spacer
spacer

PDBsum entry 2b1v

Go to PDB code: 
protein ligands Protein-protein interface(s) links
Hormone/growth factor receptor PDB id
2b1v

 

 

 

 

Loading ...

 
JSmol PyMol  
Contents
Protein chains
236 a.a. *
Ligands
LYS-ILE-LEU-HIS-
ARG-LEU-LEU-GLN-
ASP
×2
458 ×2
Waters ×91
* Residue conservation analysis
PDB id:
2b1v
Name: Hormone/growth factor receptor
Title: Human estrogen receptor alpha ligand-binding domain in complex with obcp-1m and a glucocorticoid receptor interacting protein 1 nr box ii peptide
Structure: Estrogen receptor. Chain: a, b. Fragment: ligand binding domain. Synonym: er, estradiol receptor, er-alpha. Engineered: yes. Mutation: yes. Nuclear receptor coactivator 2. Chain: c, d. Fragment: residues 686 - 698.
Source: Homo sapiens. Human. Organism_taxid: 9606. Gene: esr1, esr, nr3a1. Expressed in: escherichia coli bl21(de3). Expression_system_taxid: 469008. Synthetic: yes. Other_details: this sequence occurs naturally in humans.
Biol. unit: Tetramer (from PQS)
Resolution:
1.80Å     R-factor:   0.205     R-free:   0.238
Authors: S.S.Rajan,R.W.Hsieh,S.K.Sharma,G.L.Greene
Key ref:
R.W.Hsieh et al. (2006). Identification of ligands with bicyclic scaffolds provides insights into mechanisms of estrogen receptor subtype selectivity. J Biol Chem, 281, 17909-17919. PubMed id: 16648639 DOI: 10.1074/jbc.M513684200
Date:
16-Sep-05     Release date:   09-May-06    
PROCHECK
Go to PROCHECK summary
 Headers
 References

Protein chains
Pfam   ArchSchema ?
P03372  (ESR1_HUMAN) -  Estrogen receptor from Homo sapiens
Seq:
Struc:
 
Seq:
Struc:
595 a.a.
236 a.a.*
Key:    PfamA domain  Secondary structure  CATH domain
* PDB and UniProt seqs differ at 4 residue positions (black crosses)

 

 
DOI no: 10.1074/jbc.M513684200 J Biol Chem 281:17909-17919 (2006)
PubMed id: 16648639  
 
 
Identification of ligands with bicyclic scaffolds provides insights into mechanisms of estrogen receptor subtype selectivity.
R.W.Hsieh, S.S.Rajan, S.K.Sharma, Y.Guo, E.R.DeSombre, M.Mrksich, G.L.Greene.
 
  ABSTRACT  
 
Estrogen receptors alpha (ERalpha) and beta (ERbeta) have distinct functions and differential expression in certain tissues. These differences have stimulated the search for subtype-selective ligands. Therapeutically, such ligands offer the potential to target specific tissues or pathways regulated by one receptor subtype without affecting the other. As reagents, they can be utilized to probe the physiological functions of the ER subtypes to provide information complementary to that obtained from knock-out animals. A fluorescence resonance energy transfer-based assay was used to screen a 10,000-compound chemical library for ER agonists. From the screen, we identified a family of ERbeta-selective agonists whose members contain bulky oxabicyclic scaffolds in place of the planar scaffolds common to most ER ligands. These agonists are 10-50-fold selective for ERbeta in competitive binding assays and up to 60-fold selective in transactivation assays. The weak uterotrophic activity of these ligands in immature rats and their ability to stimulate expression of an ERbeta regulated gene in human U2OS osteosarcoma cells provides more physiological evidence of their ERbeta-selective nature. To provide insight into the molecular mechanisms of their activity and selectivity, we determined the crystal structures of the ERalpha ligand-binding domain (LBD) and a peptide from the glucocorticoid receptor-interacting protein 1 (GRIP1) coactivator complexed with the ligands OBCP-3M, OBCP-2M, and OBCP-1M. These structures illustrate how the bicyclic scaffolds of these ligands are accommodated in the flexible ligand-binding pocket of ER. A comparison of these structures with existing ER structures suggests that the ERbeta selectivity of OBCP ligands can be attributed to a combination of their interactions with Met-336 in ERbeta and Met-421 in ERalpha. These bicyclic ligands show promise as lead compounds that can target ERbeta. In addition, our understanding of the molecular determinants of their subtype selectivity provides a useful starting point for developing other ER modulators belonging to this relatively new structural class.
 
  Selected figure(s)  
 
Figure 6.
FIGURE 6. ER ligand binding site. Shown are ball-and-stick renderings of the ligands OBCP-3M(MonA) (A), OBCP-3M(MonB) (B), OBCP-2M(MonB) (C) (only the C9-S diastereomer shown), and OBCP-1M (D), along with their interacting residues and corresponding F[o] – F[c] electron density omit maps contoured at 1.95 (OBCP-3M), 1.35 (OBCP-2M), and 1.80 (OBCP-1M). Hydrogen bonds are shown as dotted lines.
Figure 7.
FIGURE 7. Ligand binding mode of OBCP-3M. Monomer A of OBCP-3M-ER LBD-GRIP1 complex (dark gray) was superimposed on monomer B of the same complex (A) and with other ER structures complexed with E2 (Protein Data Bank code 1ERE) (B) and DES (Protein Data Bank code 3ERD) (C) (all light gray). Shown are the ball-and-stick diagrams of their ligand binding sites.
 
  The above figures are reprinted by permission from the ASBMB: J Biol Chem (2006, 281, 17909-17919) copyright 2006.  
  Figures were selected by an automated process.  

Literature references that cite this PDB file's key reference

  PubMed id Reference
21207517 A.Jerome-Morais, A.M.Diamond, and M.E.Wright (2011).
Dietary supplements and human health: for better or for worse?
  Mol Nutr Food Res, 55, 122-135.  
19967775 F.Minutolo, M.Macchia, B.S.Katzenellenbogen, and J.A.Katzenellenbogen (2011).
Estrogen receptor β ligands: Recent advances and biomedical applications.
  Med Res Rev, 31, 364-442.  
20347861 H.B.Patisaul, and W.Jefferson (2010).
The pros and cons of phytoestrogens.
  Front Neuroendocrinol, 31, 400-419.  
20148675 P.Huang, V.Chandra, and F.Rastinejad (2010).
Structural overview of the nuclear receptor superfamily: insights into physiology and therapeutics.
  Annu Rev Physiol, 72, 247-272.  
19063592 A.Amadasi, A.Mozzarelli, C.Meda, A.Maggi, and P.Cozzini (2009).
Identification of xenoestrogens in food additives by an integrated in silico and in vitro approach.
  Chem Res Toxicol, 22, 52-63.  
19566600 C.K.Taylor, R.M.Levy, J.C.Elliott, and B.P.Burnett (2009).
The effect of genistein aglycone on cancer and cancer risk: a review of in vitro, preclinical, and clinical studies.
  Nutr Rev, 67, 398-415.  
19319186 S.Sassi-Messai, Y.Gibert, L.Bernard, S.Nishio, K.F.Ferri Lagneau, J.Molina, M.Andersson-Lendahl, G.Benoit, P.Balaguer, and V.Laudet (2009).
The phytoestrogen genistein affects zebrafish development through two different pathways.
  PLoS ONE, 4, e4935.  
18695641 A.Bitto, B.P.Burnett, F.Polito, H.Marini, R.M.Levy, M.A.Armbruster, L.Minutoli, V.Di Stefano, N.Irrera, S.Antoci, R.Granese, F.Squadrito, and D.Altavilla (2008).
Effects of genistein aglycone in osteoporotic, ovariectomized rats: a comparison with alendronate, raloxifene and oestradiol.
  Br J Pharmacol, 155, 896-905.  
18344977 K.W.Nettles, J.B.Bruning, G.Gil, J.Nowak, S.K.Sharma, J.B.Hahm, K.Kulp, R.B.Hochberg, H.Zhou, J.A.Katzenellenbogen, B.S.Katzenellenbogen, Y.Kim, A.Joachmiak, and G.L.Greene (2008).
NFkappaB selectivity of estrogen receptor ligands revealed by comparative crystallographic analyses.
  Nat Chem Biol, 4, 241-247.
PDB codes: 2b23 2qa6 2qa8 2qab 2qgt 2qgw 2qh6 2qr9 2qse 2qxm
17949766 R.W.Hsieh, S.S.Rajan, S.K.Sharma, and G.L.Greene (2008).
Molecular characterization of a B-ring unsaturated estrogen: implications for conjugated equine estrogen components of premarin.
  Steroids, 73, 59-68.
PDB code: 2b1z
16914190 P.Ascenzi, A.Bocedi, and M.Marino (2006).
Structure-function relationship of estrogen receptor alpha and beta: impact on human health.
  Mol Aspects Med, 27, 299-402.  
The most recent references are shown first. Citation data come partly from CiteXplore and partly from an automated harvesting procedure. Note that this is likely to be only a partial list as not all journals are covered by either method. However, we are continually building up the citation data so more and more references will be included with time. Where a reference describes a PDB structure, the PDB codes are shown on the right.

 

spacer

spacer