 |
PDBsum entry 2h6k
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gene regulation
|
PDB id
|
|
|
|
2h6k
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
References listed in PDB file
|
 |
|
Key reference
|
 |
|
Title
|
 |
Histone h3 recognition and presentation by the wdr5 module of the mll1 complex.
|
 |
|
Authors
|
 |
A.J.Ruthenburg,
W.Wang,
D.M.Graybosch,
H.Li,
C.D.Allis,
D.J.Patel,
G.L.Verdine.
|
 |
|
Ref.
|
 |
Nat Struct Mol Biol, 2006,
13,
704-712.
[DOI no: ]
|
 |
|
PubMed id
|
 |
|
 |
|
|
 |
 |
|
Abstract
|
 |
|
WDR5 is a core component of SET1-family complexes that achieve transcriptional
activation via methylation of histone H3 on Nzeta of Lys4 (H3K4). The role of
WDR5 in the MLL1 complex has recently been described as specific recognition of
dimethyl-K4 in the context of a histone H3 amino terminus; WDR5 is essential for
vertebrate development, Hox gene activation and global H3K4 trimethylation. We
report the high-resolution X-ray structures of WDR5 in the unliganded form and
complexed with histone H3 peptides having unmodified and mono-, di- and
trimethylated K4, which together provide the first comprehensive analysis of
methylated histone recognition by the ubiquitous WD40-repeat fold. Contrary to
predictions, the structures reveal that WDR5 does not read out the methylation
state of K4 directly, but instead serves to present the K4 side chain for
further methylation by SET1-family complexes.
|
 |
 |
 |
|
 |
|
 |
Figure 3.
Figure 3. Peptide recognition by WDR5 and conformational changes
upon peptide binding. (a) The peptide is recognized by an
elaborate series of direct and indirect contacts. Orientation of
the peptide–WDR5 complex is the same as in the lower panel of
Figure 1c. The majority of direct contacts from WDR5 are made to
the N terminus and the first three residues. These residues
adopt an approximately helical main chain conformation, with one
hydrogen bond between the A1 and K4 backbone. Water-mediated
contacts are important in recognition of the C-terminal residues
of the peptide, as all waters shown (red spheres) are conserved
among the peptide-bound structures. Tyr191 apparently acts as a
central platform in this peptide-bound water network. (b) Phe133
and Phe263 form an aromatic sandwich about the R2 guanidinium
moiety, equatorially flanked by a number of backbone
carbonyl–mediated hydrogen bonds. These tight hydrogen bonds
are thought to impart specificity for arginine over
dimethyllysine, particularly the one from N of
R2 to the Ser91 carbonyl. (c) Apparent coordinated movement of
Phe133 and Phe149 to form the top of the aromatic sandwich
recognition element when peptide is bound. The relevant
apostructure side chains are depicted in gray and a
representative liganded structure (H3K4me2 complex I) is in
crimson. (d) Retraction of the loop bearing Lys259 causes a
reorganization of the residues lining the central cavity, which
permits tight R2 coordination. Coloring is as in c. This
movement may be driven by a steric clash between this lysine and
the incoming peptide Q5 side chain.
|
 |
Figure 5.
Figure 5. Differences in K4 conformation in the different
methylation states. (a–d) The crystal-packing interface
relevant to K4 conformation is depicted for the H3K4me3 complex
(C2 space group, a), H3K4me2 complex I (C2, b), H3K4me1 complex
(C2, c) and unmodified H3 complex (P2[1], d). Peptides are
colored as in Figure 2b; the principal WDR5 protomer is red; and
the symmetry-related protomer at the peptide interface is gray.
Note the rotation about 3
moving from the tri- and dimethylated species to the
monomethylated and unmodified species. In H3K4me2 complex I, the
distances between the -methyl
carbons and the Glu322 carboxylate O 1
are 3.27 Å and 3.37 Å for the closest methyl group
in each of the two complexes per asymmetric unit, whereas these
distances are 3.83 Å and 3.87 Å for the more distant
methyl group. For comparison, the previously reported shorter
distances for these measurements were 3.15 Å and 3.42
Å^22.
|
 |
|
 |
 |
|
The above figures are
reprinted
by permission from Macmillan Publishers Ltd:
Nat Struct Mol Biol
(2006,
13,
704-712)
copyright 2006.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |