 |
PDBsum entry 2gfe
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Membrane protein
|
PDB id
|
|
|
|
2gfe
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
Contents |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* Residue conservation analysis
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
|
| |
|
|
J Neurosci
26:7650-7658
(2006)
|
|
PubMed id:
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
Interdomain interactions in AMPA and kainate receptors regulate affinity for glutamate.
|
|
M.C.Weston,
C.Gertler,
M.L.Mayer,
C.Rosenmund.
|
|
|
|
| |
ABSTRACT
|
|
|
| |
|
Ionotropic glutamate receptors perform diverse functions in the nervous system.
As a result, multiple receptor subtypes have evolved with different kinetics,
ion permeability, expression patterns, and regulation by second messengers.
Kainate receptors show slower recovery from desensitization and have different
affinities for agonists than AMPA receptors. Based on analysis of ligand binding
domain crystal structures, we identified interdomain interactions in the
agonist-bound state that are conserved in kainate receptors and absent in AMPA
receptors. Mutations in GluR6 designed to disrupt these contacts reduced agonist
apparent affinity, speeded up receptor deactivation and increased the rate of
recovery from desensitization. Conversely, introduction of mutations in GluR2
that enabled additional interdomain interactions in the agonist-bound state
increased agonist apparent affinity 15-fold, and slowed both deactivation and
recovery from desensitization. We conclude that interdomain interactions have
evolved as a distinct mechanism that contributes to the unique kinetic
properties of AMPA and kainate receptors.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
Literature references that cite this PDB file's key reference
|
|
 |
| |
PubMed id
|
 |
Reference
|
 |
|
|
|
 |
S.S.Cha,
Y.J.An,
C.S.Jeong,
M.K.Kim,
S.G.Lee,
K.H.Lee,
and
B.H.Oh
(2012).
Experimental phasing using zinc anomalous scattering.
|
| |
Acta Crystallogr D Biol Crystallogr,
68,
1253-1258.
|
 |
|
PDB codes:
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
A.Y.Lau,
and
B.Roux
(2011).
The hidden energetics of ligand binding and activation in a glutamate receptor.
|
| |
Nat Struct Mol Biol,
18,
283-287.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
J.Pøhlsgaard,
K.Frydenvang,
U.Madsen,
and
J.S.Kastrup
(2011).
Lessons from more than 80 structures of the GluA2 ligand-binding domain in complex with agonists, antagonists and allosteric modulators.
|
| |
Neuropharmacology,
60,
135-150.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
K.M.Vance,
N.Simorowski,
S.F.Traynelis,
and
H.Furukawa
(2011).
Ligand-specific deactivation time course of GluN1/GluN2D NMDA receptors.
|
| |
Nat Commun,
2,
294.
|
 |
|
PDB codes:
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
P.Paoletti
(2011).
Molecular basis of NMDA receptor functional diversity.
|
| |
Eur J Neurosci,
33,
1351-1365.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
D.Perrais,
J.Veran,
and
C.Mulle
(2010).
Gating and permeation of kainate receptors: differences unveiled.
|
| |
Trends Pharmacol Sci,
31,
516-522.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
J.von Engelhardt,
V.Mack,
R.Sprengel,
N.Kavenstock,
K.W.Li,
Y.Stern-Bach,
A.B.Smit,
P.H.Seeburg,
and
H.Monyer
(2010).
CKAMP44: a brain-specific protein attenuating short-term synaptic plasticity in the dentate gyrus.
|
| |
Science,
327,
1518-1522.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
M.Farrant,
and
S.G.Cull-Candy
(2010).
Neuroscience. AMPA receptors--another twist?
|
| |
Science,
327,
1463-1465.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
R.Edwards,
J.Madine,
L.Fielding,
and
D.A.Middleton
(2010).
Measurement of multiple torsional angles from one-dimensional solid-state NMR spectra: application to the conformational analysis of a ligand in its biological receptor site.
|
| |
Phys Chem Chem Phys,
12,
13999-14008.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
C.Chaudhry,
M.C.Weston,
P.Schuck,
C.Rosenmund,
and
M.L.Mayer
(2009).
Stability of ligand-binding domain dimer assembly controls kainate receptor desensitization.
|
| |
EMBO J,
28,
1518-1530.
|
 |
|
PDB codes:
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
S.M.Schmid,
S.Kott,
C.Sager,
T.Huelsken,
and
M.Hollmann
(2009).
The glutamate receptor subunit delta2 is capable of gating its intrinsic ion channel as revealed by ligand binding domain transplantation.
|
| |
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A,
106,
10320-10325.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
A.C.Penn,
S.R.Williams,
and
I.H.Greger
(2008).
Gating motions underlie AMPA receptor secretion from the endoplasmic reticulum.
|
| |
EMBO J,
27,
3056-3068.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
A.J.Plested,
R.Vijayan,
P.C.Biggin,
and
M.L.Mayer
(2008).
Molecular basis of kainate receptor modulation by sodium.
|
| |
Neuron,
58,
720-735.
|
 |
|
PDB codes:
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
M.L.Blanke,
and
A.M.VanDongen
(2008).
Constitutive activation of the N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor via cleft-spanning disulfide bonds.
|
| |
J Biol Chem,
283,
21519-21529.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
T.Mamonova,
K.Speranskiy,
and
M.Kurnikova
(2008).
Interplay between structural rigidity and electrostatic interactions in the ligand binding domain of GluR2.
|
| |
Proteins,
73,
656-671.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
T.Mamonova,
M.J.Yonkunas,
and
M.G.Kurnikova
(2008).
Energetics of the cleft closing transition and the role of electrostatic interactions in conformational rearrangements of the glutamate receptor ligand binding domain.
|
| |
Biochemistry,
47,
11077-11085.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
Y.Yao,
C.B.Harrison,
P.L.Freddolino,
K.Schulten,
and
M.L.Mayer
(2008).
Molecular mechanism of ligand recognition by NR3 subtype glutamate receptors.
|
| |
EMBO J,
27,
2158-2170.
|
 |
|
PDB codes:
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
K.Montgomery,
E.Suzuki,
M.Kessler,
and
A.C.Arai
(2007).
Factors affecting guanine nucleotide binding to rat AMPA receptors.
|
| |
Brain Res,
1177,
1-8.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
A.Priel,
S.Selak,
J.Lerma,
and
Y.Stern-Bach
(2006).
Block of kainate receptor desensitization uncovers a key trafficking checkpoint.
|
| |
Neuron,
52,
1037-1046.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
M.C.Weston,
P.Schuck,
A.Ghosal,
C.Rosenmund,
and
M.L.Mayer
(2006).
Conformational restriction blocks glutamate receptor desensitization.
|
| |
Nat Struct Mol Biol,
13,
1120-1127.
|
 |
|
PDB codes:
|
 |
|
|
 |
 |
|
The most recent references are shown first.
Citation data come partly from CiteXplore and partly
from an automated harvesting procedure. Note that this is likely to be
only a partial list as not all journals are covered by
either method. However, we are continually building up the citation data
so more and more references will be included with time.
Where a reference describes a PDB structure, the PDB
codes are
shown on the right.
|
');
}
}
 |