 |
PDBsum entry 2a37
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Signaling protein
|
PDB id
|
|
|
|
2a37
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
Contents |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* Residue conservation analysis
|
|
|
|
|
PDB id:
|
 |
|
 |
| Name: |
 |
Signaling protein
|
 |
|
Title:
|
 |
Solution structure of the t22g mutant of n-terminal sh3 domain of drk (drkn sh3 domain)
|
|
Structure:
|
 |
Protein e(sev)2b. Chain: a. Fragment: n-terminal sh3 domain, residues 1-59. Synonym: protein enhancer of sevenless 2b, sh2-sh3 adapter protein drk, downstream of receptor kinase. Engineered: yes. Mutation: yes
|
|
Source:
|
 |
Drosophila melanogaster. Fruit fly. Organism_taxid: 7227. Gene: drk, e(sev)2b, cg6033. Expressed in: escherichia coli. Expression_system_taxid: 562.
|
|
NMR struc:
|
 |
10 models
|
 |
|
Authors:
|
 |
I.Bezsonova,A.Singer,W.-Y.Choy,M.Tollinger,J.D.Forman-Kay
|
Key ref:
|
 |
I.Bezsonova
et al.
(2005).
Structural comparison of the unstable drkN SH3 domain and a stable mutant.
Biochemistry,
44,
15550-15560.
PubMed id:
DOI:
|
 |
|
Date:
|
 |
|
23-Jun-05
|
Release date:
|
13-Dec-05
|
|
|
|
|
|
PROCHECK
|
|
|
|
|
Headers
|
 |
|
|
References
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Q08012
(DRK_DROME) -
Growth factor receptor-bound protein 2 from Drosophila melanogaster
|
|
|
|
Seq: Struc:
|
 |
 |
 |
211 a.a.
59 a.a.*
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
|
|
Key: |
 |
PfamA domain |
 |
 |
 |
Secondary structure |
 |
 |
CATH domain |
 |
|
*
PDB and UniProt seqs differ
at 1 residue position (black
cross)
|
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
|
| |
|
DOI no:
|
Biochemistry
44:15550-15560
(2005)
|
|
PubMed id:
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
Structural comparison of the unstable drkN SH3 domain and a stable mutant.
|
|
I.Bezsonova,
A.Singer,
W.Y.Choy,
M.Tollinger,
J.D.Forman-Kay.
|
|
|
|
| |
ABSTRACT
|
|
|
| |
|
The N-terminal SH3 domain of the Drosophila adapter protein Drk (drkN SH3
domain) is marginally stable (DeltaG(U) = 1 kcal/mol) and exists in equilibrium
between folded and highly populated unfolded states. The single substitution
T22G, however, completely stabilizes the protein (DeltaG(U) = 4.0 kcal/mol). To
probe the causes of instability of the wild-type (WT) protein and the dramatic
stabilization of the mutant, we determined and compared nuclear magnetic
resonance structures of the folded WT and mutant drkN SH3 domains. Residual
dipolar coupling (RDC) and carbonyl chemical-shift anisotropy (C'-CSA)
restraints measured for the WT and T22G domains were used for calculating the
structures. The structures for the WT and mutant are highly similar. Thr22 of
the WT and Gly22 of the mutant are at the i + 2 position of the diverging,
type-II beta-turn. Interestingly, not only Gly22 but also Thr22 successfully
adopt an alpha(L) conformation, required at this position of the turn, despite
the fact that positive phi values are energetically unfavorable and normally
disallowed for threonine residues. Forcing the Thr22 residue into this unnatural
conformation increases the free energy of the folded state of the WT domain
relative to its T22G mutant. Evidence for residual helix formation in the
diverging turn region has been previously reported for the unfolded state of the
WT drkN SH3 domain, and this, in addition to other residual structure, has been
proposed to play a role in decreasing the free energy of the unfolded state of
the protein. Together these data provide evidence that both increasing the free
energy of the folded state and decreasing the free energy of the unfolded state
of the protein contribute to instability of the WT drkN SH3 domain.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
Literature references that cite this PDB file's key reference
|
|
 |
| |
PubMed id
|
 |
Reference
|
 |
|
|
|
 |
V.Chevelkov,
Y.Xue,
D.K.Rao,
J.D.Forman-Kay,
and
N.R.Skrynnikov
(2010).
15N H/D-SOLEXSY experiment for accurate measurement of amide solvent exchange rates: application to denatured drkN SH3.
|
| |
J Biomol NMR,
46,
227-244.
|
 |
|
 |
 |
|
The most recent references are shown first.
Citation data come partly from CiteXplore and partly
from an automated harvesting procedure. Note that this is likely to be
only a partial list as not all journals are covered by
either method. However, we are continually building up the citation data
so more and more references will be included with time.
|
');
}
}
 |