 |
PDBsum entry 2b1v
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hormone/growth factor receptor
|
PDB id
|
|
|
|
2b1v
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
Contents |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* Residue conservation analysis
|
|
|
|
|
PDB id:
|
 |
|
 |
| Name: |
 |
Hormone/growth factor receptor
|
 |
|
Title:
|
 |
Human estrogen receptor alpha ligand-binding domain in complex with obcp-1m and a glucocorticoid receptor interacting protein 1 nr box ii peptide
|
|
Structure:
|
 |
Estrogen receptor. Chain: a, b. Fragment: ligand binding domain. Synonym: er, estradiol receptor, er-alpha. Engineered: yes. Mutation: yes. Nuclear receptor coactivator 2. Chain: c, d. Fragment: residues 686 - 698.
|
|
Source:
|
 |
Homo sapiens. Human. Organism_taxid: 9606. Gene: esr1, esr, nr3a1. Expressed in: escherichia coli bl21(de3). Expression_system_taxid: 469008. Synthetic: yes. Other_details: this sequence occurs naturally in humans.
|
|
Biol. unit:
|
 |
Tetramer (from
)
|
|
Resolution:
|
 |
|
1.80Å
|
R-factor:
|
0.205
|
R-free:
|
0.238
|
|
|
Authors:
|
 |
S.S.Rajan,R.W.Hsieh,S.K.Sharma,G.L.Greene
|
Key ref:
|
 |
R.W.Hsieh
et al.
(2006).
Identification of ligands with bicyclic scaffolds provides insights into mechanisms of estrogen receptor subtype selectivity.
J Biol Chem,
281,
17909-17919.
PubMed id:
DOI:
|
 |
|
Date:
|
 |
|
16-Sep-05
|
Release date:
|
09-May-06
|
|
|
|
|
|
PROCHECK
|
|
|
|
|
Headers
|
 |
|
|
References
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
P03372
(ESR1_HUMAN) -
Estrogen receptor from Homo sapiens
|
|
|
|
Seq: Struc:
|
 |
 |
 |
595 a.a.
236 a.a.*
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
|
|
Key: |
 |
PfamA domain |
 |
 |
 |
Secondary structure |
 |
 |
CATH domain |
 |
|
*
PDB and UniProt seqs differ
at 4 residue positions (black
crosses)
|
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
|
| |
|
DOI no:
|
J Biol Chem
281:17909-17919
(2006)
|
|
PubMed id:
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
Identification of ligands with bicyclic scaffolds provides insights into mechanisms of estrogen receptor subtype selectivity.
|
|
R.W.Hsieh,
S.S.Rajan,
S.K.Sharma,
Y.Guo,
E.R.DeSombre,
M.Mrksich,
G.L.Greene.
|
|
|
|
| |
ABSTRACT
|
|
|
| |
|
Estrogen receptors alpha (ERalpha) and beta (ERbeta) have distinct functions and
differential expression in certain tissues. These differences have stimulated
the search for subtype-selective ligands. Therapeutically, such ligands offer
the potential to target specific tissues or pathways regulated by one receptor
subtype without affecting the other. As reagents, they can be utilized to probe
the physiological functions of the ER subtypes to provide information
complementary to that obtained from knock-out animals. A fluorescence resonance
energy transfer-based assay was used to screen a 10,000-compound chemical
library for ER agonists. From the screen, we identified a family of
ERbeta-selective agonists whose members contain bulky oxabicyclic scaffolds in
place of the planar scaffolds common to most ER ligands. These agonists are
10-50-fold selective for ERbeta in competitive binding assays and up to 60-fold
selective in transactivation assays. The weak uterotrophic activity of these
ligands in immature rats and their ability to stimulate expression of an ERbeta
regulated gene in human U2OS osteosarcoma cells provides more physiological
evidence of their ERbeta-selective nature. To provide insight into the molecular
mechanisms of their activity and selectivity, we determined the crystal
structures of the ERalpha ligand-binding domain (LBD) and a peptide from the
glucocorticoid receptor-interacting protein 1 (GRIP1) coactivator complexed with
the ligands OBCP-3M, OBCP-2M, and OBCP-1M. These structures illustrate how the
bicyclic scaffolds of these ligands are accommodated in the flexible
ligand-binding pocket of ER. A comparison of these structures with existing ER
structures suggests that the ERbeta selectivity of OBCP ligands can be
attributed to a combination of their interactions with Met-336 in ERbeta and
Met-421 in ERalpha. These bicyclic ligands show promise as lead compounds that
can target ERbeta. In addition, our understanding of the molecular determinants
of their subtype selectivity provides a useful starting point for developing
other ER modulators belonging to this relatively new structural class.
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Selected figure(s)
|
|
|
| |
 |
 |
|
 |
|
 |
Figure 6.
FIGURE 6. ER ligand binding site.
Shown are ball-and-stick renderings of the ligands OBCP-3M(MonA)
(A), OBCP-3M(MonB) (B), OBCP-2M(MonB) (C) (only the C9-S
diastereomer shown), and OBCP-1M (D), along with their
interacting residues and corresponding F[o] – F[c] electron
density omit maps contoured at 1.95 (OBCP-3M), 1.35 (OBCP-2M), and 1.80
(OBCP-1M). Hydrogen
bonds are shown as dotted lines.
|
 |
Figure 7.
FIGURE 7. Ligand binding mode of OBCP-3M. Monomer A of
OBCP-3M-ER LBD-GRIP1 complex (dark
gray) was superimposed on monomer B of the same complex (A) and
with other ER structures complexed
with E2 (Protein Data Bank code 1ERE) (B) and DES (Protein Data
Bank code 3ERD) (C) (all light gray). Shown are the
ball-and-stick diagrams of their ligand binding sites.
|
 |
|
|
|
| |
The above figures are
reprinted
by permission from the ASBMB:
J Biol Chem
(2006,
281,
17909-17919)
copyright 2006.
|
|
| |
Figures were
selected
by an automated process.
|
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
Literature references that cite this PDB file's key reference
|
|
 |
| |
PubMed id
|
 |
Reference
|
 |
|
|
|
 |
A.Jerome-Morais,
A.M.Diamond,
and
M.E.Wright
(2011).
Dietary supplements and human health: for better or for worse?
|
| |
Mol Nutr Food Res,
55,
122-135.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
F.Minutolo,
M.Macchia,
B.S.Katzenellenbogen,
and
J.A.Katzenellenbogen
(2011).
Estrogen receptor β ligands: Recent advances and biomedical applications.
|
| |
Med Res Rev,
31,
364-442.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
H.B.Patisaul,
and
W.Jefferson
(2010).
The pros and cons of phytoestrogens.
|
| |
Front Neuroendocrinol,
31,
400-419.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
P.Huang,
V.Chandra,
and
F.Rastinejad
(2010).
Structural overview of the nuclear receptor superfamily: insights into physiology and therapeutics.
|
| |
Annu Rev Physiol,
72,
247-272.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
A.Amadasi,
A.Mozzarelli,
C.Meda,
A.Maggi,
and
P.Cozzini
(2009).
Identification of xenoestrogens in food additives by an integrated in silico and in vitro approach.
|
| |
Chem Res Toxicol,
22,
52-63.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
C.K.Taylor,
R.M.Levy,
J.C.Elliott,
and
B.P.Burnett
(2009).
The effect of genistein aglycone on cancer and cancer risk: a review of in vitro, preclinical, and clinical studies.
|
| |
Nutr Rev,
67,
398-415.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
S.Sassi-Messai,
Y.Gibert,
L.Bernard,
S.Nishio,
K.F.Ferri Lagneau,
J.Molina,
M.Andersson-Lendahl,
G.Benoit,
P.Balaguer,
and
V.Laudet
(2009).
The phytoestrogen genistein affects zebrafish development through two different pathways.
|
| |
PLoS ONE,
4,
e4935.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
A.Bitto,
B.P.Burnett,
F.Polito,
H.Marini,
R.M.Levy,
M.A.Armbruster,
L.Minutoli,
V.Di Stefano,
N.Irrera,
S.Antoci,
R.Granese,
F.Squadrito,
and
D.Altavilla
(2008).
Effects of genistein aglycone in osteoporotic, ovariectomized rats: a comparison with alendronate, raloxifene and oestradiol.
|
| |
Br J Pharmacol,
155,
896-905.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
K.W.Nettles,
J.B.Bruning,
G.Gil,
J.Nowak,
S.K.Sharma,
J.B.Hahm,
K.Kulp,
R.B.Hochberg,
H.Zhou,
J.A.Katzenellenbogen,
B.S.Katzenellenbogen,
Y.Kim,
A.Joachmiak,
and
G.L.Greene
(2008).
NFkappaB selectivity of estrogen receptor ligands revealed by comparative crystallographic analyses.
|
| |
Nat Chem Biol,
4,
241-247.
|
 |
|
PDB codes:
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
R.W.Hsieh,
S.S.Rajan,
S.K.Sharma,
and
G.L.Greene
(2008).
Molecular characterization of a B-ring unsaturated estrogen: implications for conjugated equine estrogen components of premarin.
|
| |
Steroids,
73,
59-68.
|
 |
|
PDB code:
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
P.Ascenzi,
A.Bocedi,
and
M.Marino
(2006).
Structure-function relationship of estrogen receptor alpha and beta: impact on human health.
|
| |
Mol Aspects Med,
27,
299-402.
|
 |
|
 |
 |
|
The most recent references are shown first.
Citation data come partly from CiteXplore and partly
from an automated harvesting procedure. Note that this is likely to be
only a partial list as not all journals are covered by
either method. However, we are continually building up the citation data
so more and more references will be included with time.
Where a reference describes a PDB structure, the PDB
codes are
shown on the right.
|
');
}
}
 |