spacer
spacer

PDBsum entry 2bkg

Go to PDB code: 
protein Protein-protein interface(s) links
De novo protein PDB id
2bkg

 

 

 

 

Loading ...

 
JSmol PyMol  
Contents
Protein chains
155 a.a. *
Waters ×330
* Residue conservation analysis
PDB id:
2bkg
Name: De novo protein
Title: Crystal structure of e3_19 a designed ankyrin repeat protein
Structure: Synthetic construct ankyrin repeat protein e3_19. Chain: a, b. Engineered: yes
Source: Synthetic construct. Organism_taxid: 32630. Expressed in: escherichia coli. Expression_system_taxid: 562.
Resolution:
1.90Å     R-factor:   0.178     R-free:   0.227
Authors: H.K.Binz,A.Kohl,A.Pluckthun,M.G.Grutter
Key ref:
H.K.Binz et al. (2006). Crystal structure of a consensus-designed ankyrin repeat protein: implications for stability. Proteins, 65, 280-284. PubMed id: 16493627 DOI: 10.1002/prot.20930
Date:
16-Feb-05     Release date:   21-Jun-06    
PROCHECK
Go to PROCHECK summary
 Headers
 References

Protein chains
No UniProt id for this chain
Struc: 155 a.a.
Key:    Secondary structure  CATH domain

 

 
DOI no: 10.1002/prot.20930 Proteins 65:280-284 (2006)
PubMed id: 16493627  
 
 
Crystal structure of a consensus-designed ankyrin repeat protein: implications for stability.
H.K.Binz, A.Kohl, A.Plückthun, M.G.Grütter.
 
  ABSTRACT  
 
Consensus-designed ankyrin repeat (AR) proteins are thermodynamically very stable. The structural analysis of the designed AR protein E3_5 revealed that this stability is due to a regular fold with highly conserved structural motifs and H-bonding networks. However, the designed AR protein E3_19 exhibits a significantly lower stability than E3_5 (9.6 vs. 14.8 kcal/mol), despite 88% sequence identity. To investigate the structural correlations of this stability difference between E3_5 and E3_19, we determined the crystal structure of E3_19 at 1.9 A resolution. E3_19 as well has a regular AR domain fold with the characteristic H-bonding patterns. All structural features of the E3_5 and E3_19 molecules appear to be virtually identical (RMSD(Calpha) approximately 0.7 A). However, clear differences are observed in the surface charge distribution of the two AR proteins. E3_19 features clusters of charged residues and more exposed hydrophobic residues than E3_5. The atomic coordinates of E3_19 have been deposited in the Protein Data Bank. PDB ID: 2BKG.
 
  Selected figure(s)  
 
Figure 2.
Figure 2. Structural comparison of of E3_19 and E3_5. (a) Stereoview of the superposition of E3_19 (B molecule, brown) with E3_5 (PDB ID: 1MJ0, blue) in ribbon representations. The N-and C-termini are labeled for orientation. The two proteins are practically identical, with the biggest differences being observed in the C-terminal AR, where E3_5 appears to be more compact than E3_19. The two E3_19 molecules of the asymmetric unit are virtually identical (b) H-bonding in the C-terminal AR of E3_19. Asn156 makes H-bonds to Asp122 (residues in stick mode in blue). (c) H-bonding in the C-terminal AR of E3_5. Asn158 makes H-bonds to Lys122 and Ala121 (residues in stick mode in magenta).
Figure 3.
Figure 3. Charge distribution in E3_19 and E3_5. E3_19 is depicted on the left, E3_5 is depicted on the right. (a) Negative charges in the -turn regions. Negatively charged residues are depicted in stick mode in red on the backbones in ribbons. For completeness, Asp122 of E3_19 is also shown. (b) Positively charged residues (stick mode in blue) in the first three repeats of E3_19 and the first and fourth repeat of E3_5, respectively, are depicted on the backbones in ribbons. (c) Surface representations of the electrostatic potential of E3_19 and E3_5 (red = -0.5, white = 0, blue = +0.5). For orientation identically positioned ribbon representations are depicted on the left of each surface representation.
 
  The above figures are reprinted by permission from John Wiley & Sons, Inc.: Proteins (2006, 65, 280-284) copyright 2006.  
  Figures were selected by the author.  

Literature references that cite this PDB file's key reference

  PubMed id Reference
21296164 N.Monroe, G.Sennhauser, M.A.Seeger, C.Briand, and M.G.Grütter (2011).
Designed ankyrin repeat protein binders for the crystallization of AcrB: Plasticity of the dominant interface.
  J Struct Biol, 174, 269-281.
PDB codes: 3noc 3nog
20495541 J.P.Theurillat, B.Dreier, G.Nagy-Davidescu, B.Seifert, S.Behnke, U.Zürrer-Härdi, F.Ingold, A.Plückthun, and H.Moch (2010).
Designed ankyrin repeat proteins: a novel tool for testing epidermal growth factor receptor 2 expression in breast cancer.
  Mod Pathol, 23, 1289-1297.  
18243686 D.Barrick, D.U.Ferreiro, and E.A.Komives (2008).
Folding landscapes of ankyrin repeat proteins: experiments meet theory.
  Curr Opin Struct Biol, 18, 27-34.  
18481120 P.Sklenovský, P.Banás, and M.Otyepka (2008).
Two C-terminal ankyrin repeats form the minimal stable unit of the ankyrin repeat protein p18INK4c.
  J Mol Model, 14, 747-759.  
17407160 C.J.Tsai, J.Zheng, D.Zanuy, N.Haspel, H.Wolfson, C.Alemán, and R.Nussinov (2007).
Principles of nanostructure design with protein building blocks.
  Proteins, 68, 1.  
17766391 E.Wyler, M.Kaminska, Y.M.Coïc, F.Baleux, M.Véron, and F.Agou (2007).
Inhibition of NF-kappaB activation with designed ankyrin-repeat proteins targeting the ubiquitin-binding/oligomerization domain of NEMO.
  Protein Sci, 16, 2013-2022.  
16948156 H.Yu, A.Kohl, H.K.Binz, A.Plückthun, M.G.Grütter, and W.F.van Gunsteren (2006).
Molecular dynamics study of the stabilities of consensus designed ankyrin repeat proteins.
  Proteins, 65, 285-295.  
The most recent references are shown first. Citation data come partly from CiteXplore and partly from an automated harvesting procedure. Note that this is likely to be only a partial list as not all journals are covered by either method. However, we are continually building up the citation data so more and more references will be included with time. Where a reference describes a PDB structure, the PDB codes are shown on the right.

 

spacer

spacer