 |
PDBsum entry 2an7
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
DNA binding protein
|
PDB id
|
|
|
|
2an7
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
|
| |
|
DOI no:
|
Protein Sci
16:1676-1688
(2007)
|
|
PubMed id:
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
The solution structure of ParD, the antidote of the ParDE toxin antitoxin module, provides the structural basis for DNA and toxin binding.
|
|
M.Oberer,
K.Zangger,
K.Gruber,
W.Keller.
|
|
|
|
| |
ABSTRACT
|
|
|
| |
|
ParD is the antidote of the plasmid-encoded toxin-antitoxin (TA) system
ParD-ParE. These modules rely on differential stabilities of a highly expressed
but labile antidote and a stable toxin expressed from one operon. Consequently,
loss of the coding plasmid results in loss of the protective antidote and
poisoning of the cell. The antidote protein usually also exhibits an
autoregulatory function of the operon. In this paper, we present the solution
structure of ParD. The repressor activity of ParD is mediated by the N-terminal
half of the protein, which adopts a ribbon-helix-helix (RHH) fold. The
C-terminal half of the protein is unstructured in the absence of its cognate
binding partner ParE. Based on homology with other RHH proteins, we present a
model of the ParD-DNA interaction, with the antiparallel beta-strand being
inserted into the major groove of DNA. The fusion of the N-terminal DNA-binding
RHH motif to the toxin-binding unstructured C-terminal domain is discussed in
its evolutionary context.
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Selected figure(s)
|
|
|
| |
 |
 |
|
 |
|
 |
Figure 1.
The experimentally derived restraints per residue reflect the
two-domain architecture of ParD protein. The shading is hatched,
light gray, dark gray, black, and dotted for intraresidue,
sequential, short-range (d[ij], j < i + 5), long-range (d[ij], j
> i + 4), and intermonomer NOEs, respectively.
|
 |
Figure 5.
Model of the ParD --DNA complex. The ParD --DNA complex is
shown in a ribbon presentation: (blue and light blue) the two
chains of the ParD dimer, and (green and pale green) the two
strands of the 10-bp inverted repeat. Residues involved in
protein --DNA interactions are shown in stick presentation:
(gray) those pointing into the major groove of the DNA (Arg3,
Thr5, and Asp7), (yellow) those interacting with the phosphate
backbone. (A) View along the [beta]-ribbon protruding the major
groove. (B) View approximately along the twofold axis of the
dimer. The line drawing of the nucleotides was omitted for
clarity. (C) The superposition of two ParD dimers with the MetJ
--DNA complex (PDB entry: 1mjo). The ParD dimers are shown as
ribbon drawing: (blue) chain A, (pale green) chain B, (pink) the
hydrophobic patches positioned at the dimer --dimer interface
above the minor groove. The DNA represents the original 19-mer
repressor site of MetJ (Garvie and Phillips 2000). (D) The ParD
promoter sequence from [minus sign]32 to +17, showing the
inverted repeat (solid boxes) and the flanking half sites (half
tone).
|
 |
|
|
|
| |
The above figures are
reprinted
from an Open Access publication published by the Protein Society:
Protein Sci
(2007,
16,
1676-1688)
copyright 2007.
|
|
| |
Figures were
selected
by the author.
|
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
Literature references that cite this PDB file's key reference
|
|
 |
| |
PubMed id
|
 |
Reference
|
 |
|
|
|
 |
N.Chopra,
S.Agarwal,
S.Verma,
S.Bhatnagar,
and
R.Bhatnagar
(2011).
Modeling of the structure and interactions of the B. anthracis antitoxin, MoxX: deletion mutant studies highlight its modular structure and repressor function.
|
| |
J Comput Aided Mol Des,
25,
275-291.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
T.R.Blower,
G.P.Salmond,
and
B.F.Luisi
(2011).
Balancing at survival's edge: the structure and adaptive benefits of prokaryotic toxin-antitoxin partners.
|
| |
Curr Opin Struct Biol,
21,
109-118.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
C.Göbl,
S.Kosol,
T.Stockner,
H.M.Rückert,
and
K.Zangger
(2010).
Solution structure and membrane binding of the toxin fst of the par addiction module.
|
| |
Biochemistry,
49,
6567-6575.
|
 |
|
PDB code:
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
E.Diago-Navarro,
A.M.Hernandez-Arriaga,
J.López-Villarejo,
A.J.Muñoz-Gómez,
M.B.Kamphuis,
R.Boelens,
M.Lemonnier,
and
R.Díaz-Orejas
(2010).
parD toxin-antitoxin system of plasmid R1--basic contributions, biotechnological applications and relationships with closely-related toxin-antitoxin systems.
|
| |
FEBS J,
277,
3097-3117.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
J.Yuan,
Y.Sterckx,
L.A.Mitchenall,
A.Maxwell,
R.Loris,
and
M.K.Waldor
(2010).
Vibrio cholerae ParE2 poisons DNA gyrase via a mechanism distinct from other gyrase inhibitors.
|
| |
J Biol Chem,
285,
40397-40408.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
K.M.Dalton,
and
S.Crosson
(2010).
A conserved mode of protein recognition and binding in a ParD-ParE toxin-antitoxin complex.
|
| |
Biochemistry,
49,
2205-2215.
|
 |
|
PDB code:
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
L.Miallau,
M.Faller,
J.Chiang,
M.Arbing,
F.Guo,
D.Cascio,
and
D.Eisenberg
(2009).
Structure and proposed activity of a member of the VapBC family of toxin-antitoxin systems. VapBC-5 from Mycobacterium tuberculosis.
|
| |
J Biol Chem,
284,
276-283.
|
 |
|
PDB code:
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
S.E.Bailey,
and
F.Hayes
(2009).
Influence of operator site geometry on transcriptional control by the YefM-YoeB toxin-antitoxin complex.
|
| |
J Bacteriol,
191,
762-772.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
Y.Yamaguchi,
J.H.Park,
and
M.Inouye
(2009).
MqsR, a crucial regulator for quorum sensing and biofilm formation, is a GCU-specific mRNA interferase in Escherichia coli.
|
| |
J Biol Chem,
284,
28746-28753.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
A.Garcia-Pino,
M.Christensen-Dalsgaard,
L.Wyns,
M.Yarmolinsky,
R.D.Magnuson,
K.Gerdes,
and
R.Loris
(2008).
Doc of prophage P1 is inhibited by its antitoxin partner Phd through fold complementation.
|
| |
J Biol Chem,
283,
30821-30827.
|
 |
|
PDB code:
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
A.Garcia-Pino,
M.H.Dao-Thi,
E.Gazit,
R.D.Magnuson,
L.Wyns,
and
R.Loris
(2008).
Crystallization of Doc and the Phd-Doc toxin-antitoxin complex.
|
| |
Acta Crystallogr Sect F Struct Biol Cryst Commun,
64,
1034-1038.
|
 |
|
 |
 |
|
The most recent references are shown first.
Citation data come partly from CiteXplore and partly
from an automated harvesting procedure. Note that this is likely to be
only a partial list as not all journals are covered by
either method. However, we are continually building up the citation data
so more and more references will be included with time.
Where a reference describes a PDB structure, the PDB
code is
shown on the right.
|
');
}
}
 |