spacer
spacer

PDBsum entry 2anj

Go to PDB code: 
Top Page protein ligands links
Membrane protein PDB id
2anj
Contents
Protein chain
262 a.a.
Ligands
KAI
Waters ×250

References listed in PDB file
Key reference
Title A binding site tyrosine shapes desensitization kinetics and agonist potency at glur2. A mutagenic, Kinetic, And crystallographic study.
Authors M.M.Holm, P.Naur, B.Vestergaard, M.T.Geballe, M.Gajhede, J.S.Kastrup, S.F.Traynelis, J.Egebjerg.
Ref. J Biol Chem, 2005, 280, 35469-35476. [DOI no: 10.1074/jbc.M507800200]
PubMed id 16103115
Abstract
Binding of an agonist to the 2-amino-3-(3-hydroxy-5-methyl-4-isoxazolyl)-propionic acid (AMPA) receptor family of the glutamate receptors (GluRs) results in rapid activation of an ion channel. Continuous application results in a non-desensitizing response for agonists like kainate, whereas most other agonists, such as the endogenous agonist (S)-glutamate, induce desensitization. We demonstrate that a highly conserved tyrosine, forming a wedge between the agonist and the N-terminal part of the bi-lobed ligand-binding site, plays a key role in the receptor kinetics as well as agonist potency and selectivity. The AMPA receptor GluR2, with mutations in Tyr-450, were expressed in Xenopus laevis oocytes and characterized in a two-electrode voltage clamp setup. The mutation GluR2(Y450A) renders the receptor highly kainate selective, and rapid application of kainate to outside-out patches induced strongly desensitizing currents. When Tyr-450 was substituted with the larger tryptophan, the (S)-glutamate desensitization is attenuated with a 10-fold increase in steady-state/peak currents (19% compared with 1.9% at the wild type). Furthermore, the tryptophan mutant was introduced into the GluR2-S1S2J ligand binding core construct and co-crystallized with kainate, and the 2.1-A x-ray structure revealed a slightly more closed ligand binding core as compared with the wild-type complex. Through genetic manipulations combined with structural and electrophysiological analysis, we report that mutations in position 450 invert the potency of two central agonists while concurrently strongly shaping the agonist efficacy and the desensitization kinetics of the AMPA receptor GluR2.
Figure 1.
FIGURE 1. Structure of ionotropic glutamate receptors and ligands. A, an individual subunit is highlighted on the left and is formed by a single polypeptide chain beginning with the N-terminal LIVBP (leucine-isoleucine-valine-binding protein)-like domain, which is followed by S1 forming the majority of domain 1 (D1) of the ligand binding core (red). The amino acid chain then transverses domain 2 (D2) of the ligand binding core and forms M1, the P-loop, and M2. Subsequently, the rest of domain 2 (D2, blue) is formed by S2, ending up in the last transmembrane -helix (M3) and the intracellular C-terminal domain. The flip/flop region lies on the back, primarily of the D1. Scissors indicate where the corresponding receptor has been cleaved during construction of the GluR2-S1S2J construct. B, structures of selected AMPA receptor agonists.
Figure 7.
FIGURE 7. Details of the structure of GluR2-S1S2J(Y450W) in complex with kainate. A, schematic representation of the overall structure of GluR2-S1S2J(Y450W) with zoom on a F[o] - F[c] omit map contoured at 3.0 for kainate (blue in D1 and green in D2). B, stereo view of the ligand binding pocket of GluR2-S1S2J(Y450W) showing the hydrogen-bonding network to kainate (black). C, comparison of the ligand binding pocket of wild-type GluR2-S1S2J (6) (PDB code 1FT0 [PDB] , black) and GluR2-S1S2J(Y450W) (blue in D1 and green in D2), both in complex with kainate. The side chain of residue 450 is depicted showing the 6° difference of the aromatic wedge. Nitrogen atoms are blue, oxygen atoms are red, and sulfur atoms are yellow. The figure was prepared using Molscript (36) and Raster3d (37).
The above figures are reprinted by permission from the ASBMB: J Biol Chem (2005, 280, 35469-35476) copyright 2005.
Secondary reference #1
Title Mechanisms for activation and antagonism of an ampa-Sensitive glutamate receptor: crystal structures of the glur2 ligand binding core.
Authors N.Armstrong, E.Gouaux.
Ref. Neuron, 2000, 28, 165-181. [DOI no: 10.1016/S0896-6273(00)00094-5]
PubMed id 11086992
Full text Abstract
Figure 1.
Figure 1. Ligand Binding Constants for S1S2J(A) Domain structure of iGluRs showing the S1 and S2 segments in turquoise and pink, respectively. “Cut” and “link” denote the edges of the S1S2 construct.(B) K[D] for ^3H-AMPA binding was 24.8 ± 1.8 nM.(C) IC[50] for displacement of ^3H-AMPA by glutamate, kainate, and DNQX were 821 nM, 14.5 μM, and 998 nM, respectively.
Figure 2.
Figure 2. Superposition of the Expanded Cleft Structures and Stereo View of the DNQX Binding Site(A) The two apo molecules (ApoA and ApoB) and two DNQX molecules (DNQXA and DNQXB) in each asymmetric unit were superimposed using only Cα atoms from domain 1. Apo protomers are shaded red and pink while DNQX protomers are colored light green and dark green. DNQX is depicted in black, and selected side chains from DNQXB are shown in dark green. The conformational change undergone by Glu-705 is illustrated by comparing its orientation in ApoB and DNQXB. In the apo state, Glu-705 accepts hydrogen bonds from the side chains of Lys-730 and Thr-655.(B) The chemical structure of DNQX and F[o]-F[c] omit electron density for DNQX and sulfate contoured at 2.5 σ.(C) Stereo image of the interactions between DNQX, sulfate, and S1S2J. DNQXB side chains are colored gray. Water molecules are shown as green balls. DNQX is colored black. Hydrogen bonds between DNQX, sulfate, and S1S2J are indicated by black dashed lines.
The above figures are reproduced from the cited reference with permission from Cell Press
Secondary reference #2
Title Tyr702 is an important determinant of agonist binding and domain closure of the ligand-Binding core of glur2.
Authors A.Frandsen, D.S.Pickering, B.Vestergaard, C.Kasper, B.B.Nielsen, J.R.Greenwood, G.Campiani, C.Fattorusso, M.Gajhede, A.Schousboe, J.S.Kastrup.
Ref. Mol Pharmacol, 2005, 67, 703-713.
PubMed id 15591246
Abstract
Secondary reference #3
Title Tuning activation of the ampa-Sensitive glur2 ion channel by genetic adjustment of agonist-Induced conformational changes.
Authors N.Armstrong, M.Mayer, E.Gouaux.
Ref. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A, 2003, 100, 5736-5741. [DOI no: 10.1073/pnas.1037393100]
PubMed id 12730367
Full text Abstract
Figure 4.
Fig. 4. Comparison of WT and S1S2J L650T/AMPA(AS) conformations. (A) Superposition of WT S1S2J/AMPA (gray) with S1S2J L650T/AMPA (AS form) protomer A (blue). (B) Superposition of WT S1S2J/AMPA (gray) with S1S2J L650T/AMPA(AS) protomer B (green). The black arrows in A and B indicate the axis of rotation relating the conformational difference between the WT and L650T structures. (C) Superimposed WT and mutant AMPA dimers.
Figure 6.
Fig. 6. Mechanism of agonist binding and domain closure. (A) The binding site of the open-cleft, closed-channel state (Apo S1S2J, protomer A). (B) The possible first step in agonist binding as observed in molecule B of the L650T/AMPA(AS) structure. We suggest that this semiclosed cleft conformation represents the agonist-bound, closed-channel state. (C) The closed-cleft, open-channel conformation as observed in the WT S1S2J/AMPA binding cleft (protomer A). In B and C, water molecules are shown as green spheres, AMPA is drawn in magenta, and hydrogen bonds are depicted by black dashed lines. The degrees of domain closure relative to the Apo conformation are indicated below each structure.
PROCHECK
Go to PROCHECK summary
 Headers

 

spacer

spacer