 |
PDBsum entry 2bkg
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
De novo protein
|
PDB id
|
|
|
|
2bkg
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
Contents |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* Residue conservation analysis
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
|
| |
|
DOI no:
|
Proteins
65:280-284
(2006)
|
|
PubMed id:
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
Crystal structure of a consensus-designed ankyrin repeat protein: implications for stability.
|
|
H.K.Binz,
A.Kohl,
A.Plückthun,
M.G.Grütter.
|
|
|
|
| |
ABSTRACT
|
|
|
| |
|
Consensus-designed ankyrin repeat (AR) proteins are thermodynamically very
stable. The structural analysis of the designed AR protein E3_5 revealed that
this stability is due to a regular fold with highly conserved structural motifs
and H-bonding networks. However, the designed AR protein E3_19 exhibits a
significantly lower stability than E3_5 (9.6 vs. 14.8 kcal/mol), despite 88%
sequence identity. To investigate the structural correlations of this stability
difference between E3_5 and E3_19, we determined the crystal structure of E3_19
at 1.9 A resolution. E3_19 as well has a regular AR domain fold with the
characteristic H-bonding patterns. All structural features of the E3_5 and E3_19
molecules appear to be virtually identical (RMSD(Calpha) approximately 0.7 A).
However, clear differences are observed in the surface charge distribution of
the two AR proteins. E3_19 features clusters of charged residues and more
exposed hydrophobic residues than E3_5. The atomic coordinates of E3_19 have
been deposited in the Protein Data Bank. PDB ID: 2BKG.
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Selected figure(s)
|
|
|
| |
 |
 |
|
 |
|
 |
Figure 2.
Figure 2. Structural comparison of of E3_19 and E3_5. (a)
Stereoview of the superposition of E3_19 (B molecule, brown)
with E3_5 (PDB ID: 1MJ0, blue) in ribbon representations. The
N-and C-termini are labeled for orientation. The two proteins
are practically identical, with the biggest differences being
observed in the C-terminal AR, where E3_5 appears to be more
compact than E3_19. The two E3_19 molecules of the asymmetric
unit are virtually identical (b) H-bonding in the C-terminal AR
of E3_19. Asn156 makes H-bonds to Asp122 (residues in stick mode
in blue). (c) H-bonding in the C-terminal AR of E3_5. Asn158
makes H-bonds to Lys122 and Ala121 (residues in stick mode in
magenta).
|
 |
Figure 3.
Figure 3. Charge distribution in E3_19 and E3_5. E3_19 is
depicted on the left, E3_5 is depicted on the right. (a)
Negative charges in the -turn
regions. Negatively charged residues are depicted in stick mode
in red on the backbones in ribbons. For completeness, Asp122 of
E3_19 is also shown. (b) Positively charged residues (stick mode
in blue) in the first three repeats of E3_19 and the first and
fourth repeat of E3_5, respectively, are depicted on the
backbones in ribbons. (c) Surface representations of the
electrostatic potential of E3_19 and E3_5 (red = -0.5, white =
0, blue = +0.5). For orientation identically positioned ribbon
representations are depicted on the left of each surface
representation.
|
 |
|
|
|
| |
The above figures are
reprinted
by permission from John Wiley & Sons, Inc.:
Proteins
(2006,
65,
280-284)
copyright 2006.
|
|
| |
Figures were
selected
by the author.
|
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
Literature references that cite this PDB file's key reference
|
|
 |
| |
PubMed id
|
 |
Reference
|
 |
|
|
|
 |
N.Monroe,
G.Sennhauser,
M.A.Seeger,
C.Briand,
and
M.G.Grütter
(2011).
Designed ankyrin repeat protein binders for the crystallization of AcrB: Plasticity of the dominant interface.
|
| |
J Struct Biol,
174,
269-281.
|
 |
|
PDB codes:
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
J.P.Theurillat,
B.Dreier,
G.Nagy-Davidescu,
B.Seifert,
S.Behnke,
U.Zürrer-Härdi,
F.Ingold,
A.Plückthun,
and
H.Moch
(2010).
Designed ankyrin repeat proteins: a novel tool for testing epidermal growth factor receptor 2 expression in breast cancer.
|
| |
Mod Pathol,
23,
1289-1297.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
D.Barrick,
D.U.Ferreiro,
and
E.A.Komives
(2008).
Folding landscapes of ankyrin repeat proteins: experiments meet theory.
|
| |
Curr Opin Struct Biol,
18,
27-34.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
P.Sklenovský,
P.Banás,
and
M.Otyepka
(2008).
Two C-terminal ankyrin repeats form the minimal stable unit of the ankyrin repeat protein p18INK4c.
|
| |
J Mol Model,
14,
747-759.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
C.J.Tsai,
J.Zheng,
D.Zanuy,
N.Haspel,
H.Wolfson,
C.Alemán,
and
R.Nussinov
(2007).
Principles of nanostructure design with protein building blocks.
|
| |
Proteins,
68,
1.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
E.Wyler,
M.Kaminska,
Y.M.Coïc,
F.Baleux,
M.Véron,
and
F.Agou
(2007).
Inhibition of NF-kappaB activation with designed ankyrin-repeat proteins targeting the ubiquitin-binding/oligomerization domain of NEMO.
|
| |
Protein Sci,
16,
2013-2022.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
H.Yu,
A.Kohl,
H.K.Binz,
A.Plückthun,
M.G.Grütter,
and
W.F.van Gunsteren
(2006).
Molecular dynamics study of the stabilities of consensus designed ankyrin repeat proteins.
|
| |
Proteins,
65,
285-295.
|
 |
|
 |
 |
|
The most recent references are shown first.
Citation data come partly from CiteXplore and partly
from an automated harvesting procedure. Note that this is likely to be
only a partial list as not all journals are covered by
either method. However, we are continually building up the citation data
so more and more references will be included with time.
Where a reference describes a PDB structure, the PDB
codes are
shown on the right.
|
');
}
}
 |