 |
PDBsum entry 2e2d
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hydrolase/hydrolase inhibitor
|
PDB id
|
|
|
|
2e2d
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
References listed in PDB file
|
 |
|
Key reference
|
 |
|
Title
|
 |
Flexibility and variability of timp binding: x-Ray structure of the complex between collagenase-3/mmp-13 and timp-2.
|
 |
|
Authors
|
 |
K.Maskos,
R.Lang,
H.Tschesche,
W.Bode.
|
 |
|
Ref.
|
 |
J Mol Biol, 2007,
366,
1222-1231.
[DOI no: ]
|
 |
|
PubMed id
|
 |
|
 |
 |
|
Abstract
|
 |
|
The excessive activity of matrix metalloproteinases (MMPs) contributes to
pathological processes such as arthritis, tumor growth and metastasis if not
balanced by the tissue inhibitors of metalloproteinases (TIMPs). In arthritis,
the destruction of fibrillar (type II) collagen is one of the hallmarks, with
MMP-1 (collagenase-1) and MMP-13 (collagenase-3) being identified as key players
in arthritic cartilage. MMP-13, furthermore, has been found in highly metastatic
tumors. We have solved the 2.0 A crystal structure of the complex between the
catalytic domain of human MMP-13 (cdMMP-13) and bovine TIMP-2. The overall
structure resembles our previously determined MT1-MMP/TIMP-2 complex, in that
the wedge-shaped TIMP-2 inserts with its edge into the entire MMP-13 active site
cleft. However, the inhibitor is, according to a relative rotation of
approximately 20 degrees, oriented differently relative to the proteinase. Upon
TIMP binding, the catalytic zinc, the zinc-ligating side chains, the enclosing
MMP loop and the S1' wall-forming segment move significantly and in concert
relative to the rest of the cognate MMP, and the active site cleft constricts
slightly, probably allowing a more favourable interaction between the Cys1(TIMP)
alpha-amino group of the inhibitor and the catalytic zinc ion of the enzyme.
Thus, this structure supports the view that the central N-terminal TIMP segment
essentially defines the relative positioning of the TIMP, while the flanking
edge loops determine the relative orientation, depending on the individual
target MMP.
|
 |
 |
 |
|
 |
|
 |
Figure 1.
Figure 1. Stereo views of the cdMMP-13/TIMP-2 complex (blue
ribbon, catalytic domain; orange ribbon, TIMP-2), optimally
overlaid with the formerly determined cdMMP-14/TIMP-2 complex
(grey rope, catalytic domain; green rope, TIMP-2).^25 Helices,
strands and selected loops of the cdMMP-13/TIMP2 complex are
labelled. Due to their more similar conformation, essentially
both catalytic domains are superimposed. The MMP-13 catalytic
domain differs in that the N-terminal segment nestles against
the proteinase surface, forming a surface-located salt-bridge,
and by lacking the characteristic MT-loop. (a) Front view. (b)
Side view. Figure 1. Stereo views of the cdMMP-13/TIMP-2
complex (blue ribbon, catalytic domain; orange ribbon, TIMP-2),
optimally overlaid with the formerly determined cdMMP-14/TIMP-2
complex (grey rope, catalytic domain; green rope, TIMP-2).[3]^25
Helices, strands and selected loops of the cdMMP-13/TIMP2
complex are labelled. Due to their more similar conformation,
essentially both catalytic domains are superimposed. The MMP-13
catalytic domain differs in that the N-terminal segment nestles
against the proteinase surface, forming a surface-located
salt-bridge, and by lacking the characteristic MT-loop. (a)
Front view. (b) Side view.
|
 |
Figure 2.
Figure 2. Optimal superimposition of the MMP-13/TIMP-2 complex
with the MMP-14/TIMP-2 complex.^25 CdMMP-13 is shown in surface
representation with some residues indicated by blue labels, and
MMP-14 is omitted for clarity. The stereo views show the
detailed interactions of some TIMP-2 edge loops (orange) of the
MMP-13/TIMP-2 complex and compare them with the TIMP-2 loops in
the MMP-14/TIMP-2 complex (green). (a) Front view towards the
left-hand side surface of cdMMP-13. The distal parts of the
sA-sB loops of both TIMP-2 molecules are shown as stick models.
(b) Front view towards the right-hand side surface of cdMMP-13
showing the interactions of the C-terminal parts of TIMP-2 with
MMP-13 (surface) in comparison with the equivalent TIMP-2
segments in the MMP-14/TIMP-2 complex. Figure 2. Optimal
superimposition of the MMP-13/TIMP-2 complex with the
MMP-14/TIMP-2 complex.[3]^25 CdMMP-13 is shown in surface
representation with some residues indicated by blue labels, and
MMP-14 is omitted for clarity. The stereo views show the
detailed interactions of some TIMP-2 edge loops (orange) of the
MMP-13/TIMP-2 complex and compare them with the TIMP-2 loops in
the MMP-14/TIMP-2 complex (green). (a) Front view towards the
left-hand side surface of cdMMP-13. The distal parts of the
sA-sB loops of both TIMP-2 molecules are shown as stick models.
(b) Front view towards the right-hand side surface of cdMMP-13
showing the interactions of the C-terminal parts of TIMP-2 with
MMP-13 (surface) in comparison with the equivalent TIMP-2
segments in the MMP-14/TIMP-2 complex.
|
 |
|
 |
 |
|
The above figures are
reprinted
by permission from Elsevier:
J Mol Biol
(2007,
366,
1222-1231)
copyright 2007.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |