires
movement of the N-terminus by approximately 20 A and thus serves as a bridge
between the two domains that helps to orient the DNA-binding domain in position
for DNA binding.
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Selected figure(s)
|
|
|
| |
 |
 |
|
 |
|
 |
Figure 1.
Figure 1 Crystal structure of RrCooA. (a) In monomer A (dark)
the DNA-binding domain is in the fully extended orientation,
while in monomer B (light) the DNA-binding domain is in a bent
orientation. The van der Waals spheres are the heme groups. Note
the long C helices that form the dimer interface. (b) A close-up
view of the C-helical interface, showing the interaction between
symmetry-related Leu and Ile residues.
|
 |
Figure 4.
Figure 4 2F[o] - F[c] electron-density map contoured at 1 and
F[o] - F[c] map contoured at 3.0 (red)
around the heme site. (a) The electron densities for both Cys80
and His82 are continuous with the iron, although the geometry
and the distance between Cys80 and the iron indicates very weak
ligation. Also shown is Asn47 which in inactive RrCooA hydrogen
bonds to the His ligand. However, in LL-ChCooA Asn47 is about
4.6 Å from His82. Both 2F[o] - F[c] and F[o] - F[c]
density indicate the presence of CO bound to the heme iron. (b)
Structure around the CO-binding pocket. Residues shown in yellow
are from molecule B, while those in green are from molecule A.
The cluster of Leu residues forms a tight hydrophobic pocket
around CO that favors a linear Fe-CO bond. Gly122 also
contributes to the CO-binding pocket, but is not shown for
clarity.
|
 |
|
|
|
| |
The above figures are
reprinted
by permission from the IUCr:
Acta Crystallogr D Biol Crystallogr
(2007,
63,
282-287)
copyright 2007.
|
|
| |
Figures were
selected
by an automated process.
|
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
Literature references that cite this PDB file's key reference
|
|
 |
| |
PubMed id
|
 |
Reference
|
 |
|
|
|
 |
G.Giardina,
N.Castiglione,
M.Caruso,
F.Cutruzzolà,
and
S.Rinaldo
(2011).
The Pseudomonas aeruginosa DNR transcription factor: light and shade of nitric oxide-sensing mechanisms.
|
| |
Biochem Soc Trans,
39,
294-298.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
G.Giardina,
S.Rinaldo,
N.Castiglione,
M.Caruso,
and
F.Cutruzzolà
(2009).
A dramatic conformational rearrangement is necessary for the activation of DNR from Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Crystal structure of wild-type DNR.
|
| |
Proteins,
77,
174-180.
|
 |
|
PDB code:
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
N.Popovych,
S.R.Tzeng,
M.Tonelli,
R.H.Ebright,
and
C.G.Kalodimos
(2009).
Structural basis for cAMP-mediated allosteric control of the catabolite activator protein.
|
| |
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A,
106,
6927-6932.
|
 |
|
PDB code:
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
M.Ibrahim,
M.Kuchinskas,
H.Youn,
R.L.Kerby,
G.P.Roberts,
T.L.Poulos,
and
T.G.Spiro
(2007).
Mechanism of the CO-sensing heme protein CooA: new insights from the truncated heme domain and UVRR spectroscopy.
|
| |
J Inorg Biochem,
101,
1776-1785.
|
 |
|
 |
 |
|
The most recent references are shown first.
Citation data come partly from CiteXplore and partly
from an automated harvesting procedure. Note that this is likely to be
only a partial list as not all journals are covered by
either method. However, we are continually building up the citation data
so more and more references will be included with time.
Where a reference describes a PDB structure, the PDB
code is
shown on the right.
|
');
}
}
 |
|